Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology
  • Open Access

Barley callus: a model system for bioengineering of starch in cereals

  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Plant Methods20128:36

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-8-36

©  Carciofi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

  • Received: 12 July 2012
  • Accepted: 4 September 2012
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Starch is the most important source of calories for human nutrition and the majority of it is produced by cereal farming. Starch is also used as a renewable raw material in a range of industrial sectors. It can be chemically modified to introduce new physicochemical properties. In this way starch is adapted to a variety of specific end-uses. Recombinant DNA technologies offers an alternative to starch industrial processing. The plant biosynthetic pathway can be manipulated to design starches with novel structure and improved technological properties. In the future this may reduce or eliminate the economical and environmental costs of industrial modification. Recently, many advances have been achieved to clarify the genetic mechanism that controls starch biosynthesis. Several genes involved in the synthesis and modification of complex carbohydrates in many organisms have been identified and cloned. This knowledge suggests a number of strategies and a series of candidate genes for genetic transformation of crops to generate new types of starch-based polymers. However transformation of cereals is a slow process and there is no easy model system available to test the efficiency of candidate genes in planta.

Results

We explored the possibility to use transgenic barley callus generated from immature embryo for a fast test of transgenic modification strategies of starch biosynthesis. We found that this callus contains 4% (w/w dw) starch granules, which we could modify by generating fully transgenic calli by Agrobacterium-transformation. A Green Fluorescent Protein reporter protein tag was used to identify and propagate only fully transgenic callus explants. Around 1 – 1.5 g dry weight of fully transgenic callus could be produced in 9 weeks. Callus starch granules were smaller than endosperm starch granules and contained less amylose. Similarly the expression profile of starch biosynthesis genes were slightly different in callus compared with developing endosperm.

Conclusions

In this study we have developed an easy and rapid in planta model system for starch bioengineering in cereals. We suggest that this method can be used as a time-efficient model system for fast screening of candidate genes for the generation of modified starch or new types of carbohydrate polymers.

Keywords

  • Starch
  • Green Fluorescent Protein
  • Amylose
  • Starch Granule
  • Amylose Content

Background

Starch is a product of plant photosynthetic carbon fixation and is the principal source of energy for human nutrition. Cereal crops produce the majority of starch in agriculture. Starch is also a useful biopolymer used in different industrial sectors [1]. Different crops synthesise structurally and chemically diverse starches with specific physicochemical properties that are suitable for diverse end-uses. However the natural variation found in natural starches does not provide enough different functionalities for the many end-uses. Therefore, after extraction, starch is often processed through a series of chemical or enzymatic modification and physical treatments in order to confer additional properties. Therefore the development of new crops with novel starches, avoiding post-harvest processing, is of economic interest. Genetic modification of the plant starch biosynthetic pathway to design a wide range of tailor made carbohydrates has shown to be a promising strategy [2–6]. The elucidation of the starch biosynthetic mechanism and the characterization of a number of genes, from different origins, involved in polysaccharide modification are offering a rich toolbox for in planta production of improved polymers by transgenic technology [7, 8]. Therefore it is expected that many novel starches or heterogeneous polysaccharides can be engineered in relevant crops, such as cereals. A severe limitation in the process of testing candidate transgenes is the time required to do genetic transformation, regeneration of transformed plants and characterization of the engineered starch stored in the sink organs (e.g. cereal grains). In barley, which is an important crop and a genetically well characterized cereal model, this time is at least 6 months.

A fast model system for genetic transformation of starch would therefore be useful. The model system should permit the high-throughput screening of candidate transgene activities and the preliminary characterization of the generated modified polysaccharide in a time-efficient way. This could allow to test the validity of several potential transformation strategies. The promising transgenic constructs would be selected to be employed in a cycle of plant transformation, full regeneration and propagation. Such in vitro approach may potentially boost the production of new valuable crops synthesizing rationally designed polymers.

Callus tissues of different plants accumulate starch granules especially when they are grown in high sugar media and specific culture conditions, such as controlled temperature, correct hormone treatment and osmotic potential [9–15]. It is not clear why starch is deposited in callus. But it has been suggested that the starch function as an energy reserve for the energy-requiring process of organogenesis (e.g. shoot formation). Alternatively it may play a role in equilibrating the level of free soluble sugars to counterbalance the osmotic potential in the medium [16–20].

In this study we explore the possibility to use transgenic callus of immature barley embryos as a fast model system to study starch biosynthesis and bioengineering of starch in cereals. We optimized a protocol to purify starch from callus. Transgenic callus induced from immature barley embryo after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were found to store significant amounts of starch granules, which are comparable to the ones accumulated in barley storage organs. The system was tested by over-expressing the gene encoding granular bound starch synthase Ia (GBSSIa) tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP). GBSS is known to synthesize amylose. The transgenic protein localized in the starch granules of the callus and increased the content of amylose.

Results and Discussion

Establishing a protocol for generation of transgenic callus to produce starch

Three transgenic callus cultures, Ubi:GFP (control), Ubi:GFP:GBSS and Ubi:GBSS:GFP, were obtained from barley immature embryo transformation with the transgenic constructs pUCEUbi:GFP-NOS, pUCEUbi:TP-GFP-HvGBSSIaΔTP:NOS and pUCEUbi:HvGBSSIa-GFP:NOS respectively (Figure 1). The pUCEUbi:GFP-NOS construct which enables constitutive expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene in the cytosol of the transgenic calli was used as a control to generate transgenic calli without altered GBSS expression. The constructs pUCEUbi:TP-GFP-HvGBSSIaΔTP:NOS and pUCEUbi:HvGBSSIa-GFP:NOS were used to over-express GBSSIa tagged with GFP at the N- or C- terminal end, respectively. The presence of a GFP tag allows to identify the cells in each callus, which are expressing the transgenic protein, but is also useful for examination of the sub-cellular localization of the transgenic GBSSIa enzyme. In addition to the GFP marker, a hygromycin selection marker was used to select for growth of transgenic cells over non-transgenic cells. One hundred and fifty embryos were transfected for each of the three constructs. After the first three weeks on selective medium the calli consisted of a mosaic of transgenic/fluorescent and non-transgenic/non-fluorescent cells. Those parts of callus tissues not showing fluorescence were removed by excision. The remaining pieces of calli were sub-cultured into the medium of new petri dishes for additionally 3 weeks, after which the calli consisted only of transgenic cells. After another additional sub-culturing period most of the calli were pooled from each of the lines and harvested. Between 1 and 1.5 g dw tissue was obtained for each of the three different constructs, from which we could purify between 5 and 10 mg of starch from each. However we suggest that it may be possible to optimize culture conditions (e.g. hormones concentration, temperature, carbohydrate concentration) in order to increase starch content, influence the starch biosynthetic activity pathway and alter starch composition [9, 11, 12, 21, 22]. This could increase the resemblance among the callus and the endosperm system, increasing the in vitro culture ability to serve as a model system [23]. The starch is purified from a pool of calli, which originate from different transformation events, whereby the expression level of the enzyme is an average of multiple T-DNA insertion events, After characterization of the callus starch, we were able to regenerate plants from the remaining calli. The complete strategy is schematized in Figure 2.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Transgenic constructs. pUCEUbi:GFP-NOS, pUCEUbi:TP-GFP-HvGBSSIaΔTP:NOS and pUCEUbi:HvGBSSIa-GFP:NOS constructs. (a) The control vector (pUCEUbi:GFP:NOS) was engineered for constitutive expression of the reporter gene encoding enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (eGFP). (b) The pUCEUbi:TP-GFP-HvGBSSIaΔTP:NOS and the (c) pUCEUbi:HvGBSSIa-GFP:NOS were designed to overexpress the endogenous barley granular bound starch synthase Ia. HvGBSSIa was fused with GFP. In (b) the GFP was placed after the transit peptide (TP) in GBSSIa. For all constructs, expression was driven by the common maize Ubiquitin promoter. The actual lengths of the individual elements are not drawn to scale.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Schematic workflow of the callus starch models system. The scheme presents the essential steps. (a) Immature embryo transformation. (b) Callus containing both transgenic and non-trangenic parts. Transgenic parts are identified by GFP, excised and sub-cultured (c) Fully transgenic callus is obtained. (d) Callus cultures maintenance with subculturing steps every three weeks. Sampling and starch analysis. (e) Transgenic plants can be regenerated.

Characterization of starch granules in barley callus

Calli were cut in 30 μm thick sections with a microtome. Presence of starch granules in the control callus tissues was observed with light microscopy after staining with Lugol iodine. The staining showed the presence of numerous starch granules deposited inside cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1). This confirmed previous studies, which indicated that barley callus contain starch granules [13, 24, 25]. The starch content of the barley callus at the time of harvesting was determined as described in materials and methods. We found that the callus contained 4.4% starch (St. Dev ± 0.4, n = 7) of the dry weight. This value is less than that of developing barley grains (15–20 DAP), which was determined to be 35.4% (St. Dev ± 6.0, n = 7). However it is comparable to the starch content in the early developmental stages of the grain [26, 27]. Similar amounts of starch were also found in potato and sweet potato callus tissue, and in suspension cell cultures of rice [9, 10, 21, 23, 28]. As reported above, the actual amount of starch which could be purified from callus was 5 – 10 mg per 1 g dw (0.5–1% w/w), which suggests that more than 75% of the starch is lost during the purification process. Starch granule morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy. Starch granules isolated from callus tissues were round with a smooth surface resembling granules purified form barley endosperm except that they were smaller (Diameters between 2 and 10 μm, Figure 3). A subpopulation of starch granules exhibited a peculiar “doughnut-shaped” morphology, which is unusual for barley starch granules Such collapsed morphology was reported in starch of some sorghum genotypes and is associated with a more digestible starch type [29, 30].
Figure 3
Figure 3

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of starch granules. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures of (a,c) Ubi:GFP control callus and (b,d) barley endosperm starch granules. A magnification of starch granules with the characteristic doughnut-shape is indicated in the lower right corner of (c). Scale bars represent 50 μm in (c,d) and 5 μm in (a,b).

The callus starch was further examined by using high performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection to determine the distribution of chain length in de-branched amylopectin. The chain length distribution was compared with endosperm starch (Figure 4). Callus and endosperm starch both have a bimodal distribution of the chain lengths peaking at 14 DP (degree of polymerization) for peak I. However peak II is at 20 and 22 DP for amylopectin from barley endosperm and callus respectively. In addition, callus starch has a higher proportions of the very short chains (DP 6–9), long chains (DP 33–39) and very long chains (> DP 50). In contrast starch from barley endosperm has a higher amount in short and intermediate chains (DP 10–28).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Profile of chain length distributions. Chain length distribution (a) of amylopectin isolated from Ubi:GFP callus (white dots) and barley endosperm (black dots). The numbers are based on duplicates. Bars represent standard deviations. (b) Relative differences in the frequency of chain lengths between amylopectin isolated from Ubi:GFP control callus and barley endosperm.

Expression of genes involved in starch biosynthesis in callus

The major starch storage tissue in cereal plants is the filial starchy endosperm. However other tissues in the seed and in other organs accumulate starch in a transitory form, such as the aleurone, embryo, pericarp and leaf tissues [26]. The starch is shaped differently in the various tissues due to differential expression of genes, coding for starch biosynthesis enzymes and other factors involved in the shaping of starch [26].

We studied the gene expression profiles of genes coding for selected enzymes involved in the synthesis and shaping of starch callus tissues and compared with barley leaf, 15–20 DAP developing endosperm and embryo: starch branching enzyme I (SBEI), starch branching enzyme IIa (SBE IIa), starch synthase I (SSI), starch synthase IIa (SSIIa), starch synthase IIIa (SSIIIa), starch synthase IV (SSIV), granule bound starch synthase Ia (GBSSIa), granule bound starch synthase Ib (GBSSIb), glucan water dikinase I (GWD) (Figure 5). Expression levels were estimated by qRT-PCR. The aim was to test whether the expression profile of the genes associated with starch biosynthesis in barley calli was comparable with the one in barley endosperm or if it has more resemblance with the expression profile of a transitory storage organ (such as leaf or embryo). Most of the tested genes involved in starch biosynthesis are expressed in callus, with exception of starch-branching enzyme IIb (SBE IIb), which was neither expressed in callus nor in leaves. In general the level of expression of the starch synthases were lower in callus than in endosperm, which is well in line with the observation, that callus contains less starch than the endosperm does. Starch synthase IV was an exception to this, with a significant higher expression in callus (and embryos and leaves) than in endosperm. Studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have indicated that starch synthase IV type enzymes play a role in the control of starch granule numbers and size, possible by priming starch synthesis, because plants without SS IV contain less but bigger starch granules and same amount of starch [31]. A higher SS IV gene expression level in callus as compared to endosperm is therefore consistent with the observation that callus contains smaller granules than endosperm does. Overall, the pattern of gene expression in callus has more similarity with the pattern detected in embryos and leaves. The biosynthesis of transient starch in chloroplasts in leaves is essentially similar to the biosynthesis of storage starch in amyloplasts [32]. In both tissues glucose is utilized from ADP-glucose by starch synthases to elongate starch chains. However the difference among the tissues is believed to be due to differential concentrations of the various forms of starch synthases, which have different chain length preferences [32]. The observation that there is a difference in chain length distribution between callus and endosperm starch (Figure 4) is therefore well in line with our observation that the two tissues have different expression patterns of starch synthases. For example GBSSIa and SSIIa gene expression is barely detectable in callus. However, this implies that the callus system would be particularly well suited for studying the effect of expressing different variants of these two starch synthases, because only little is expressed already. Interestingly it has been observed in rice breeding populations that polymorphism in the GBSSIa and SSIIa genes is responsible for the majority of variation in gelatinization temperature and other functionalities of starch [33, 34].
Figure 5
Figure 5

Expression patterns. Transcript profiles of starch biosynthetic enzymes in endosperm, embryo, leaf, Ubi:GFP callus, Ubi:GFP:GBSS callus and Ubi:GBSS:GFP callus. Bars indicate standard deviations. Letters above bars indicate statistical difference at P < 0.05.

Overexpression of GFP tagged GBSS in callus: proof-of-concept

As a proof-of-concept, that starch callus can be engineered by transgenic techniques we overexpressed GBSSIa tagged with GFP (Ubi:GBSS-GFP and Ubi:GFP-GBSS) in callus as described above. We observed that control callus (Ubi:GFP) has a very low gene expression level of GBSSI (Figure 5), which suggest that it contains less amylose than endosperm starch does. This was confirmed by direct measurement of amylose content in starch purified from endosperm and control callus (Ubi:GFP) respectively, which showed that the callus starch only contains 2.2% amylose, whereas endosperm starch from the same barley variety contains 24.5% amylose (Table 1). Overexpression of GBSSIa-GFP or GFP-GBSSIa was confirmed by qRT-PCR studies, which demonstrated that Ubi:GFP:GBSS and Ubi:GBSS:GFP calli had an up-regulation in gene expression of GBSSIa at 126.5 and 160.7 folds respectively, compared with control callus (Ubi:GFP). This level of GBSSIa gene expression in Ubi:GBSS-GFP and Ubi:GFP-GBSS were similar to that of developing endosperm (Figure 5). The overexpression of GBSSIa increased the amount of amylose in callus starch from 2.2% in the control callus to 11.7% in Ubi:GFP:GBSS and 27.9% in Ubi:GBSS:GFP callus starches (Table 1). For Ubi:GBSS-GFP this level is in the range of that of developing endosperm (24.5%). This demonstrates by an example that we are able to modify starch biosynthesis in callus starch by transgenically changing gene expression. GBSSIa over-expression had an effect on the expression of some of the other genes involved in starch biosynthesis. The expression level of the SBEI, SBEIIa and SSI genes were all increased in the Ubi:GBSS-GFP and Ubi:GFP-GBSS calli compared with control callus (Ubi:GFP).
Table 1

Amylose content

Sample

Amylose content (%) ± SD

Barley endosperm

24.5 ± 0.8

Callus Ubi:GFP (control)

2.2 ± 0.2

Callus Ubi:GBSS:GFP

27.9 ± 0.7

Callus Ubi:GFP:GBSS

11.7 ± 1.2

Amylose content analysis (average values of 2 biological and 6 technical replicates are indicated).

Before the extraction process, samples of calli were stained with Lugol iodine stain solution and examined by microscopy. Starch granules deposited in Ubi:GBSS: GFP tissues stained dark blue in contrast to the brownish granules found in Ubi:GFP calli, confirming that these granules contain a higher amount of amylose (Figure 6). The same color difference was observed in purified granules. We did not observe any difference in the shape or size of Ubi:GBSS-GFP and control (Ubi:GFP) starch granules, either in the callus or in the purified starch fraction.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Morphology of control and transgenic callus starch. Microscopy of callus and purified starch stained with Lugol iodine (a) Ubi:GFP mashed tissue (lower magnification) and purified granules (higher magnification, upper left corner). (b) Ubi:GBSS:GFP mashed tissue (lower magnification) and purified granules (higher magnification, upper left corner). Scale bar represents 40 μm for lower magnification.

Polymorphism in the genes encoding starch synthases have been demonstrated to be associated with variation in starch functionality such as gelatinization temperature and retrogradation [33, 34]. In addition wild relatives of cereals contain a significantly higher diversity of genes encoding enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis than domesticated species. Wild cereals may therefore contribute to the breeding of cereal varieties with new starch functionalities [35]. However, association studies cannot directly demonstrate the effect of amino acid sequence variation in enzymes on starch functionality. We suggest that the callus starch model presented here can be used as a fast screening method to directly evaluate the impact of such known variants of starch synthases in gene pools of breeding populations and wild cereal species.

Binding of GFP tagged GBSS in starch granules

The use of a GFP tag on the overexpressed enzyme allowed us to visualize its subcellular localization. In control callus (Ubi:GFP) GFP was found in the cytosol (Figure 7a) whereas in tissues of transgenic callus transformed with Ubi:GFP-GBSS construct the fluorescence was localized in small spots within the cells (Figure 7b). When the calli were cut in 30 μm it was possible to clearly distinguish starch granules within debris from smashed cells, in both control and Ubi:GFP:GBSS samples (Figure 7 c,d – upper panels). In control Ubi:GFP callus, GFP was floating around in the cell debris giving a general high background without specific localization (Figure 7c – lower panel). While in tissue sections of Ubi:GFP:GBSS callus the GFP was found into the starch granules (Figure 7d – lower panel). These results were in agreement with our expectation, that the fused Ubi:GFP:GBSS protein was targeted into the plastids and localized within starch granules. Furthermore, they demonstrate that the callus starch model system can be used to visualize the binding of GBSSIa in starch granules.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Fluorescence microscopy. Bright field (upper figures) and fluorescence (lower figures) microscopy. (a) Intact Ubi:GFP callus. (b) Intact Ubi:GFP:GBSS callus. (c) 30 μm section of mashed Ubi:GFP callus. (d) 30 μm section of mashed Ubi:GFP:GBSS callus. Ubi:GFP:GBSS callus shows a fluorescence pattern localized in small spots (b) and in the starch granules (d). The red arrows point at starch granules.

Conclusions

Plant callus tissues have been used as a tool for biochemical studies of the parent tissues [23, 36]. Attempts have been conducted to validate callus and suspension cell cultures as model systems to investigate carbohydrate and starch metabolism in storage organs of different plants, such as maize, rice, potato and sweet potato [10, 21–23, 28, 37].

In our study we aimed to demonstrate that transgenic barley callus may represent a valid model system for starch bioengineering by transgenic transformation of the callus.

We analysed the starch produced by callus generated from immature barley embryos. There is a lower quantity of starch in callus than in endosperm tissue. The starch granules are smaller and contain only little amylose. We examined the expression profile of various genes involved in starch biosynthesis. Callus has a different expression profile than endosperm of the various forms of starch synthases, which is reflected in a different chain length distribution of the starch. We suggest that among the starch synthases the callus system may be particularly well suited for studying the effect of expression of transgenic variants of GBSSIa and SSIa, because these two genes only have very little expression in callus already. We used GFP as a tag for expression of transgenic enzymes in the callus. GFP fluorescence was easily detectable in the callus, and could be used to validate gene transfer to the callus and localize transgenic cells. Fluorescent transgenic cells could be isolated by cutting the callus with a scalpel and sub-culture it to obtain stable transgenic callus (Figure 2). 1 g of dry callus could be obtained after 9 weeks of growth, from which we were able to purify > 5 mg starch. By using GBSSIa as an example we demonstrated that this method could be applied to overexpress genes of enzymes in callus to engineer starch biosynthesis. The transgenic callus had a significantly increased content of amylose, which is expected if the enzyme is active in the callus. In addition we were able to visualize the physical binding of GBSSIa in starch granules. In summary we suggest that the method can be used to do fast in vivo screening of variants of genes encoding enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis or other potential transgenes for bioengineering of starch in cereals. We also suggest that the method can be used to study the binding of proteins such as starch synthases in starch granules.

Methods

Vector engineering and transgenic callus generation

Transgenic callus cultures were induced from immature embryos of Golden Promise, by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as described previously [38]. Three plasmid vectors were used for transformation: a control vector (pUCEUbi:GFP-NOS) and two vectors designed to manipulate starch synthesis altering amylose content (pUCEUbi:TP-GFP-HvGBSSIaΔTP:NOS and pUCEUbi:HvGBSSIa-GFP:NOS). They were engineered by using the pUCE tool box for construction of cereal transformation vectors as described previously [39]. They all contain the Hygromycin phosphotransferase selection marker gene (HPT), and the common maize ubiquitin promoter for constitutive expression of the transgene. In addition green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used as a marker. The control vector (pUCEUbi:GFP:NOS) was engineered for constitutive expression of GFP without an enzyme . The other binary vectors were designed to overexpress barley granule bound starch synthase Ia. (HvGBSSIa), In the case of pUCEUbi:TP-GFP-HvGBSSIaΔTP:NOS the transit peptide (TP) from GBSSIa was attached in front of GFP. The GBSSI-GFP and GFP-GBSSI sequences were synthesized artificially by DNA2.0 (http://www.dna20.com) fusing together the coding sequence of GFP with the coding sequence of HvGBSS with or without the native transit peptide, respectively. The two constructs were provided by the company in their cloning vectors and they were both digested with PacI (Fermentas, FastDigest), and re-cloned into the pUCE vectors Ubi:USER:NOS and Ubi:TP-USER:NOS (PacI digested and treated with calf intestine alkaline phosphatase) respectively. The two binary vectors are described in details in [39].

Transgenic callus maintenance and culture procedures

After two days on callus induction media the embryos were transferred to callus production media as described in the protocol in [38]. After three weeks of culturing on production media the calli were examined with a ‘Wild MZ8 Leica’ stereo microscope, equipped with a GFP fluorescence detection system and calli pieces of full transgenic tissues were excised and sub-cultured on fresh production media to obtain homogeneous fully transgenic calli. Callus cultures were sub-cultured one additional time after 3 weeks, and after 9 weeks total the transgenic calli tissues were harvested and snap-freezed in liquid nitrogen and stored in a freezer (−80) to be directly used for analysis or for starch granules purification.

Light microscopy observations

For light microscopy analysis, 30 μm sections were cut from fresh frozen callus tissues using a HM 550 OM Cryostat microtome. Callus tissue sections, mashed tissue and purified starch granules were stained with Lugol´s iodine stain solution (250 mg I2, 2.5 g KI, 125 mL ddH2O) and mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 Imaging microscope. Pictures were taken using the software provided by the manufacturer.

Measurement of starch content

Callus tissue was freeze-dried using a Heto LyoPro 6000 freeze dryer and ground using mortar and pestle. Pulverized material was used for starch content analysis. Starch content was determined using the ‘Total starch AOAC Method 996.11/AACC Method 76.13’ kit from Megazyme International Ltd. (Wicklow, Ireland) using the protocol recommended by the manufacturer for samples containing also d-glucose and/or maltodextrins.

Extraction of total RNA and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was purified from transgenic callus tissues, barley endosperm 15–20 DAP and barley leaves; and cDNA was synthesised and quantitative real-time PCR (RT qPCR was conducted as described in [38]. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was co-amplified as housekeeping gene to calculate relative quantification of expression [40]. All the analyses were conducted in three biological replicates each with three technical replicates using specific primers targeting the following starch biosynthetic genes: starch branching enzyme I (SbeI), starch branching enzyme IIa (SbeIIa), starch branching enzyme IIb (SbeIIb), starch synthase I (SSI), starch synthase IIa (SSIIa), starch synthase IIIa (SSIIIa), starch synthase IV (SSIV), granule bound starch synthase Ia (GBSSIa), granule bound starch synthase Ib (GBSSIb), glucan water dikinase I (GWDI). The primer sequences are described in Additional file 2: Table S1. Student’s t-test was used to compare the levels of expression of the same genes among the different tissues (with 95% confidence level).

Starch extraction and purification

Starch purification form barley grain was conducted according to the protocol described in Additional file 3: Protocol.

Scanning electron microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy was carried out as described in [38].

Amylose determination

The amylose content was determined by iodine colorimetrics following the method described in [41].

Chain-length distribution of starch

Chain length distribution was assessed according to the protocol described in [42, 43].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by The Danish Council for Independent Research Technology and Production Sciences and by Graduate School of Agriculture, Food and Environment (SAFE), Aarhus University. We are thankful to Monica Palcic and colleagues at The Carlsberg Laboratory, Denmark, for ideas and suggestions to this work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Section of Crop Genetics and Biotechnology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
(2)
Enzymology Group Carlsberg Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark
(3)
VKR Research Centre for Pro-Active Plants, Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark

References

  1. BeMiller JN, Whistler RL: Starch: chemistry and technology. 2009, USA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Chibbar N, Ganeshan S, Båga M: In planta novel starch synthesis. Improvement of Crop Plants for Industrial End Uses. Edited by: RANALLI P. 2007, Netherlands: Springer, 181-208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis JP, Supatcharee N, Khandelwal RL, Chibbar RN: Synthesis of novel starches in planta: Opportunities and challenges. Starch-Starke. 2003, 55: 107-120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jobling S: Improving starch for food and industrial applications. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004, 7: 210-218. 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Morell MK, Myers AM: Towards the rational design of cereal starches. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005, 8: 204-210. 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zeeman SC, Kossmann J, Smith AM: Starch: Its Metabolism, Evolution, and Biotechnological Modification in Plants. 2010, PALO ALTO: ANNUAL REVIEWSGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang XF, Vincken JP: Visser RGF. 2010, Trindade LM: Production of Heterologous Storage Polysaccharides in Potato Plants. In Annual Plant Reviews. Wiley-Blackwell, 389-408.Google Scholar
  8. Kok-Jacon GA, Ji Q, Vincken JP, Visser RGF: Towards a more versatile alpha-glucan biosynthesis in plants. J Plant Physiol. 2003, 160: 765-777. 10.1078/0176-1617-01028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagen SR, Harrison S, Muneta P, Letourneau D: Methods to Increase the Starch Content of Potato-Tuber Callus-Tissue. Potato Research. 1993, 36: 293-299. 10.1007/BF02361795.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagen SR, Muneta P, Letourneau D, Brown J: Effect of Temperature on the Starch Content of Potato Callus-Tissue. American Potato Journal. 1991, 68: 191-195. 10.1007/BF02853899.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lu CH, Lee PD, Su JC: Preparation of Amyloplasts from Sweet-Potato Callus-Culture. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 1995, 36: 223-228.Google Scholar
  12. Miyazawa Y, Sakai A, Miyagishima S, Takano H, Kawano S, Kuroiwa T: Auxin and cytokinin have opposite effects on amyloplast development and the expression of starch synthesis genes in cultured Bright Yellow-2 tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121: 461-469. 10.1104/pp.121.2.461.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Granatek CH, Cockerline AW: Callus Formation Vs Differentiation of Cultured Barley Embryos Hormonal and Osmotic Interactions. In Vitro (Rockville). 1978, 14: 212-217.Google Scholar
  14. Higuchi N, Maeda E: Enhanced Plant-Regeneration in Rice Callus-Cultures Following Abscisic-Acid Treatment. Japanese Journal of Crop Science. 1990, 59: 359-368. 10.1626/jcs.59.359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Heng-Long W, Ping-Du L, Rong-Huary J, Jong-Ching S: Starch-accumulating sweet potato callus tissue devoid of beta-amylase but with two starch phosphorylase isozymes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1993, 57: 1311-1315. 10.1271/bbb.57.1311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Thorpe TA, Joy RW, Leung DWM: Starch Turnover in Shoot-Forming Tobacco Callus. Physiol Plant. 1986, 66: 58-62. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1986.tb01233.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Thorpe TA, Meier DD: Starch Metabolism, Respiration, and Shoot Formation in Tobacco Callus Cultures. Physiol Plant. 1972, 27: 365-369. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1972.tb03629.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Thorpe TA, Meier DD: Starch Metabolism in Shoot-Forming Tobacco Callus. J Exp Bot. 1974, 25: 288-294. 10.1093/jxb/25.2.288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Thorpe TA, Murashig T: Starch Accumulation in Shoot-Forming Tobacco Callus Cultures. Science. 1968, 160: 421-10.1126/science.160.3826.421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang WL, Liu LF: Carbohydrate metabolism in rice during callus induction and shoot regeneration induced by osmotic stress. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 2002, 43: 107-113.Google Scholar
  21. Wang HL, Lee PD, Juang RH, Su JC: Starch-Accumulating Sweet-Potato Callus-Tissue Devoid of Beta-Amylase But with 2 Starch Phosphorylase Isozymes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1993, 57: 1311-1315. 10.1271/bbb.57.1311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee MH, Yang CC, Wang HL, Lee PD: Regulation of sucrose phosphate synthase of the sweet potato callus is related to illumination and osmotic stress. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 2003, 44: 257-265.Google Scholar
  23. Shaw R, Varns JL, Miller KA, Talley EA: Potato-Tuber Callus - Validation As Biochemical Tool. Plant Physiol. 1976, 58: 464-467. 10.1104/pp.58.4.464.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shamina ZB, Scheunert EU, Koblitz H: Studies on Barley Calluses Cultured in Vitro .2. Cytological and Morphological Features of Barley Callus-Cultures. Plant Science Letters. 1978, 13: 177-184. 10.1016/0304-4211(78)90245-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Oka S, Saito N, Kawaguchi H: Histological Observations on Initiation and Morphogenesis in Immature and Mature Embryo-Derived Callus of Barley (Hordeum-Vulgare L). Ann Bot. 1995, 76: 487-492. 10.1006/anbo.1995.1124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Radchuk VV, Borisjuk L, Sreenivasulu N, Merx K, Mock H, Rolletschek H, Wobus U, Weschke W: Spatiotemporal profiling of starch biosynthesis and degradation in the developing barley grain. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150: 190-204. 10.1104/pp.108.133520.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Renwick F, Duffus CM: Factors Affecting Dry-Weight Accumulation in Developing Barley Endosperm. Physiol Plant. 1987, 69: 141-146. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb01957.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Landry LG, Smyth DA: Characterization of Starch Produced by Suspension Cell-Cultures of Indica Rice (Oryza-Sativa-L). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 1988, 15: 23-32. 10.1007/BF00039886.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Benmoussa M, Suhendra B, Aboubacar A, Hamaker BR: Distinctive sorghum starch granule morphologies appear to improve raw starch digestibility. Starch-Starke. 2006, 58: 92-99. 10.1002/star.200400344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh H, Sodhi NS, Singh N: Characterisation of starches separated from sorghum cultivars grown in India. Food Chem. 2010, 119: 95-100. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.086.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Roldan I, Wattebled F, Lucas MM, Delvalle D, Planchot V, Jimenez S, Perez R, Ball S, D'Hulst C, Merida A: The phenotype of soluble starch synthase IV defective mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a novel function of elongation enzymes in the control of starch granule formation. Plant J. 2007, 49: 492-504. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02968.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Orzechowski S: Starch metabolism in leaves. Acta Biochim Pol. 2008, 55: 435-445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kharabian-Masouleh A, Waters DLE, Reinke RF, Ward R, Henry RJ: SNP in starch biosynthesis genes associated with nutritional and functional properties of rice. Sci Rep. 2012, 2: 557-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu Y, Xiao P, Shao YF, Zhang G, Thanyasiriwat T, Bao JS: Development of new markers to genotype the functional SNPs of SSIIa, a gene responsible for gelatinization temperature of rice starch. Journal of Cereal Science. 2010, 52: 438-443. 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.07.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitt SR, Wilson LM, Tenaillon MI, Gaut BS, Buckler ES: Genetic diversity and selection in the maize starch pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 12959-12962. 10.1073/pnas.202476999.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Trivedi S, Galiba G, Sankhla N, Erdei L: Responses to Osmotic and Nacl Stress of Wheat-Varieties Differing in Drought and Salt Tolerance in Callus-Cultures. Plant Sci. 1991, 73: 227-232. 10.1016/0168-9452(91)90032-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chu LJC, Shannon JC: Invitro Cultures of Maize Endosperm - Model System for Studying Invivo Starch Biosynthesis. Crop Science. 1975, 15: 814-819. 10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500060022x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Carciofi M, Shaik SS, Jensen SL, Blennow A, Svensson JT, Vincze E, Hebelstrup KH: Hyperphosphorylation of cereal starch. Journal of Cereal Science. 2011, 54: 339-346. 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.06.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hebelstrup KH, Christiansen MW, Carciofi M, Tauris B, Brinch-Pedersen H, Holm PB: UCE: A uracil excision (USER (TM))-based toolbox for transformation of cereals. Plant Methods. 2010, 6: 15-10.1186/1746-4811-6-15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wickramasinghe HAM, Blennow A, Noda T: Physico-chemical and degradative properties of in-planta re-structured potato starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2009, 77: 118-124. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Olsen CE, Moller BL: The distribution of covalently bound phosphate in the starch granule in relation to starch crystallinity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2000, 27: 211-218. 10.1016/S0141-8130(00)00121-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Wischmann B, Olsen CE, Moller BL: The degree of starch phosphorylation is related to the chain length distribution of the neutral and the phosphorylated chains of amylopectin. Carbohydr Res. 1998, 307: 45-54. 10.1016/S0008-6215(98)00015-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Carciofi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Plant Methods

ISSN: 1746-4811