- Open Access
An aeroponic culture system for the study of root herbivory on Arabidopsis thaliana
© Vaughan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 14 December 2010
- Accepted: 10 March 2011
- Published: 10 March 2011
Plant defense against herbivory has been studied primarily in aerial tissues. However, complex defense mechanisms have evolved in all parts of the plant to combat herbivore attack and these mechanisms are likely to differ in the aerial and subterranean environment. Research investigating defense responses belowground has been hindered by experimental difficulties associated with the accessibility and quality of root tissue and the lack of bioassays using model plants with altered defense profiles.
We have developed an aeroponic culture system based on a calcined clay substrate that allows insect herbivores to feed on plant roots while providing easy recovery of the root tissue. The culture method was validated by a root-herbivore system developed for Arabidopsis thaliana and the herbivore Bradysia spp. (fungus gnat). Arabidopsis root mass obtained from aeroponically grown plants was comparable to that from other culture systems, and the plants were morphologically normal. Bradysia larvae caused considerable root damage resulting in reduced root biomass and water absorption. After feeding on the aeroponically grown root tissue, the larvae pupated and emerged as adults. Root damage of mature plants cultivated in aeroponic substrate was compared to that of Arabidopsis seedlings grown in potting mix. Seedlings were notably more susceptible to Bradysia feeding than mature plants and showed decreased overall growth and survival rates.
A root-herbivore system consisting of Arabidopsis thaliana and larvae of the opportunistic herbivore Bradysia spp. has been established that mimics herbivory in the rhizosphere. Bradysia infestation of Arabidopsis grown in this culture system significantly affects plant performance. The culture method will allow simple profiling and in vivo functional analysis of root defenses such as chemical defense metabolites that are released in response to belowground insect attack.
- Root Mass
- Arabidopsis Root
- Larval Feeding
- Root Herbivore
- Belowground Herbivory
Belowground herbivory affects plant performance in several ways. For example, insect feeding on plant roots reduces uptake of water and nutrients, limits carbohydrate storage, and changes the production of phytohormones [1–3]. Such alterations in the physical, biochemical, and physiological state of plants can influence surrounding organismal communities both above-and belowground [2, 4].
Plants have developed multiple strategies such as tolerance and direct and indirect defenses to cope with or defeat herbivore attack [5–7]. Direct defense mechanisms involve the production of defense proteins and secondary (specialized) plant metabolites, which directly affect herbivores, whereas indirect defenses help attract natural enemies of herbivores [5–11]. In contrast to the many plant defense responses investigated aboveground, fewer studies have focused on plant defenses against root-attacking herbivores . For example, feeding of the cabbage and turnip root maggot (Delia radicum and Delia floralis) was shown to induce the production of glucosinolate defense metabolites in the roots of several Brassica species [13, 14]. Schmelz et al.  demonstrated that phytoecdysteroids accumulating in spinach roots serve as inducible defense compounds that decrease root feeding of Bradysia spp. (fungus gnat) larvae. In addition to direct defenses, some indirect defense responses have been demonstrated belowground. When attacked by larvae of the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera), maize roots release the sesquiterpene volatile (E)-β-caryophyllene, which attracts insect parasitizing nematodes .
Detailed investigations of molecular and chemical defense responses in plant roots are limited, which can be largely attributed to experimental shortfalls associated with the accessibility of root tissue or the interference of soil particles with root metabolite analysis [1, 17]. Moreover, research on belowground defenses has been hindered by the lack of bioassays using model plants deficient in herbivore-induced root defenses such as the formation of defense metabolites. In response to these challenges, we have developed a root-herbivore system using Arabidopsis thaliana and larvae of the root herbivore Bradysia spp.
Dark-winged fungus gnats are generalist opportunistic herbivores, whose larvae feed on organic matter and fungi, but upon depletion of this food source, larvae actively feed on root tissue of a variety of plants including Arabidopsis[18, 19]. Larvae chew on roots and strip away the cortex, thereby negatively impacting water and nutrient absorption . The two most common species, Bradysia coprophila (Lintner) and Bradysia impatiens (Johannsen), are both considered important greenhouse pests , which, at extreme infestations, lead to loss of plant vigor and even mortality . For example, 90% of alfalfa seedlings are killed at densities of less than one larva per seedling . Young soybean plants have been shown to survive Bradysia coprophila feeding but produce less seed . These damaging effects of Bradysia species can be attributed to their short life cycle of 20 to 25 days with females laying between 250 to 1000 eggs in approximately three days. Emerging larvae feed in the soil for 12 to 14 days prior to pupating .
Bradysia larvae have been used to investigate hormone-dependent defense responses in Arabidopsis. Larvae caused high mortality of soil-grown Arabidopsis mutants deficient in the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid, but also affected the growth of wild-type seedlings . Effects on mature plants were described as minor, but this assessment was based only on observations of foliage and survival without investigating the severity of root damage . Bradysia feeding was also employed to analyze root-specific defense activities of phytoecdysteroids in spinach . However, this study used in vitro feeding assays, instead of an in vivo approach, utilizing diets of powdered root tissue containing different phytoecdysteroid concentrations.
In this paper, we describe a culture system based on commercially-available, porous calcined clay pellets (Seramis®) to investigate belowground herbivory on Arabidopsis roots. The system maintains a soil-type environment for the herbivore while providing easy access to root tissue for analysis. Furthermore, we evaluate feeding by fungus gnat larvae on seedlings grown in soil in comparison to feeding on roots of mature plants in aeroponic culture. We propose this bioassay to be a useful tool for studying chemical- and molecular-defense responses of Arabidopsis to belowground herbivory. Moreover, the system has broader utility to investigate many aspects of root biochemistry, physiology, and ecology.
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0, ABRC Stock no. 6000) was grown under controlled conditions at 22°C to 25°C, 150 μmol m-2 sec-1 photosynthetically active radiation and a 10 h light - 14 h dark photoperiod. Seeds were stratified for 24 h at 4°C prior to planting in potting mix [90% Sunshine Mix No. 1 (Sun Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, WA) and 10% sand].
Arabidopsis aeroponic culture system
Tubes were then filled with Seramis® clay granules and wrapped with aluminum foil to reduce light penetration and algal growth. The top of each tube was covered with plastic wrap and the caps were reattached. A small hole large enough for the root mass to pass through was punctured in the plastic wrap using the tip of a scalpel. The tubes were then placed in a test tube rack and submerged in Hoagland's solution  to moisten the substrate. Four-week-old Arabidopsis plants grown in potting mix were carefully removed from their pots (Figure 1). Roots were repeatedly submerged in water to remove as much of the potting substrate as possible. A 1.25 cm cube of Rockwool was divided and placed beneath the rosette, around the top of the roots. Plants were then transferred to Seramis®-containing tubes and allowed to grow. The Rockwool and plastic wrap stabilized the plant until its roots had grown into the clay granulate. The clay granulate was kept moist by submerging the culture tubes in Hoagland's solution for 10 to 15 min every other day. After four weeks, when the plants started to bolt, roots had grown to the bottom of the tube. During the feeding experiments, plants were watered every other day by applying 10 ml of Hoagland's solution to the surface and allowing excess media to drain freely from the tube.
Bradysia (fungus gnat) culture
Fungus gnat larvae were collected from greenhouse soil by the "potato disk" method  and subsequently used to establish a laboratory colony. The colony was maintained in 8 L plastic containers with screened openings for ventilation. The culture medium consisted of 4 L of moist Sunshine Mix No. 1 enriched with 1.5 kg of shredded potato tubers . The cultures were kept at ambient greenhouse conditions (21°C to 23°C; indirect sunlight). To maintain the colony, 0.5 L of medium (containing Bradysia larvae, pupae, adults, and eggs) was transferred to a fresh container of soil and potato mix every three to four weeks. Specimens were identified by Dr. Raymond J. Gragné (USDA Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Washington, DC) as a mixed colony of Bradysia coprophila (Lintner) and Bradysia impatiens (Johannsen).
Isolation of Bradysia larvae
Bradysia feeding experiments in aeroponic culture
Four weeks after their transfer to aeroponic culture tubes, Arabidopsis plants were infested with fungus gnat larvae. To this end, the plastic tube caps were carefully removed to avoid leaf damage. Approximately 200 to 300 second- and third-instar larvae, collected as described above, were transferred to a single aeroponic culture tube. First instar (~1 mm) and fourth instar larvae were excluded from the feeding experiments since they were either too difficult to apply or too close to pupation. Larvae were submerged in 1 mL of Hoagland's solution (Hoagland's solution was used instead of water to avoid washing nutrients from the clay pellets) and then released with a pipette into the Seramis® substrate. After two and four days of larval feeding, roots were removed from the tubes by submerging the plant and the tube in water. Roots were then separated from the granulate by simply holding the plant rosette and moving it back and forth in the water. The heavier clay granules fell to the bottom of the container, while the roots stayed attached to the rosette. The shoots and roots were then blotted dry with Kimwipes (Fisher Scientific, Suwanee, GA) and their fresh weights were recorded. Tissue dry weight was measured after two to three days of air drying at room temperature. Under lab conditions, this time was sufficient to completely dehydrate the root mass and additional drying did not significantly alter weight measurements. The shoot and root biomass and percentage of water weight for each tissue were calculated. For these measurements a T-test was performed (n = 12, α = 0.05) to test the null hypothesis of no biomass change for the variables. To determine if there was a significant difference in root mass after larval feeding, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-Kramer HSD (n = 8) was performed.
Bradysia feeding experiments with seedlings grown in potting mix
To validate the feeding damage by Bradysia larvae on roots of aeroponically-grown mature Arabidopsis plants, plants were challenged with larval feeding at the seedling stage in potting mix. Individual seedlings were grown in pots (8 cm × 8 cm × 10 cm) under the described conditions. Bradysia larvae (second and third instar, Figure 2B), collected as described above, were dislodged from the bottom of the Petri dish with 1 mL of water, and ten larvae were transferred with a Pasteur pipette into each pot. Larvae that did not move into the potting substrate within 5 min were removed and replaced. Larvae were transferred to pots at seed germination, ten and 14 days after germination. Infested and control plants were kept in net enclosures. The percentage of surviving seedlings from three independent experiments was determined seven days after inoculation. Plants were removed from the pots, roots were rinsed in water, and fresh and dry weights of the entire seedling were recorded. For data analysis, the weights were log transformed before performing a one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer HSD (n = 8-10).
Statistical data analysis was performed as described for the individual experimental procedures. Analysis of variance was accomplished by the JMP program (Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) statistical software.
Arabidopsis growth in an aeroponic root culture system
Arabidopsis thaliana growth in aeroponic culture (this study) compared to axenic and hydroponic liquid cultures reported in previous studies
Fresh Weight (mg)
984 ± 61
92 ± 6
2,824 ± 180
203 ± 10
498 ± 57
32 ± 3
1,160 ± 69
121 ± 37
2,916 ± 164
211 ± 10
10,940 ± 499
1,195 ± 37
Larval feeding behavior on aeroponically grown Arabidopsis roots
Effects of Bradysia larval feeding on roots of aeroponically grown Arabidopsis plants
Bradysia larval feeding on seedlings grown in potting mix
Arabidopsis aeroponic root cultures provide conditions suitable for root herbivory
Investigating root herbivory has remained a challenge in the study of belowground plant-organism interactions because of limited access to root tissue for subsequent analyses. Several culture methods have been developed previously to make Arabidopsis roots more accessible for molecular and biochemical studies. These methods are primarily based on growing plants in liquid culture for optimal root biomass production, but they are not suitable for investigating root herbivory [22, 26]. We tested whether hydroponically grown roots removed from liquid culture could be used for Bradysia feeding experiments; however, larvae did not actively feed on these roots. Similarly, larvae did not feed on roots of plants grown in solid sterile media, but instead burrowed into the agar and suffocated. Arabidopsis hairy root cultures have been previously used to investigate root-aphid interactions and the emission of volatile organic compounds in response to aphid attack . However, in this study aphid feeding was confined to floating root tissue, which simulates the natural habitat of the herbivore only marginally and prevents analyzing responses of the whole plant.
To study herbivory on Arabidopsis roots, it was necessary to establish a culture system that could accommodate belowground herbivores while still providing easy access to the root tissue for further molecular or biochemical analysis. Initial attempts to grow Arabidopsis in sand and vermiculite resulted in poor plant growth in comparison to soilless potting mix. By contrast, optimal growth conditions were achieved by growing plants in nonsterile perlite or Seramis® clay granules. Seramis® substrate was preferred over perlite since roots could easily be removed from the clay granules by submersion in water without causing any substantial tissue damage.
Optimal survival of plants was achieved when plants were first grown on potting mix for approximately 4 weeks prior to their transfer to aeroponic culture tubes. Transfer of younger plants was avoided due to inconsistent growth performance under aeroponic conditions. Growing seedlings directly on Rockwool placed on top of the clay substrate is less suitable since plants are easily stressed by over- or under-watering. A similar problem has been encountered in establishing hydroponic cultures and is considered a major limitation in the success of germination and seedling survival in this system [22, 26]. Within two to three days after transplanting, plants adapt to the aeroponic conditions and grow as phenotypically healthy mature plants with no obvious signs of impaired root growth or damage after 4 weeks (Figure 3 and 6A-D). The culture requires eight weeks to progress from seed to mature plants, but beyond transferring the plants from soil to aeroponic substrate, only watering with Hoagland's solution is necessary. The harvest of roots from the aeroponic system is rapid, complete, and causes negligible damage to roots (Figure 5A and 6A-D) in contrast to removal of potting mix (Figure 1B-D and 9).
Aeroponically-grown plants produce a root mass comparable to that obtained in other previously reported Arabidopsis culture systems (Table 1). For example, plants grown for 24 days in axenic liquid culture supplemented with 1 to 3% sucrose yield approximately 1 g of root fresh weight , which is similar to that of roots grown in the aeroponic system (Table 1). When compared to Arabidopsis grown under hydroponic conditions, the average root-to-shoot ratio in aeroponic culture (0.45) is approximately twice the ratio observed for hydroponically-grown plants . Thirty percent of the total aeroponic plant biomass (dry weight) is comprised of root tissue while only 15 to 25% of total hydroponic plant biomass has been attributed to root tissue  (Table 1). The higher percentage of root mass under aeroponic conditions may be the result of increased aeration in the root environment [28, 29]. Moreover, enhanced root growth might be caused by the intermittent nutrient supply in aeroponic culture as opposed to continuous nutrient availability in hydroponic systems.
Taken together, the technique shown here represents a simple culture method, which can be established under ordinary growth conditions without the use of sophisticated hydroponic equipment such as bubble stones, air pumps or sprayers. In comparison to hydroponic cultivation, the culture system reflects more closely the conditions of the soil environment. Since clay granules such as Seramis® are used as a common plant medium in home gardens and interior landscapes http://www.seramis.de, aeroponic cultures similar to the one presented here can be established for a variety of different plants including those with a longer life span than Arabidopsis. Because of the loosely packed consistency of the clay substrate, it seems possible that root herbivores of larger size than Bradysia larvae can be accommodated in this substrate, which will allow testing this method for other root-herbivore systems.
Bradysia larval feeding significantly reduces root biomass of mature Arabidopsis plants and affects survival and growth of seedlings
Fungus gnats are common greenhouse pests and frequently infest Arabidopsis growth rooms. While feeding of Bradysia larvae on Arabidopsis seedlings has been previously reported , the extent of feeding damage on mature wild-type plants has not been investigated. When placed in aeroponic clay substrate deprived of other food sources, larvae quickly began to feed on root tissue. Within two to four days of feeding, larvae significantly reduced root mass by an average of 37%. Despite the considerable damage of tissue belowground, plants appeared to be less affected aboveground. However, Bradysia-damaged plants showed reduced shoot mass, which was due to the loss of water, suggesting that water absorption and most likely nutrient absorption were compromised by root herbivore damage.
In the presented experiments, approximately 200 to 300 larvae at the second and third instar were applied per plant. Considering that only 20 to 25 gnats released into an area with 15 pots containing Arabidopsis plants can yield 300 to 500 larvae per pot within 14 days , it was within reason that this density can occur under greenhouse conditions. The observed root damage in aeroponic culture may be magnified due to the absence of other food sources such as organic matter. Bradysia larvae primarily consumed root tips, root hairs, and young lateral roots (Figure 6E-H). Less feeding was observed on older roots, where larvae preferably removed the epidermis and cortex but none of the vascular tissue and only parts of the endodermis. This feeding preference may be caused in part by increased root secondary growth. An increase in cell wall lignification can affect root herbivore activity as shown for wireworm feeding on tobacco roots . Moreover, differences in formation and concentration of constitutive and induced secondary defense metabolites such as glucosinolates and terpenoids can contribute to the observed differential feeding behavior and overall root consumption (Vaughan, Tokuhisa, and Tholl, unpublished results). The role of direct defense metabolites was also demonstrated in spinach roots, where Bradysia larvae led to a dramatic up-regulation of defense compounds . A recent study investigating glucosinolate distributions in canola (Brassica napus) roots showed that the highest concentration of glucosinolates occurs in the outer layer of roots with secondary growth [31, 32]. To what extent Bradysia feeding is affected by the distribution of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis roots requires further investigation.
Depending on the developmental stage, Arabidopsis seedlings grown in potting mix were severely affected by Bradysia larval feeding. A moderate infestation  of ten larvae per plant reduced seedling survival by 50% or less depending on the plant age at the time the biotic stress was introduced. Surviving seedlings were much smaller and appeared to have reduced growth. This reduction in plant growth can be attributed to larval root consumption and limited uptake of nutrients but may also reflect fundamental changes in the physiological state of the plant due to trade-offs between resource allocation to defense and growth [33, 34] or changes in the potting mix due to frass deposition.
To our knowledge, a bioassay for studying belowground herbivory on intact Arabidopsis plants has not previously been reported. We propose that Arabidopsis grown in aeroponic culture and the generalist herbivore Bradysia (B. coprophila and B. impatiens) can be used as a novel system to investigate belowground plant defense responses to herbivore attack such as the release of secondary metabolites. The chemistry of plant defense against root herbivores is one of the most neglected aspects of root biology . Using this system, Arabidopsis mutants with altered profiles of secondary metabolites, such as glucosinolates  or terpenoids, can be applied to study the biological effect of individual defense compounds belowground. Finally, knowledge gained from these and various other mutants may provide closer insight into the still poorly understood molecular and physiological mechanisms of belowground and aboveground interactions .
We have established a method of growing Arabidopsis in a clay granulate culture system, which can be used to investigate root biology including belowground herbivory and allows for easy preparation of roots for chemical and molecular analyses upon insect feeding. We have shown that Bradysia larvae actively feed on mature Arabidopsis in aeroponic culture and cause severe root damage that affects both root biomass and water absorption. Furthermore, Arabidopsis seedlings challenged by Bradysia larvae under conventional cultivation show decreased survival and growth. This root-herbivore system can be used to study the biochemistry, molecular regulation, and function of root defense compounds in response to belowground herbivory.
Acknowledgements and Funding
We thank Ashley Spencer for maintaining plant cultures. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation AdvanceVT research seed grant and by the Thomas and Kate Jeffress Memorial Trust grants (J-850) (to DT) and (J-871) (to JGT).
- van Dam NM: Belowground herbivory and plant defenses. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009, 40: 373-391. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Der Putten WH: Plant defense belowground and spatiotemporal processes in natural vegetation. Ecology. 2003, 84: 2269-2280. 10.1890/02-0284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blossey B, Hunt-Joshi TR: Belowground herbivory by insects: Influence on plants and aboveground herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol. 2003, 48: 521-547. 10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Deyn GB, Van der Putten WH: Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005, 20: 625-633. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strauss SY, Agrawal AA: The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999, 14: 179-185. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01576-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kessler A, Baldwin IT: Plant responses to insect herbivory: The emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002, 53: 299-328. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arimura G, Kost C, Boland W: Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2005, 1734: 91-111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Unsicker SB, Kunert G, Gershenzon J: Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 12: 479-485. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu-Salzman K, Luthe DS, Felton GW: Arthropod-inducible proteins: Broad spectrum defenses against multiple herbivores. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 852-858. 10.1104/pp.107.112177.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pechan T, Cohen A, Williams WP, Luthe DS: Insect feeding mobilizes a unique plant defense protease that disrupts the peritrophic matrix of caterpillars. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 13319-13323. 10.1073/pnas.202224899.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Wilkerson CG, Kuchar JA, Phinney BS, Howe GA: Jasmonate-inducible plant enzymes degrade essential amino acids in the herbivore midgut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 19237-19242. 10.1073/pnas.0509026102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasmann S, Agrawal AA: In defense of roots: A research agenda for studying plant resistance to belowground herbivory. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 875-880. 10.1104/pp.107.112045.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birch ANE, Griffiths DW, Hopkins RJ, Smith WHM, McKinlay RG: Glucosinolate responses of swede, kale, forage and oilseed rape to root damage by turnip root fly (Delia floralis) larvae. J Sci Food Agric. 1992, 60: 1-9. 10.1002/jsfa.2740600102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Dam NM, Raaijmakers CE: Local and systemic induced responses to cabbage root fly larvae (Delia radicum) in Brassica nigra and B. oleracea. Chemoecology. 2006, 16: 17-24. 10.1007/s00049-005-0323-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmelz EA, Grebenok RJ, Ohnmeiss TE, Bowers WS: Interactions between Spinacia oleracea and Bradysia impatiens: A role for phytoecdysteroids. Arch Insect Biochem. 2002, 51: 204-221. 10.1002/arch.10062.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rasmann S, Köllner TG, Degenhardt J, Hiltpold I, Toepfer S, Kuhlmann U, Gershenzon J, Turlings TCJ: Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature. 2005, 434: 732-737. 10.1038/nature03451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunter MD: Out of sight, out of mind: the impacts of root-feeding insects in natural and managed systems. Agric For Entomol. 2001, 3: 3-9. 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2001.00083.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harris MA, Gardner WA, Oetting RD: A review of the scientific literature on fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) in the genus Bradysia. J Entomol Sci. 1996, 31: 252-276.Google Scholar
- McConn M, Creelman RA, Bell E, Mullet JE, Browse J: Jasmonate is essential for insect defense in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 5473-5477. 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5473.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jagdale GB, Casey ML, Canas L, Grewal PS: Effect of entomopathogenic nematode species, split application and potting medium on the control of the fungus gnat, Bradysia difformis (Diptera : Sciaridae), in the greenhouse at alternating cold and warm temperatures. Biol Control. 2007, 43: 23-30. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.03.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meers TL, Cloyd RA: Egg-laying preference of female fungus gnat Bradysia sp. nr. coprophila (Diptera : Sciaridae) on three different soilless substrates. J Econ Entomol. 2005, 98: 1937-1942. 10.1603/0022-0493-98.6.1937.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gibeaut DM, Hulett J, Cramer GR, Seemann JR: Maximal biomass of Arabidopsis thaliana using a simple, low-maintenance hydroponic method and favorable environmental conditions. Plant Physiol. 1997, 115: 317-319. 10.1104/pp.115.2.317.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris MA, Oetting RD, Gardner WA: Use of entomopathogenic nematodes and a new monitoring technique for control of fungus gnats, Bradysia coprophila (Diptera, Sciaridae), in floriculture. Biol Control. 1995, 5: 412-418. 10.1006/bcon.1995.1049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cloyd RA, Zaborski ER: Fungus gnats, Bradysia spp. (Diptera : Sciaridae), and other arthropods in commercial bagged soilless growing media and rooted plant plugs. J Econ Entomol. 2004, 97: 503-510. 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darrah PR, Jones DL, Kirk GJD, Roose T: Modelling the rhizosphere: a review of methods for 'upscaling' to the whole-plant scale. Eur J Soil Sci. 2006, 57: 13-25. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00786.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hetu MF, Tremblay LJ, Lefebvre DD: High root biomass production in anchored Arabidopsis plants grown in axenic sucrose supplemented liquid culture. Biotechniques. 2005, 39: 345-349. 10.2144/05393ST02.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steeghs M, Bais HP, de Gouw J, Goldan P, Kuster W, Northway M, Fall R, Vivanco JM: Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry as a new tool for real time analysis of root-secreted volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 47-58. 10.1104/pp.104.038703.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Padgett PE, Leonard RT: Contamination of ammonium-based nutrient solutions by nitrifying organisms and the conversion of ammonium to nitrate. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101: 141-146.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spek LY: Influence of nitrate and aeration on growth and chemical composition of Zea mays L. Plant Soil. 1981, 63: 115-118. 10.1007/BF02374266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson SN, Hallett PD, Gillespie TL, Halpin C: Below-ground herbivory and root toughness: a potential model system using lignin-modified tobacco. Physiol Entomol. 2010, 35: 186-191. 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00723.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Dam NM, Tytgat TOG, Kirkegaard JA: Root and shoot glucosinolates: a comparison of their diversity, function and interactions in natural and managed ecosystems. Phytochem Rev. 2009, 8: 171-186. 10.1007/s11101-008-9101-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCully ME, Miller C, Sprague SJ, Huang CX, Kirkegaard JA: Distribution of glucosinolates and sulphur-rich cells in roots of field-grown canola (Brassica napus). New Phytol. 2008, 180: 193-205. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02520.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Gase K, Baldwin IT: Constitutive and inducible trypsin proteinase inhibitor production incurs large fitness costs in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 1607-1612. 10.1073/pnas.0305096101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ: Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution. 1999, 53: 1093-1104. 10.2307/2640814.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gigolashvili T, Berger B, Mock HP, Müller C, Weisshaar B, Fluegge UI: The transcription factor HIG1/MYB51 regulates indolic glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2007, 50: 886-901. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03099.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Dam NM, Heil M: Multitrophic interactions below and above ground: en route to the next level. J Ecol. 2011, 99: 77-88. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01761.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.