Open Access

Recent achievements obtained by chloroplast transformation

Plant Methods201713:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0179-1

Received: 3 February 2017

Accepted: 9 April 2017

Published: 19 April 2017

Abstract

Chloroplasts play a great role for sustained wellbeing of life on the planet. They have the power and raw materials that can be used as sophisticated biological factories. They are rich in energy as they have lots of pigment-protein complexes capable of collecting sunlight, in sugar produced by photosynthesis and in minerals imported from the plant cell. Chloroplast genome transformation offers multiple advantages over nuclear genome which among others, include: integration of the transgene via homologus recombination that enables to eliminate gene silencing and position effect, higher level of transgene expression resulting into higher accumulations of foreign proteins, and significant reduction in environmental dispersion of the transgene due to maternal inheritance which helps to minimize the major critic of plant genetic engineering. Chloroplast genetic engineering has made fruit full progresses in the development of plants resistance to various stresses, phytoremediation of toxic metals, and production of vaccine antigens, biopharmaceuticals, biofuels, biomaterials and industrial enzymes. Although successful results have been achieved, there are still difficulties impeding full potential exploitation and expansion of chloroplast transformation technology to economical plants. These include, lack of species specific regulatory sequences, problem of selection and shoot regeneration, and massive expression of foreign genes resulting in phenotypic alterations of transplastomic plants. The aim of this review is to critically recapitulate the latest development of chloroplast transformation with special focus on the different traits of economic interest.

Keywords

Chloroplast transformation Novel traits Homologus recombination Transgene Regulatory sequences

Background

World population is expected to rise to 9.2 billion in 2050. In order to feed the rising population food production has to grow in parallel. The problem is that arable land is exploited to its potential (High Level Expert Forum, FAO, October 2009; http://www.fao.org). Advancement in agricultural biotechnology particularly plant genetic engineering is believed to boost crop productivity. Due to enormous rewards crucial traits have been engineered via chloroplast genome instead of nuclear genome. It is amazing that more than 120 genes from various sources have been well integrated and expressed via the chloroplast genome for various applications. Aims of these applications include, developing crops with high levels of resistance to insects, bacterial, fungal and viral diseases, different types of herbicides, drought, salt and cold tolerance, cytoplasmic male sterility, metabolic engineering, phytoremediation of toxic metals and production of many vaccine antigens, biopharmaceuticals, industrial enzymes and biofuels [15].

Chloroplasts originated from endosymbiosis around 1.5 billion years ago, when a cyanobacterial cell was engulfed by heterotrophic eukaryote [6, 15]. Chloroplast organelle of plants and algal cells evolved from photosynthetic bacteria living inside the primitive ancestors of plant cells [7, 8]. Chloroplast gene products are not only homologus to the present-day cyanobacteria but the arrangement and expression of genes also reflect the prokaryotic ancestry of chloroplasts. They possess multiple copies of a small circular genome with 100–250 genes and their genome size varies between species, ranging from 107 kb (Cathaya argyrophylla) to 218 kb (Pelargonium) and maternally inherited in angiosperm plants [5]. There is a strong believe that the action of gene transfer and genome streamlining resulted into a drastic shrinkage of the genome of cyanobacterial endosymbiont where thousands of genes disappeared and were either transferred to nucleus or lost. Consequently, modern-day chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic eukaryotes are much reduced [9, 10].

The high ploidy number of the plastid genome and compartmentalization of proteins allow high levels of foreign protein expression from 5 to 40% total soluble protein [11] and up to 70% total soluble protein in Tobacco [2, 3, 12]. Moreover, nuclear encoded proteins are also accumulated at high level inside the chloroplast, although the ploidy level is not as high as chloroplast encoded proteins. That is why recent advancement in plant biotechnology has proved the use of chloroplasts as excellent ideal host for conferring agronomic traits and production of biopharmaceuticals, biomaterials and industrial enzymes [13]. Chloroplast genetic engineering has enormous advantages over nuclear transformation as well explained in Table 1 [1, 5, 1425].
Table 1

Comparative advantages of chloroplast genome over nuclear genome

Chloroplast transformation

Nuclear transformation

Reduced of gene dispersal in the environment due to maternal inheritance

There is gene dispersal in the environment due to its parental nature

Multiple copy (high ploidy) of plastids results higher expression and accumulation of foreign proteins

Nuclear is not in high ploidy results lower expression and accumulation of foreign proteins

Efficient multiple gene expression in single transformation event

Efficiency of single transformation for multiple gene expression is very poor

Single promoter for expression of multi-subunit complex protein from polycistronic mRNAs

Several promoters for each genes to drive expression of respective subunits

Simultaneous expression of several genes as it contains prokaryotic gene expression system

Do not have prokaryotic expression system can’t undergo simultaneous expression of several genes

Homologous recombination avoids position effects and gene silencing

Random integration presents position effects and gene silencing

Chloroplast transformation

Multistep processes are involved to achieve chloroplast transformation. Species specific or heterologous chloroplast transformation vectors are developed in a manner that flanks the foreign genes and insert them through homologous recombination at predetermined and precise location in the plastome [26]. When the foreign DNA is delivered into plasmids, initially only a few copies of the plastome are transformed resulting in-to heteroplasmic state. Then, through sub-culturing the bombarded explants in vitro under selection all copies of the plastome contains the transgene leading to the state of homoplsamy, where all the plastomes of the chloroplasts present in the cell are transformed (Fig. 1). Generally, three key conditions have to be full-filled to achieve plastid transformation: (1) a robust method of DNA delivery into the chloroplast, (2) the presence of active homologous recombination machinery in the plastid, and (3) the availability of highly efficient selection and regeneration protocols for transplastomic cells [11, 27].
Fig. 1

Diagrammatic representation of the processes for chloroplast genome transformation. a Basic design of a typical vector for transforming the plastid genome. Both the expression cassette and the selection cassette are placed between the two plastid regions. These flanking regions are taken from the wild-type plastid genome of a plant species whose plastome is to be manipulated, to allow a crossover event take place to integrate DNA sequences between them. Green arrows in the chloroplast expression vector represent promoters (P) and the direction of transcription, whereas terminators (T) are indicated by red rectangles. The untranslated regions are represented by white circles. The thin dotted lines with arrows indicate homologous recombination. b Delivery of transforming plasmids into chloroplasts in leaf cells using a particle delivery system. The plasmid DNA is coated on the surface of the microparticles of either gold or tungsten and then shot on to the abaxial surface of 4- to 6-week-old sterile leaves using a gene gun. The bombarded leaves are incubated for 48 h in the dark, cut into small discs and placed on regeneration medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic and hormones. Primary shoots generally arise within 2–3 months. c The process of recovering a stable homoplasmic transplastomic plant line. Initially, only a few copies of the plastome are transformed, and therefore the explant contains a mixture of both transformed as well as untransformed copies, a state known as heteroplasmy. The wild-type copies (indicated by light-coloured ovals) are sorted out gradually by repeating two or three regeneration cycles under selection to reach homoplasmy, a state where all copies of the plastome are transformed (indicated by dark grey ovals).

Adopted from Ref. Ahmad et al. [113]

Transformation is highly efficient when there is complete homology of plastid DNA flanking sequences. For successful transformation, it is critical to identify promoters, 5′-UTRs, 3′-UTRs and insertion sites as indicated in Table 2. Complete chloroplast genome sequences are essential for integration of the transgene at optimal site via homologus recombination and to identify endogenous regulatory sequences for optimal transgene expression [28, 29].
Table 2

Commonly used promoters, un-translated regions and insertion sites for chloroplast transformation as avowed in [25, 117]

Promoter

5′-UTRs

3′-UTRs

Popular insertion sites

PpsbA

Ggagg

rbcL

rbcL-accD

Prna

T7G10

rps16

Trnl-trnA

PrbcL

rbcL

petD

rp132-trnL

psaA

atpB

psbA

petA-psbJ

atpI

psbA

 

3’rps12/7-trnV

 

cry2a

 

Trn16/V-3’rps12/7

   

23srrnA-16srrnA

   

trnfM-trnG

   

atpB-rbcL

   

trN-trnR

   

Ycf3-trnS

   

rps7-ndhB

Plastid transformation was first achieved in unicellular algae called Chlamydomonas reindhartii [30]. Tobacco was the first higher plant in which chloroplast transformation was successfully performed [31, 32]. Similarly, a protocol for plastid transformation of an elite rapeseed cultivar (Brassica napus L.) has been developed [33].

Traits of interest for chloroplast transformation

Conferring agronomic traits

Researchers have successfully engineered different genes on chloroplasts to confer agronomic traits of interest. For instance simultaneous expression of protease inhibitors and chitinase have been employed to develop multiple biotic and abiotic stresses resistant plants, particularly tobacco [34]. Economical agronomic traits, such as herbicide resistance, insect resistance and tolerance to drought and salt, have already been engineered via the plastid genome [35]. The dominant trait that attracted the most attention for plastid transformation has been herbicide tolerance [11, 3638]. The production of plants resistant to high level of glyphosate was achieved through biolistic transformation of plastids by introduction of a mutated herbicide-tolerant gene coding for EPSP synthase [11] (Table 3).
Table 3

Agronomic traits engineered via chloroplast genome

Site of integration

Regulatory sequences

Transgene/s

Efficiency of expression

Enhanced traits

References

rbcL/accD

Prrn/rbcL 3′

panD

>4-fold β-alanine

Tolerance to high-temperature stress

[39]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/ggagg/psbA

tps1

>169-fold transcript

Drought tolerance: growth in 6% polyethylene glycol and rehydration after 24 days of drought

[40]

rbcL/rbcL

psbA/psbA/3′rbL

Hppd

5% TSP

Resistance to herbicide

[41]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/T7 10/rps16

Badh

93–101 μM g−1 FW

Salt tolerance: carrot plants survived up to 400 mM NaCl

[42]

trnfM/trnG

atpI/rps16

Lycopene β-cyclase

0.28 mg g−1 DW

Herbicide resistance and triggers conversion of lycopene

[43]

rbcL/accD

Prrn/ggagg/psbA

EPSPS/aroA

NR

Resistance to glyphosate (>5 mM)

[32]

prs14/trnG

Prrn/T7 g10/TrbcL

HTP, TCY, TMT

NR

Cold-stress tolerance and increase in vitamin E in fruit

[44]

trnV/rps7/12

Prrn/Trps16

EPSPS

>10% TSP

Resistance to the herbicide glyphosate

[45]

trnV/rps12/7

Prrn/TrbcL

b-bar1

>7% TSP

Resistance to the herbicide phosphinothricin

[46]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/psbA/psbA

phaA

14.71 β-ketothiolase mg−1 FW

Engineered cytoplasmic male sterility

[47]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/T7 g 10/TpsbA

γ-TMT

>7.7% TSP

Increased salt tolerance and enhanced accumulationof ɑ-tocopherol in seeds

[48]

trnI/trnA

T7g10 or psbA

RbcS

>150-fold RbcS transcript

Restoration of RuBisCO activity in rbcS mutants

[49]

rbcL/accD

Prrn/ggagg/psbA

cry2Aa2

2–3% of TSP

Resistance to Heliothis virescens, Helicoverpa zea, and Spodoptera exigua

[50]

trnV/3′rps12

prrn T7G10/rps12

Trx f, Trx m

NR

Starch synthesis

[51]

trnI/trnA

5′psbA/3′psbA

ubiC

25% DW

250-fold higher pHBA polymer accumulation than nuclear transgenic lines

[52]

rbcL/accD

PpsbA/Trsp16

TC, γ -TMT

3 nmol h−1 mg−1 FW

Vitamin E accumulation in tobacco and lettuce

[53]

trnV/orf708

psbA/psbA/psbA

BicA

~0.1% TSP

CO2 capture within leaf chloroplasts

[54]

trnV/rps12/7

Prrn/rbcL/rps16

cry1A(c)

3–5% of TSP

Resistance to larvae of Heliothis virescens, Helicoverpa zea, and Spodoptera exigua

[55]

rbcL/accD

Prrn/Trps16

CrtZ, CrtW

NR

Accumulation of astaxanthin fatty acid esters in lettuce

[56]

trnV/rps12/7

Prrn/T7gene10/rbcL

cry1Ab

NR

Resistance to caterpillar of Anticarsia gemmatalis

[57]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/Trps16

MSI-99

89.75 μg g−1 FW

Resistance against rice blast fungus

[30]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/TpsbA

sporamin1, CeCPI2, and chitinase2

0.85–1% TSP

Resistance against Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera exigua leaf spot, as well as soft rot diseases

[58]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/ggagg/psbA

Bt cry2Aa2 operon

45.3% TSP

100% mortality of cotton bollworm, beet armyworm; cuboidal Bt crystals formation

[59]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/ggagg/psbA

msi-99

21–43% TSP

Resistance to in planta challenge of Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium moniliforme, Verticillium dahlia, and Colletotrichum destructivum

[60]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/ggagg/rbcL

Bt cry9Aa2

~10% of TSP

Resistance to Phthorimaea operculella

[61]

trnI/trnA

Prrn/psbA/psbA

Cpo

NR

Resistance to fungal pathogens in vitro (Fusarium verticillioides, and Verticillium dahliae) and in planta (Alternaria alternata)

[62]

trnI/trnA

5′psbA/3′psbA

PelB1, PelD2

~2.42 units mg−1 FW

Resistance against Erwinia soft rot

[63]

trnI/trnA

5′psbA/3′

RC1011, PG12

17–38% TSP

Resistance to Erwinia soft rot and tobacco mosaic virus

[64]

trnI/trnA

5′psbA/3′psbA

Pta

7.1–9.2% TSP

Broad-spectrum resistance against viral/bacterial/phloem-feeding insects

[51]

trnI/trnA

5′psbA/3′psbA

Bgl-1

>160-fold enzyme

Resistance against whitefly and aphid

[65]

Production of vaccine antigens and biopharmaceuticals

It is believed that more than 90% of the global population cannot afford insulin, a drug needed to treat the global diabetes epidemic [5]. The high cost of protein drugs is due to their production in prohibitively expensive fermentation systems, prohibitively expensive purification from host proteins, the need for refrigerated storage and transport, and the short shelf-life of the final product [66, 67]. Protein drugs made by plant chloroplasts overcome most of these challenges as they do not require such expensive production process and can be stored without losing efficacy [68, 69] As listed in Table 4 numerous vaccine antigens and biopharmaceuticals have been engineered via chloroplast genome of higher plants.
Table 4

Vaccine antigens and biopharmaceuticals engineered via chloroplast genome of higher plants

Traits

Gene

Expression

Host plant

References

HIV/AIDS

gp120, gp41

16 μg g−1 FW

Tobacco

[70]

Human papiloma virus

GUS-E7

3–4% TSB

Tobacco

[71]

Polio virus

CTB-VP1

4–5% TSP

Tobacco

[72]

Tuberculosis antigens

CTB-SAT6CTB-Mtb72F

7.5% TSP

Tobacco

[73]

CTB-ESAT6

0.75% TSP

Lettuce

[73]

Bacterial

Pa

2.5–4% TSP

Tobacco

[74]

Dengue virus

EDIII

0.8–1.6 TSP

Tobacco

[75]

Bacterial phage lytic `protein

plyGBS

>70% TSP

Tobacco

[76]

Pompe disease

CTB-GAA

0.1–0.2 TLP

Tobacco

[77]

Thioredoxin 1

hTx1

15 TSP

Lettuce

[78]

Insulin liken growth factors

IGF-1n

32% TSP

Tobacco

[79]

Endolysin Cpl-1

Cpl-1

10% TSP

Tobacco

[80]

Interferon-α2b(IFN-α2b)

IFN-a2b

21% TSP

Tobacco

[81]

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)

bFGF

0.1% TSP

Tobacco

[82]

Among plant plastids, tobacco plastid has been engineered to express the E7 HPV type 16 protein, which is an attractive candidate for anticancer vaccine development [83]. The main factor why plant plastids are chosen as better bioreactors is due to the ability of plants to correctly carry out post-translation modifications such as phosphorylation, amidation, proper folding, formation of disulfide bonds and the assembly of complex multi-subunit proteins. Microorganisms are also used for large-scale industrial applications of recombinant protein production, but cannot carryout post-translational modifications [35]. The hyper-expression of vaccine antigens or therapeutic proteins in transgenic chloroplasts (leaves) or chromoplasts (fruits/roots) and antibiotic-free selection systems available in plastid transformation systems became successful in the oral delivery of vaccine antigens against cholera, tetanus, anthrax, plague, and canine parvovirus [17, 28, 69, 84]. Although higher level protein production is vital of chloroplast, too much expression of foreign proteins in chloroplasts is causing toxicity on host plant. Temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs) using Alka Burst technology has produced leafy biomass that expressed OspA at levels of up to 7.6% total soluble protein to give a maximum yield of OspA (about 108 mg/L). These results show that TIBs offer an alternative method for the production of transplastomic biomass proteins, which are non-toxic for plants and particularly useful when absolute gene dispersion control is required [85] From a single plant Chlanydomonas reinhadtii various recombinant therapeutic proteins have been produced (Table 5).
Table 5

Recombinant therapeutic proteins produced in the chloroplast of Chlanydomonas reinhadtii

Therapeutic protein

Expression

References

αCD22HCH23PE40; dimeric version of αCD22PE40

0.2–0.3% TSP

[86]

Human glutamic acid decarboxylase (hGAD65)

0.25–0.3% TSP

[87]

Escherichia coli phytase gene (appA)

Not detected

[88]

CtxB-Pfs25; Plasmodium falciparum surface protein 25 fused to the β subunit of the choleratoxin from Vibrio cholera

0.09% TSP

[89]

Mammary associated serum amyloid (M-SSA)

3–5% TSP

[90]

αCD22CH23Gel; dimeric version of αCD22Gel

0.1–0.2% TSP

[91]

Infectious burial disease virus (IBDV-VP2)

0.8–4% TCP

[92]

Phytoremediation

It is strongly believed that phytoremediation is a safe and cost-effective system for cleaning up contaminated environments using plants. Organomercurial compounds are the most toxic forms of mercury and chloroplast genome is a primary target of mercury damage in plants. It is, thus, an ideal site to engineer resistance and detoxification of organomercurials and metallic mercury [93]. Chloroplast genetic engineering of plants for synthesis of metal chelators has improved the capability of plants for metal uptake [94, 95].

Two bacterial genes encoding two enzymes, mercuric ion reductase (merA) and organomercurial lyase (merB), were expressed as an operon in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. This demonstrated accumulate of mercury in roots to levels surpassing the concentration in soil, up to 200 μg/g, without any detrimental effect and could accumulate 100-fold more mercury in leaves than untransformed plants [96]. Phytoremediation of toxic mercury was achieved by engineering of tobacco chloroplast with metallothionein enzyme [53].

Production of industrial enzymes and biomaterials

Chloroplast genome has been successfully engineered to produce important enzymes and biomaterials. Despite the diversion of major metabolic intermediate, metabolic engineering using chloroplast genomes produced the highest level of the poly (p-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA) polymer (25% dry weight) in normal healthy plants [97]. Optimized genetic construct for plastid transformation of tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum) for the production of the renewable biodegradable plastic poly hydroxy butyrate (PHB) was designed using an operon extension strategy [98]. Lots of efforts have been made to produce PHB in different systems, but to date, the highest levels of PHB have been achieved in plastids. This was due to the high flux of the PHB pathway substrate acetyl-CoA through this organelle during fatty acid biosynthesis [99, 100] Typical examples of biomaterials and enzymes that have been engineered via chloroplast genome of Tobacco are mentioned in (Table 6).
Table 6

Biomaterials and enzymes engineered via chloroplast genome of Tobacco

Enzymes/biomaterials

Gene

Yield

References

β-glucosidase

Bgl1

20 mg g−1 TSP

[101]

Elastin-derived polymer

Eg121

Not detected

[102]

Fibronectin extra domain A

EDA

2% TCP

[68]

Xylanase

xynA

6% TSP

[101]

 

Xyn

35% TSP

[103]

Endo-glucanase

celB

60–70% TSP

[103]

Superoxide dismutase

Cu/ZnSOD

9% TSP

[97]

Polyhydroxybutyrate

phb operon

18.8% TSP

[104]

p-Hydroxybenzoic acid

ubiC

13–18% TSP

[97]

Cellulases

bgl1C, cel6B, cel9A, xeg74

5–40% TSP

[105]

CelA, CelB

22–23 mg g−1 TSP,

[106]

Production of biofuels

The most important and first requirement for lingo-cellulosic biofuels production is to develop an efficient enzyme production system for economical and rapid biomass depolymerization. High levels of expression and compartmentalization of toxic proteins within chloroplasts enables to protect transgenic plants from pleiotropic effects, making chloroplast an ideal bioreactor for industrial enzyme production [25]. Although it was possible to have single biofuels enzymes expressed whole biomass hydrolysis was not effective because of the requirement of more number of enzymes [94, 95]. The development of chloroplast derived cocktails of enzymes for production of fermentable sugars from different ligno-cellulosic biomass become major fresh breakthrough in biofuels research. Different enzymes from bacteria or fungi, namely β-1,4-endoglucanase, Beta glucosidase, Swollenin, esterase, cutinase, endoglucanases, exoglucanase, pectate lyases, xylanase, lipase, acetyl, Acetyl xylan esterase and xylan were expressed in tobacco chloroplasts for production of fermentable sugars [107111].

Endoglucanase Ce19A, β-glucosidase Bg11C, Exoglucanase Ce16B and xyloglucanase Xeg74 from Trichoderma fusca were highly active and hydrolyzed their synthetic test substrates in a dose dependent manner. The cocktail of these enzymes triggered efficient sugar release from straw [107]. Treatment of cotton fiber with chloroplast derived cutinase showed enlarged segments and the intertwined inner fibers were irreversibly unwound due to expansion activity of cutinase. Chloroplast derived cutinase showed esterase and lipase activity [110]. Β-1,4-endoglucanase from Pyrococcus horikoshii which drives EPGh from chloroplast was able to recover from dry leaves and digested carboxylmethyl cellulose(CMC) substrate [56]. β-Mannanase enzyme from Trichoderma reesei showed sixfold to sevenfold higher enzyme activity than E. coli. β-Mannanase enzyme cocktail with chloroplast derived mannanse yielded 20% more glucose equivalents from pinewood than the cocktail without mannanase [111]. Catalytic activity of chloroplast produced Xylanase was detected with birch wood xylan as substrate [112]. Chloroplast enzymes (Endoglucanase, Swollenin, Acetyl xylan esterase, Xylanase enzymes originated from T. reesei, Endoglucanase exoglucanase from C. thermocellum, Lipase from M. tuberclosis, Cutinase and Pectate lyase A from F. solani) showed wider pH and higher temperature stability than enzymes expressed in E. coli. Chloroplast derived crude extract enzyme cocktails yielded more than 36-fold glucose from citrus peel, filter paper or pine wood than commercial cocktails [113].

Conclusion and prospects

Chloroplast genome has become the target of many plant genetic transformation efforts due to its enormous advantages over nuclear genome of the plant. The nuclear transgenic approach is incapable to develop products when higher-level transgene expression and multigene engineering is a requirement. Chloroplast transformation is expected to offer unique advantages in the advancement of different biotechnological applications; including, phytoremediation, production of industrial enzymes, biofuels, biomaterials, molecular farming for the production of antibiotics, vaccines, biopharmaceuticals and conferring agronomic traits. Chloroplast transformation has been achieved only to tobacco, lettuce, Arabidopsis, tomato, carrot, oilseed rape, potato, cabbage, cotton, petunia, soybean, sugarcane, sugar beet, rice, eggplant, cauliflower and poplar [114].

Although successful progresses have been made, full potential exploitation of chloroplast technology requires addressing critical challenges. These include: recalcitrant nature of cereal species to existing regeneration protocols is daunting so developing efficient shoot regeneration system is very critical [115], optimizing the level of expression as massive expression of foreign proteins is resulting in phenotypic alterations of transplastomic plants [116], lack of appropriate tissue specific regulatory sequences [117, 118], problem of gene expression in non-green plastids [119], unintended homologus recombination that hinder efficient recovery of transplastomic transformants containing the desired transgene [120], degradation of foreign proteins is a limiting factor for accumulation of foreign proteins in transgenic chloroplasts [50, 121, 122] low frequency transgene dispersion might occur due to occasionally parental/biparental transmission of plastids and via transgene transfer to nuclear genome [115]. To ease public concern and increase public acceptance production of marker free transplastomic plants is also very important. As chloroplast genome is capable of expressing more than 120 foreign genes originated from different organisms (bacteria, animals, viruses, fungi and humans), addressing the above barriers will make chloroplast genome very attractive site for various biotechnological applications with incredible impact on human life.

Abbreviations

UTR: 

un-translated region

TLP: 

total leaf protein

TSP: 

total soluble protein

TCP: 

total cell protein

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MA has prepared the manuscript and DB, TF read and approved the review for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no any competing interests.

Consent for publication

Figure 1 directly reproduced from Ref.[113] with permission from Author Ahmad et al. (2016b).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Department of Forestry, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Madawalabu University
(3)
Institute of Biotechnology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University

References

  1. Bock R. Plastid biotechnology: prospects for herbicide and insect resistance, metabolic engineering, and molecular farming. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:100–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.12.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Daniell H, Singh ND, Mason H, Streatfield SJ. Plant-made vaccine antigens and biopharmaceuticals. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:669–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.09.009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock R, Warzecha H. Solar-powered factories for new vaccines and antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:246–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.01.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke JL, Daniell H. Plastid biotechnology for crop production: present status and future perspectives. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-011-9767-z.Google Scholar
  5. Daniell H, Choun-S L, Ming Y, Wan- JC. Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 2016;17:134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmad N, Burgess SJ, Nielsen BL. Editorial: advances in plastid biology and its applications. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1396. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016a.01396.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Maul JE, Lilly JW, Cui L, Depamphilis CW, Miller W, Harris EH, et al. The Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastid chromosome: islands of genes in a sea of repeats. Plant Cell. 2002;14:2659–79.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Stephen D. Green genes—DNA in (and out of) chloroplasts sciences and plants. 2013. http://www-saps.plantsci.cam.ac.uk. Accessed 14 Apr 2017.
  9. Bock R, Timmis JN. Reconstructing evolution: gene transfer from plastids to the nucleus. BioEssays. 2008;30:556–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20761.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Qiu H, Price DC, Weber APM, Facchinelli F, Yoon HS, Bhattacharya D. Assessing the bacterial contribution to the plastid proteome. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:680–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Roudsari MF, Salmanian AH, Mousavi A, Sohi HH, Jafari M. Regeneration of glyphosate-tolerant Nicotiana tabacum after plastid transformation with a mutated variant of bacterial aroA gene. Iran J Biotechnol. 2009;7:247–53.Google Scholar
  12. Bock R. Engineering plastid genomes: methods, tools, and applications in basic research and biotechnology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:31–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Beeramganti N, Beeramganti H,Subramanyam K, Rajasekhar P. Chloroplast expression vector system & its transformation. Int J Sci Technol. 2012; 2(4).Google Scholar
  14. Staub JM, Garcia B, Graves J, Hajdukiewicz PTJ, Hunter P, Nehra N, et al. High-yield production of a human therapeutic protein in tobacco chloroplasts. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:333–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/73796.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Maliga P. Progress towards commercialization of plastid transformation technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(1):20–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Maliga P. Plastid transformation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:289–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141633.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniell H, Chebolu S, Kumar S, Singleton M, Falconer R. Chloroplast-derived vaccine antigens and other therapeutic proteins. Vaccine. 2005;23:1779–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruhlman T, Sb Lee, Jansen RK, Hostetler JB, Tallon LJ, Town CD, et al. Complete plastid genome sequence of Daucus carota: implications for biotechnology and phylogeny of angiosperms. BMC Genom. 2006;7:222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Moeller L, Wang K. Engineering with precision: tools for the new generation of transgenic crops. Bioscience. 2008;58:391–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1641/B580506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasunuma T, Miyazawa S, Yoshimura S, Shinzaki Y, Tomizawa KI, Shindo K, et al. Biosynthesis of astaxanthin in tobacco leaves by transplastomic engineering. Plant J. 2008;55:857–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03559.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cardi T, Lenzi P, Maliga P. Chloroplasts as expression platform for plant-produced vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010;9:893–911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1586/erv.10.78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyers B, Zaltsman A, Lacroix B, Kozlovsky SV, Krichevsky A. Nuclear and plastid genetic engineering of plants: comparison of opportunities and challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;6:747–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.05.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Obembe OO, Popoola JO, Leelavathi S, Reddy VS. Advances in plant molecular farming. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Day A, Michel GC. The chloroplast transformation toolbox: selectable markers and marker removal. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:540–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00604.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jin S, Daniell H. Engineered chloroplast genome just got smarter. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(10):622–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan MS. Plastid genome engineering in plants: present status and future trends. Mol Plant Breed. 2012;3(8):91–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.5376/mpb.2012.03.0009).Google Scholar
  27. Doetsch NA, Favreau MR, Kuscuoglu N, Thompson MD, Hallick RB. Chloroplast transformation in Euglena gracilis: splicing of a group II twin intron transcribed from a transgenic psbK operon. Curr Genet. 2011;39:49–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Grevich JJ, Daniell H. Chloroplast genetic engineering: recent advances and future perspectives. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2015;24:83–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruhlman T, Verma D, Samson N, Daniell H. The role of heterologous chloroplast sequence elements in transgene integration and expression. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:2088–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.152017.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Boynton JE, Gillham NW, Harris EH, Hosler JP, Johnson AM, Jones AR, et al. Chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas with high velocity microprojectiles. Sciences. 1998;240:1534–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Svab Z, Hajdukiewicz P, Maliga P. Stable transformation of plastids in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990;87:8526–30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jabeen R, Khan MS, Zafar Y, Anjum T. Codon optimization of cry1Ab gene for hyper expression in plant organelles. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:1011–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-009-9802-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cheng L, Li HP, Qu B, Huang T, Tu JX, Fu TD, et al. Chloroplast transformation of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by particle bombardment of cotyledons. Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29:371–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0828-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen PJ, Senthilkumar R, Jane WN, He Y, Tian Z, Yeh KW. Transplastomic Nicotiana benthamiana plants expressing multiple defence genes encoding protease inhibitors and chitinase display broad-spectrum resistance against insects, pathogens and abiotic stresses. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:503–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12157.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Jana Ř. Potential of chloroplast genome in plant breeding. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2010;46(3):103–13.Google Scholar
  36. Kang TJ, Loc NH, Jang MO, Jang YS, Kim YS, Seo JE, et al. Expression of the B subunit of E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin in the chloroplasts of plants and its characterization. Transgenic Res. 2003;12:683–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Daniell H, Datta R, Varma S, Gray S, Lee SB. Containment of herbicide resistance through genetic engineering of the chloroplast genome. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16:345–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0498-345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Haghani K, Salmanian AH, Ranjbar B, Zakikhan K, Khajeh K. Comparative studies of wild type E. coli 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase with three lyphosate insensitive mutated forms, activity, stability and structural characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1784:1167–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.07.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Fouad WM, Altpeter F. Transplastomic expression of bacterial l-aspartate-alpha-decarboxylase enhances photosynthesis and biomass production in response to high temperature stress. Transgenic Res. 2009;18:707–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9258-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Oey M, Lohse M, Scharff LB, Kreikemeyer B, Bock R. Plastid production of protein antibiotics against pneumonia via a new strategy for high level expression of antimicrobial proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:6579–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813146106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Dufourmantel N, Dubald M, Matringe M, Canard H, Garcon F, Job C, et al. Generation and characterization of soybean and marker-free tobacco plastid transformants over-expressing a bacterial 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase which provides strong herbicide tolerance. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5:118–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00226.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Kumar S, Dhingra A, Daniell H. Plastid-expressed betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in carrot cultured cells, roots, and leaves confers enhanced salt tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2843–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.045187.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wurbs D, Ruf S, Bock R. Contained metabolic engineering in tomatoes by expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes from the plastid genome. Plant J. 2007;49:276–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02960.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu Y, Rijzaani H, Karcher D, Ruf S, Bock R. Efficient metabolic pathway engineering in transgenic tobacco and tomato plastids with synthetic multigene operons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E623–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216898110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ye GN, Hajdukiewicz PT, Broyles D, Rodriguez D, Xu CW, Nehra N, Staub JM. Plastid-expressed 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase genes provide high level glyphosate tolerance in tobacco. Plant J. 2001;25:261–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Lutz KA, Knapp JE, Maliga P. Expression of bar in the plastid genome confers herbicide resistance. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:1585–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruiz ON, Daniell H. Engineering cytoplasmic male sterility via the chloroplast genome by expression of beta-ketothiolase. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1232–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.057729.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Jin S, Daniell H. Expression of gamma-tocopherol methyltransferase in chloroplasts results in massive proliferation of the inner envelope membrane and decreases susceptibility to salt and metal-induced oxidative stresses by reducing reactive oxygen species. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:1274–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400981101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Dhingra A, Portis AR Jr, Daniell H. Enhanced translation of a chloroplast expressed RbcS gene restores small subunit levels and photosynthesis in nuclear RbcS antisense plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:6315–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400981101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Jin S, Kanagaraj A, Verma D, Lange T, Daniell H. Release of hormones from conjugates: chloroplast expression of beta-glucosidase results in elevated phytohormone levels associated with significant increase in biomass and protection from aphids or whiteflies conferred by sucrose esters. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:222–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.160754.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Viitanen PV, Devine AL, Khan MS, Deuel DL, Van Dyk DE, Daniell H. Metabolic engineering of the chloroplast genome using the Echerichia coli ubiC gene reveals that chorismate is a readily abundant plant precursor for p-hydroxybenzoic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:4048–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.050054.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yabuta Y, Tanaka H, Yoshimura S, Suzuki A, Tamoi M, Maruta T, Shigeoka S. Improvement of vitamin E quality and quantity in tobacco and lettuce by chloroplast genetic engineering. Transgenic Res. 2013;22:391–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-012-9656-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Agrawal P, Verma D, Daniell H. Expression of Trichoderma reesei betamannanase in tobacco chloroplasts and its utilization in lignocellulosicwoody biomass hydrolysis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e29302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029302.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Verma D, Jin S, Kanagaraj A, Singh ND, Daniel J, Kolattukudy PE, et al. Expression of fungal cutinase and swollenin in tobacco chloroplasts reveals novel enzyme functions and/or substrates. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057187.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Harada H, Maoka T, Osawa A, Hattan J, Kanamoto H, Shindo K, et al. Construction of transplastomic lettuce dominantly producing astaxanthin fatty acid esters and detailed chemical analysis of generated carotenoids. Transgenic Res. 2014;23:303–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9750-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang YP, Wei ZY, Zhang YY, Lin CJ, Zhong XF, Wang YL, et al. Chloroplast expressed MSI-99 in tobacco improves disease resistance and displays inhibitory effect against rice blast fungus. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:4628–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16034628.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Dufourmantel N, Tissot G, Goutorbe F, Garcon F, Muhr C, Jansens S, et al. Generation and analysis of soybean plastid transformants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protoxin. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;58:659–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-7405-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. De Cosa B, Moar W, Lee SB, Miller M, Daniell H. Over expression of the Bt cry2Aa2 operon in chloroplasts leads to formation of insecticidal crystals. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:71–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/83559.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. DeGray G, Rajasekaran K, Smith F, Sanford J, Daniell H. Expression of an antimicrobial peptide via the chloroplast genome to control phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:852–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Chakrabarti SK, Lutz KA, Lertwiriyawong B, Svab Z, Maliga P. Expression of the cry9Aa2 B.t. gene in tobacco chloroplasts confers resistance to potato tuber moth. Transgenic Res. 2006;15:481–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-006-0018-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruhlman TA, Rajasekaran K, Cary JW. Expression of chloroperoxidase from Pseudomonas pyrrocinia in tobacco plastids for fungal resistance. Plant Sci. 2014;228:98–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.02.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Verma D, Kanagaraj A, Jin SX, Singh ND, Kolattukudy PE, Daniell H. Chloroplast-derived enzyme cocktails hydrolyse lignocellulosic biomass and release fermentable sugars. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8:332–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00486.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee SB, Li B, Jin S, Daniell H. Expression and characterization of antimicrobial peptides Retrocyclin-101 and Protegrin-1 in chloroplasts to control viral and bacterial infections. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:100–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00538.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Jin S, Zhang X, Daniell H. Pinellia ternata agglutinin expression in chloroplasts confers broad spectrum resistance against aphid, whitefly, Lepidopteran insects, bacterial and viral pathogens. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10:313–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00663.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Grabowski H, Cockburn I, Long G. The market for follow-on biologics: how will it evolve? Health Aff. 2006;25:1291–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Spök A, Karner S, Stein AJ, Rodríguez-C E. Plant molecular farming; opportunities and challenges. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. 2008.Google Scholar
  67. Farran I, McCarthy-S I, Río-M F, Mansilla C, Lasarte JJ. Mingo-CM. The vaccine adjuvant extra domain A from fibronectin retains its proinflammatory properties when expressed in tobacco chloroplasts. Planta. 2010;231:977–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Holtz BR, Berquist BR, Bennett LD, Kommineni VJ, Munigunti RK, White EL. Commercial-scale biotherapeutics manufacturing facility for plant made pharmaceuticals. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:1180–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12469.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosales-Mendoza S, Soria-Guerra RE, Moreno-Fierros L, Alpuche-Solís AG, Martínez-González L, Korban SS. Expression of an immunogenic F1-V fusion protein in lettuce as a plant-based vaccine against plague. Planta. 2010;232:409–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1176-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Morgenfeld M, Lentz E, Segretin ME, Alfano EF, Bravo-Almonacid F. Translational fusion and redirection to thylakoid lumen as strategies to enhance accumulation of human papilloma virus E7 antigen in tobacco chloroplasts. Mol Biotechnol. 2014;56:1021–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Chan H-T, Xiao Y, Weldon WC, Oberste SM, Chumakov K, Daniell H. Cold chain and virus free chloroplast-made booster vaccine to confer immunity against different polio virus serotypes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12575.Google Scholar
  72. Lakshmi PS, Verma D, Yang X, Lloyd B, Daniell H. Low cost tuberculosis vaccine antigens in capsules: expression in chloroplasts, bio-encapsulation, stability and functional evaluation in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:54708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054708.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Gorantala J, Grover S, Rahi A, Chaudhary P, Rajwanshi R, Sarin NB, et al. Generation of protective immune response against anthrax by oral immunization with protective antigen plant-based vaccine. J Biotechnol. 2014;176:1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.01.033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Gottschamel J, Lössl A, Ruf S, Wang Y, Skaugen M, Bock R, et al. Production of dengue virus envelope protein domain III-based antigens in tobacco chloroplasts using inducible and constitutive expression systems. Plant Mol Biol. 2016;91:497–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-016-0484-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Oey M, Lohse M, Kreikemeyer B, Bock R. Exhaustion of the chloroplast protein synthesis capacity by massive expression of a highly stable protein antibiotic. Plant J. 2009;57:436–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03702.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Su J, Sherman A, Doerfler PA, Byrne BJ, Herzog RW, Daniell H. Oral delivery of Acid Alpha Glucosidase epitopes expressed in plant chloroplasts suppresses antibody formation in treatment of Pompe mice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:1023–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12413.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Lim S, Ashida H, Watanabe R, Inai K, Kim Y-S, Mukougawa K, et al. Production of biologically active human thioredoxin 1 protein in lettuce chloroplasts. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:335–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-011-9745-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Ruiz O. Optimization of codon composition and regulatory elements for expression of the human IGF-1 in transgenic chloroplasts. MS thesis, University of Florida. 2002.Google Scholar
  79. Oey M, Lohse M, Scharff LB, Kreikemeyer B, Bock R. Plastid production of protein antibiotics against pneumonia via a new strategy for high-level expression of antimicrobial proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:6579–84.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Arlen PA, Falconer R, Cherukumilli S, Cole A, Cole AM, Oishi KK, et al. Field production and functional evaluation of chloroplast derived interferon-α2b. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5:511–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00258.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang YP, Wei ZY, Zhong XF, Lin CJ, Cai YH, Ma J, et al. Stable expression of basic fibroblast growth factor in chloroplasts of tobacco. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:9–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17010019i.Google Scholar
  82. Morgenfeld M, Segretin ME, Wirth S, Lentz E, Zelada A, Mentaberry A, et al. Potato virus X coat protein fusion to human papilloma virus 16 E7 oncoprotein enhance antigen stability and accumulation in tobacco chloroplast. Mol Biotechnol. 2009;43(3):243–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-009-9195-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Almaraz-Delgado AL, Flores-Uribe J, Pérez-España VH, Salgado-Manjarrez E, Badillo-Corona JA. Production of therapeutic proteins in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. AMB Express. 2014;4:57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-014-0057-4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Michoux F, Ahmad N, Hennig A, Nixon PJ, Warzecha H. Production of leafy biomass using temporary immersion bioreactors: an alternative platform to express proteins in transplastomic plants with drastic phenotypes. Planta. 2013;237:903–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1829-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Tran M, Van C, Barrera DJ, Pettersson PL, Peinado CD, Bui J, et al. Production of unique immunotoxin cancer therapeutics in algal chloroplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E15–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang X, Brandsma M, Tremblay R, Maxwell D, Jevnikar AM, Huner N, et al. A novel expression platform for the production of diabetes-associated auto antigen human glutamic acid decarboxylase (hGAD65). BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8:87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-8-87.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Yoon S-M, Kim SY, Li KF, Yoon BH, Choe S, Kuo MM-C. Transgenic microalgae expressing Escherichia coli AppA phytase as feed additive to reduce phytate excretion in the manure of young broiler chicks. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:553–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3279-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Gregory JA, Topol AB, Doerner DZ, Mayfield S. Alga-produced cholera toxin-Pfs25 fusion proteins as oral vaccines. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:3917–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00714-13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Manuell AL, Beligni MV, Elder JH, Siefker DT, Tran M, Weber A, et al. Robust expression of a bioactive mammalian protein in Chlamydomonas chloroplast. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5:402–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00249.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Tran M, Henry RE, Siefker D, Van C, Newkirk G, Kim J, et al. Production of anti-cancer immunotoxins in algae: ribosome inactivating proteins as fusion partners. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110:2826–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24966.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Surzycki R, Greenham K, Kitayama K, Dibal F, Wagner R, Rochaix J-D, et al. Factors effecting expression of vaccines in microalgae. Biologicals. 2009;37:133–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.02.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Kupper H, Kepper F, Spiller M. Environmental relevance of heavy metal substituted chlorophylls using the example of water plants. J Exp Bot. 1996;47:259–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Smits E, Pilon M. Phytoremediation of metals using transgenic plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2002;21:439–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Clemens S, Palmgren MG, Kranmer U. A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:309–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Hussein H, Ruis ON, Terry N, Daniell H. Phytoremediation of mercury and organomercurials in chloroplast transgenic plants: enhance root uptake, translocation to shoots and volatilization. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:8439–46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Occhialini A, Lin MT, Andralojc PJ, Hanson MR, Parry MAJ. Transgenic tobacco plants with improved cyanobacterial Rubisco expression but no extra assembly factors grow at near wild-type rates if provided with elevated CO2. Plant J. 2016;85:148–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13098.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Bohmert-Tatarev K, McAvoy S, Daughtry S, Peoples OP, Snell KD. High levels of bioplastic are produced in fertile transplastomic tobacco plants engineered with a synthetic operon for the production of polyhydroxybutyrate. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:1690–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.169581.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Beilen JB, Poirier Y. Production of renewable polymers from crop plants. Plant J. 2008;54:684–701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03431.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Snell KD, Peoples OP. PHA bioplastic: a value-added coproduct for biomass biorefineries. Biofuel Bioprod Bior. 2009;3:456–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Leelavathi S, Gupta N, Maiti S, Ghosh A, Reddy VS. Overproduction of an alkali- and thermo-stable xylanase in tobacco chloroplasts and efficient recovery of the enzyme. Mol Breed. 2003;11:59–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Guda C, Lee SB, Daniell H. Stable expression of a biodegradable protein-based polymer in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Cell Rep. 2000;19:257–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Castiglia D, Sannino L, Marcolongo L, Ionata E, Tamburino R, Stradis A, et al. High-level expression of thermostable cellulolytic enzymes in tobacco transplastomic plants and their use in hydrolysis of an industrially pretreated Arundo donax L. biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:154–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0569-z.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Madanala R, Gupta V, Pandey AK, Srivastava S, Pandey V, Singh PK, et al. Tobacco chloroplasts as bioreactors for the production of recombinant superoxide dismutase in plants, an industrially useful enzyme. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2015;33:1107–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0805-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Petersen K, Bock R. High-level expression of a suite of thermostable cell wall-degrading enzymes from the chloroplast genome. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:311–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-011-9742-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Espinoza-Sánchez EA, Álvarez-Hernández MH, Torres-Castillo JA, Rascón-Cruz Q, Gutiérrez-Díez A, Zavala-García F, et al. Stable expression and characterization of a fungal pectinase and bacterial peroxidase genes in tobacco chloroplast. Electron J Biotechnol. 2016;18:161–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.03.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Verma D, Moghimi B, LoDuca PA, Singh HD, Hoffman BE, Herzog RW, et al. Oral delivery of bioencapsulated coagulation factor IX prevents inhibitor formation and fatal anaphylaxis in hemophilia B mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:7101–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Gray BN, Yang H, Ahner BA, Hanson MR. An efficient downstream box fusion allows high-level accumulation of active bacterial beta-glucosidase in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:345–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-011-9743-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Kim JY, Kanagaraj A, Verma D, Lange T, Daniell H. Production of hyperthermostable GH10 xylanase Xyl10B from Thermotoga maritima in transplastomic plants enables complete hydrolysis of methylglucuronoxylan to fermentable sugars for biofuel production. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:357–69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Xue XY, Mao Y-B, Tao X-Y, Huang Y-P, Chen X-Y. New approaches to agricultural insect pest control based on RNA interference. Adv Insect Physiol. 2012;42:73–117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Nakahira Y, Ishikawa K, Tanaka K, Tozawa Y, Shiina T. Overproduction of hyperthermostable beta-1,4-endoglucanase from the archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii by tobacco chloroplast engineering. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:2140–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Pantaleoni L, Longoni P, Ferroni L, Baldisserotto C, Leelavathi S, Reddy VS, Pancaldi S, et al. Chloroplast molecular farming: efficient production of a thermostable xylanase by Nicotiana tabacum plants and long-term conservation of the recombinant enzyme. Protoplasma. 2014;251:639–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0564-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Yu LX, Gray BN, Rutzke CJ, Walker LP, Wilson DB, Hanson MR. Expression of thermostable microbial cellulases in the chloroplasts of nicotine-free tobacco. J Biotechnol. 2007;131:362–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.07.942.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Ahmad N, Michoux F, Lössl AG, Nixon PJ. Challenges and perspectives in commercializing plastid transformation technology. J Exp Bot. 2016 ;67(21):5945–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw360.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Ahmadabadi M, Ruf S, Bock R. A leaf-based regeneration and transformation system for maize (Zea mays L.). Transgenic Res. 2007;16:437–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-006-9046-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Ahmad N, Michoux F, Nixon PJ. Investigating the production of foreign membrane proteins in tobacco chloroplasts: expression of an algal plastid terminal oxidase. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:417–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041722.Google Scholar
  116. Kahlau S, Bock R. Plastid transcriptomics and translatomics of tomato fruit development and chloroplast-to-chromoplast differentiation: chromoplast gene expression largely serves the production of a single protein. Plant Cell. 2008;20:856–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.055202.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Valkov T, Scotti N, Kahlau S, MacLean D, Grillo S, Gray JC, et al. Genome-wide analysis of plastid gene expression in potato leaf chloroplasts and tuber amyloplasts: transcriptional and posttranscriptional control. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:2030–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.140483.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Zhang J, Ruf S, Hasse C, Childs L, Scharff LB, Bock R. Identification of cis-elements conferring high levels of gene expression in non-green plastids. Plant J. 2012;72:115–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05065.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Iamtham S, Day A. Removal of antibiotic resistance genes from transgenic tobacco plastids. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:1172–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/81161.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhou F, Badillo-Corona JA, Karcher D, Gonzalez-Rabade N, Piepenburg K, Borchers AMI, et al. High-level expression of human immunodeficiency virus antigens from the tobacco and tomato plastid genomes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6:897–913.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Apel W, Schulze WX, Bock R. Identification of protein stability determinants in chloroplasts. Plant J. 2010;63:636–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04268.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Sheppard AE, Madesis P, Lloyd AH, Day A, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN. Introducing an RNA editing requirement into a plastidlocalised transgene reduces but does not eliminate functional gene transfer to the nucleus. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:299–309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement