- Open Access
Investigations of barley stripe mosaic virus as a gene silencing vector in barley roots and in Brachypodium distachyon and oat
© Pacak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 13 August 2010
- Accepted: 30 November 2010
- Published: 30 November 2010
Gene silencing vectors based on Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) are used extensively in cereals to study gene function, but nearly all studies have been limited to genes expressed in leaves of barley and wheat. However since many important aspects of plant biology are based on root-expressed genes we wanted to explore the potential of BSMV for silencing genes in root tissues. Furthermore, the newly completed genome sequence of the emerging cereal model species Brachypodium distachyon as well as the increasing amount of EST sequence information available for oat (Avena species) have created a need for tools to study gene function in these species.
Here we demonstrate the successful BSMV-mediated virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) of three different genes in barley roots, i.e. the barley homologues of the IPS1, PHR1, and PHO2 genes known to participate in Pi uptake and reallocation in Arabidopsis. Attempts to silence two other genes, the Pi transporter gene HvPht1;1 and the endo-β-1,4-glucanase gene HvCel1, in barley roots were unsuccessful, probably due to instability of the plant gene inserts in the viral vector. In B. distachyon leaves, significant silencing of the PHYTOENE DESATURASE (BdPDS) gene was obtained as shown by photobleaching as well as quantitative RT-PCR analysis. On the other hand, only very limited silencing of the oat AsPDS gene was observed in both hexaploid (A. sativa) and diploid (A. strigosa) oat. Finally, two modifications of the BSMV vector are presented, allowing ligation-free cloning of DNA fragments into the BSMV-γ component.
Our results show that BSMV can be used as a vector for gene silencing in barley roots and in B. distachyon leaves and possibly roots, opening up possibilities for using VIGS to study cereal root biology and to exploit the wealth of genome information in the new cereal model plant B. distachyon. On the other hand, the silencing induced by BSMV in oat seemed too weak to be of practical use. The new BSMV vectors modified for ligation-free cloning will allow rapid insertion of plant gene fragments for future experiments.
- Barley Root
- Silence Efficiency
- Virus Induce Gene Silence
- Barley Stripe Mosaic Virus
- Virus Symptom
Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) is a single-stranded RNA virus with three genome components termed α, β, and γ . Infectious clones of several strains of BSMV have been constructed . To initiate infection, in vitro transcripts of all three genome components are mixed and rubbed onto leaves of host plants. Vectors based on BSMV have been shown capable of inducing efficient gene silencing in leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare)  and wheat (Triticum vulgare) . Subsequently, numerous studies have used BSMV vectors for gene silencing studies in barley or wheat (reviewed in [1, 5]). However, only a few studies have explored the capacity of BSMV for gene silencing in other species (in Haynaldia villosa, , and Brachypodium distachyon ecotype ABR-1, ). In addition to BSMV, two vectors based on Brome mosaic virus have been reported to induce gene silencing in barley, maize and rice [8, 9], but these vectors have not yet been widely used. Furthermore, no reports have appeared of virus induced gene silencing in monocot roots. Genes expressed in roots are involved in important processes such as root development, nutrient uptake, and pathogen resistance. Therefore, tools for studying root expressed genes are needed. Due to our interest in phosphorous (P) starvation responses, we have chosen some important genes of interest for phosphate (Pi) acquisition and the P-starvation response for the exploration of the usefulness of VIGS in barley roots. Previously, virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) has been successfully demonstrated in roots of several dicot plant species using vectors based on Tobacco rattle virus, Pea early browning virus[11, 12], Tomato yellow leaf curl China virus, or Bean pod mottle virus.
B. distachyon is a small, fast-growing, self fertile member of the grass subfamily Pooideae, which also encompasses the major cereals wheat and barley as well as forage grasses. B. distachyon is being implemented as a model species for grasses and cereals due to several attractive features including a relative small (~ 275 Mb) genome . In recognition of the importance of developing a model grass, the US DoE Joint Genome institute has funded the sequencing of the B. distachyon genome and the sequence was published in 2010 . Although genetic transformation protocols for B. distachyon have been established [15, 17–19], the VIGS technique would be a useful supplement as a faster and simple means of exploring gene function.
Oat (Avena) is another member of the Poaceae family. Most cultivated oat varieties belong to the hexaploid A. sativa with an estimated 1C genome size of 13000 Mbp but diploid wild oat and tetraploid varieties exist. Although the large oat genome remains relatively unexplored compared to wheat, barley, and indeed B. distachyon, genetic maps of oat are being developed [20, 21]. Furthermore large oat EST sequencing programmes are in progress, and already 16k ESTs of diploid A. strigosa root material and around 25k A. sativa and 54k A. barbata ESTs are publicly available ([22, 23] and unpublished GenBank accessions). Hexaploid oat cultivars (A. sativa) have been successfully transformed using biolistic  and Agrobacterium-mediated  transformation techniques, but these techniques are time consuming. Thus a VIGS approach for oat could greatly reduce the time and effort needed to identify and study gene function in oat.
Here we show that BSMV can be used to induce VIGS in roots of barley, although attention to the stability of the inserts in the vector is recommended. Furthermore, successful VIGS in leaves of B. distachyon was obtained. On the other hand, the silencing efficiency in Avena species appeared too low to be of practical value. Finally, two BSMV vectors adapted for ligation-free insertion of gene fragments are presented.
VIGS in barley roots
Since we have found the stability of the inserted plant gene fragment to be a limiting factor for BSMV-induced gene silencing , we investigated the stability of the viral constructs in the barley roots using RT-PCR with primers surrounding the insert in the viral vectors (Figure 1B and 1C). The expected length for the PCR product is 610 bp from BSMV-Pht1;1 and 617 bp from BSMV-GFP375. As is seen in Figure 1C the PCR products were all shorter than expected, indicating that both BSMV-Pht1;1 and BSMV-GFP375 are relatively unstable. The lack of silencing effect of BSMV-Pht1;1 could thus be explained by the loss of the inserted HvPht1;1 sequence.
The stability of the viral constructs was again investigated by RT-PCR. PCR products of the expected length of 493 bp were the dominant products from BSMV-IPS1 infected plants at all time-points and at zero as well as high Pi content, although minor products of lower molecular weight were seen in samples from late harvested plants (Figure 2B). This suggests that the better silencing effect of BSMV-IPS1 compared to BSMV-Pht1;1 could be due to better stability of the BSMV-IPS1 construct. On the other hand, the BSMV-GFP250 construct was found to be highly unstable (Figure 2C; expected length for PCR product is 492 bp), demonstrating that virus construct stability is not determined only by the length of the insert.
That BSMV-IPS1 could induce silencing of HvIPS1 in barley roots was confirmed in an additional experiment, this time including shoot as well as root tissue in the analysis. Leaf no. III was chosen for analysis because this leaf was previously shown to display the most extensive silencing . All plants were grown in hydroponic culture with 0 mM Pi. At nine dpi plants were harvested and analyzed for HvIPS1 expression by qRT-PCR (Figure 2D). A significant down regulation of HvIPS1 was observed in both root (p < 0.001) and shoot (p < 0.05) tissue of BSMV-IPS1 infected plants compared to BSMV-GFP250 infected plants. An analysis of the viral construct stability again showed that the BSMV-IPS1 construct was relatively stable over the experimental period, while BSMV-GFP250 was quite unstable (data not shown).
The apparent stability of the BSMV-PHR1 and BSMV-PHO2 constructs prompted us to test the silencing capacity of these constructs in barley roots. First, HvPHR1 expression in the two BSMV-PHR1 infected root samples used in Figure 3A (lanes 9 and 10) was analyzed by qRT-PCR and compared to the expression in the two BSMV-GFP250 infected samples (lanes 15 and 16). The result suggested that the BSMV-PHR1 construct was indeed able to induce efficient silencing (Figure 3B). To confirm this, the experiment was repeated with five independent samples (each consisting of three plants in a pot with garden soil) for both BSMV-PHR1 and BSMV-GFP250. Seven days old barley plants were inoculated and after nine days the roots were harvested. Again, expression of HvPHR1 was significantly down regulated (p < 0.05) by infection with BSMV-PHR1 (Figure 3C). A stability analysis confirmed that the BSMV-PHR1 construct was highly stable (data not shown). Next, BSMV-PHO2247 and BSMV-GFP250 were both inoculated to seven pots containing three 7-days old barley plants each. At 9 dpi roots as well as the third leaf were harvested and HvPHO2 expression was analysed by qRT-PCR. A significant reduction in HvPHO2 mRNA levels was seen both in leaves (p < 0.02) and in roots (p < 0.001) infected with BSMV-PHO2247 relative to BSMV-GFP250 (Figure 3D). Since the homologous gene in Arabidopsis is a negative regulator of Pi translocation from roots to shoots [31–33], we measured the free Pi content in the root and leaf samples (Figure 3E). Pi content was significantly up-regulated in shoots (p < 0.003) and downregulated in roots (p < 0.001) in BSMV-PHO2247 infected plants relative to BSMV-GFP250 infected plants. This suggests that HvPHO2 may play a similar role in barley as AtPHO2 in Arabidopsis.
Short inverted repeats are not generally superior to sense fragments
VIGS in B. distachyon
To test the potential of BSMV for VIGS in B. distachyon we tried to silence the phytoene desaturase gene (PDS). PDS is often used as a visual reporter for VIGS since its silencing produces easily visible chlorophyll photobleaching . A 433 nt fragment of PDS from B. distachyon was first produced by RT-PCR using primers designed based on alignment of PDS sequences from other monocot species. The sequence of the cloned product (filed as Genbank acc. No. HM755884) showed 92% nt sequence identity to the corresponding fragments of barley, wheat and rice PDS (Additional file 2: Alignment of PDS sequences). A 300 nt internal fragment of BdPDS was then amplified by PCR and inserted into BSMV. For these experiments, two modified vector versions called BSMVγ-USER and BSMVγ-T4 allowing ligation-free cloning were employed (see below for description of the vectors).
PDS silencing in B. distachyon
Plants with symptoms
To test for infectivity and thus silencing potential of BSMV in B. distachyon roots, B. distachyon plants inoculated with the empty BSMV vector (BSMV-MCS) were harvested at 18 dpi and the presence of BMSV coat protein was determined separately in leaves and roots by double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) (Additional file 3: BSMV in B. distachyon leaves and roots). In all 12 plants tested, strong positive reactions were obtained from both leaf and root samples, indicating that BSMV has potential as a VIGS vector in roots as well as leaves of this species.
VIGS in oat
VIGS experiments have not previously been reported for oat. The existing BSMV-based vectors are all based on the ND18 strain, which does not infect oat . However, infectivity on oat has been reported for the CV42 strain of BSMV, as well as for pseudorecombinants of the two strains containing the CV42 α component . We therefore decided to test the silencing potential of the BSMV VIGS vector in oat when combined with the BSMVCV42 α component. In this paper, "BSMV" and "BSMVND18" both refer to ND18-derived virus clones while "BSMVCV42" refers to clones derived from strain CV42 . In a first experiment, the susceptibility of a range of oat cultivars to different BSMV component combinations was investigated using visual observation of virus symptoms as well as detection of the virus coat protein by DAS-ELISA.
BSMV accumulation in oat cultivars
BSMV coat protein detection
A sterilis 11089
A strigosa 14522
A strigosa 8768
A strigosa 8770
A strigosa 5399
The PDS gene was chosen as a first target of silencing, but the oat PDS gene (AsPDS) has not been reported previously. To obtain fragments of AsPDS we performed RT-PCR on A. strigosa cv. S75 mRNA using primers designed from conserved nucleotide sequences of monocot PDS mRNAs. Two partly overlapping fragments, AsPDS1 (422bp) and AsPDS2 (401bp) were obtained and cloned into the ND18-based BSMV-MCS vector. The combined sequence of the fragments (filed as GenBank acc. No. HM755676) showed 92 and 93% nt identity to barley and wheat PDS genes, respectively, with several regions of 100% identity over more than 25 nt (Additional file 2: Alignment of PDS sequences).
To improve silencing, we tested another variant of BSMV-γ, which was used previously in silencing experiments in wheat . In this ND18-based BSMV-γ variant the start codon of the γb open-reading frame was modified to create a Bam HI site and γb expression was blocked (designated in the following as BSMV-γΔb). By insertion of the AsPDS2 fragment into the γΔb-vector, a part of the γb protein was deleted and a vector γΔbAsPDS2 was obtained. Belinda and S75 plants showed neither virus symptoms nor silencing when inoculated with BSMVCV42 α and β together with BSMV-γΔbAsPDS2 or BSMV-γΔb. In barley plants inoculated with these virus vectors both photobleached areas and virus symptoms were observed (Figure 7C; BSMV-γΔbPDS2 and BSMV-γΔb). Compared to BSMV-AsPDS2 and BSMV-MCS visual determination revealed a reduced effect for the γΔb vector variants.
Increased silencing efficiency in barley has previously been reported by using a BSMV-β component with a deleted coat protein (βΔβa ). In oat plants no phenotypical difference was observed when using the BSMV-βΔβa component instead of BSMVCV42-β (data not shown). Also the use of BSMVND18-β instead of BSMVCV42-β had no influence on virus infectivity or silencing effects (data not shown). The use of BSMV-βΔβa in barley plants was associated by extensive necrosis as reported before .
To ensure that the poor gene silencing effect in oat was not specific for the PDS gene, another round of experiments was conducted targeting a presumed oat homologue of the HvCel1 gene. Using primers designed from an oat EST sequence (Genbank acc. No. CN821108) two non-overlapping 399 bp fragments, AsCel1-2 and AsCel1-3, were produced by RT-PCR from A. strigosa cv. S75 mRNA and cloned into the ND18-based BSMV-MCS vector. The combined sequence of the fragments (filed as GenBank acc. No. HM755677) showed 89% nt identity to HvCel1 (data not shown). A. strigosa cv. S75 plants were inoculated as described above with BSMVCV42 -α and -β together with BSMVND18-γ-AsCel1-2, BSMVND18-γ-AsCel1-3 or the control vector BSMVND18-γ-GFP375. At 12 dpi, leaves displaying virus symptoms were harvested and expression of AsCel1 was determined by qRT-PCR (see Additional file 4: Lack of silencing of AsCel1 in oat shoots). No significant differences between the three groups of plants were obtained.
In summary, only very weak signs of silencing were obtained in two different oat species and with two different target genes, indicating that BSMV is not a promising gene silencing vector for oat.
BSMV vectors adapted for ligation-free cloning
The cloning efficiencies for the two vectors were tested by insertion of the 300 nt BdPDS fragment (see above) amplified by PCR using primers designed for either the BSMV-USER or the BSMV-T4 vector. After transformation, more than a hundred colonies were produced from both vectors, and 12 colonies of each were randomly selected. All the BSMVγ-USER-BdPDS clones and six of the BSMVγ-T4-BdPDS clones were found to contain the correct insert. The BSMVγ-USER-BdPDS construct was used for most of the B. distachyon VIGS experiments reported above; one experiment employed the BSMVγ-T4-BdPDS construct. No difference in efficiency of the two constructs was observed. The BSMVγ-USER vector has subsequently been used for preparation of several different VIGS constructs in our laboratory, including the BSMV-PHO2247, BSMV-PHO2387 and BSMV-γ-Cel1-IR constructs used for silencing experiments in barley roots (see above). In all cases, large numbers of colonies were obtained, all of which contained the desired insert. The inverted repeat of BSMV-Cel1-IR was made by simultaneous insertion  of the sense and the antisense fragments as PCR products into the BSMV-USER vector. Again 15 out of 15 colonies tested contained the expected insert, demonstrating the high efficiency of the USER cloning method.
We here present the first evidence of virus induced gene silencing in roots of a monocotyledonous plant species. The transcript levels of HvIPS1, HvPHR1 or HvPHO2 were significantly decreased in the roots of barley plants infected with BSMV-IPS1, BSMV-PHR1 or BSMV-PHO2247 relative to plants infected with the control construct BSMV-GFP250. On the other hand, our attempts at silencing the HvPht1;1 and HvCel1 genes failed. The difference in silencing efficiency for the five genes could be related to differences in experimental conditions or to characteristics of the silencing inducing sequences, the viral constructs, the target genes, or a combination hereof.
Growth conditions, and in particular temperature, are known to be important for the success of VIGS experiments . However all experiments reported here were performed in growth chambers at the same temperature, 20°C. Successful gene silencing in roots was observed under hydroponic growth conditions (HvIPS1) as well as in plants grown in soil (HvPHR1 and HvPHO2), and unsuccessful VIGS results were also obtained under both conditions (HvPht1;1 and HvCel1, respectively). Furthermore, the successful silencing of HvIPS1 was obtained under P-starvation conditions, while the silencing of HvPHR1 and HvPHO2 was achieved under Pi repleteness conditions. Thus the different outcomes with these five target genes seem unrelated to the growth conditions.
Previous studies have indicated that the plant Dicer-like proteins producing siRNAs from dsRNA show a preference for GC rich regions [43, 44], suggesting that GC rich gene fragments would be more likely to induce successful VIGS. An analysis of the silencing inducing fragments used here failed to show any correlation between GC content and silencing, with the successful HvIPS1 fragment having the lowest GC content (41.8%) and the unsuccessful HvPht1;1 fragment the highest (58.1%). See also Additional file 5: GC content in silencing fragments.
The length of the silencing inducing sequence might also influence silencing efficiency. Fragments as short as 33 nt inserted into potato virus X were shown to induce silencing of the PDS gene in Nicotiana benthamiana, but a 368 nt fragment produced stronger silencing . In previous VIGS experiments with BSMV in barley, efficient silencing of the PDS gene has been obtained with fragments ranging from 120 nt to 1215 nt [3, 4, 28]. In the experiments reported here, the successful silencing inducing sequences were 247, 251 or 253 nt in length, respectively, while the unsuccessful sequences were 368 or 401 nt in length or an inverted repeat of 58 nt. Thus, the length of the silencing inducing sequence does not seem directly correlated to the efficiency of silencing.
The length of the sequence inserted into a viral vector may however indirectly impact on the silencing efficiency by influencing the stability of the modified virus. Many viral vectors show a tendency to loose the inserted sequence over time [8, 46, 47]. We have previously shown that the transient nature of BSMV-induced gene silencing is related to instability of the modified virus; the shortest insert tested (128 nt) was most stable, with instability increasing progressively with increasing length up to the longest tested (584 nt) . This prompted us to investigate the stability of the viral constructs used here. The successful construct BSMV-IPS1 proved to be relatively stable, while the unsuccessful BSMV-Pht1;1 was highly unstable. A test of five more constructs, BSMV-Pht1;4, BSMV-Pht1;7, BSMV-PHR1, BSMV-PHO2247 and BSMV-PHO2387, indicated that BSMV-PHR1 and the two BSMV-PHO2 constructs had a stability similar to BSMV-IPS1, and indeed both BSMV-PHR1 and BSMV-PHO2247 were able to induce significant silencing of their target genes in barley roots. On the other hand, three further viral constructs only inducing weak silencing of their target, HvCel1, were all highly unstable. Thus, the stability of the individual viral constructs can account for the differences in silencing efficiency observed.
The reason for the great variation in stability between individual viral constructs is unclear. The length of the insert may be of importance, since three of the most stable constructs, BSMV-IPS1, BSMV-HvPHR1 and BSMV-PHO2247, also carried the shortest of the simple sense inserts, and an inverse correlation between stability and insert length has previously been shown for the PDS gene . However, the BSMV-GFP250 construct was highly unstable, while BSMV-PHO2387 appeared relatively stable, demonstrating that length is not the sole determinant of stability. Possibly, secondary structure of the insert may interfere with steps in the viral infection cycle such as replication or assembly of viral particles. In agreement with this hypothesis, the inverted repeat construct, BSMV-Cel1-IR, was highly unstable despite carrying an insert of only 124 nt in total length. The expected hairpin-loop structure of the inverted repeat may be especially prone to interfere with viral infection steps. The secondary structures of the other inserts in the viral genome context are more difficult to predict, and other features such as local GC content or cryptic motifs might also interfere with the viral infection cycle. A negative effect of the insert on virus fitness would favour the emergence of viral constructs with deletions of the insert. In a previous VIGS study in pea, different silencing efficiencies were obtained when two different Nin gene fragments of equal size were inserted into a Pea early browning virus-based vector. The difference was attributed to differences in viral fitness, since the viral construct inducing the most efficient silencing also accumulated in larger amounts in infected plants .
The efficiency of silencing can also be influenced by characteristics of the target genes, such as accessibility of target sequences for siRNAs, possibly related to target RNA secondary structure [48, 49], or feed-back regulation leading to increased transcription when mRNA levels are reduced by RNA silencing [50, 51]. Genes with high transcription rates and short mRNA half-lives will also appear more refractory to RNAi than genes with slower natural turn-over . We cannot rule out that such factors may also contribute to the different silencing efficiencies we observe.
The HvIPS1 and HvPHO2 genes are expressed in both leaf and root tissues, and BSMV-IPS1 and BSMV-PHO2247 induced similar levels of silencing in both organs. The leaf samples analyzed were taken from leaf no. III where silencing is expected to be most strongly manifested . The root samples were taken after crushing the entire root and thus represent an average of all parts of the root. The significant silencing seen in root tissue with the more stable BSMV constructs suggests that BSMV can induce gene silencing in roots at least as strongly as in leaves. However, the sampling difficulties in roots put greater demands on the silencing efficiency/stability of the virus.
We measured the free Pi contents in the root samples of plants grown under hydroponic conditions. This confirmed that the 0 mM Pi growth conditions indeed led to extremely low levels of free Pi in the plant roots (Additional file 1: Pi content in hydroponics: HvPht1;1 experiment). Silencing of the HvIPS1 gene might have been expected to lead to increased Pi levels, if this gene plays a similar role in Pi regulation in barley as previously shown for the homologous gene in Arabidopsis . However the differences observed were not statistically significant due to the extremely low Pi content of plants grown without addition of Pi (Additional file 6: Pi content in hydroponics: HvIPS1 experiment). Further studies including more sensitive (e.g. P-33 autoradiography) Pi measurements and/or more sophisticated Pi addition regimes will be necessary to establish the impact of HvIPS1 silencing on the Pi uptake in barley. On the other hand, silencing of HvPHO2 under Pi repleteness conditions led to a significant increase in leaf Pi and a similar decrease in root Pi content (Figure 3E). This is in agreement with previous studies in Arabidopsis, where pho2 mutants show increased root-to-shoot translocation of Pi and excessive accumulation of Pi in leaf tissues [31–33]. Our data indicate that the barley PHO2 homologue has similar roles in Pi regulation in barley as previously shown for PHO2 genes in Arabidopsis, and that BSMV-mediated VIGS can be used to explore the roles of barley genes in nutrient acquisition and distribution.
Our VIGS experiments in B. distachyon were successful, in that two out of three plants infected with BSMV-BdPDS developed photobleaching accompagnied by significant reductions in BdPDS mRNA levels (Table 1 Figure 5). These data suggest that BSMV could be a very useful tool for functional genomics in this new model species. We have not attempted gene silencing in B. distachyon roots, but since BSMV was found to infect the roots efficiently (Additional file 3) it is likely that this vector will also be useful for VIGS in B. distachyon roots. The experiments reported here were conducted under greenhouse conditions and the silencing frequency was found to increase between experiment 1 (performed in mid-winter) and experiment 3 (performed in spring), suggesting that optimisation of growth conditions could further increase silencing efficiencies. In barley, efficiency of BSMV-mediated VIGS is highly cultivar dependent, and screening of different B. distachyon accessions may also further improve the VIGS efficiency in this species. For the experiments reported here, line Bd21-3 was chosen since this line is also the preferred line for transformation  and for mutagenesis and TILLING projects by international consortia (e.g., http://www.renewall.eu/). In a recent publication , successful VIGS was demonstrated in the B. distachyon ecotype ABR-1.
Our attempts at using BSMV for VIGS in oat were less promising. Although BSMVCV42 and pseudorecombinants including BSMVCV42-α accumulated to similar levels in infected oat plants as in barley (Figure 6), we found it more difficult to achieve high infection frequencies with in vitro transcripts in oat compared to barley and B. distachyon, and the infected plants showed no or very limited signs of silencing. Although we screened a range of both hexaploid and diploid oat accessions for BSMV susceptibility before choosing two lines for the silencing experiments, it is possible that other accessions may be more suited for VIGS. Furthermore, it is known that growth conditions can significantly affect VIGS efficiency . The experiments reported here were performed in growth chambers under conditions that were previously found to be appropriate for BSMV-mediated VIGS in barley , but further optimisation of temperature and light regimes might lead to improved silencing in oat.
Although the BSMV vectors are generally easy to manipulate during cloning work, occasional cloning difficulties prompted us to explore two previously reported systems for ligation-free cloning. Both the USER cloning strategy  and the T4 DNA polymerase strategy [41, 53] rely on the generation of relatively short sticky ends for inserting fragments into the vectors; in the BSMV vectors reported here, only 8 nt are used for annealing. This means that in contrast to e.g. the GATEWAY cloning strategy, only very few extra nucleotides are introduced into the final virus construct relative to traditional restriction enzyme based cloning strategies. This is particularly important for vectors such as BSMV, where instability of the virus construct increases significantly with increasing length of the foreign sequence . We found the USER strategy to be extremely efficient, fast and reliable for inserting both simple and more complex, inverted repeat fragments into the BSMV vector. The T4 DNA polymerase strategy as implemented here was slightly less efficient, with 6/12 clones containing the correct insert (8/12 in a subsequent experiment (data not shown)). However, due to the general availability of T4 DNA polymerase in most molecular biology laboratories some laboratories may find the T4 vector system preferable.
In conclusion, we have shown that BSMV can be used to induce gene silencing in barley roots. However, we recommend the screening of potential BSMV constructs for stability prior to initiating root silencing experiments. Furthermore, BSMV was shown to be a promising tool for functional genomics studies in B. distachyon, but less so in oat. Finally, new versions of the BSMV vector adapted for ligation-free cloning enable fast and highly efficient insertion of simple as well as inverted-repeat silencing inducing fragments.
Infectious clones of BSMV strain ND18 were from Prof. Andrew Jackson, University of Berkeley . Modifications of the γ clone to allow insertion of gene fragments (BSMVγ-MCS) have previously been described . These ND18-based clones are referred to as "BSMVND18" or simply as "BSMV" in this paper. An ND18-based γ clone where expression of the γb open reading frame is blocked by an insertion site for gene fragments (termed BSMV-γΔb), as well as infectious clones of BSMV strain CV42, were obtained from Prof. Michael Edwards, USDA ARS, USA. The CV42-based clones are referred to here as "BSMVCV42".
Plant growth conditions
Experiments with B. distachyon used the diploid inbred line Bd21-3  and were carried out in a greenhouse with a 20/18°C day/night temperature regime and a light period of 16 h/day, regulated with supplementary light from September to May. Plants were grown in 6-cm peat pots with Pindstrup no. 2 Peat Substrate. Experiments with oat and barley were performed in growth chambers with constant temperature (20°C) and a 16 h light period with light intensity 300 μmol · m-2 · s-1 photosynthetic active radiation (PAR). Oat plants were sown in 11-cm pots with garden soil. For hydroponic culture of barley, seeds were germinated in vermiculite soaked with the final nutrient solution for 5 days (with a 24/17°C day/night temperature regime and 16 h light/day), then transferred to hydroponics with four plants per container. All plants (showing virus symptoms) in one container were treated as one sample. Each container contained one liter of aerated nutrient solution with the following composition: 0.2 mM K2SO4, 0.3 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM NaCl, 0.3 mM Mg(NO3)2, 0.9 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.6 mM KNO3, 0.05 mM Fe(III)-EDTA-Na, 0.5 μM MnCl2, 0.7 μM ZnCl2, 0.8 μM CuSO4, 2 μM H3BO3, 0.8 μM Na2MoO4. KH2PO4 was added separately to some containers to 1 mM final concentration. The pH was between 5.5 and 6.5. Nitrates and micronutrients were supplemented every day and the rest of the nutrients every 4 days. The Pi content in hydroponics was monitored every 4 days by inorganic Pi assay  and when necessary replenished. For growth of barley in soil, seeds were germinated on moist filter paper for 3 days in the growth chamber, then transferred to 11-cm pots with garden soil. In the experiments shown in Figure 3 each pot contained three plants that were treated as one sample. In the experiment shown in Figure 4 each pot contained one plant.
Total RNA was isolated from plant leaves or roots by use of the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturers protocol with RLT buffer without β-mercaptoethanol and on-column DNase treatment.
Construction of BSMV-USER and BSMV-T4
The BSMV-MCS vector has been described previously . To create pBSMVγ-USER, two 5'-phosphorylated DNA oligos GCTGAGGCTTAATTAAACCTCAGC and GATCGCTGAGGTTTAATTAAGCCTCAGCAT were annealed and ligated into Pac I/Bam HI digested pBSMVγ-MCS. To prepare the vector for insertion of PCR products the plasmid was linearized with Pac I, ethanol precipitated and redissolved, digested with Nt.BbvCI, phenol-chloroform extracted, and redissolved at 0.02 pmol/μl. The prepared vector can be stored in aliquots at -20°C for at least one year. To create pBSMVγ-T4, two 5'-phosphorylated DNA oligos CGGATATTAATTAATTCCC and GATCGGGAGTTAATAAATATCCGAT were annealed and ligated into Pac I/Bam HI digested pBSMVγ-MCS. To prepare the vector for insertion of PCR products the plasmid was linearized with Pac I, followed by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of 1 mM dCTP for 30 min. at 22°C. After heat-inactivation at 75°C for 20 min. the vector concentration was adjusted to 0.02 pmol/μl and stored at -20°C.
cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using oligo(dT)15 primer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Gene fragments for insertion into BSMV were PCR amplified using Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) with the primers shown in Additional file 7. GenBank accession numbers for barley genes are also shown in Additional file 7. GFP fragments were amplified using pBIN-mgfp5-ER as template (GenBank Acc. No. U87974). For insertion into pBSMV-MCS, PCR products were cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO plasmid (Invitrogen), verified by sequencing, then excised by Pac I/Bam HI digestion and ligated into pBSMVγ-MCS. For insertion into pBSMVγ-USER, 0.2 pmol PCR product was mixed with 1 μl prepared vector (see above), 1 μl USER enzyme (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), and 1xPCR buffer to a total of 10 μl, incubated at 37°C for 20 min. followed by 20 min. at 25°C, then used directly for transformation of chemically competent E. coli cells. For insertion into pBSMVγ-T4, PCR products were purified on GFX columns, then treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of 1 mM dGTP for 30 min. at 22°C. After heat-inactivation at 75°C for 20 min, 0.4 pmol PCR product was mixed with 1 μl prepared BSMV-T4 vector, incubated 5 min. at 22°C and used for transformation of E. coli.
The inverted repeat of HvCel1 was assembled from two PCR amplified fragments made with primers HvCel1 Fwd1+ HvCel1 Rev1, and HvCel1 Fwd2 + HvCel1 Rev2 (Additional file 7). The two PCR products were simultaneously inserted into pBSMVγ-USER as described above. This generates a 2 × 58 bp inverted repeat derived from the HvCel1 sequence with an 8 nt loop.
All fragments inserted into BSMV were from coding regions of the respective genes except for HvIPS1, which does not encode a protein.
The procedures for in vitro transcription and inoculation have been described previously . Plants were inoculated on the first leaf either six or seven days after sowing. For each experiment all plants were inoculated at the same age. All samples for analysis were harvested nine days after inoculation unless stated otherwise. Only plants displaying virus symptoms on their leaves at the time of harvesting were included in the analysis.
Viral construct stability analysis by PCR
Touchdown PCR with Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche) was used to estimate BSMVγ construct stability with the following primers: BSMVgbF 5'-GAAGAAGATGCAGGAGCTGAA-3'; BSMVgbR 5'-CACTCCCATCATATGGTTGAT-3', these primers surround the inserted fragment (see Figure 1B).
Touchdown PCR was performed as previously described with one modification - elongation at 72°C - 1 min .
Real-time qRT-PCR analysis
cDNA was synthesized from 200 ng of total RNA using random hexamer primers (Eurofins MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany) and Expand Reverse Transcriptase (Roche).
Real-time PCR analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7500 system using SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the Absolute Quantification method according to the manufacturer's protocol. Data were normalized to ubiquitin and/or 18 S rRNA levels. Primers used for real-time PCR are shown in Additional file 7. Real Time PCR products for HvPht1;1, HvIPS1, HvPHR1, and ubiquitin have been verified by sequencing. After each PCR reaction, the specificity of the amplification was verified by melting curve analysis. All samples were measured in duplicate.
Inorganic Pi measurements
The content of inorganic Pi in plant root samples were determined as previously described .
The standard protocol for DAS-ELISA  was used with antisera against BSMV (Cat. No. AS-0135) from DSMZ GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
We would like to thank to Marianne Bruun-Rasmussen for barley IPS1 analysis, Birgit S. Olsen for expert technical assistance, professor Michael Edwards for the CV42 and γΔb clones, and the Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility group, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, for advice on the composition of the hydroponic culture medium. AP was supported by Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship "BARPHO" no. 025110, and BJ by The Danish Food Industry Agency project no. 3304-FVFP-060697-03. The work was funded partly by the Danish Research Council for Technology and Production, grant no. 274-06-0230.
- Jackson AO, Lim HS, Bragg J, Ganesan U, Lee MY: Hordeivirus replication, movement, and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2009, 47: 385-422. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petty ITD, Hunter BG, Wei N, Jackson AO: Infectious Barley Stripe Mosaic-Virus RNA Transcribed In vitro from Full-Length Genomic cDNA Clones. Virology. 1989, 171: 342-349. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90601-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holzberg S, Brosio P, Gross C, Pogue GP: Barley stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing in a monocot plant. Plant J. 2002, 30: 315-327. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01291.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scofield SR, Huang L, Brandt AS, Gill BS: Development of a virus-induced gene-silencing system for hexaploid wheat and its use in functional analysis of the Lr21-mediated leaf rust resistance pathway. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138: 2165-2173. 10.1104/pp.105.061861.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scofield SR, Nelson RS: Resources for Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in the Grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149: 152-157. 10.1104/pp.108.128702.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Cao A, Yu C, Wang D, Wang X, Chen P: Establishment of an effective virus induced gene silencing system with BSMV in Haynaldia villosa. Mol Biol Rep. 2010, 37: 967-972. 10.1007/s11033-009-9766-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Demircan T, Akkaya MS: Virus induced gene silencing in Brachypodium distachyon, a model organism for cereals. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2010, 100: 91-96. 10.1007/s11240-009-9623-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ding XS, Schneider WL, Chaluvadi SR, Mian MAR, Nelson RS: Characterization of a Brome mosaic virus strain and its use as a vector for gene silencing in monocotyledonous hosts. Mol Plant-Microbe In. 2006, 19: 1229-1239. 10.1094/MPMI-19-1229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pacak A, Strozycki PM, Barciszewska-Pacak M, Alejska M, Lacomme C, Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, Figlerowicz M: The brome mosaic virus-based recombination vector triggers a limited gene silencing response depending on the orientation of the inserted sequence. Arch Virol. 2010, 155: 169-179. 10.1007/s00705-009-0556-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentine T, Shaw J, Blok VC, Phillips MS, Oparka KJ, Lacomme C: Efficient virus-induced gene silencing in roots using a modified tobacco rattle virus vector. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 3999-4009. 10.1104/pp.104.051466.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Constantin GD, Krath BN, MacFarlane SA, Nicolaisen M, Johansen IE, Lund OS: Virus-induced gene silencing as a tool for functional genomics in a legume species. Plant J. 2004, 40: 622-631. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02233.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Constantin GD, Grønlund M, Johansen IE, Stougaard J, Lund OS: Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) as a reverse genetic tool to study development of symbiotic root nodules. Mol Plant-Microbe In. 2008, 21: 720-727. 10.1094/MPMI-21-6-0720.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He XX, Jin CW, Li GX, You GY, Zhou XP, Zheng SJ: Use of the modified viral satellite DNA vector to silence mineral nutrition-related genes in plants: silencing of the tomato ferric chelate reductase gene, FRO1, as an example. Science in China Series C-Life Sciences. 2008, 51: 402-409. 10.1007/s11427-008-0066-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang C, Yang CL, Whitham SA, Hill JH: Development and Use of an Efficient DNA-Based Viral Gene Silencing Vector for Soybean. Mol Plant-Microbe In. 2009, 22: 123-131. 10.1094/MPMI-22-2-0123.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Draper J, Mur LAJ, Jenkins G, Ghosh-Biswas GC, Bablak P, Hasterok R, Routledge APM: Brachypodium distachyon. A new model system for functional genomics in grasses. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127: 1539-1555. 10.1104/pp.010196.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogel JP, Garvin DF, Mockler TC, Schmutz J, Rokhsar D, Bevan MW, Barry K, Lucas S, Harmon-Smith M, Lail K: Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature. 2010, 463: 763-768. 10.1038/nature08747.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christiansen P, Andersen CH, Didion T, Folling M, Nielsen KK: A rapid and efficient transformation protocol for the grass Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 23: 751-758. 10.1007/s00299-004-0889-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogel J, Hill T: High-efficiency Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Brachypodium distachyon inbred line Bd21-3. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27: 471-478. 10.1007/s00299-007-0472-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves SC, Worland B, Thole V, Snape JW, Bevan MW, Vain P: A protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Brachypodium distachyon community standard line Bd21. Nature Protocols. 2009, 4: 638-649. 10.1038/nprot.2009.30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rines HW MS, Tinker NA, Phillips RL: Oat. Cereals and millets. Edited by: Berlin CK. 2006, Springer Verlag, 211-242. full_text. [C K (Series Editor): Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tinker NA, Kilian A, Wight CP, Heller-Uszynska K, Wenzl P, Rines HW, Bjornstad A, Howarth CJ, Jannink JL, Anderson JM: New DArT markers for oat provide enhanced map coverage and global germplasm characterization. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 39-10.1186/1471-2164-10-39.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haralampidis K, Bryan G, Qi X, Papadopoulou K, Bakht S, Melton R, Osbourn A: A new class of oxidosqualene cyclases directs synthesis of antimicrobial phytoprotectants in monocots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 13431-13436. 10.1073/pnas.231324698.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brautigam M, Lindlof A, Zakhrabekova S, Gharti-Chhetri G, Olsson B, Olsson O: Generation and analysis of 9792 EST sequences from cold acclimated oat, Avena sativa. BMC Plant Biology. 2005, 5: 18-10.1186/1471-2229-5-18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svitashev S, Ananiev E, Pawlowski WP, Somers DA: Association of transgene integration sites with chromosome rearrangements in hexaploid oat. Theor Appl Genet. 2000, 100: 872-880. 10.1007/s001220051364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gasparis S, Bregier C, Orczyk W, Nadolska-Orczyk A: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars via immature embryo and leaf explants. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27: 1721-1729. 10.1007/s00299-008-0593-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schünmann PH, Richardson AE, Smith FW, Delhaize E: Characterization of promoter expression patterns derived from the Pht1 phosphate transporter genes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Exp Bot. 2004, 55: 855-865. 10.1093/jxb/erh103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schünmann PH, Richardson AE, Vickers CE, Delhaize E: Promoter analysis of the barley Pht1;1 phosphate transporter gene identifies regions controlling root expression and responsiveness to phosphate deprivation. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 4205-4214. 10.1104/pp.104.045823.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruun-Rasmussen M, Madsen CT, Jessing S, Albrechtsen M: Stability of Barley stripe mosaic virus - Induced gene silencing in barley. Mol Plant-Microbe In. 2007, 20: 1323-1331. 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin AC, del Pozo JC, Iglesias J, Rubio V, Solano R, de la Pena A, Leyva A, Paz-Ares J: Influence of cytokinins on the expression of phosphate starvation responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000, 24: 559-567. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00893.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M, Mateos I, Puga MI, Rubio-Somoza I, Leyva A, Weigel D, Garcia JA, Paz-Ares J: Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1033-1037. 10.1038/ng2079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible WR: PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 988-999. 10.1104/pp.106.079707.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Huang YT, Su CL, Chiou TJ: pho2, a phosphate overaccumulator, is caused by a nonsense mutation in a microRNA399 target gene. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 1000-1011. 10.1104/pp.106.078063.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible WR: MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J. 2008, 53: 731-738. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacomme C, Hrubikova K, Hein I: Enhancement of virus-induced gene silencing through viral-based production of inverted-repeats. Plant J. 2003, 34: 543-553. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01733.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Molhoj M, Pagant SR, Hofte H: Towards understanding the role of membrane-bound endo-beta-1,4-glucanases in cellulose biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2002, 43: 1399-1406. 10.1093/pcp/pcf163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumagai MH, Donson J, Dellacioppa G, Harvey D, Hanley K, Grill LK: Cytoplasmic Inhibition of Carotenoid Biosynthesis with Virus-Derived RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 1679-1683. 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1679.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiland JJ, Edwards MC: Evidence That the Alpha-a Gene of Barley Stripe Mosaic-Virus Encodes Determinants of Pathogenicity to Oat (Avena-Sativa). Virology. 1994, 201: 116-126. 10.1006/viro.1994.1271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiland JJ, Edwards MC: A single nucleotide substitution in the alpha a gene confers oat pathogenicity to barley stripe mosaic virus strain ND18. Mol Plant-Microbe In. 1996, 9: 62-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tai YS, Bragg J, Edwards MC: Virus vector for gene silencing in wheat. Biotechniques. 2005, 39: 310-312. 10.2144/05393BM03.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nour-Eldin HH, Geu-Flores F, Halkier BA: USER cloning and USER fusion: the ideal cloning techniques for small and big laboratories. Methods Mol Biol. 2010, 643: 185-200. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dong Y, Burch-Smith TM, Liu Y, Mamillapalli P, Dinesh-Kumar SP: A Ligation-Independent cloning tobacco rattle virus vector for high-throughput virus-induced gene silencing identifies roles for NbMADS4-1 and -2 in floral development. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145: 1161-1170. 10.1104/pp.107.107391.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burch-Smith TM, Anderson JC, Martin GB, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Applications and advantages of virus-induced gene silencing for gene function studies in plants. Plant J. 2004, 39: 734-746. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02158.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho T, Wang H, Pallett D, Dalmay T: Evidence for targeting common siRNA hotspots and GC preference by plant Dicer-like proteins. FEBS Letters. 2007, 581: 3267-3272. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho T, Pilcher RLR, Edwards ML, Cooper I, Dalmay T, Wang H: Evidence for GC preference by monocot Dicer-like proteins. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2008, 368: 433-437. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas CL, Jones L, Baulcombe DC, Maule AJ: Size constraints for targeting post-transcriptional gene silencing and for RNA-directed methylation in Nicotiana benthamiana using a potato virus × vector. Plant J. 2001, 25: 417-425. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00976.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donson J, Kearney CM, Hilf ME, Dawson WO: Systemic Expression of a Bacterial Gene by a Tobacco Mosaic Virus-Based Vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 7204-7208. 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7204.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avesani L, Marconi G, Morandini F, Albertini E, Bruschetta M, Bortesi L, Pezzotti M, Porceddu A: Stability of Potato virus X expression vectors is related to insert size: implications for replication models and risk assessment. Transgenic Res. 2007, 16: 587-597. 10.1007/s11248-006-9051-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gredell JA, Berger AK, Walton SP: Impact of target mRNA structure on siRNA silencing efficiency: A large-scale study. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008, 100: 744-755. 10.1002/bit.21798.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rudnick SI, Swaminathan J, Sumaroka M, Liebhabert S, Gewirtz AM: Effects of local mRNA structure on posttranscriptional gene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 13787-13792. 10.1073/pnas.0805781105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D: Specific effects of MicroRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell. 2005, 8: 517-527. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bellés X: Beyond Drosophila: RNAi in vivo and functional genomics in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010, 55: 111-128. 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds E: RNAi and the insect immune system. Insect Immunology. Edited by: Beckage N. 2008, Academic Press, 295-330. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aslanidis C, Dejong PJ: Ligation-Independent Cloning of Pcr Products (Lic-Pcr). Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 6069-6074. 10.1093/nar/18.20.6069.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lanzetta PA, Alvarez LJ, Reinach PS, Candia OA: Improved Assay for Nanomole Amounts of Inorganic-Phosphate. Anal Biochem. 1979, 100: 95-97. 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90115-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haseloff J, Siemering KR, Prasher DC, Hodge S: Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 2122-2127. 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2122.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tolia NH, Joshua-Tor L: Strategies for protein coexpression in Escherichia coli. Nature Methods. 2006, 3: 55-64. 10.1038/nmeth0106-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller R, Nilsson L, Krintel C, Nielsen TH: Gene expression during recovery from phosphate starvation in roots and shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum. 2004, 122: 233-243. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00394.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark MF, Adams AN: Characteristics of Microplate Method of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Plant-Viruses. J Gen Virol. 1977, 34: 475-483. 10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.