Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Reference gene identification for reliable normalisation of quantitative RT-PCR data in Setaria viridis

  • Duc Quan Nguyen1,
  • Andrew L. Eamens1 and
  • Christopher P. L. Grof1Email author
Contributed equally
Plant Methods201814:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0293-8

Received: 25 October 2017

Accepted: 15 March 2018

Published: 21 March 2018

Abstract

Background

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the key platform for the quantitative analysis of gene expression in a wide range of experimental systems and conditions. However, the accuracy and reproducibility of gene expression quantification via RT-qPCR is entirely dependent on the identification of reliable reference genes for data normalisation. Green foxtail (Setaria viridis) has recently been proposed as a potential experimental model for the study of C4 photosynthesis and is closely related to many economically important crop species of the Panicoideae subfamily of grasses, including Zea mays (maize), Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) and Sacchurum officinarum (sugarcane). Setaria viridis (Accession 10) possesses a number of key traits as an experimental model, namely; (i) a small sized, sequenced and well annotated genome; (ii) short stature and generation time; (iii) prolific seed production, and; (iv) is amendable to Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. There is currently however, a lack of reference gene expression information for Setaria viridis (S. viridis). We therefore aimed to identify a cohort of suitable S. viridis reference genes for accurate and reliable normalisation of S. viridis RT-qPCR expression data.

Results

Eleven putative candidate reference genes were identified and examined across thirteen different S. viridis tissues. Of these, the geNorm and NormFinder analysis software identified SERINE/THERONINE-PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A (PP2A), 5′-ADENYLYLSULFATE REDUCTASE 6 (ASPR6) and DUAL SPECIFICITY PHOSPHATASE (DUSP) as the most suitable combination of reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of S. viridis RT-qPCR expression data. To demonstrate the suitability of the three selected reference genes, PP2A, ASPR6 and DUSP, were used to normalise the expression of CINNAMYL ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE (CAD) genes across the same tissues.

Conclusions

This approach readily demonstrated the suitably of the three selected reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of S. viridis RT-qPCR expression data. Further, the work reported here forms a highly useful platform for future gene expression quantification in S. viridis and can also be potentially directly translatable to other closely related and agronomically important C4 crop species.

Keywords

Setaria viridis C4 cropQuantitative RT-PCR normalisationReference genesGene expression

Background

C4 plants include some of the most productive species in the world due to their unique leaf anatomy that supports efficient fixation of CO2 into biomass and their adaptation to high temperature and intense light [1]. Recently, Setaria viridis (S. viridis), a C4 monocot grass, has emerged as a promising experimental model to study the photosynthesis and cell wall biology pathways unique to C4 plants. Setaria viridis (green foxtail) is the wild ancestor of the minor crop foxtail millet (S. italica) and has close evolutionary links to several major C4 crop species, including Zea mays (maize), Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) and Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane), as well as the bioenergy grasses Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) and Miscanthus × giganteus (the perennial hybrid of Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus sacchariflorus), all of which belong to the Panicoideae subfamily of Poaceae grasses [2]. Setaria viridis has been identified as a model species as it possesses many desirable traits, including; (i) a small sized (~ 500 Mb), sequenced and well annotated genome; (ii) short stature (20–30 cm in height) and rapid life cycle (6–9 weeks); (iii) prolific seed production (13,000 seeds/plant), and; (iv) is amendable to Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation [3]. Use of S. viridis as an experimental model is further supported by the rapidly expanding availability of genetic tools and online genomic information [46].

Recent advances in the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) approach have revolutionised gene expression studies. The RT-qPCR approach provides greatly enhanced levels of sensitivity and accuracy for gene expression analysis compared to the more conventional methods, semi-quantitative RT-PCR and northern blot hybridisation [7]. The RT-qPCR approach is reliant upon the exponential incorporation of fluorescent dyes into amplified products [8], and has become the method of choice to validate RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data, or to quantify the abundance of a select group of target genes stemming from a large population of expressed transcripts [9, 10]. The accuracy and reliability of gene expression data derived from RT-qPCR experiments is not only influenced by the quality and quantity of the RNA used as template for complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, but is highly dependent on normalisation to one or more stably expressed reference genes. To date, the lack of a stably expressed reference gene(s) for the accurate normalisation of S. viridis RT-qPCR data has been a major hurdle for gene expression studies in this species.

The selection of a subset of reference genes for normalisation of target gene expression is based on the identification of gene transcripts that are constantly expressed at a high level throughout plant development, or in a specific tissue or organ under analysis [11, 12]. Traditionally, housekeeper genes are preferred for RT-qPCR data normalisation as the protein products encoded by these genes are required for maintenance of fundamental cellular metabolism. Further, due to their assigned function, the expression of a housekeeper gene is assumed constant irrespective of the organ or tissue type under analysis, or the developmental stage or physiological condition(s) of the assessed species [13, 14]. Several housekeeper genes have been widely used in Arabidopsis thaliana (CYCLOPHILIN (CYC), ACTIN2 (ACT2) and ELONGATION FACTOR 1α (EF1α; [15, 16])), rice (ACTIN1 (ACT1) and UBIQUITIN5 (UBI5; [7, 11])), and sorghum (SERINE/THERONINE-PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A (PP2A) and EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR 4α (EIF4α; [14])). However, a growing body of research has shown that housekeeper genes cannot be utilised universally across different plant species, experimental conditions, or even across different developmental stages within a single species [9, 11, 14]. Further, normalisation of RT-qPCR data using just a single housekeeper gene is no longer recommended [17, 18], as such an approach could result in a biased or incorrect interpretation of the expression of the studied gene(s). Therefore, identification of a group of reference genes, which are constitutively and stably expressed across different tissues, organs, developmental stages and experiment conditions, is the first critical step for the completion of accurate and unbiased (reliable) quantification of gene expression by RT-qPCR [19]. For this reason, many statistical tools (for example; NormFinder, geNorm, BestKeeper), which are publically available online, have been developed to identify cohorts of suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalisation.

Here, in order to advance the current quantification of gene expression in S. viridis, we assessed the performance of eleven candidate reference genes across thirteen different tissues to identify a suitable cohort of stably expressed reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of S. viridis RT-qPCR expression data. The eleven normalisation candidates assessed were identified from two RNA-Seq datasets, namely an elongating internode dataset [4] and an expanding leaf dataset [5], in combination with those reported previously for RT-qPCR analyses in other C4 species [9, 14]. NormFinder and geNorm analyses of candidate reference gene performance identified three candidates, SERINE/THERONINE-PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A (PP2A), 5′-ADENYLYLSULFATE REDUCTASE 6 (ASPR6) and DUAL SPECIFICITY PHOSPHATASE (DUSP), as the most suitable combination of reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of target gene expression across S. viridis tissues. We next used the identified reference gene combination to normalise the expression of seven S. viridis CINNAMYL ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE (CAD) genes. Normalisation of CAD gene expression with PP2A, ASPR6 and DUSP readily demonstrated the suitably of the three selected reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of S. viridis RT-qPCR data across architecturally and developmentally distinct tissues. Together, the data reported in this study forms a highly useful platform for the future quantification of gene expression in S. viridis.

Methods

Plant material

Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. (Accession A10) was used for all reported experimental work. Setaria viridis seeds were sown under a thin layer of a soil mixture composed of coarse sand, coco peat, and perlite at a ratio of 2:1:1. Post seed germination, S. viridis plants were cultivated under a controlled growth regime of 16 h light (~ 600 μmol m−2 s−1) and 8 h dark with a day/night temperature of 28 °C/20 °C. Plant material was harvested at different stages of development. Internode and leaf material was harvested at the 50% ear emergence stage, 20–25 days after germination (DAG), immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C until required for processing. Of the plant material sampled for processing; (i) whole internode 4, and leaf 4, represented fully elongated mature tissues; (ii) whole internode 5, and leaf 5, represented elongating tissues, and; (iii) whole internode 6, and leaf 6, were sampled to represent immature tissues. Additional representatives of the internode 5 were also sampled and subsequently divided into four developmentally distinct zones upon collection, including the; (i) meristematic (MS); (ii) cell expansion (CEZ); (iii) transitional (TZ), and (iv) mature (MatZ) zones. Whole inflorescence stems were also sampled at the 50% ear emergence stage (S1; 20–25 DAG), the flowering stage (S2; 27–32 DAG; once pollen sacs had appeared on spikelets), and the milky dough stage (S3; 40–45 DAG; at the start of grain fill). The three stages harvested represent immature, elongating and fully elongated mature inflorescence tissues, respectively. In total, four biological replicates were collected and each biological replicate contained tissue sampled from five individual plants (see Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Total RNA extraction and complementary DNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, USA). Any contaminating genomic DNA was subsequently removed using an Ambion™ TURBO™ DNase kit (Life Technologies, USA). Post DNase treatment, total RNA was column purified using a RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA). The concentration and purity of extracted total RNA was next assessed with a NanoDrop™ 1000 Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) and only samples with an A260/A280 absorbance ratio in the range of 1.9–2.1 were subsequently used for the synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA). One microgram (1.0 μg) of DNase-treated and column purified total RNA was used as template for first strand cDNA synthesis with Superscript® III Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) and oligo dT23 primer. The resulting cDNA was immediately diluted 1:50 in RNase-free dH2O and this working stock was stored at − 20 °C until required as template for all PCR-based analyses, including; standard RT-PCR and RT-qPCR analysis.

Selection of candidate reference genes and the design of RT-qPCR primers

Eleven candidate reference genes were selected for evaluation to determine their suitability for use to normalise gene expression data stemming from S. viridis RT-qPCR analyses. Seven candidate reference genes (ASPR6, SEIPIN, STK, DUSP, FBoxD, WNK1 and GRAS) were selected based on the bioinformatic analysis of two RNA-Seq datasets from S. viridis tissues by screening for genes with relatively stable expression (based on reported RPKM and fold change values). The first dataset interrogated, represented four developmentally distinct zones of an elongating internode, internode 5, and included the; MS, CEZ, TZ and MatZ zones [4]. The second dataset analysed, was derived from leaf 3 sampled from a 10 day old plant [5]. The remaining four candidate reference genes selected for detailed assessment in this study, namely CUL, FPGS, PGM and PP2A, were included based on their expression profiles reported in previous RT-qPCR studies performed in S. viridis [9] and sorghum [14].

The primers for the eleven candidate reference genes were designed using the Primer3 ver4.0 (RRID: nlx_156833) and NCBI Primer-BLAST (RRID: SCR_003095) web-based tools with the following parameters; (1) a GC content of 50–60%; (2) an amplicon size of 60–120 base pairs (bp), and; (3) a melting temperature (Tm) of 60 ± 1 °C. Primer details are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1. For assessment of primer performance (R2) and the efficiency of amplification (E), analysis of standard curves was conducted to determine the performance of each pair of primers.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis

All RT-qPCRs were carried out on a Rotor-Gene Q machine (Qiagen, USA) using the GoTaq® qPCR Master mix (Promega, USA). Each 10 μL reaction contained; 5.0 μL of 2X GoTaq® qPCR Master mix; 1.0 μL of each primer (10 μM), 1.0 μL of diluted (1:50) cDNA template (~ 15 ng/μL), and 2.0 μL of RNase-free dH2O. The cycle program for product amplification was; 1 cycle of 95 °C for 10 min (hot-start activation), followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s (denaturation), and 60 °C for 40 s (annealing/extension). The melt curve was generated for each primer pair across the temperature range of 72–95 °C, and with a temperature increment of 1.0 °C each 5-s period. Each primer pair was assessed using four biological replicates and three technical replicates were performed per biological replicate.

Data analysis and assessment of candidate reference gene performance

The expression stability of each assessed candidate reference gene was evaluated using two different algorithms, namely; (1) NormFinder (RRID: SCR_003387; [20], and; (2) geNorm (RRID: nlx_156922; [21], and with the use of 52 samples (that is; thirteen different tissue types and 4 biological replicates sampled per tissue type). The raw quantification cycle (Cq) values from this RT-qPCR analysis were converted to relative quantities by using the formula, Q = EΔCq, where E is the efficiency of amplification, and ΔCq is the difference in quantification cycle of the most lowly expressed target gene and the Cq value of all samples analysed in the dataset. Candidate reference genes for S. viridis RT-qPCR data normalisation were selected based on their NormFinder and geNorm ranked stability values (M). The candidate reference gene returning the lowest M value was identified as the most stably expressed whereas the reference gene returning the highest M value was considered to be the least stably expressed. GeNorm was also used to determine the optimal number of candidate reference genes via pairwise variation (Vn/Vn + 1) analysis with the proposed threshold value of 0.15 used as outlined by Vandesompele et al. [21].

Results and discussion

Identification of candidate reference genes

Quantitative RT-PCR has become the most accurate, and therefore most frequently used technique for the quantification of transcript abundance in many plant species due to the rapid, high throughput, sensitive and accurate nature of this approach [22]. The success of gene expression quantification via the RT-qPCR approach is however, entirely dependant upon the identification and use of a group of suitable reference genes for expression normalisation due to; (1) there not being any ‘universal’ reference gene(s) available for use across a wide range of phenotypically distinct plant species or experimental conditions in a single species [23, 24], and; (2) the use of only a single reference gene could lead to an incorrect functional interpretation of the expression profile of a gene [18, 21]. Fang et al. [18] specify that an appropriate reference gene is an endogenous gene that exhibits relatively stable expression across a group of biological samples, including different cell or tissue types, different stages of development, or a range of experimental conditions.

Setaria viridis is an ideal genetic model to study C4 photosynthesis and cell wall biology [2, 3]. Several studies have attempted to validate the use of a number of ‘traditional’ housekeeper genes, including UBIQUITIN, ACTIN, TUBULIN, GLYCERALDEHYDE 3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE and the ribosomal RNA, 18S-RNA, to normalise gene expression data in Setaria tissues. However, the majority of these ‘traditional’ housekeeper genes returned poor expression stability under differing experimental conditions or across the samples tested, including seedlings, whole-stem, whole-leaf and a leaf developmental gradient [9, 22, 25]. Here, we assessed the suitability of eleven candidate reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of gene expression quantification across thirteen developmentally distinct tissues of S. viridis, including internodes 4, 5 and 6, leaves 4, 5 and 6, inflorescence stems S1, S2 and S3, and the four developmental zones of the expanding internode, internode 5. Detailed expression information about the selected candidate reference genes is provided in Additional file 3: Table S2. Three candidate reference genes were selected from our existing RNA-Seq dataset that was generated from the four developmentally distinct zones of internode 5, an elongating internode [4]. The genes selected from this dataset included, 5′-ADENYLYLSULFATE REDUCTASE6 (ASPR6; Sevir.3G358100), SERINE-THREONINE PROTEIN KINASE (STK; Sevir.1G021400) and ADIPOSE-REGULATORY PROTEIN (SEIPIN)-RELATED (SEIPIN; Sevir.2G298500). Four additional candidate reference genes were next selected from a second S. viridis derived RNA-Seq dataset generated from an expanding leaf, leaf 3 [5], and included DUAL SPECIFICITY PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE (DUSP; Sevir.4G179200), SERINE-THREONINE KINASE WNK1-RELATED (WNK1; Sevir.2G373600), and one member each from the GRAS DOMAIN (GRAS; Sevir.1G267700) and F-BOX DOMAIN (FBoxD; Sevir8G147200) gene families. A further four candidate reference genes previously reported as appropriate candidates for S. viridis [9] or sorghum [14] gene expression normalisation were also included in this analysis, including PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE2A (PP2A; Sevir.9G262700), PHOSPHOGLUCOMUTASE (PGM; Sevir.9G117100), CULLIN (CUL; Sevir.3G038900) and FOLYPOLYGLUTAMATE SYNTHASE (FPGS; Sevir.9G574400).

Assessment of the specificity and efficacy of selected candidate reference genes

Each pair of primers used for candidate reference gene analysis were designed via a combinatorial approach using the Primer3 ver4.0 (RID: nlx_156833) and NCBI Primer-BLAST (RRID: SCR_003095) online tools (see Additional file 2: Table S1). Following primer design, primer pairs of 11 candidate reference genes were tested using a standard RT-PCR approach and the construction of melt curves. For each primer pair, a single amplicon of the expected size was returned via RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 1a) of the cDNA template prepared from total RNA extracted from internode 5 as well as single melting curve peaks via RT-qPCR analysis across 52 tissue samples (Fig. 1b). The amplified products were next column purified and cloned into the pGEM®-T Easy cloning vector (Promega) in preparation for sequencing. Sequencing revealed that the desired region of each target transcript had been successfully amplified by RT-PCR with all eleven sequences returning 100% homology to the region targeted for amplification for each assessed candidate reference gene (see Additional file 4). The amplification efficiency (E), and the correlation coefficient value (R2), was also calculated from each standard curve, with E values ranging from 0.91 for ASPR6, to 1.09 for CUL, and R2 values ranging from 0.943 for FBoxD to 0.997 for PP2A, indicated that each primer pair was highly efficient and specific to the targeted region.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Specificity of each S. viridis candidate reference gene primer pair. a Agarose gel analysis of RT-PCR generated amplicons for each of the eleven assessed candidate reference genes. M, marker (200 base pair gene ruler); 1, PP2A; 2, ASPR6; 3, PGM; 4, STK; 5, SEIPIN; 6, DUSP; 7, WNK1; 8, GRAS; 9, FBoxD; 10, CUL, and; 11, FPGS. b Melt curve analysis of the eleven candidate reference genes assessed across thirteen developmentally distinct tissues of S. viridis tested (including, internodes 4, 5 and 6; leaves 4, 5 and 6; inflorescence stem stages S1, S2 and S3, and; the four developmental zones of the expanding internode, internode 5) showed a single peak for each primer pair at a specific annealing temperature. The -(dF/dT) value represents the raw fluorescence (F) versus temperature (T) values

Expression profiling of candidate reference genes

The box plot presented in Fig. 2 provides an overview of the expression level of the eleven candidate reference genes analysed. The RT-qPCR-derived quantification (Cq) values for these eleven candidates across all thirteen tissues assessed, was used for the generation of the data presented in Fig. 2. The mean Cq values varied from 19.2 for PGM, to 31.3 for SEIPIN, with a lower Cq value indicating a more abundant target transcript. The majority of the candidate reference genes analysed (10 out of 11), were determined to have an average Cq value that fell within the range of 21.9–25.3 cycles. Of these, ASPR6 (Cq: 24.3) and DUSP (Cq: 23.9), returned the most compact Cq value distribution (i.e., exhibiting the least Cq value variance). This result strongly indicated that the expression of ASPR6 and DUSP was the most stable of those assessed across the thirteen tissues sampled for analysis.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Reference gene quantification cycle (Cq) distributions. Considerable variability in Cq value was observed for the eleven candidate reference genes assessed across the internode, leaf and inflorescence tissue samples. The whisker caps show the distribution of the highest and lowest Cq values. The boxes indicate the first and third quartile, while the middle line marks the median. The majority of the assessed candidate reference genes returned an average Cq value ranging between 21.9 and 25.3 cycles

Expression stability of candidate reference genes

To identify the most suitable reference genes, reference genes that exhibit stable expression across all assessed samples and/or experimental conditions, we next applied two frequently used statistical algorithms, NormFinder [20] and geNorm [21]. A stability value (M) was calculated and used to determine the optimal number of reference genes required for the accurate and reliable normalisation of RT-qPCR data across the different S. viridis tissues analysed. NormFinder is a Visual Basic tool that relies on a mathematical modelling approach to calculate the variation in gene expression between inter- (different tissues and developmental regions) and intra-related (biological replicates) groups, to rank the assessed candidates in order from least, to most stably expressed [22]. Specifically, an expressed gene that returns a low M value is classed as stably expressed, whereas a gene with a high M value is considered to have variable expression and therefore represents an unsuitable option for use as a reference gene to normalise RT-qPCR expression data [21]. NormFinder ranked PP2A (M value = 0.28), ASPR6 (M = 0.35) and DUSP (M = 0.41), as the most stably expressed of the eleven assessed candidates, and therefore; the most suitable candidates for normalisation of S. viridis gene expression data (Fig. 3a). In previous studies, PP2A has also been identified as an ideal reference gene to normalise RT-qPCR data stemming from sorghum and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) studies [14, 19]. Importantly, these previous studies assessed PP2A performance across various tissues (seedlings, leaves and roots), or under different conditions of abiotic stress (salt, cold, heat and drought) [14, 19]. PP2A has also been used previously to normalise gene expression data in both tobacco and Arabidopsis thaliana leaf samples, post viral infection [16, 23]. Following PP2A, DUSP and ASPR6, NormFinder ranked GRAS (M value = 0.44) as the next most suitable candidate to be used as a reference gene in S. viridis RT-qPCR analyses. In contrast, the remaining seven candidates returned M values ranging from 0.48 to 0.78, a result that indicates excessive variability in transcript abundance across the thirteen assessed tissues. These candidates were therefore considered unsuitable for use as normalisation controls in S. viridis RT-qPCR-based expression analyses.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Average expression stability (M), ranking and pairwise variation (V n /V(n+1)) of the eleven reference gene candidates as calculated by NormFinder (a) and geNorm (b, c). A reduced value for ‘average expression stability’ indicates that the candidate reference gene is more stably expressed across the assessed tissues. Both the Normfinder (a) and the geNorm (b) approach ranked PP2A, ASPR6 and DUSP as the most stably expressed of the eleven candidates analysed. c Pairwise variation (V n /V(n+1)) analysis by geNorm determines the optimal number of reference gene candidates required for the accurate and reliable normalisation of RT-qPCR generated data. The use of three reference genes to accurately and reliably normalise RT-qPCR generated data across S. viridis tissues was decided upon due to the V3/4 value being lower than the proposed threshold value of 0.15 [21]

Unlike the mathematical modelling approach used by NormFinder, geNorm evaluates reference gene suitability based on the stepwise exclusion of the least stable reference gene [21]. Although geNorm (Fig. 3b) utilises a different approach to that used by NormFinder (Fig. 3a), geNorm again identified DUSP and ASPR6 as the most stably expressed of the eleven candidates assessed with both DUSP and ASPR6 returning a M value score of 0.46. Further confidence in the NormFinder analysis was provided when the geNorm approach next ranked PP2A, with an M value of 0.61, as the third most suitable candidate. Therefore, both approaches identified the same three candidates as the most stably expressed, and thus, most suitable for use as reference genes to normalise S. viridis RT-qPCR data (Fig. 3). Similarly, and although not ranked in exactly the same order, FBoxD, SEIPIN and PGM, returned the highest M scores via geNorm analysis to indicate that these three candidates have variable expression across the assessed tissues and therefore, are not suitable for use as reference genes for S. viridis RT-qPCR data normalisation. Previous studies in Setaria and sorghum have demonstrated the requirement to use more than a single reference gene for the accurate and reliable normalisation of RT-qPCR data [9, 14, 22, 25]. GeNorm provides pairwise comparison (V n /Vn+1) analysis of candidate reference genes for determination of the optimal number of reference genes required to ensure accurate and reliable RT-qPCR expression data normalisation [20]. The geNorm approach recommends that the threshold value is set to 0.15, below which the inclusion of an additional reference gene does not provide any further benefit to the analysis being performed [11, 20, 21]. Pairwise comparison analysis returned a V2/3 value of 0.194, above the recommended 0.15 threshold, to indicate that for S. viridis analyses, the use of two reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalisation would not be sufficient. Figure 3c further shows that a value of 0.138 was returned for the V3/4 pairwise comparison. Considering that the V2/3 value was above the threshold, and that the V3/4 value fell below the 0.15 threshold, the pairwise comparison analysis indicated that the optimal number of reference genes for accurate and reliable RT-qPCR data normalisation is three. The pairwise comparison analysis also clearly showed that the V value was significantly reduced via increasing the number of reference genes included in the analysis, for example; the use of six reference genes returned a V8/9 value of 0.093. However, the use of three reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalisation was considered the most practical choice. Taken together, the NormFinder and geNorm analyses clearly identified PP2A, ASPR6 and DUSP as the best reference gene combination to ensure the accurate and reliable normalisation of RT-qPCR data generated from S. viridis tissues.

Validation of selected candidate reference genes

To validate the suitability of the three selected reference genes (ASPR6, DUSP and PP2A), and to demonstrate that FBoxD, PGM and SEIPIN (the three least suitably ranked candidates following NormFinder and geNorm analysis) are indeed the least suitable for RT-qPCR data normalisation, these two sets of putative candidate reference genes were used to generate an expression profile for two members of the S. viridis CINNAMYL ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE (CAD) gene family, namely SvCAD2 (Sevir.1G056800) and SvCAD8 (Sevir.2G207500), across whole internode samples (internode 4, 5 and 6), the whole leaf samples (leaf 4, 5 and 6), and the whole inflorescence stem samples (stages S1, S2 and S3). In addition, SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 expression was also quantified across the four developmentally distinct regions of elongating internode 5 using these two sets of candidate reference genes. In the lignin biosynthesis pathway, CAD proteins are one of the eleven key enzymes that function as dimeric alcohol dehydrogenases to catalyse the reduction of the cinnamylaldehydes, coumaraldehyde, synapaldehyde and coniferaldehyde, to produce the lignin precursors, coumaryl alcohol, synapyl alcohol and coniferyl alcohol, respectively [26]. When applying the three best reference gene candidates (ASPR6, DUSP and PP2A) for expression normalisation, RT-qPCR revealed that SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 transcript abundance increased sharply in internode 5 (an elongating internode) and internode 4 (a mature internode) as well as in inflorescence S2 (an expanding inflorescence) and inflorescence S3 (a mature inflorescence; Fig. 4). A similar expression profile for SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 was also observed across the four developmentally distinct zones of internode 5, that is: SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 transcript abundance slowly increased from the MS to the CEZ zone (zones composed of immature and elongating tissues) before sharply increasing in the TZ zone (elongating and mature tissues) and peaking in the MatZ zone (mature tissues). Further, the SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 expression profiles across the four developmental zones of internode 5 generated here via RT-qPCR, correlated strongly with those obtained in our previous RNA-Seq dataset (see Additional file 5: Figure S2), a dataset profiling gene expression across the same four zones of elongating internode 5 [4]. Interestingly, when the ASPR6, DUSP and PP2A reference gene combination was used to normalise SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 expression across leaves 4, 5 and 6, an opposing expression profile was observed. More specifically, RT-qPCR revealed SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 to be expressed at a low level in leaf 4, a mature leaf, more abundantly expressed in elongating leaf 5, and highly expressed in leaf 6, a young and developing leaf. RT-qPCR also revealed a clear difference in transcript abundance of SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 amongst the internode, leaf and inflorescence stem samples. Namely, the SvCAD2 transcript was highly abundant in the internode and inflorescence samples compared to the leaf samples, whereas SvCAD8 was predominantly expressed in the three leaf samples. Abundant expression of the SvCAD2 transcript in the internode samples was not surprising, as Saballos et al. [27] have previously demonstrated that the orthologous protein in sorghum, SbCAD2, primarily functions to direct lignification of stem tissues during flowering. Our expression data for SvCAD2 infers a similar, stem-specific function in the lignin biosynthesis pathway for CAD2 in the S. viridis inflorescence.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Profiling of SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 expression across thirteen developmentally distinct Setaria viridis tissues using the most suitable and least suitable sets of reference gene candidates. Normalised SvCAD2 (a) and SvCAD8 (b) expression using the most suitable set of reference genes (ASPR6 + DUSP + PP2A) and the three least suitable reference genes individually (FBoxD, PGM and SEIPIN), and in combination with one another (FBoxD + PGM + SEIPIN). MS meristematic, CEZ cell expansion, TZ transitional, MatZ mature zones, 4–6IN internode 4–6, 4–6LE leaf 4–6, IFS1–3 inflorescence stem stage 1–3

The candidate reference genes, FBoxD, PGM and SEIPIN, ranked by NormFinder and geNorm as the least stably expressed and therefore, the least suitable for use as reference genes for RT-qPCR normalisation were also included in this analysis. Interestingly, when these three unsuitable reference gene candidates were used to normalise RT-qPCR data to profile SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 expression, the expression of these two CADs was determined to be highly variable across the assessed tissues. Furthermore, when FBoxD, PGM and SEIPIN were used to normalise SvCAD2 and SvCAD8 expression, the expression of these two CADs was repeatedly underestimated, or even obscured, in each of the analysed tissues. Similar results were obtained when the expression of the other four members of S. viridis CAD gene family, SvCAD3, SvCAD5, SvCAD6 and SvCAD7, were also normalised with the three reference genes determined least suitable (see Additional file 6: Figure S3). Taken together, the RT-qPCR profiling of CAD gene expression strongly supported the NormFinder and geNorm analyses identifying ASPR6, DUSP and PP2A as the most appropriate set of reference genes for the accurate and reliable gene expression normalisation in future S. viridis RT-qPCR-based studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides a list of novel reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of gene expression data generated by RT-qPCR analyses of the model C4 plant, Setaria viridis. Here we identified ASPR6, DUSP and PP2A as the most stably expressed, and therefore most suitable set of reference genes for the normalisation of RT-qPCR generated gene expression data across S. viridis tissues. Furthermore, we demonstrated the combined performance of the three selected reference genes for the accurate and reliable normalisation of CAD gene expression across developmentally distinct S. viridis tissues. It would however behove researchers to experimentally validate the stability of the reference genes identified in this investigation for their own experimental treatments and purposes. The plant material and organs sampled in this study were taken within a restricted period of the day when the plants were actively photosynthesising. Therefore, the suitability of the three reference genes identified here as ideal candidates for RT-qPCR data normalisation, would require empirical validation prior to use as reference genes for an investigation of circadian rhythms for example. The findings presented in this study form a highly useful platform for future profiling of the expression of genes of interest in the S. viridis, findings that can also be potentially directly transferred to other closely related and agronomically important C4 crop species.

Notes

Abbreviations

ASPR6: 

adenylylsulfate reductase 6

CAD: 

cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase

CEZ: 

cell expansion zone

CUL: 

cullin

DUSP: 

dual specificity protein phosphatase

FBoxD: 

F-box domain

FPGS: 

folylpolyglutamate synthase

GRAS: 

GRAS domain family

MS: 

meristematic zone; MatZ: mature zone

PGM: 

phosphoglucomutase

PP2A: 

serine/theronine-protein phosphatase 2A

SEIPIN: 

adipose-regulatory protein (SEIPIN)-related

STK: 

serine–threonine protein kinase

TZ: 

transitional zone

WNK1: 

serine/theronine-protein kinase WNK1-related

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ALE and CPLG proposed the study. DQN collected samples, performed the RT-qPCR experimental analyses, produced the Graphs and Figures for the manuscript, and also drafted the manuscript. DQN, ALE and CPLG analysed all described RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR data. ALE and CPLG revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Anthony Studer (University of Illinois, Illinois, USA) and Prof. Thomas Brutnell (Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, USA) for providing the transcriptome data from S. viridis leaf sections prior to the publication of this important dataset. The authors would also like to thank fellow members of the Centre for Plant Science, Christopher Brown, Kate Hutcheon and Thu Suong Nguyen, for guidance on the analysis of RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR data, and for their numerous helpful discussions regarding RT-qPCR experiments.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials supporting the conclusions of this study are included within the article.

Consent for publication

All authors have consented to this publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Plant Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia

References

  1. Osborne CP, Beerling DJ. Nature’s green revolution: the remarkable evolutionary rise of C4 plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:173–94. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brutnell TP, Wang L, Swartwood K, Goldschmidt A, Jackson D, Zhu XG, et al. Setaria viridis: a model for C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2010;22:2537–44. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.075309.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Li P, Brutnell TP. Setaria viridis and Setaria italica, model genetic systems for the Panicoid grasses. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:3031–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Martin AP, Palmer WM, Brown C, Abel C, Lunn JE, Furbank RT, et al. A developing Setaria viridis internode: an experimental system for the study of biomass generation in a C4 model species. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0457-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Studer AJ, Schnable JC, Weissmann S, Kolbe AR, McKain MR, Shao Y, et al. The draft genome of the C3 panicoid grass species Dichanthelium oligosanthes. Genome Biol. 2016;17:223–41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1080-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennetzen JL, Schmutz J, Wang H, Percifield R, Hawkins J, Pontaroli AC, et al. Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:555–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bevitori R, Oliveira MB, Grossi-de-Sá MF, Lanna AC, da Silveira RD, Petrofeza S. Selection of optimized candidate reference genes for qRT-PCR normalization in rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Magnaporthe oryzae infection and drought. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:9795–805. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.november.27.7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Guenin S, Mauriat M, Pelloux J, Van Wuytswinkel O, Bellini C, Gutierrez L. Normalization of qRT-PCR data: the necessity of adopting a systematic, experimental conditions-specific, validation of references. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:487–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lambret-Frotte J, de Almeida LC, de Moura SM, Souza FL, Linhares FS, Alves-Ferreira M. Validating internal control genes for the accurate normalization of qPCR expression analysis of the novel model plant Setaria viridis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 − ΔΔCt method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;345:646–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li W, Qian Y-Q, Han L, Liu J-X, Sun Z-Y. Identification of suitable reference genes in buffalo grass for accurate transcript normalization under various abiotic stress conditions. Gene. 2014;547:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin F, Jiang L, Liu Y, Lv Y, Dai H, Zhao H. Genome-wide identification of housekeeping genes in maize. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;86:543–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-014-0246-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Reddy S, Srinivas Reddy D, Sivasakthi K, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Vadez V, Sharma KK. Evaluation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)] reference genes in various tissues and under abiotic stress conditions for quantitative real-time PCR data normalization. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:529–43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00529.Google Scholar
  15. Hong SM, Bahn SC, Lyu A, Jung HS, Ahn JH. Identification and testing of superior reference genes for a starting pool of transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51:1694–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lilly ST, Drummond RS, Pearson MN, MacDiarmid RM. Identification and validation of reference genes for normalization of transcripts from virus-infected Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011;24:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-10-10-0236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Remans T, Smeets K, Opdenakker K, Mathijsen D, Vangronsveld J, Cuypers A. Normalisation of real-time RT-PCR gene expression measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to increased metal concentrations. Planta. 2008;227:1343–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0706-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang P, Lu R, Sun F, Lan Y, Shen W, Du L, et al. Assessment of reference gene stability in rice stripe virus and rice black streaked dwarf virus infection rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Virol J. 2015;12:175–86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0405-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Saha P, Blumwald E. Assessing reference genes for accurate transcript normalization using quantitative real-time PCR in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br]. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106308.Google Scholar
  20. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5245–50. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar K, Muthamilarasan M, Prasad M. Reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in the model plant foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) subjected to abiotic stress conditions. J Plant Bioechnol. 2013;115:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0335-x.Google Scholar
  23. Liu D, Shi L, Han C, Yu J, Li D, Zhang Y. Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in virus-infected Nicotiana benthamiana using quantitative real-time PCR. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046451.Google Scholar
  24. Wang C, Cui HM, Huang TH, Liu TK, Hou XL, Li Y. Identification and validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in non-heading chinese cabbage flowers. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00811.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Martins PK, Mafra V, de Souza WR, Ribeiro AP, Vinecky F, Basso MF, et al. Selection of reliable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis during developmental stages and abiotic stress in Setaria viridis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28348.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Saathoff A, Tobias C, Sattler S, Haas E, Twigg P, Sarath G. Switchgrass contains two cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenases involved in lignin formation. BioEnergy Res. 2011;4:120–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9106-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Saballos A, Ejeta G, Sanchez E, Kang C, Vermerris W. A genomewide analysis of the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase family in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] identifies SbCAD2 as the brown midrib6 gene. Genetics. 2009;181:783–95. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.098996.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement