Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology
  • Open Access

Protocol: high-efficiency in-planta Agrobacterium-mediated transgenic hairy root induction of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis

Contributed equally
Plant Methods201814:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0285-8

  • Received: 8 August 2017
  • Accepted: 19 February 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Camellia sinensis var. sinensis is widely grown for tea beverages that possess significant health promoting effects. Studies on tea plant genetics and breeding are hindered due to its recalcitrance to Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Among the possible reasons, oxidation of phenolics released from explant tissues and bactericidal effects of tea polyphenols during the process of transformation play a role in the plant recalcitrance. The aim of the present study was to alleviate the harmful effects of phenolic compounds using in-planta transformation.

Results

Two-month old seedlings of tea cultivar “Nong Kangzao” were infected at the hypocotyl with wild type Agrobacterium rhizogenes and maintained in an environment of high humidity. 88.3% of infected plants developed hairy roots at the wounded site after 2 months of infection. Our data indicated that transgenic hairy root induction of tea can be achieved using A. rhizogenes following the optimized protocol.

Conclusion

With this method, composite tea plants containing wild-type shoots with transgenic roots can be generated for “in root” gene functional characterization and root-shoot interaction studies. Moreover, this method can be applied to improve the root system of composite tea plants for a better resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses.

Keywords

  • Hairy root
  • Tea
  • Agrobacterium rhizogenes
  • Polyphenols
  • Tissue browning
  • In-planta

Background

Tea is consumed as a popular beverage globally. The People’s Republic of China ranks first (1,467,467 tonnes) in the world followed by India (991,180 tonnes), Kenya, Sri Lanka, and Turkey in tea production [1]. World tea production reached 4.52 million tonnes with an average consumption of 644.1 tonnes/day in the United Kingdom [2]. Tea is generally divided into pu-erh, oolong, green and black tea depending on the manufacturing process. In Asia pu-erh tea is almost exclusively consumed as compared to black tea which economically dominates the market and is popular in the West. In China and Japan green tea is common over the other types whereas, Oolong tea is preferred in some other countries [3].

Tea roots are rich in l-theanine, a unique non-protein amino acid synthesized in the roots, but accumulates in the leaves of tea plants. Recently l-theanine has been researched due to its beneficial effects on reducing anxiety, suppressing high blood pressure, improving learning ability, as well as promoting relaxation [48]. Tea leaves are rich in polyphenols, which exhibit anticancer, anti-allergic, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and immunostimulant effects [9]. The natural polyphenols may have beneficial antioxidant effects in humans due to their ability to deactivate free radicals within the body [10]. In particular, the various therapeutic properties of tea polyphenols have been explored recently for the development of novel antimicrobials to treat microbial infections [11, 12]. The most abundant flavanol group of polyphenols known as catechins present in green tea leaves are at 16–30% (DW), among which (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is the dominant form [13, 14]. It has been proposed that the presence of galloyl moieties in ECG and EGCG act as antimicrobials through direct binding with bacterial peptidoglycan layer and interferes with its biosynthesis [15].

Tea is grown in different countries and climates across the world under a rain-fed mono-cropping system that is influenced by climatic variations that determine optimal growth. Given the increasing drought conditions together with salinity there is a need for thorough investigation of molecular and physiological processes involved in salt and drought tolerance in order to improve the agronomic traits in tea [16, 17]. In recent years DNA delivery through Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation has been widely used for the production of transgenic plants to improve the agricultural and nutritional traits.

However, biotechnological exploitation and application of plant genetic resources for trait improvement and stress resistance enhancement in tea have been hindered due to the recalcitrance of tea plants to Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation, even though some genetic transformation of tea plants has been reported for some clones of Camellia sinensis var. assamica [1820]. A well-established protocol for tea genetic transformation is required to overcome this bottleneck. During in vitro Agrobacterium-mediated tea transformation, the polyphenols released from the explant wounding site suppress the growth of Agrobacterium due to their bactericidal effect [21]. Generally, the high amount of bactericidal polyphenols is also toxic to the plant tissues, probably because of quinone formation from the oxidation of tannins and polyphenols following wounding or stress [22]. Although the polyphenols are less in calli compared to tea leaves [22, 23], the accumulation of phenolic content moderately increases during sub-culturing [24] and stress conditions such as explant excision, wounding, co-cultivation of explants with Agrobacterium, antibiotic selection, light exposure, and application of disinfectants for explant surface sterilization [22, 25, 26]. During in-vitro Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, a co-culture period of 2–3 days is usually required for most crop species. Whereas in tea an optimum period of 5–6 days is recommended to enhance the transformation efficiency [18, 19], which may cause excessive explant browning [26]. For optimizing the Agrobacterium–mediated tea transformation efficiency and to control phenolic oxidation of tea explant tissues, different culture conditions and media supplemented with different adsorbents and antioxidants have been tested to mitigate tissue browning (necrosis) and improve genetic transformation efficiency [26]. The oncogenes of root-inducing (Ri) plasmid from the extrachromosomal replicon of A. rhizogenes can result in the formation of independent hairy roots after being integrated into the plant genome [27]. Genetically transformed hairy roots can be generated from explants such as leaves and stems by A. rhizogenes infection for plant metabolic engineering, plant-pathogen interaction, nodulation, mycorrhization, and phytoremediation studies [2832]. Transgenic hairy roots can be also induced from wild-type shoots, resulting in the production of composite plants [32]. This composite system allows for “in root” examination of transgene functions in the context of a complete plant and can be utilized for root-shoot interaction studies and crop trait improvement without changing its shoot genetic background. Thus, the offspring generated either by sexual or asexual means from wild type tissues of the composite plant should not contain any transgene.

To extend the study of genetic analysis and gene function, efficient transformation techniques are needed. The various explants of tea such as shoots, hypocotyl, cotyledon and cotyledonary nodes have been used to produce genetically modified plants either by using particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. However, on larger scales these transformation methods are insufficient and labor-intensive. Genes involved in root biology are under investigation for nutrient uptake, pathogen interactions, symbiosis, hormone transport. These problems can be addressed using A. rhizogenes-mediated transgenic hairy root induction [33], which can be easily analyzed.

Methods

Plant materials and growth

Mature seeds were collected during autumn from 7-year-old tea plants (C. sinensis var. sinensis cv. “Nong Kangzao”) grown at the experimental tea farm of Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China. Seeds were soaked for overnight after rinsing with tap-water and removal of the outer coat. Using a strainer, the “floaters” and “sinkers” were separated. “Sinkers” were used as primary batch for sowing. The selected seeds were soaked in 4% bavistin (Guoguang Agricultural Chemicals, Si-Chuan, China) overnight to eliminate fungal contamination, followed by 70% (v/v) ethanol for 3 min and 0.1% mercuric chloride for 4 min and thoroughly rinsed five times in sterile distilled water. Seed sterilization could minimize the risk of microbial contamination and infection. Sterilization is essential when growing plants in a humid chamber since the warm, humid environment in the chamber promotes the growth of pathogens, especially fungi. The mixture of Pindstrup high quality peat substrate (Pindstrup Horticulture Ltd, Shanghai, China) and vermiculite (3:1 v/v) was placed in polythene bags and autoclaved for 15 min at 121 °C, 15 psi. The seeds were placed into wet autoclaved mixture in pots (12 cm in dimeter and 14 cm in height) for germination in a growth chamber at 26 ± 2 °C for 2 months.

Agrobacterium rhizogenes strains

Wild-type A. rhizogenes A4 agropine-type strain obtained from Agricultural Culture Collection of China (ACCC) and its transformant containing the binary plasmid pBI121 (14.7 Kb) were used in this study. pBI121 contains uidA reporter gene (GUS, β-glucuronidase) driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and the terminator of nopaline synthase (nos) gene. The binary vector was introduced into A. rhizogenes strains by electroporation [34] and transformants were selected on A4 solid media (10 g sucrose, 0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O, 0.5 g K2HPO4, 0.2 g CaSO4, 0.1 g NaCl, 1.0 ml of 1% NaMoO4, 1 ml of 1% C6H5FeO7, 1 ml of 1% Boric acid, 1.0 g Yeast extract and 15 g Agar in 1000 ml of double distilled H2O, pH 6.8–7.0) (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) supplemented with 50 mg/l kanamycin.

Plant transformation

A single colony of A4-wild type and the A4 transformant harboring pBI121 was used to inoculate 5 ml of A4 liquid media. The cultures were incubated overnight at 28 °C with shaking (200 rpm) on an orbital shaker (Zhicheng, Shanghai, China). To develop enough bacterial paste both the strains were streaked on respective media and incubated for 4 days at 28 °C. It is critical to always inoculate Agrobacterium cultures on A4 sloid media directly from glycerol stocks and not from stored plates. For hairy root induction, 2 months old healthy seedlings were selected. The hypocotyl region was punctured using a needle carrying a drop of Agrobacterium paste (OD600 = 0.1) and the punctured region was smeared with Agrobacterium paste using bent glass rod. It is critical to smear the Agrobacterium paste with a bent glass rod around the wounded hypocotyl region to enhance infection. The infected plants were transferred to a humid chamber and watered with 10% A4 strain suspension with a culture density of OD600 = 0.6 from the first 2 weeks. After 2-weeks the plants were transferred to growth chamber and kept under 16 h light (cool white fluorescent light tubes providing irradiance of 40–50 mmol m −2 s−1) and 8 h dark cycle at 26 ± 2 °C. The plants were periodically watered with 1% MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium and water for 3 months. Critical step: Watering of the seedlings with A4 suspension for the first 2 weeks is a key step to increase the Agrobacterium population in the pot mixture to enhance infection.

Transgene analysis

The roots from infected and non-infected seedlings were collected and washed with running tap water for 1 h and rinsed with sterile distilled water. The roots were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min to remove Agrobacterium and other microbes from the surface of roots. Genomic DNA was extracted from the sterilized roots using the MiniBEST Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). PCR detection of transgenes in root DNA extracts were performed using gene specific primer pairs for rol C and aux1 which are present in the T-DNA region of A. rhizogenes. Further PCR detection for uidA was carried out to confirm the transgene integration in roots transformed with A4 harboring pBI121, using gene specific primers (Table 1) as per manufacturer’s instructions (TransGene, Beijing, China). Programmable thermal cycler (Bio-Rad S1000) was used for the amplification under the following cycles: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 10 min). PCR product was resolved on 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization of the bands. To check the expression levels of some root-inducing genes in the shoots of the composite plants, leaves were collected to extract total RNA using RNAprep pure Plant Kit (TianGen Biotech., Ltd, Beijing, China). The quality and quantity of RNA were analyzed using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and agarose gel. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) expression analysis was performed on a CFX96 platform (Bio-Rad, California, USA) using gene specific primers for uidA and six other Agrobacterium genes rol A, rol B, rol C, rol D, ORF13a, and ORF14 with 18S rRNA as reference gene for data normalization (Table 1).
Table 1

Primers used in this study

Primer code

Sequence of the primer

Note

rol a

5′-atggaactagccggaataaa-3′

5′-accccgtaggtctgaatatt-3′

qPCR analysis

rol b

5′-atggcactgaacttgccgtt-3′

5′-agtcgccgaggtttctttct-3′

qPCR analysis

rol c

5′-atggcggaatttgacctatg-3′

5′-ctccattccaaatttgcatt-3′

qPCR analysis

rol d

5′-atggctcgttatttcggcag-3′

5′-ttccaacaggaccttgccaa-3′

qPCR analysis

orf13a

5′-atgctcaccgctcacgcgat-3′

5′-ggtgttccaaattgactggc-3′

qPCR analysis

orf14

5′-atgagcatggcagatgagtt-3′

5′-aaatacactctttccagcac-3′

qPCR analysis

uidA

5′-attggggccaactcctaccgtac-3′

5′-gctgctgtcggctttaacctctct-3′

qPCR analysis and gene detection

rol c

5′-tgtgacaagcagcgatgagc-3′

5′-gattgcaaacttgcactcgc-3′

PCR gene detection

aux1

5′-ccaagcttgtcagaaaacttcaggg-3′

5′-ccggatccaatacccagcgcttt-3′

PCR gene detection

GUS assay

The histochemical assay for the reporter gene GUS activity was performed using the established method [35]. For histochemical detection, the transformed roots were incubated overnight in a solution containing 25 mg/l of histochemical substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide (Aladdin, Shanghai, China), 10 mM EDTA, phosphate buffer, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 20% methanol, pH 8.0. The reaction mixture was placed under mild vacuum for 5 min and incubated overnight at 37º C. After incubation, blue color was observed on root tissues transformed with A4 strain carrying pBI121. No color was observed on A4-wild type strain transformed hairy roots.

Results

High efficiency protocol for the generation of composite plants in tea

The use of ex vitro composite plants through A. rhizogenes—mediated transformation has been widely researched in various plant species [3638]. We have optimized the hairy root induction protocol in tea (Fig. 1; Table 2) that reliably generates high efficiency transformed roots suitable for root biology studies. The surface sterilized seeds were transferred in polypropylene pots containing high quality Pindstrup substrate and allowed for germination at 26 ± 2 °C for 2-months. The healthy seedlings were selected for hairy root induction to produce composite plants. The 2-month old seedlings were carefully up-rooted from the substrate and washed with running tap water for 10–15 min. The seedlings were infected as described in methodology and transferred in mini plastic acrodomes and watered with 10% A4 strain suspension with a culture density of OD600 = 0.6 for 2 weeks. Among the factors that enhance high efficiency hairy root induction, we found that smearing of Agrobacterium paste around the punctured region, maintaining humid conditions after infection and continuous watering with A4 suspension culture at a density of OD600 = 0.6 were essential. We also observed root initiation at the punctured region of hypocotyl after 2-months of infection. Compared to control plants without A4 infection (Fig. 3a–c), 88.3% (± 2%) of infected plants with A4-wild type and A4-harboring pBI121 produced transgenic hairy roots (Table 3; Fig. 3d–g). After 5 months the roots were collected from the non-infected, A4-wild type and A4-harboring pBI121 infected plants to confirm the integration of T-DNA region in the transformed hairy roots. The presence of Agrobacterial transgenes rolC, aux1 and uidA were PCR detected in the hairy roots, thus confirming successful gene transformation (Fig. 4a, b). To further validate the presence of the marker enzyme GUS, transformed hairy roots of A4-wild type (control) and A4-harboring pBI121 were used for histochemical GUS staining. Development of deep blue color in transgenic hairy roots, following histochemical staining for GUS activity further confirmed the transgenic status of hairy roots tested (Fig. 5). Furthermore, qPCR analysis revealed that none of the transgenes were expressed in the leaves of the composite plants (Fig. 4c). For rolD and uidA, their expression ratios to the reference gene 18S rRNA were only 0.00029 and 0.00081, which were likely resulted from non-specific amplification.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The stepwise protocol for in-planta hairy root induction in tea seedlings

Table 2

Troubleshooting

Problem

Reason

Solution

Poor germination and seedling growth

Used floaters

Poor storage of seeds

Use sinkers

Use desiccants during storage at 4 °C

Lack of induction of hairy roots

Agrobacterium may lose virulence over the culturing process or become contaminated

Seedling viability is too low

Plants were not periodically watered

Use fresh − 80 °C glycerol stock

Grow new seedlings

Water plants regularly

Table 3

Effect of Agrobacterium rhizogenes (A4) on hairy root induction in tea seedlings

Number of seedlings

Number of seedlings with hairy root

PCR rolC

PCR aux1

Final transformation efficiency (%)

20

18

+

+

90

20

18

+

+

90

20

17

+

+

85

Average of final transformation efficiency (%) 88.33

‘+’ indicates the presence of rolC and aux1 in transformed roots

Discussion

The in-vitro transformation of tea faces many challenges limiting the realization of a viable and feasible protocol for tea transformation. In-planta Agrobacterium transformation gives a practical alternative in overcoming challenges that arise from in-vitro transformation such as meticulous sterilization, laborious plant management, and low transformation efficiency. This technique can be used for “in root” gene functional studies such as understanding of root-produced l-theanine metabolic pathways, shoot–root interaction, root resistance against different biotic and abiotic stresses. The improvement of the whole composite plant system resulting from the root genetic manipulation will not change the genotype of the composite plant shoots genetically, so that the economically important genetic traits of the shoots may be maintained, even enhanced.

In the present study, for in-planta hairy root induction in recalcitrant tea plants, the A. rhizogene strains A4 and A4-harboring pBI121 were found to be effective to establish chimeric plants with transgenic hairy roots at the hypocotyl proximal region. Our data indicated that using this protocol high-efficiency of hairy root formation (88.3%) in tea has been achieved. Further efforts should be made to improve this protocol such as Agrobacterial infection to obtain more consistent hairy root production among infected seedlings. Similar in-planta transformation has been reportedly applied to generate transgenic hairy roots in recalcitrant bean species, Phaseolus acutifolius, P. vulgaris, P. coccineous, P. lunatus for various purposes [39]. Similarly, Vieweg et al. [40] demonstrated the effective induction of hairy roots for DNA transfer using an agropine type A. rhizogenes strain on the model legume Vicia hirsuta, V. faba, Medicago truncatula and Pisum sativum. These previous findings suggest that the hairy roots can be induced on a wide range of legumes with appropriate A. rhizogenes by infecting the hypocotyl and/or the cotyledonary node. Here, in our current protocol an attempt has been made to transform tea plant, with an emphasis to reduce oxidative browning. This protocol may serve as an efficient tool for the rapid validation of transgene and tea root biology studies. Based on the efficiency of this protocol we might possibly achieve similar transformation efficiency with many other tea varieties for practical and biological study purposes.

Conclusion

The protocol described here has been successfully adapted to induce hairy roots in the recalcitrant Chinese tea variety “Nong Kangzao”. In-vitro transformation has more challenges, which limits success in improving tea varieties; in-planta transformation gives an alternative in overcoming challenges posed by in-vitro transformation. This protocol is an important tool for the study of root biology and secondary metabolites. It may be possible to achieve similar efficiency with all tea varieties, other woody and medicinal plants.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KA and LFS conducted the experiments and prepared the manuscript; SW conceived the study, provided critical suggestions and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank all our lab members Zhou Hanchen, Jing-Yi Pang, Yu-Hao Yan, Dong-Wei Zhao, Zhen Yan, Meng-Xian Zhang for their technical support at State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article: Tables 1, 2, 3, Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Illustrations depicting the infection of tea-seedlings with A. rhizogenes a 2-month-old seedlings suitable for hairy root induction; b the bacterial mass obtained after 4 days of growth on A4-modified medium in the Petri dish; c inoculation with bacterial paste by puncturing the hypocotyl with a needle; d the infected seedlings transferred to assembled humid chamber for effective transformation

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Different stages of hairy root induction in tea seedlings ac controls without Agrobacterium; ac3, c4 punctured; c1, c2 not punctured; df Agrobacterium treated tea plants; d, e infected by A4 wild-type; f infected by A4-harboring PBI121; g 5 month old infected plants

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Validation of T-DNA insertion in hairy roots using PCR a amplification of rolC (Lane 1, 2) and aux1 (Lane 3, 4) from A4-wild type and A4-harboring pBI121 generated hairy roots; M, 1000 bp ladder; C, non-transformed roots; b amplification of uidA (GUS) gene from A4-harboring pBI121 generated hairy roots; M, 1000 bp ladder; C, transgenic hairy roots of A4-wild type; Lanes 1–4, transgenic hairy roots of A4 with uidA; c the relative transcript levels of the transgenes to the reference gene 18S rRNA showing their absence in the shoots of composite plants

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

GUS activity assay in roots of tea after transformation with A. rhizogenes harboring pBI121 using X-gluc a control: transgenic hairy roots of A4-wild type; b transgenic hairy roots carrying pBI121 uidA showing blue color

Consent for publication

All authors are consent for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 31370687) to Shu Wei financially supported this work. Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31770734) and Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant No. 20123418110002).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-Production FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?pageID=567&lang=en#ancor. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  2. http://www.statisticbrain.com/tea-drinking-statistics/. Accessed 30 July 2012.
  3. Balentine DA, Wiseman SA, Bouwens LCM. The chemistry of tea flavonoids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1997;37:693–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yokogoshi H, Kato Y, Sagesaka YM, Matsuura TT, Kakuda T, Takeuchi N. Reduction effect of theanine on blood pressure and brain 5-hydroxyindoles in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1995;59:615–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yokozawa T, Dong EB. Influence of green tea and its three major components upon low-density lipoprotein oxidation. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1997;49:329–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Juneja LR, Chu DC, Okubo T, Nagato Y, Yokogoshi H. l-theanine—a unique amino acid of green tea and its relaxation effect in humans. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1999;10:199–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kakuda T, Nozawa A, Unno T, Okamura N, Okai O. Inhibiting effects of theanine on caffeine stimulation evaluated by EEG in the rat. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000;64:287–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim KS, Song CH, Oh HJ. Effects of theanine on the release of brain alpha-wave in adult males. FASEB J. 2004;18:541–2.Google Scholar
  9. Scalbert A, Manach C, Morand C, Rémésy C. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2005;45:287–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Staszewski MV, Pilosof AMR, Jagus RJ. Antioxidant and antimicrobial performance of different argentinean green tea varieties as affected by whey proteins. Food Chem. 2011;125:186–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor PW, Stapleton PD, Luzio JP. New ways to treat bacterial infections. Drug Discov Today. 2002;7:1086–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman M. Overview of antibacterial, antitoxin, antiviral, and antifungal activities of tea flavonoids and teas. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007;51:116–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Almajano MP, Carbó R, Jiménez JAL, Gordon MH. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of tea infusions. Food Chem. 2008;108:55–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham HN. Green tea composition, consumption, and polyphenol chemistry. Prev Med. 1992;21:334–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shimamura T, Zhao WH, Hu ZQ. Mechanism of action and potential for use of tea catechin as an anti-infective agent. Anti-Infect Agents Med Chem. 2007;6:57–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Rus AM, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM. Unraveling salt tolerance in crops. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1029–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Beritognolo I, Harfouche A, et al. Comparative study of transcriptional and physiological responses to salinity stress in two contrasting Populus alba L. genotypes. Tree Physiol. 2011;31:1335–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mondal TK, Bhattacharya A, Ahuja PS, Chand PK. Transgenic tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze cv. Kangra Jat) plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Rep. 2001;20:712–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopez SJ, Kumar RR, Pius PK, Muraleedharan N. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2004;22:201–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandal I, Saini U, Lacroix B, Bhattacharya A, Ahuja PS, Citovsky V. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of tea leaf explants: effects of counteracting bactericidity of leaf polyphenols without loss of bacterial virulence. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:169–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yam TS, Shah S, Hamilton-Miller JM. Microbiological activity of whole and fractionated crude extracts of tea (Camellia sinensis), and of tea components. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;152:169–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ru Z, Lai Y, Xu C, Li L. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in early stage of browning of Phalaenopsis leaf explants. J Agric Sci. 2013;5:57–64.Google Scholar
  23. Song DP, Feng L, Rana MM, Gao MJ, Wei S. Effects of catechins on Agrobacterium- mediated genetic transformation of Camellia sinensis. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. 2014;119:27–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Naz S, Ali A, Iqbal J. Phenolic content in vitro cultures of chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.) during callogenesis and organogenesis. Pak J Bot. 2008;40:2525–39.Google Scholar
  25. Ngomuo M, Mneney E, Ndakidemi P. Control of lethal browning by using ascorbic acid on shoot tip cultures of a local Musa spp. (Banana) cv. Mzuzu in Tanzania. Afr J Biotechnol. 2014;13:1721–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rana MM, Han ZH, Song DP, Liu GF, Li DX, Wan XC, Karthikeyan A, Wei S. Effect of medium supplements on Agrobacterium rhizogenes mediated hairy root induction from the callus tissues of Camellia sinensis var. Sinensis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1132–49.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Ali M, Kiani BH, Mannan A, Ismail T, Mirza B. Enhanced production of artemisinin by hairy root cultures of Artemisia dubia. J Med Plant Res. 2012;6:1619–22.Google Scholar
  28. Sujatha G, Zdravković-Korać S, Ćalić D, Flamini G, Ranjitha Kumaria BD. High-efficiency Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation in Artemisia vulgaris: Hairy root production and essential oil analysis. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;44:643–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Christey MC. Use of Ri-mediated transformation for production of transgenic plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2001;37:687–700.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Georgiev MI, Agostini E, Ludwig-Muller J, Xu J. Genetically transformed roots: from plant disease to biotechnological resource. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:528–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Guillon S, Tremouillaux-Guiller J, Pati PK, Rideau M, Gantet P. Hairy root research: recent scenario and exciting prospects. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9:341–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor CG, Fuchs B, Collier R, Lutke WK. Generation of composite plants using Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;343:155–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chilton MD, et al. Agrobacterium rhizogenes inserts T-DNA into the genome of the host plant root cells. Nature. 1982;295:432–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagel R, Elliott A, Masel A, Birch RG, Manners JM. Electroporation of binary Ti plasmid vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;67:325–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Jefferson RA. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1987;5:387–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Collier R, Fuchs B, Walter N, Kevin Lutke W, Taylor CG. Ex vitro composite plants: an inexpensive, rapid method for root biology. Plant J. 2005;43:449–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Colpaert N. Composite Phaseolus vulgaris plants with transgenic roots as research tool. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7:404–8.Google Scholar
  38. Clemow SR, Clairmont L, Madsen LH, Guinel FC. Reproducible hairy root transformation and spot-inoculation methods to study root symbioses of pea. Plant Methods. 2011;7:46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Estrada-Navarrete G, et al. Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformation of the Phaseolus spp.: a tool for functional genomics. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006;19:1385–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vieweg MF, et al. The promoter of the Vicia faba L. gene VfLb29 is specifically activated in the infected cells of root nodules and in the arbuscule-containing cells of mycorrhizal roots from different legume and non-legume plants. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004;17:62–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement