Skip to main content

A rapid and versatile combined DNA/RNA extraction protocol and its application to the analysis of a novel DNA marker set polymorphic between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Col-0 and Landsberg erecta



Many established PCR-based approaches in plant molecular biology rely on lengthy and expensive methods for isolation of nucleic acids. Although several rapid DNA isolation protocols are available, they have not been tested for simultaneous RNA isolation for RT-PCR applications. In addition, traditional map-based cloning technologies often use ill-proportioned marker regions even when working with the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, where the availability of the full genome sequence can now be exploited for the creation of a high-density marker systems.


We designed a high-density polymorphic marker set between two frequently used ecotypes. This new polymorphic marker set allows size separation of PCR products on agarose gels and provides an initial resolution of 10 cM in linkage mapping experiments, facilitated by a rapid plant nucleic acid extraction protocol using minimal amounts of A. thaliana tissue. Using this extraction protocol, we have also characterized segregating T-DNA insertion mutations. In addition, we have shown that our rapid nucleic acid extraction protocol can also be used for monitoring transcript levels by RT-PCR amplification. Finally we have demonstrated that our nucleic acid isolation method is also suitable for other plant species, such as tobacco and barley.


To facilitate high-throughput linkage mapping and other genomic applications, our nucleic acid isolation protocol yields sufficient quality of DNA and RNA templates for PCR and RT-PCR reactions, respectively. This new technique requires considerably less time compared to other purification methods, and in combination with a new polymorphic PCR marker set dramatically reduces the workload required for linkage mapping of mutations in A. thaliana utilizing crosses between Col-0 and Landsberg erecta (Ler) ecotypes.


PCR and RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-PCR) are the most widely used analytical methods in plant genetics and molecular biology, providing simple tools for studying the segregation of mutations and monitoring the transcription of wild type and mutant alleles of genes in different plant tissues. Like several other classical methods (e.g. Southern and northern hybridization analysis of nucleic acids), PCR and RT-PCR applications also require a sufficient amount and quality of nucleic acids suitable for these assays. Because most well-established protocols include procedures based on the use of either potentially toxic chemicals or expensive commercial kits, numerous quick DNA isolation methods have been developed to promote large-scale genomic applications during the past years [1]. One of the major disadvantages of these quick isolation methods is that they are not suitable for applications requiring amplification of DNA fragments greater than 2 kb in size. Additionally, the available DNA purification methods have not been combined with rapid isolation of RNA from plant tissue.

Upon completion of the A. thaliana genome sequence, a major goal of post-genomic research is to understand the function and regulation of over 26000 genes in this model species. Several EMS (ethylmethansulfonate) and T-DNA mutagenized populations offer valuable genetic resources for wide-scale functional genomics studies in A. thaliana [26]. These studies require high-throughput DNA and RNA isolation from tens to thousands of plants. Progress in the molecular and genetic characterization of EMS and T-DNA insertion mutants is thus largely dependent on the speed, simplicity and quality of nucleic acid isolation methods. Map-based cloning of mutant alleles generated by EMS or radiation mutagenesis has been simplified by developing various pooling strategies, which are aided by well-characterized molecular markers. Many linkage mapping techniques are based either on enzymatic digestion of PCR products [7], or on the use of SNaP shot assays (SNP polymorphism markers; [8]), which may require separation on large, labor intensive acrylamide gels and detection by silver staining or radiography. Linkage mapping strategies in A. thaliana are still restricted by the number of known polymorphisms available between various ecotypes, such as Col-0 and Ler. The frequent use of segregating populations derived from Col-0 × Ler crosses, especially in the study of flowering time and plant development, would thus significantly benefit from a larger set of well-characterized and tested markers. Therefore, to develop a facile map based cloning approach, we refined the current design of polymorphic markers such that all polymorphic markers can now be resolved on 3% (w/v) agarose gels and detected by ethidium bromide staining.

To facilitate high-throughput application of our new polymorphic markers, as well as PCR-based identification and characterization of insertion mutants, we have developed a simple technique for rapid nucleic acid isolation from minimal quantity of A. thaliana tissue. This technique isolates both DNA and RNA templates, the quantity and quality of which are sufficient for PCR and RT-PCR analyses, respectively. Our data illustrate that this new technique can considerably accelerate PCR screening for T-DNA knockout mutations and greatly facilitates tracking segregating progeny of Col-0 × Ler crosses, which we used for identification of an EMS-induced mutation affecting the regulation of flowering time in A. thaliana.


The Sucrose Prep method for rapid isolation of nucleic acid templates for PCR analysis

We have systematically tested various protocols optimized for DNA isolation at room temperature for the efficiency of PCR amplification while omitting the inhibitory component EDTA. Combinations of DNA isolation protocols from Edwards et al. [9] and Walbot and Warren [10] were thus compared using ~2.5 mg (~3 mm2) of A. thaliana leaf tissue in 50 μl of extraction mixture, from which 1 μl was used as template in a routine PCR application. We have found that one of the variant extraction buffers, hereafter called Sucrose Solution, exhibited no change in the efficiency of PCR amplification judged by ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels in response to varying the pH from 7.0 to 8.0, or changing the salt and sucrose concentrations between 200 to 400 mM NaCl and 300 to 440 mM sucrose, respectively (data not shown). Due to the presence of sucrose in the extraction buffer, we named this nucleic acid extraction method the Sucrose Prep. In agreement with Thomson and Henry [11], we found that heating the crude extract for 10 min followed by centrifugation for 5 sec at 6000 g eliminated nearly all debris that interferes with PCR amplification.

The Sucrose Prep protocol was further optimized by controlling sampling size. Optimal results were obtained by harvesting of leaf tissue with a 500 μl Eppendorf cap punch (yielding about 10 mg fresh tissue) in 200 μl of Sucrose Solution. Multiple samples were stored on ice prior to extraction and were ground using either sterile pipette tips or plastic pestles. The extracts could be stored at 4°C overnight or at -20°C for longer term storage, but were normally used immediately. We could store samples at -20°C for up to 4 weeks with no detectable decrease in PCR amplification efficiency. Following long term storage however, samples required re-heating before PCR amplification. Successful PCR amplification was obtained with A. thaliana DNA samples extracted from 2 to 4 week-old leaf material, petals, sepals, stigmas, styles, anthers, and embryos. The maximum size of products obtained in routine PCR amplification reactions was around 3 kb. Using optimized thermal cycling conditions, no difference was observed for products up to 4 kb when compared to DNA templates prepared according to Edwards et al. [9]. By limiting the amount of plant debris carried over into the mixture, PCR product sizes of up to 5.5 kb were obtained (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Efficiency of PCR amplification using DNA templates prepared by the Sucrose Prep. (A) Extracts were prepared from various tissues using 10 mg sample/200 μl Sucrose Solution. (1) 4 week-old leaf, (2) senescent leaf, (3) anthers, (4) petals, (5) sepals, (6) gynoecium, (7) petiole, (8) 8–12 days old embryos. (B) Comparison of DNA templates prepared by the methods of Edwards (ED; Edwards et al., [9]) and Sucrose Prep (SP) in long-range PCR amplification. Optimized PCR conditions were used to amplify 2.2, 3.7, and 4 kb size products. (C) Long-range PCR amplification on DNA template isolated by CTAB (CT; see methods) and Sucrose Prep using LA TaKaRa polymerase. Sucrose Prep replicates show the inhibition of PCR amplification by inclusion of plant debris in the reaction (SP1) in comparison to samples avoiding contamination with debris (SP2).

Novel marker set for mapping between A. thaliana ecotypes Landsberg erecta and Col-0

The availability of the entire genome sequence of A. thaliana ecotype Col-0 and the high abundance of genomic sequence from Landsberg erecta (Ler) allowed us to design a new set of markers that show polymorphism between these ecotypes [12, 13]. A novel set of 51 DNA markers were identified at regular intervals across all five chromosomes (Table 1; Figure 2A). This marker set allows mapping at a 10 cM (~2 Mbp) resolution.

Table 1 List of chromosomal positions of BSA markers detecting polymorphism between A. thaliana ecotypes Col-0 and Ler.
Figure 2
figure 2

Chromosomal location of polymorphic markers and their use for genotyping. (A) Chromosomal location of the 51 polymorphic Col-0/Ler markers is depicted graphically and the sequence of each primer pair and fragment polymorphism is listed in Table 1. The region on chromosome II that is linked to the early flowering phenotype is boxed. (B) PCR amplification of DNA markers F14G16 on chromosome IV and F26B6 on chromosome II from the parents and early and normal flowering F2 DNA bulks. For DNA marker F14G16 both the Ler and Col-0 alleles were amplified from the early flowering bulk demonstrating that the marker is not linked to the early flowering mutation. Only the Ler allele of DNA marker F26B6 was amplified from the early flowering DNA bulk indicating the marker is linked to the early flowering mutation. (C) PCR amplification of DNA marker F26B6 from the parents and progeny.

Using the new marker set to map a novel early flowering mutant of Ler

To test the efficiency of linkage mapping with the new polymorphic marker set, a Ler line carrying T-DNA constructs overexpressing CONSTANS (CO) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), as well as a fusion between the promoter of SUPRESSOR of OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1) and a beta-glucuronidase (GUS) gene (35S::CO 35S::FLC 1 kb::SOC1:GUS; [14]), was subjected to EMS mutagenesis in order to screen for mutations affecting flowering time. An early flowering mutant displaying an elongated hypocotyl when grown in white light was identified in the M2 generation. After demonstrating that the early flowering mutant phenotype was stably inherited to the M4 generation, the mutant was back-crossed with the progenitor transgenic Ler parent. F1 progeny showed wild type flowering time (hereafter referred as normal flowering time), indicating that the mutation was recessive. Recessive inheritance was confirmed by the analysis of 96 F2 progeny, of which about one quarter showed early flowering. Subsequently, a Col-0 mapping parent was generated by crossing the 35S::CO/35S::FLC/1 kb::SOC1:GUS transgenes from the Ler progenitor to Col-0 four times. The early flowering Ler mutant line was subsequently crossed with the Col-0 mapping parent, and a segregating F2 population was generated to map the mutation. Six early flowering plants were chosen from the F2 generation, and one leaf from each plant was bulked together and DNA purified using the protocol of Edwards et al. [9]. Similarly 6 plants showing a normal flowering phenotype were identified, their leaves were also bulked together and DNA purified.

DNA fragments were amplified from each of the DNA bulks by PCR using the entire new set of 51 poylmorphic markers. Two markers, ciw3 and F26B6 on chromosome II were identified to be linked to the early flowering mutation as both markers were homozygous for the Ler allele from the early flowering bulk and heterozygous for the normal flowering bulk. The other DNA markers were heterozygous in both bulks indicating that they were not linked to the early flowering mutation, with the exception of three markers that most likely were linked to the loci of the T-DNA carrying the CO, FLC and SOC1 gene constructs (data not shown). Figure 2B shows the linked marker F26B6 and an unlinked marker F14G16 amplified from the Col-0 and Ler parents and the DNA bulks of early and normal flowering F2 progeny. DNA marker F26B6 was confirmed to be linked to the mutation by PCR amplification of the marker from five early flowering and four normal flowering plants from the F2 mapping population (Figure 2C).

We then used the Sucrose Prep to rapidly screen 96 early flowering plants from the F2 population, confirming that the mutation was located between the markers ciw3 and F26B6 (data not shown). Analysis of the annotated DNA sequence for candidate genes within this region revealed PHYB as one of the most likely candidates responsible for the early flowering mutant phenotype. Previously, a phyB mutant has been demonstrated to flower earlier under long day conditions and has an elongated hypocotyl under white light conditions [15, 16]. Therefore, we sequenced the PHYB gene from wild type Ler and our early flowering mutant. A base substitution of cytosine to thymine was detected at position 1660 bp downstream of the PHYB translational start site, resulting in a premature stop codon in the first exon. This nonsense mutation is predicted to result in a truncated protein that is unlikely to be functional as it contains neither the PAS repeat domain nor the histidine kinase related domain essential for the known function of the protein.

The Sucrose Prep as a method for identification of T-DNA insertion mutations

To determine if the Sucrose Prep method is suitable for screening of homozygous T-DNA mutants, we screened segregating T2 progeny from the SALK_098205 line, in which a T-DNA was inserted in exon 3 of the AtWRKY22 gene (At4g01250; Figure 3). In parallel, we isolated RNA from the same plants using a commercial kit. As illustrated in Figure 3, the Sucrose Prep (DNA; upper panel) produced results that were consistent with the observed expression of the gene (cDNA; lower panel) thereby identifying line 3 as a homozygous loss-of-function mutant of AtWRKY22.

Figure 3
figure 3

Use of the Sucrose Prep to identify T-DNA insertion knock-out mutations. Putative mutant plants homozygous for the T-DNA insertion were identified with the Sucrose Prep using gene specific primers for AtWRKY22 (Table 2) and amplification of DNA by PCR. The lines were also tested by RT-PCR for the loss of AtWRKY22 transcript using a commercial RNA isolation kit (Qiagen). Positions of the primers used for amplification are indicated below the schematic diagram.

The simplicity of the Sucrose Prep also facilitated the screening for T-DNA insertions in larger populations. For example, the identification of double knockouts carrying T-DNA insertions with identical selectable markers is readily feasible using the Sucrose Prep procedure. To illustrate this point, we performed an experiment to create an atwrky46 (At2g46400), atwrky53 (At4g23810) double mutant. These WRKY transcription factors belong to the same sub-group (group III) and show very similar transcription induction kinetics in response to pathogen and elicitor treatments (data not shown). After crossing the T-DNA insertion lines (Figure 4), F2 progeny were screened by PCR for the loss of gene specific products. Seven candidates were immediately identified as potentially being homozygous for both insertion mutations within 90 plants assayed (Figure 4B). Two of these 7 candidates were subsequently confirmed to be true double knockouts (not shown).

Figure 4
figure 4

Isolation of homozygous T-DNA insertion mutant lines carrying the atwrky46 , atwrky53 double mutation. (A) Schematic structure of atwrky46 and atwrky53 mutant alleles carrying T-DNA insertions. (B) PCR amplification using gene specific primers shown in panel A. Putative lines homozygous for the atwrky46, atwrky53 double knockout mutations fail to amplify the wild-type allele (marked by circles).

The Sucrose Prep can also effectively be used to detect the presence or absence of specific transcripts by RT-PCR

To demonstrate that the Sucrose Prep method is also suitable for facile detection of specific transcripts in small amounts of plant tissue, we tested the expression of SOC1 (At2g45660) and AGC1-10 (At2g26700) genes in leaf samples by RT-PCR amplification of RNA templates prepared by the Sucrose Prep. Since RNA might be destroyed during heating, the extracts from leaf samples were subjected to various heating times of 1 to 5 min prior to RT-PCR amplification. The length of the heating step did not appear to influence the efficiency of RT-PCR amplification since the SOC1 transcript was detected in all samples (Figure 5). Although the amplification of the cDNA product was weaker in comparison to the efficiency obtained with the commercial RNA purification kit, the cDNA product was specific and its amplification was reproducible.

Figure 5
figure 5

RT-PCR analysis of RNA templates isolated by the Sucrose Prep. (A) Amplification of a specific SOC1 cDNA product from leaf tissue. Leaf material was harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen then ground in Sucrose Solution and subjected to heating at 99°C for 1, 3 or 5 min. A control PCR was performed with DNA isolated according to Edwards et al. [9]. A second control was performed with cDNA made from fresh leaf material prepared from RNA isolated by extraction using a commercial RNA isolation kit (Qiagen). (B) Isolation of RNA was performed as in (A) and heat treated at 99°C for 5 min. The samples were subjected to RT-PCR analysis using AGC1-10 specific primers, which flank the two introns depicted in the schematic diagram (expected sizes, genomic: 1300 bp, Intron I: 520 bp; Intron II: 215 bp). The cDNA product from the mature mRNA (600 bp) was detectable in shoot meristem tissues (s-m) and weakly in floral tissue, whereas only the first splicing product was observed in leaf tissues due to variations in the RNA yield (i.e., indicated by the amount of DNA product in the reactions).

Next, we tested homozygous T-DNA knockout lines for loss of WRKY transcripts. A T-DNA in the AtWRKY36 (At1g69810) gene was localized within the first intron. This insertion resulted in a loss of detectable transcript by RT-PCR analysis compared to wild type (data not shown). RT-PCR analysis of wild-type and homozygous atwrky36 knockout mutant plants was performed by using the Sucrose Prep. Since the T-DNA was located in the first intron, no amplification of cDNA product was expected in the knockout mutant (Figure 6, panel A). Nonetheless, a faint cDNA product was detected by the RT-PCR assay suggesting that the T-DNA insertion was spliced out from a small fraction of primary transcripts.

Figure 6
figure 6

Transcript analysis in A. thaliana knockout mutants. (A) Leaf material was harvested from wild type or homozygous atwrky36 knockout mutant plants and the Sucrose Prep was used for RT-PCR analysis with gene specific primers. The T-DNA is located in the first intron of AtWRKY36 and was occasionally transcribed and spliced out since a cDNA product corresponding to a segment of mature RNA is detected in the knockout mutant. The second column is digitally enhanced to highlight the cDNA product detected in the knockout line. (B) Leaf material from wild-type and a homozygous atwrky70 mutant were sampled using the 'Touch-and-Go' method (see text for details). The T-DNA insertion in the gene prevented PCR amplification of both DNA and cDNA products (larger than 4 kb).

The 'Touch-and-Go' approach for PCR and RT-PCR applications

We also developed an alternative method for isolating nucleic acids from very small sample sizes designated 'Touch-and-Go'. This method eliminates the preparation steps required by the Sucrose Prep, since the extraction of DNA/RNA templates is made simply by capturing plant tissue with a pipette tip which is immediately available for the amplification of nucleic acids by PCR and RT-PCR methods respectively. In practice, leaf tissue was punctured using an RNAse-free 20 μl pipette-tip against a firm surface, i.e. a finger covered with a latex glove, and then the pipette-tip was immediately touched into 50 μl PCR solution mix in prepared reaction wells. Due to the very small amount of leaf material taken by pipette tip puncturing, the number of PCR cycles should be 35 to 40 when using this method. For plant material located in the greenhouse or the field, 10 μl water was first delivered to PCR tubes or plates kept on ice, and 'Touch-and-Go' sampling was performed by touching the water in the tubes or wells with the pipette tip containing the plant tissue. After sampling, 40 μl PCR solution mix was added to the tubes or wells in the laboratory and DNA/RNA was amplified by PCR for 40 cycles using a thermocycler. Figure 6, panel B illustrates that the 'Touch-and-Go' method can be used to PCR amplify DNA products a maximum of 1.5 kb in size. This mini-preparation method was also tested in combination with RT-PCR by monitoring for the loss of detectable expression of AtWRKY70 (At3g56400) in a T-DNA insertion mutant line. The atwrky70 insertion mutant carries the T-DNA insertion in the last exon of the gene. Figure 6, panel B illustrates that no specific cDNA signal was detectable in the homozygous atwrky70 knockout line in comparison to wild type extracts from which both DNA and cDNA products were well amplified. To verify that the observed lower band of the correct predicted cDNA size of is indeed AtWRKY70, this fragment was gel isolated and subsequently sequenced. The sequencing data clearly confirmed that this fragment represents the full-length AtWRKY70 cDNA fragment and that the two known introns were spliced out.

The 'Touch-and-Go' extraction method was also tested in screening for an atwrky40, atwrky18 double mutant. Figure 7 shows a screening of F2 progeny homozygous for the atwrky18 T-DNA insertion mutation. Whereas a DNA fragment of 644 bp specific for the AtWRKY18 locus was amplified from extracts prepared from wild type Col-0 and homozygous atwrky40 mutant plants, this was not the case when the assay was applied to extracts that were prepared from homozygous atwrky18 lines. By screening 72 segregating F2 progeny from an atwrky40 × atwrky18 cross, we identified 19 individuals to be homozygous for the atwrky18 mutation (as judged by the absence of the 644 bp PCR product). These results are in agreement with the expected Mendelian segregation ratio (i.e. 18/72; Figure 7)

Figure 7
figure 7

Screening for homozygous atwrky18 T-DNA knockouts using the 'Touch-and-Go' method. Seventy-two F2 progeny obtained by crossing of homozygous atwrky40 and atwrky18 mutants, were screened with primers flanking the T-DNA insertion site in the AtWRKY18 gene allowing detection of the wild-type AtWRKY18 allele. Amplification of a 644 bp size fragment indicates that F2 progeny are either wild type or heterozygous for AtWRKY18. No amplification suggests that the progeny are homozygous for the atwrky18 mutant allele. Controls, including DNA from the homozygous parental lines (knockout; KO), were replicated twice in pairs, giving a total of four independent control reactions. Primer control, lanes that contain no DNA template.

The Sucrose Prep and the 'Touch-and-Go' methods can successfully be used in other plants

We isolated DNA from the dicotyledonous crop species tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and its close relative N. benthamiana, as well as from the monocotyledonous crop species barley (Hordeum vulgare) using Sucrose Prep and the 'Touch-and-Go' methods to demonstrate their applicability for plants other than A. thaliana. As illustrated in Figure 8 (upper two panels), both methods produced sufficient quality and quantity of DNA that can be amplified using primers for two tobacco genes NtCDPK2 (calcium dependent protein kinase2) and NtRBCS that yield 2 kb and 0.8 kb PCR amplified DNA products respectively. Amplification failed in only one out of eight reactions using the Sucrose Prep while none failed using the 'Touch-and-Go' method. A similar isolation and PCR amplification was performed with barley tissue using four barley specific primer pairs producing varying sizes of amplified DNA fragments (Figure 8; lower two panels and Table 2). The sizes and patterns of the observed amplified DNA fragments are identical to those observed with other conventional DNA isolation methods (personal communication T. Zhao, M. Böhmer, and G. Freymark, MPIZ Köln). All of the primer pairs produced the expected size fragments (1.7, 0.7, 0.6 and 0.4 kb) in PCR analysis using DNA isolated by the Sucrose Prep. Using the Touch-and-Go' method, three primer pairs successfully amplified the expected smaller size fragments (0.7, 0.6 and 0.4 kb) but failed to amplify the largest size fragment of 1.7 kb.

Figure 8
figure 8

Sucrose Prep and the 'Touch-and-Go' methods works well in other plant species. DNA was isolated in duplicate using the Sucrose Prep or the 'Touch-and-Go' methods (indicated on the left) from leaves of one month old N. tabacum and N. benthamiana plants (upper two panels) or from leaves of 10 day-old barley plants (lower two panels). PCR was carried out for 40 cycles in a 50 μl reaction volume using primers for NtCDPK2 and NtRBCS in tobacco, and four different pairs of primers for barley. Only 10 μl of the final reaction was resolved by agarose (1%) gel electrophoresis for analysis.

Table 2 List of primers and T-DNA lines used

Flow diagrams for the Sucrose Prep and the 'Touch-and-Go' methods for PCR and RT-PCR applications are shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9
figure 9

Flow diagram of the Sucrose Prep and the 'Touch-and-Go' methods for PCR and RT-PCR applications.


The Sucrose Prep is not unique in being a quick DNA isolation protocol. Kasajima et al. [18] have exploited the method of Edwards et al. [9] to develop a rapid method for marker and transgene detection, and have demonstrated amplification of fragments up to 1.4 kb in size. As Langridge et al. [19] and Petersen et al. [20], we have also observed that DNA can be extracted by grinding the plant tissue in pure water and transferring a sample aliquot of the extract to a PCR reaction or that DNA templates can be delivered by adding a small amount of tissue to a PCR reaction mixture (data not shown). Therefore, we tried using extremely small amounts of tissue sampled with pipette tips by puncturing leaf tissue and immediately touching the tips into prepared PCR reaction mixtures. This 'Touch-and-Go' method is comparable in PCR amplification efficiency of DNA fragments up to about 1 kb with the Sucrose Prep and other rapid nucleic acid isolation methods. The stability of the Sucrose Prep in providing templates for numerous PCR or RT-PCR reactions however encouraged us to continue optimization of the method in connection with various high-throughput applications.

Alkaline lysis with NaOH [2123] has also been successfully used in rapid isolation of DNA, however PCR amplification of DNA fragments are typically smaller than 2 kb in size. A common step between the majority of rapid procedures and the Sucrose Prep is the inclusion of a 'boiling' step. Burr et al. [24] used a thermal cycling protocol from 65°C to 96°C for a total time of 11.5 min, whereas Thomas and Henry [11] had optimized their protocol for DNA extraction from dried tissue by heating for 10 min at 95°C. Many quick DNA preparation methods dilute out contaminants from the harvested tissue, which interfere with the PCR reaction, by raising the extraction volume [2226]. Sucrose Prep also employs such a dilution step by using about 50 μl extraction buffer for 2.5 mg tissue. Another component of the Sucrose Solution is the use of high salt, which is also employed in the protocol of Wang et al. [22] and is a principal component of DNA extraction buffers described by Edwards et al. [9] and Walbot and Warren [10].

The Sucrose Prep has been optimized for A. thaliana tissue, but is also suitable for DNA isolation from other species, including tobacco and barley (Figure 8). Therefore, Sucrose Prep should also work for species such as maize, wheat, rice, potato, tomato and other plants that have low to moderate concentrations of phenolics and starch

The combination of bulk segregant analysis with our new polymorphic DNA marker set proved very effective in rapidly locating a mutation of interest within a 10 cM interval. Tracking F2 segregation with the Sucrose Prep dramatically eased the analysis, as we employed a DNA shaker and thermal cycling blocks for heating, making future optimisation with robots possible. DNA sequencing of a candidate gene identified a mutation in the first exon of the PHYB gene, causing a premature stop codon at amino acid 554. The resulting truncated protein is predicted not to contain the PAS domain, which are important in phytochrome function and mediate interaction with putative signalling partners [2729].

The Sucrose Prep also proved useful in screening for homozygous T-DNA insertion mutants and it was particularly useful for rapid identification of double homozygous knock-out lines that carried T-DNA insertions bearing identical selectable markers (Figure 3 and Figure 5). Occasionally, certain PCR primers did behave differently between conventional DNA preparations and templates obtained by the Sucrose Prep (Figure 1 and Figure 4). Nonetheless, in most cases where a primer combination did not work with Sucrose Prep, they also failed to produce PCR amplification with conventional methods under the aforementioned size limits (data not shown).

Pre-screening of segregating F2 or T2 EMS- and T-DNA-induced mutation populations with the Sucrose Prep greatly reduced the number of lines requiring further characterization. Upon fast screening with Sucrose Prep, detailed analysis always led to the identification of homozygous mutant lines that were confirmed by other DNA and RNA isolation methods.

RNA isolation from plants is often a lengthy process requiring toxic chemicals or expensive kits, and requires a very clean practice due to vast contamination of RNAses. A quick RNA isolation method is therefore highly desirable. We have demonstrated above that plant extracts prepared by the Sucrose Prep are also suitable for RT-PCR assays (Figures 5 and 6). Due to high concentration of DNA in the extracts, the primers must be designed in exons separated by introns in order to distinguish DNA from cDNA (Figure 6). DNA contamination is not a unique problem to our approach but is common to several other RNA isolation methods. The only major disadvantage of our quick RNA isolation method is that the RNA to DNA ratio is very low as compared to other methods where RNA is concentrated through several steps. However, our method is very useful and even superior to other methods in certain applications requiring speed and use of limited amounts of plant tissue. Thus, the method is particularly useful if cells expressing the gene of interest are restricted to certain tissue, such as hydathodes, major and minor veins, emerging young leaves, flower organs such as nectaries, flower abscission zones, sepals petals, anthers, gynoecium, root tips, as well as local pathogen infected tissues and islands of cells generated by transposon jumping. One of the limitations of our method is that it is not suitable for genes that are expressed at very low levels. The 'Touch-and-Go' method is not suitable for quantitative RT-PCR applications, due to the varying amount of RNA isolated during sampling.

Using the Sucrose Prep and the 'Touch-and-Go' methods, we have identified homozygous T-DNA knockouts for the AtWRKY36 and AtWRKY70 genes (Figure 6). With respect to PCR amplification of DNA samples, we found the 'Touch-and-Go' method extremely useful and time saving, especially when screening for the presence or absence of PCR products of less than 500 bp in size. We had however variable success rates if the size of the expected PCR products was larger than 1 kb. As with the Sucrose Prep, the 'Touch-and-Go' method worked very well for tobacco in amplifying DNA fragments up to 2 kb, however, in barley it failed to amplify the largest predicted fragment of 1.7 kb and the amount of amplification product varied for fragments less than 1 kb in length. This difference observed in the reproducibility of DNA isolation between tobacco and barley is possibly due to the lower number of cells that are disrupted in barley plants upon puncturing with the pipette tip. Nevertheless, the simplicity, speed and reproducibility of the 'Touch-and-Go' approach and the robustness and relative speed of the Sucrose Prep method makes them ideal for high-throughput PCR based screens in alternative transgenic approaches replacing the use antibiotic resistance selectable markers [31].


In comparison to other rapid nucleic acid isolation protocols described for plant samples, the Sucrose Prep is thus far the only extraction protocol, which is shown to be compatible with simultaneous isolation of DNA and RNA templates. This minimal-step nucleic acid isolation method can be combined with the use of our high resolution marker set that can be resolved on agarose gel after amplification with PCR to perform fast and precise mapping of mutations using DNA polymorphisms between A. thaliana ecotypes Col-0 and Ler. We anticipate that the utilization of Sucrose Prep as well the 'Touch-and-Go' method will facilitate the improvement of automated high-throughput genomic techniques used in functional genomics studies of the model plant A. thaliana, as well as in other plants species, including important crops.


The Sucrose Prep

Sucrose Solution: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl and 300 mM sucrose.

  1. (A)

    Individual samples: approximately 10 mg of leaf tissue was placed directly in 200 μl Sucrose Solution and ground at room temperature or on ice using a pipette tip or pestle. The samples were then heated to 99–100°C for 10 min and then briefly spun at 2000–6000 g for 5 sec. The samples were placed on ice until PCR. One μl of the supernatant was used for PCR, avoiding debris.

  2. (B)

    Multiple sample 96-well format: between 10–20 mg leaf tissue from 14 d-old plants was harvested as leaf discs into 96 well plates. Metal balls (3 mm, tungsten carbide beads) were added and shaken in a Retsch MM300 shaker for 10 sec, then 300 μl of Sucrose Solution was added, the plate heated at 99°C for 10 min and placed on ice until use. Following storage at 4°C or -20°C, samples were reheated at 99–100°C for 10 min and then immediately placed on ice.

The 'Touch-and-Go' method

Leaves were punctured against a firm surface, like a finger covered with a latex glove using a fine pipette tip (TipOne from Starlab GMBH, catalog no. S1111-3000 or S1110-3000). The DNA/RNA on the tip of the pipette was transferred to the pre-prepared PCR solution in the PCR tubes by touching the tip of the pipette to the solution and pipetting up and down a few times. For plants in the field or greenhouse, 10 μl water was aliquoted into PCR tubes or microtiter plates. The tubes/plates were kept on ice while puncturing the leaves with a fine pipette tip against a firm surface and DNA/RNA the tip was transferred into water by pipeting up and down. After returning the samples to the laboratory, 40 μl PCR master mix was added to each well. Thermocycling with the 'Touch-and-Go' method requires 40 cycles of PCR amplification.

CTAB method

The CTAB protocol used was developed by Murray and Thompson [32], modified from Rogers and Bendich [33] and adapted by Rios et al. [2].

Plant Growth Conditions

A. thaliana plants were grown under a 16 h photoperiod at 20°C in a greenhouse.

EMS Mutagenesis

Approximately 6,500 35S::CO 35S::FLC 1 kb:SOC1::GUS co-2 seeds were mutagenized by imbibition in 0.3% ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS; Sigma) for 8 to 9 h, followed by washing with 0.1 M Na2SO4 and distilled water. The M1 mutagenized seed was planted into about 260 pools each containing 25 M1 seeds. About 300 M2 seed from each pool were sown under long day conditions and scored for flowering time.


Routine PCR: 3 min 94°C, 35–40 cycles of: (30 sec 94°C, 45 sec 55°C, 1 min 72°C), 10 min 72°C, 4°C until analysis. 2.5 μM each gene specific primers, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 5–10 U (0.5–1 μl) Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), 1 × Taq Buffer (commercially supplied). For products larger than 2 kb, 0.5 U of enzyme LA Taq polymerase (TaKaRa) was substituted for Invitrogen Taq polymerase and the PCR protocol from Rios et al. [2] was used.

Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR Kit (catalog no. 210210) was used following the manufacturer's recommendations. For isolation of cDNA, RNA was extracted with RNeasy Plant Mini Kit from Qiagen (catalog no. 74904) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Primers and T-DNA knockout lines are listed in Table 2.

Gel documentation

All of the agarose gel pictures are ethidium bromide stained gels and the images are inverted in Adobe Photoshop.


  1. Zhang J, Stewart J: Economical and rapid method for extracting cotton genomic DNA. The Journal of Cotton Science. 2000, 4: 193-201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ríos G, Lossow A, Hertel B, Breuer F, Schaefer S, Broich M, Kleinow T, Jásik J, Winter J, Ferrando A, Farrás R, Panicot M, Henriques R, Mariaux J, Oberschall A, Molnár G, Berendzen K, Shukla V, Lafos M, Koncz Z, Rédei G, Schell J, Koncz C: Rapid identification of Arabidopsis insertion mutants by non-radioactive detection of T-DNA tagged genes. Plant J. 2002, 32: 243-253. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01416.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR: T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 2283-2290. 10.1105/tpc.11.12.2283.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Samson F, Brunaud V, Balzergue S, Dubreucq B, Lepiniec L, Pelletier G, Caboche M, Lecharny A: FLAGdb/FST: a database of mapped flanking insertion sites (FSTs) of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA transformants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 94-97. 10.1093/nar/30.1.94.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R: Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003, 301: 653-657. 10.1126/science.1086391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosso MG, Li Y, Strizhov N, Reiss B, Dekker K, Weisshaar B: An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 53: 247-259. 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000009297.37235.4a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM: A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J. 1993, 4: 403-410. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020403.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torjek O, Berger D, Meyer R, Mussig C, Schmid K, Rosleff Sorensen T, Weisshaar B, Mitchell-Olds T, Altmann T: Establishment of a high-efficiency SNP-based framework marker set for Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003, 36: 122-140. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01861.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C: A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19: 1349-

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walbot V, Warren C: Regulation of Mu element copy number in maize lines with an active or inactive Mutator transposable element system. Mol Gen Gen. 1988, 211: 27-34. 10.1007/BF00338389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomson D, Henry R: Single-Step protocol for preparation of plant tissue for analysis by PCR. BioTechniques. 1995, 19: 394-400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000, 408: 796-813. 10.1038/35048692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jander G, Norris SR, Rounsley SD, Bush DF, Levin IM, Last RL: Arabidopsis map-based cloning in the post-genome era. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129: 440-450. 10.1104/pp.003533.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hepworth S, Valverde F, Ravenscroft D, Mouradov A, Coupland G: Antagonistic regulation of flowering-time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 4327-37. 10.1093/emboj/cdf432.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reed J, Nagpal P, Poole D, Furuya M, Chory J: Mutations in the gene for the red/far-red light receptor phytochrome B alter cell elongation and physiological responses throughout Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell. 1993, 5: 147-157. 10.1105/tpc.5.2.147.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W, Ravenscroft D, Samach A, Coupland G: Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science. 2004, 303: 1003-1006. 10.1126/science.1091761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE: The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5: 199-206. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01600-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasajima I, Ide Y, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Hayashi H, Yoneyama T, Fujiwara T: A protocol for rapid DNA extraction from Arabidopsis thaliana for PCR analysis. Plant Mol Bio Reporter. 2004, 22: 49-52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Langridge Ursula, Schwall M, Langridge P: Squashes of plant tissue as subtrate for PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19: 6954-

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen G, Johansen B, Seberg O: PCR and sequencing from a single pollen grain. Plant Mol Biol. 1996, 31: 189-191. 10.1007/BF00020620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klimyuk V, Carroll B, Thomas C, Jones J: Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. Plant J. 1993, 3: 493-494. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.t01-26-00999.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang H, Qi M, Cutler A: A simple method of preparing plant samples for PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21: 4153-4154.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paris M, Carter M: Cereal DNA: A rapid high-throughput extraction method for marker assisted selection. Plant Mol Bio Reporter. 2000, 18: 357-360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Burr K, Harper R, Linacre A: One-Step isolation of plant DNA suitable for PCR amplification. Plant Mol Bio Reporter. 2001, 19: 367-371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dilworth E, Frey J: A rapid method for high throughput DNA extraction from plant material for PCR amplification. Plant Mol Bio Reporter. 2000, 18: 61-64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kreader C, Weber S, Song K: One-Tube preparation and PCE amplification of DNA from plant lead tissue with Extract-N-Amp™; Molecular Biology Application Notes. Life Science Quartely. 2001, 2 (1):

  27. Furuya M: Phytochromes: their molecular species, gene family and functions. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1993, 44: 617-645. 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.003153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Quail PH, Boylan MT, Parks BM, Short TM, Xu X, Wagner TM: Phytochromes: photosensory perception and signal transduction. Science. 1995, 268: 675-680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Krall L, Reed JW: The histidine kinase-related domain participates in phytochrome B function but is dispensable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 8169-8174. 10.1073/pnas.140520097.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mockler TC, Guo H, Yang H, Duong H, Lin C: Antagonistic actions of Arabidopsis cryptochromes and phytochrome B in the regulation of floral induction. Development. 1999, 126: 2073-2082.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Francis KE, Spiker S: Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana transformants without selection reveals a high occurrence of silenced T-DNA integrations. Plant J. 2005, 41: 464-477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray M, Thompson W: Rapid isolation of high-molecular-weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8: 4321-4325.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rogers S, Bendich A: Extraction of DNA from milligrams of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Mol Biol. 1985, 5: 69-76. 10.1007/BF00020088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to acknowledge the skilful assistance of Nicole Kamphaus, Sandra Kröber and Anja Reinstädler and thanks to Marcel Lafos for critical reading of the manuscript. Many thanks to Tiehan Zhao, Maik Böhmer, Gerald Freymark for sharing their primers for barley, tobacco and N. benthamiana respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Imre E Somssich or Bekir Ülker.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

KB developed the Sucrose Prep, initiated collaboration with IS to use the Sucrose Prep for mapping purposes and together with BU was involved in the design, coordination, and drafting of the manuscript. IS designed the novel marker set between Col-0 and Ler, IS and DR mapped the mutation in the PHYB gene and assisted in drafting the manuscript. BU developed the 'Touch-and-Go' method and demonstrated that the nucleic acids isolated by Sucrose Prep or the 'Touch-and-Go' methods are suitable for RT-PCR assays, tested all of these methods in screening T-DNA knockouts in Arabidopsis and demonstrated that these methods are also suitable for tobacco and barley. CK, GC and IES provided the laboratory facilities, gave valuable experimental advises and extensively helped in drafting the manuscript. AB and CK are the Ph.D supervisors of KB. All authors were involved in reading, correcting and approving the final version of the manuscript.

Kenneth Berendzen, Iain Searle and Bekir Ülker contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berendzen, K., Searle, I., Ravenscroft, D. et al. A rapid and versatile combined DNA/RNA extraction protocol and its application to the analysis of a novel DNA marker set polymorphic between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Col-0 and Landsberg erecta. Plant Methods 1, 4 (2005).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: