Open Access

Protocol: methodology for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

  • Daniela Strenkert1,
  • Stefan Schmollinger1 and
  • Michael Schroda1Email author
Plant Methods20117:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-35

Received: 13 July 2011

Accepted: 3 November 2011

Published: 3 November 2011

Abstract

We report on a detailed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The protocol is suitable for the analysis of nucleosome occupancy, histone modifications and transcription factor binding sites at the level of mononucleosomes for targeted and genome-wide studies. We describe the optimization of conditions for crosslinking, chromatin fragmentation and antibody titer determination and provide recommendations and an example for the normalization of ChIP results as determined by real-time PCR.

Keywords

Chromatin immunoprecipitation Chlamydomonas reinhardtii heat shockformaldehyde crosslinkingreal-time PCRnucleosome occupancyhistone modification HSP70A RBCS2 CYC6

Background

Since several decades the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii serves as a model organism for studying various aspects of cell biology [1]. However, although all three genetic compartments have been sequenced and are amenable for genetic manipulation [2], transgenic approaches frequently suffer from low transgene expression levels and from transgene silencing [3]. Recent work has shown that this is largely due to epigenetic mechanisms that frequently involve histone modifications. Several factors mediating histone modifications have already been identified in Chlamydomonas, mainly by Cerutti and coworkers: one of them is MUT11, a WD40-repeat protein homologous to human WDR5. Deletion of MUT11 resulted in the activation of single-copy transgenes and of dispersed transposons [4]. MUT11 was shown to interact with SET domain histone methyltransferases and suppression of SET1 by RNAi came along with a reduction in levels of monomethylated H3K4, an epigenetic mark associated with transcriptionally repressed loci [5]. Another factor is the SU(VAR)3-9-related protein SET3p. RNAi-mediated suppression of SET3 released the transcriptional silencing of tandemly repeated transgenes and correlated with a partial loss of monomethyl H3K9 at such loci [6]. Again another factor is the MUT9p kinase which phosphorylates H3T3 and histone H2A and is required for long-term, heritable gene silencing [7]. Furthermore, the Chlamydomonas enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH) catalyzes H3K27 methylation. RNAi-mediated suppression of EZH in Chlamydomonas resulted in a global increase in levels of histone H3K4 trimethylation and H4 acetylation, two characteristic marks for active chromatin, thereby leading to the release of retrotransposons and of silenced, tandemly repeated transgenes [8]. Finally, Yamasaki and coworkers found that silencing of a transgenic RBCS2 promoter, driving the expression of an inverted repeat construct, was associated with low levels of histone H3 acetylation and high levels of monomethylated H3K9 at the transgenic promoter [9]. Deletion of the Elongin C gene, which is a component of some E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, released silencing of the transgenic RBCS2 promoter. The activated promoter was characterized by high levels of H3 acetylation and low levels of H3K9 monomethylation [10]. These data clearly show that Chlamydomonas is an excellent model organism for studying the epigenetic mechanisms underlying gene silencing.

In the past Chlamydomonas also served as a valuable model organism for identifying key transcription factors that regulate responses to various stress conditions, like the copper response regulator (CRR1) [11], the regulator of the phosphorus starvation response (PSR1) [12], the regulator of the carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM1/CIA5) [13, 14] or the regulator of the heat shock response (HSF1) [15]. How these transcription factors regulate the expression of their target genes at the level of chromatin structure is poorly understood and only recently has become subject of investigation in our laboratory [16]. Our results revealed that CRR1 and HSF1 regulate the expression of their target genes via histone acetylation, histone methylation, nucleosome eviction and polymerase loading/activation. At each target promoter these means are employed individually to establish a characteristic chromatin state allowing for a fine-tuning of gene expression [16].

The ideal tool to study the mechanisms underlying transgene silencing and gene expression at the level of chromatin structure is chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), a method that was first introduced for Drosophila [17] and has since then enormously gained in popularity. The first step in the ChIP protocol is the "freezing" of the chromatin state by infiltrating cells with formaldehyde to crosslink DNA-binding proteins with DNA. After mechanical shearing of the DNA the protein of interest is immunoprecipitated with specific antibodies together with the DNA it is binding to. The crosslinks can be reversed and the precipitated DNA is subjected to PCR for the analysis of specific loci, or to microarray hybridization/deep sequencing for the genome-wide analysis of binding sites of the protein of interest. The latter techniques have allowed for the establishment of genome-wide maps of histone modifications [18] and transcription factor binding sites [19].

Detailed ChIP protocols are published for Tetrahymena thermophila[20], Drosophila[21], yeast [22], mammalian cell lines [23], and more recently also for higher plants like Arabidopsis[24], maize [25] and tomato [26]. Although ChIP has been applied to Chlamydomonas previously [57, 9, 10, 16, 27], a thorough documentation of important parameters and a step-by-step protocol are yet missing, which to provide is the goal of this work.

Materials and methods

Chlamydomonas strains and cultivation conditions

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains were grown mixotrophically in Tris-acetate-phosphate (TAP) medium [1] on a rotary shaker at 24°C and ~30 μE m-2 sec-1. Used were cell wall deficient strains CF185 [28] and 325-412 (arg7 - strain 325 transformed with pCB412 containing the wild-type ARG7 gene [16]) and cell walled strain CRR16 (crr1 - /arg7 - strain CC3960 co-transformed with plasmids pARG7.8 and pCRR1F1B6 [11]). For heat shock experiments, cells were pelleted by a 4-min centrifugation at 24°C and 2704 × g, resuspended in TAP medium prewarmed to 40°C and incubated under agitation in a water bath at 40°C. Prior to harvest, ice was added to the cells.

DNA fragmentation

A BANDELIN Sonopuls Sonifier HD 2070 with sonication tip MS 73 was used to shear DNA by sonication.

Antibodies

Antibodies against the unmodified C-terminus of histone H3 were purchased from Abcam (ab1791). Antibodies against diacetyl H3K9/K14 and tetra-acetyl H4K5/K8/K12/K16 were from Upstate (06-599 and 06-866, respectively). Antibodies against VIPP2 (mock control) were affinity-purified as described previously [29].

Buffers

KH buffer

  • 20 mM Hepes-KOH pH 7.6

  • 80 mM KCl

Crosslinking solution

  • 20 mM Hepes-KOH pH 7.6

  • 80 mM KCl

  • 0.35% formaldehyde (Roth, ROTIPURAN p.a., 4979.1)

  • (as formaldehyde decays easily it is important to use fresh stocks; also always prepare the crosslinking solution freshly)

Lysis buffer

  • 1% SDS

  • 10 mM EDTA

  • 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)

  • 0.25 × protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, complete, EDTA-free, 11873580001)

Washing buffer 1 (low salt)

  • 150 mM NaCl

  • 0.1% SDS

  • 1% Triton X-100

  • 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)

Washing buffer 2 (high salt)

  • 500 mM NaCl

  • 0.1% SDS

  • 1% Triton X-100

  • 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)

Washing buffer 3 (LiCl)

  • 250 mM LiCl

  • 1% Nonidet P40 (Roche, 1754599)

  • 1% Na-deoxycholate (Fluka, > 98.0%, 30970)

  • 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)

  • 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)

TE buffer

  • 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)

  • 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)

ChIP buffer

  • 1.1% Triton X-100

  • 1.2 mM EDTA

  • 167 mM NaCl

  • 16.7 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)

Lysis buffer

  • 1% SDS

  • 10 mM EDTA

  • 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)

Elution buffer

  • 1% SDS

  • M NaHCO3

  • (prepare freshly)

Stock solutions

  • λDNA soni : 100 μg/ml (Fermentas, #SD0011, in ChIP-buffer) [sonicated 4 times 10 sec, output control: 55%; duty cycle: 60%]

  • BSA: 10 mg/ml (Sigma, A4503, in λDNAsoni)

  • Glycogen: 2.5 μg/μl (Roth, HP51.2, in ChIP-buffer)

  • Glycine: 1 M

  • Phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol (25:24:1)

  • Chloroform/isoamylalcohol (24:1)

  • TE buffer containing 20 μg/μl boiled RNase A

  • Proteinase K: 10 mg/ml (Roth, lyophil. > 30 U/mg, 7523.3)

  • Na-acetate: 3 M (pH 5.2, adjusted with acetic acid)

  • NaCl: 5 M

  • 2x DNA loading dye: 15% Ficoll-400

  • EDTA: 5 M (pH 8.0)

  • Tris-HCl: 1 M (pH 8.0)

Protocol

Cell harvest and crosslinking

1. Grow Chlamydomonas cells in 400 ml TAP medium to a density of 4-8 × 106 cells/ml.

2. Harvest 109 cells in GSA tubes by centrifuging for 3 min at 3220 × g and 24°C [4°C if cells are not subjected to further treatments].

3. [For heat shock, resuspend cells in 45 ml TAP medium prewarmed to 40°C and incubate in a 40°C water bath. Transfer cells into a 50-ml Falcon tube containing crushed ice and centrifuge for 3 min at 3220 × g and 4°C].

4. Discard supernatant and resuspend cells.

5. Add 10 ml of Crosslinking solution, mix gently for 10 min at 24°C (formaldehyde crosslinking).

6. Add 1.25 ml of 1 M glycine, agitate for 5 min at 24°C (quenching).

7. Centrifuge for 2 min at 3220 × g and 4°C, discard supernatant.

8. Resuspend cells in 1 ml KH buffer and transfer them into a 2-ml microcentrifuge tube.

9. Centrifuge for 2 min at 16, 100 × g and 4°C, discard supernatant.

10. Add 400 μl Lysis buffer; after this step cells can be stored at -80°C for several months.

Cell lysis and fragmentation of DNA

[In case strains with cell wall are used it is essential to add an additional 500 μl of Lysis buffer. Vortex briefly and transfer cell lysate to Ultra-Clear Centrifuge Tubes (1/2 × 2 in. (13 × 51 mm), Beckman). Cell wall-deficient strains can be further processed in 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes].

11. Sonicate on ice with 55% output control, 60% duty cycle. To achieve an average DNA fragment size of ~200 bp, sonicate 20 times 20 sec with breaks of 20 sec between each sonication cycle (avoid frothing!). The sonicator tip needs to be as close as possible to the bottom of the tube.

Aliquot samples

12. Transfer sonicated cell lysates to 15-ml Falcon tubes, add Lysis buffer to a total volume of 5 ml and mix carefully.

13. Centrifuge for 2 min at 3220 × g and 4°C to remove cell debris.

14. Aliquot 50 × 100 μl (100- μl aliquots correspond to chromatin from ~2 × 107cells). The input chromatin can be stored for several months at -80°C, but avoid multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

(In contrast to long-term storage, repeated freeze-thawing cycles lead to protein degradation[30]).

Quality control of sheared DNA

15. Take one 100- μl aliquot and add 400 μl of Lysis buffer and 50 μl of 5 M NaCl.

16. Incubate over night at 65°C to reverse crosslinks.

17. Extract twice with 500 μl phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol.

18. Extract once with 500 μl chloroform/isoamylalcohol.

19. Precipitate nucleic acids by adding 55 μl of 3 M Na-acetate (pH 5.2), 1 ml of 100% EtOH and incubating for 3 h at -20°C.

20. Centrifuge for 15 min at 16, 100 × g and 4°C.

21. Wash pellet with 800 μl of 70% EtOH (take care not to remove the tiny pellet).

22. Centrifuge for 10 min at 16, 100 × g and 4°C.

23. Dry pellet and resuspend it in 10 μl TE buffer containing 20 μg/μl RNase A.

24. Incubate for 1 h at 37°C.

25. Add 10 μl of 2 × DNA loading dye and separate sheared DNA on a 1.5% agarose gel. DNA fragments should have sizes of ~200 bp.

Preparation of Protein A-Sepharose beads

26. Weigh-in 50 mg of Protein-A-Sepharose beads (Sigma, P3391-1G), resuspend beads in 1 ml ChIP-buffer and incubate them for 30 min at 4°C.

27. Wash beads two times with 500 μl ChIP buffer

28. Discard supernatant and add 250 μl ChIP-buffer and 250 μl λDNAsoni (gives ~750 μl suspension with swollen beads).

Chromatin-Immunoprecipitation

29. Prepare antibody solutions (for example, mix 5 μl of anti-H3 antibodies with 10 μl BSA in λDNAsoni solution and incubate for at least 30 min on ice).

30. For each antibody employed, thaw one 100- μl aliquot of chromatin solution on ice (for each strain/condition we also recommend a control without antibody).

31. Add 900 μl of ChIP buffer to each aliquot (from this step on consequently use stuffed tips to avoid DNA contaminations!).

32. Centrifuge for 20 sec at 16, 100 × g and 4°C, and transfer supernatant to microcentrifuge tubes containing the prepared antibody solutions.

33. Mix on a rotation wheel for 1 h at 4°C.

34. Centrifuge for 20 sec at 16, 100 × g and 4°C, and transfer each supernatant to microcentrifuge tubes containing 60 μl sepharose beads.

35. Mix on a rotation wheel for 2 h at 4°C.

36. Centrifuge for 20 sec at 16, 100 × g and 4°C.

37. Discard supernatant.

38. Wash the beads once with 1 ml each of Washing buffer 1, 2 and 3, and twice with 1 ml TE buffer (use washing solutions that are stored on ice and centrifuge at 4°C).

Elution

39. Elute precipitated chromatin with 250 μl Elution buffer for 15 min at 65°C.

40. Repeat elution with another 250 μl Elution buffer and pool eluates.

Reversion of the crosslink

41. Add 50 μl of 5 M NaCl and incubate overnight at 65°C.

42. To remove proteins in the precipitates add 10 μl 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8.0), 20 μl 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 2.1 μl proteinase K (10 mg/ml) and incubate for 1 h at 55°C.

DNA extraction

43. Extract once with 500 μl phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol.

44. Extract once with 500 μl chloroform/isoamylalcohol.

45. Precipitate DNA by adding 50 μl 3 M Na-acetate (pH 5.2), 2.5 μl glycogen (2.5 μg/μl) and 1 ml 100% EtOH and incubating for 3 h at -20°C.

46. Centrifuge for 20 min at 16, 100 × g and 4°C.

47. Wash DNA pellet with 500 μl 70% EtOH (take care not to remove the tiny pellet).

48. Centrifuge for 15 min at 16, 100 g and 4°C.

49. Dry DNA pellet in a clean bench, resuspend in 200 μl TE (pH 8.0).

50. Use 5 μl (1:40) of the precipitate for qPCR analysis (if each analysis is done with 3 technical replicates the precipitate is sufficient for 13 targets).

Endpoint PCR

Endpoint PCRs were carried out in 50- μl reactions containing 1 × Taq buffer (Fermentas), 5 μl chromatin immunoprecipitate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 M betaine, 200 μM dNTPs, 2.5 U Taq polymerase (NEB), and 0.6 μM each of forward and reverse primers (see Table 1). The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 27 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 68°C for 1 min and 74°C for 30 sec. An extension step at 74°C for 5 min was added. (Note that endpoint PCR is not an advisable method for the analysis of ChIP results as the cycle number needs to be tested empirically with dilution series until product signals are in the linear range).
Table 1

Primers used in this study.

Nr.

Target

Primer sequences (5' to 3')

Amplicon size (bp)

1

HSP70A promoter

(endpoint PCR)

For: GACGGTGGGGAGCTCGCTGAGGC

Rev: GGTGCCCAGGTCAATACCGATAGC

327

2

RBCS2 promoter

(endpoint PCR)

For: GCCAGAAGGAGCGCAGCCAAACCA

Rev: ACGGAGGACTTGGCAATGACGG

237

3

HSP70A promoter

(qPCR)

For: CGGTATAAAAGCCCGCGAC

Rev: GTGCCCAGGTCAATACCGATAG

163

4

RBCS2 promoter

(qPCR)

For: CAATGCAAGCAGTTCGCATG

Rev: ACGGAGGACTTGGCAATGAC

138

5

CYC6 promoter

(qPCR)

For: ACACGCCCCTCATTCACAGA

Rev: GCACACGAGACACTCCGAGC

121

qPCR

qPCR was performed using the StepOnePlus System (Applied Biosystems) and the Maxima SYBR Green kit from Fermentas. Each reaction contained the vendor's master mix, 200 nM of each primer (see Table 1), and 5 μl chromatin precipitate. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 65°C for 60 sec. For each target we made sure that melting curves had single peaks and that only one PCR product was visible on 1.5% agarose gels. Non-template controls were generally included.

Comments

Crosslinking and reversal

As pointed out previously, the conditions used for the crosslinking of DNA with proteins are crucial for ChIP analyses and need to be optimized for each individual organism [21, 23, 25]. Important parameters are the amount of input material, the formaldehyde concentration and the crosslinking time. Protocols for higher plants start out from 1-5 g of plant tissue and crosslinking is done for 10-15 min with 1-3% formaldehyde [2426, 31]. Protocols for Chlamydomonas start out from 2-4 × 107 cells and crosslinking is done for 5-10 min with 0.75-1% formaldehyde [5, 9]. Following crosslinking, chromatin is sheared by sonication to average fragment sizes ranging between 200 and 3000 bp (higher plant protocols) [2426] and 500-1000 bp (Chlamydomonas protocols) [5, 6, 9].

To optimize crosslinking conditions for Chlamydomonas, we used as fixed parameters 2 × 107 cells as starting material, a crosslinking time of 10 min, and a DNA fragment size of 1000-3000 bp (20 sonication pulses of 10 sec each; Figure 1A). As a variable parameter, we employed formaldehyde concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. As shown in Figure 1B, DNA of high molecular weight and less DNA fragments in the 1000-3000 bp range were recovered when formaldehyde concentrations of 0.7% and higher were used. An obvious interpretation for this observation is that at formaldehyde concentrations above 0.7% chromatin is crosslinked to higher-order structures that resist fragmentation by sonication and from which crosslinks cannot be fully reversed. Decrosslinking is performed by over-night incubation at 65°C [21] and represents an essential step, as DNA-protein complexes enter the phenol phase and are removed during phenol extraction. Presumably because of the high protein content in compact, over-crosslinked structures, they tend to be removed during phenol extraction. Similar observations with over-crosslinking at too high formaldehyde concentrations or crosslinking times were also reported by others [21, 23, 26].
Figure 1

Optimization of sonication conditions to yield ~2000-bp chromatin fragments and of formaldehyde concentrations for efficient crosslinking. A: 2 × 107 cells of Chlamydomonas strain CF185 were sonicated 0, 5, 10 and 20 times for 10 seconds. DNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol, separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with Ethidium bromide. B: 2 × 107 cells of strain CF185 were incubated for 10 min with formaldehyde (HCHO) at the concentrations indicated. After sonication of cells crosslinks were reversed by over-night incubation at 65°C. DNA was extracted and visualized as in (A). C: whole-cell proteins corresponding to 2 μg chlorophyll from strain cw15-325 were separated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by immunoblotting using antibodies against histone H3. D, E: ChIP was done with preimmune serum (mock) and with antibodies against histone H3 using chromatin as input that was crosslinked with formaldehyde at the indicated concentrations. Precipitated DNA was amplified using primers targeting the HSP70A promoter (D) or the RBCS2 promoter (E) and visualized as in (A). NTC-non-template control; TC-template control based on 10% input DNA.

To elucidate how the formaldehyde concentration used for crosslinking affects ChIP efficiency, we used antibodies against the unmodified C-terminus of histone H3 (Figure 1C) to immunoprecipitate DNA crosslinked to histones. Subsequently, precipitated DNA fragments from promoters HSP70A and RBCS2 were amplified by endpoint PCR. As shown in Figures 1D and 1E, the largest amounts of promoter DNA were precipitated when chromatin was crosslinked with a formaldehyde concentration of 0.35%. Insufficient crosslinking at lower formaldehyde concentrations and over-crosslinking at higher concentrations both impaired ChIP efficiency.

Fragmentation of DNA for high-resolution ChIP

In Chlamydomonas, the nucleosome repeat length was determined to have values of 156 and 160 bp at the RBCS2 and HSP70A loci, respectively, whereas a value of 178 bp was detected in bulk chromatin [32]. Hence, a DNA fragment size of 1000-3000 bp, as used above for determining the optimal formaldehyde concentrations for crosslinking (Figure 1), would encompass between 6 and 19 nucleosomes. Fragments of this size are therefore neither suitable for studying nucleosome occupancy and histone modifications at high resolution, nor for precisely determining transcription factor binding sites.

To reduce the size of chromatin fragments as input for ChIP we increased the sonication time to 20 times 20 sec. This yielded DNA fragments with an average fragment size of ~200 bp, basically corresponding to mononucleosomes (Figure 2) [16]. Note that when using such small chromatin fragments, PCR amplicon sizes should not exceed 120-160 bp. Note also that for cell walled Chlamydomonas strains lysis and chromatin shearing need to be carried out with a larger volume of lysis buffer. This increases the effective SDS concentration to efficiently solubilize the proteinaceous cell wall.
Figure 2

Optimization of sonication conditions to yield ~200-bp chromatin fragments. 2 × 107 cells of Chlamydomonas strains cw15-325 and CRR16 were sonicated 20 times 20 sec. DNA was extracted, separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with Ethidium bromide.

Titration of antibodies

ChIP needs to be performed either under conditions where the investigated epitope is in large excess (e.g. when nucleosome occupancy or abundant histone modifications are analyzed), or where the antibodies used are in large excess (e.g. when transcription factors or rare histone modifications are investigated). In the former case there should be a linear relationship between the amount of antibodies applied and antigen precipitated. In the latter case the amount of antigen precipitated under the respective condition should be constant and independent of the amount of antibodies used. To ensure that these premises are fulfilled it is important to titrate the antibodies used. Titration is also advisable to reduce costs, as commercially available antibodies against histones and histone modifications are expensive. Moreover, antibody titers may vary from batch to batch. Ideally, if the antigen is in excess, the amount of antibodies used should be adjusted such that robust signal intensities are obtained compared to a mock control.

To give an example for a proper antibody titration, we performed ChIP using different dilutions of antibodies directed against the unmodified C-terminus of histone H3 and employed affinity-purified antibodies against vesicle-inducing protein in plastids 2 (VIPP2) as mock control. The amount of precipitated chromatin from promoters HSP70A, RBCS2 and CYC6 relative to input DNA was quantified by real-time PCR (qPCR). As shown in Figure 3, we observed a linear relationship between the amount of antibodies used and the qPCR signal obtained for all three promoters. The smallest volume of antibodies used (1.25 μl) gave qPCR signals that were significantly stronger than those of the mock control but were still in the linear range. Hence, 1.25 μl of antibody suspension (diluted to a larger volume to reduce pipetting errors) would be more than sufficient for studying nucleosome occupancy at these promoters. The regression lines obtained suggest that nucleosome occupancy is highest at the CYC6 promoter, intermediate at RBCS2 and lowest at HSP70A, hence corroborating our earlier findings [16].
Figure 3

Testing for the linearity of ChIP efficiency with antibodies against histone H3. ChIP was done on 2 × 107 cells of Chlamydomonas strain CRR16 crosslinked with 0.35% formaldehyde. Cells were not subjected to stress. Chromatin was sonicated to fragments of ~200-bp and immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified antibodies against VIPP2 (mock) or with the indicated volumes of a suspension containing antibodies against histone H3. Precipitated DNA was amplified by qPCR using primers targeting promoters RBCS2, HSP70A, and CYC6. Shown are standard errors from 3 technical replicates. Values are normalized against those obtained with 10% input DNA.

Considerations regarding data analysis

The advantages and disadvantages of different normalization approaches to handle qPCR data from ChIP experiments have been thoroughly discussed by Haring et al. [25]. We will therefore restrict ourselves to describing how we do normalization and why [16].
  1. 1.

    No matter whether antibodies against core histones, histone modifications or transcription factors are used for ChIP, the qPCR signals from ChIPs using specific antibodies need to be significantly stronger than those from ChIPs using mock controls. Of course, the investigated antigen must be present at the target site investigated. The choice of a proper control antibody depends on the nature of the specific antibody used. For example, if the specific antibody is affinity-purified (like that against the C-terminus of histone H3), the control antibody-targeting an unrelated antigen-should be affinity-purified as well (like that against VIPP2).

     
  2. 2.

    Determine nucleosome occupancy and/or histone modifications at the locus of interest by normalizing qPCR signals from ChIPs with antibodies against a core histone and/or specific histone modifications with the qPCR signal from input chromatin (%IP). This eliminates variations in PCR efficiency for the respective locus and makes comparisons between different loci (and different PCR runs) possible.

     
  3. 3.

    Express nucleosome occupancy and/or histone modifications determined for the locus of interest relative to that of a control locus known to contain nucleosomes and/or the histone modifications under investigation (note that when changes in nucleosome occupancy or histone modifications in response to e.g. a change in environmental conditions are monitored it is important to ensure that neither histone occupancy nor modifications are affected at the respective control locus). As values for target and control loci are obtained from the same ChIP experiment, technical variations within that experiment are eliminated. This procedure also allows integrating biological replicates where for example antibody batches with varying efficiencies were used.

     
  4. 4.

    As nucleosome occupancy may vary considerably between different loci (or even at the same locus in response to environmental cues), histone modifications generally need to be expressed relative to nucleosome occupancy.

     

When investigating histone modifications in Chlamydomonas, it is important to keep in mind that the amino acid sequences of Chlamydomonas histones are not entirely conserved with those of mammals, against which many commercially available antibodies for the detection of histone modifications are directed. For instance, Chlamydomonas histone H3 contains a threonine instead of a serine at position 28 and the alanine at position 29 found in mammalian histone H3 is deleted in the Chlamydomonas protein. As a consequence, commercially available antibodies against methyl-H3K27 are not functional in Chlamydomonas[8].

Heat stress leads to rapid nucleosome remodeling at the RBCS2 promoter

We have shown previously that heat stress caused reductions in levels of H3 and H4 acetylation at the Chlamydomonas RBCS2 promoter by ~2- and ~6-fold, respectively, which correlated with a ~20% increase in nucleosome occupancy [16]. Interestingly, this effect was not mediated by HSF1 and might be part of a global, heat shock-induced loss of histone acetylation that was first observed in Drosophila[33]. We could also show that HSF1-dependent remodeling of nucleosomes at the Chlamydomonas HSP22F promoter occurred within the first minute after onset of heat stress, right after binding of HSF1 to the promoter [16]. We wondered whether HSF1-independent remodeling of nucleosomes at the RBCS2 promoter during heat stress occurred as fast as HSF1-dependent remodelling at HSP22F. To address this question, we employed ChIP to monitor nucleosome occupancy and levels of H3 and H4 acetylation at the RBCS2 promoter during the first 10 min of heat stress.

For the evaluation of this experiment we followed the normalization guidelines given above: (1) qPCR signals from precipitates generated with specific antibodies were much stronger than those obtained from precipitates generated with mock antibodies (not shown). (2) qPCR signals obtained with antibodies against histone H3, di-acetylated H3 and tetra-acetylated H4 were first normalized to those gained with 10% input DNA and (3) subsequently normalized to the respective values obtained for the CYC6 control promoter (nucleosome occupancy and levels of H3/H4 acetylation at the CYC6 promoter were shown not to change during heat stress [16]). (4) qPCR signals obtained with antibodies against acetylated histones were expressed relative to those obtained with antibodies against unmodified histone H3.

As shown in Figure 4, a significant decrease in levels of histone H4 acetylation at the RBCS2 promoter was observed 2 min after onset of heat stress. Trends towards reduced levels of H3 acetylation and increased histone occupancy were also discernible after about 2 min of heat stress. Hence, HSF1-independent nucleosome remodeling at the RBCS2 promoter after heat stress is fast (within 2 min), but not as fast as HSF1-dependent nucleosome remodeling at the HSP22F promoter (within 1 min).
Figure 4

Analysis of chromatin remodeling at the RBCS2 promoter within the first 10 minutes after onset of heat stress. Chlamydomonas cells of strain 325-412 were subjected to heat stress and samples for ChIP were taken prior to and at the indicated time points after shifting from 24°C to 40°C. qPCR was used to quantify the amount of RBCS2 promoter fragments precipitated with antibodies against histone H3, di-acetylated histone H3, and tetra-acetylated histone H4. The enrichment relative to 10% input DNA was calculated. All values are normalized against those obtained for the CYC6 promoter (control). qPCR data from ChIPs with antibodies against modified histones are given relative to the nucleosome occupancy. Error bars indicate standard errors from two biological replicates, each analyzed in triplicate. Asterisks indicate the significance of change compared with non-stress conditions (Holm-Sidak t-test, p value ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions

We describe here a detailed chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol for Chlamydomonas. We demonstrate the optimization of the most important parameters, which are the crosslinking conditions, the shearing of chromatin, the titration of antibodies and the normalization of results obtained by qPCR. Compared to earlier ChIP protocols described for Chlamydomonas[5, 6, 9], our protocol bears the following improvements: (i) it combines cell lysis and chromatin fragmentation in a single step. (ii) It facilitates high-resolution analyses as chromatin is fragmented into mononucleosomes rather than tri- to pentanucleosomes. (iii) It allows precipitating transcription factors and associated DNA [16]. By demonstrating that after heat shock histone acetylation levels at the RBCS2 promoter rapidly decrease and nucleosome occupancy rapidly increases we provide an example for the suitability of our ChIP protocol for monitoring changes of chromatin structure in a minutes scale. Our protocol will prove useful for targeted and genome-wide studies of chromatin structure in Chlamydomonas and other eukaryotic microalgae.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Stephen M. Miller (University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD) for stimulating discussions. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society and grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schr 617/4-3) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Systems Biology Initiative FORSYS, project Go FORSYS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie

References

  1. Harris EH: The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook: Introduction to Chlamydomonas and Its Laboratory Use. 2008, San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  2. Merchant SS, Prochnik SE, Vallon O, Harris EH, Karpowicz SJ, Witman GB, Terry A, Salamov A, Fritz-Laylin LK, Marechal-Drouard L: The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science. 2007, 318: 245-250. 10.1126/science.1143609.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerutti H, Johnson AM, Gillham NW, Boynton JE: Epigenetic silencing of a foreign gene in nuclear transformants of Chlamydomonas. Plant Cell. 1997, 9: 925-945. 10.1105/tpc.9.6.925.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang C, Wu-Scharf D, Jeong BR, Cerutti H: A WD40-repeat containing protein, similar to a fungal co-repressor, is required for transcriptional gene silencing in Chlamydomonas. Plant J. 2002, 31: 25-36. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01331.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Dijk K, Marley KE, Jeong BR, Xu J, Hesson J, Cerny RL, Waterborg JH, Cerutti H: Monomethyl histone H3 lysine 4 as an epigenetic mark for silenced euchromatin in Chlamydomonas. Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 2439-2453. 10.1105/tpc.105.034165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Casas-Mollano JA, van Dijk K, Eisenhart J, Cerutti H: SET3p monomethylates histone H3 on lysine 9 and is required for the silencing of tandemly repeated transgenes in Chlamydomonas. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 939-950. 10.1093/nar/gkl1149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casas-Mollano JA, Jeong BR, Xu J, Moriyama H, Cerutti H: The MUT9p kinase phosphorylates histone H3 threonine 3 and is necessary for heritable epigenetic silencing in Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 6486-6491. 10.1073/pnas.0711310105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shaver S, Casas-Mollano JA, Cerny RL, Cerutti H: Origin of the polycomb repressive complex 2 and gene silencing by an E(z) homolog in the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas. Epigenetics. 2010, 5: 301-312. 10.4161/epi.5.4.11608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yamasaki T, Miyasaka H, Ohama T: Unstable RNAi effects through epigenetic silencing of an inverted repeat transgene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics. 2008, 180: 1927-1944. 10.1534/genetics.108.092395.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamasaki T, Ohama T: Involvement of Elongin C in the spread of repressive histone modifications. Plant J. 2011, 65: 51-61. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04400.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kropat J, Tottey S, Birkenbihl RP, Depège N, Huijser P, Merchant S: A regulator of nutritional copper signaling in Chlamydomonas is an SBP domain protein that recognizes the GTAC core of copper response element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 18730-18735. 10.1073/pnas.0507693102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wykoff DD, Grossman AR, Weeks DP, Usuda H, Shimogawara K: Psr1, a nuclear localized protein that regulates phosphorus metabolism in Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 15336-15341. 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiang Y, Zhang J, Weeks DP: The Cia5 gene controls formation of the carbon concentrating mechanism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 5341-5346. 10.1073/pnas.101534498.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuzawa H, Miura K, Ishizaki K, Kucho KI, Saito T, Kohinata T, Ohyama K: Ccm1, a regulatory gene controlling the induction of a carbon-concentrating mechanism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by sensing CO2 availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 5347-5352. 10.1073/pnas.081593498.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schulz-Raffelt M, Lodha M, Schroda M: Heat shock factor 1 is a key regulator of the stress response in Chlamydomonas. Plant J. 2007, 52: 286-295. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03228.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Strenkert D, Schmollinger S, Sommer F, Schulz-Raffelt M, Schroda M: Transcription factor dependent chromatin remodeling at heat shock and copper responsive promoters in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell. 2011, 23: 2285-2301. 10.1105/tpc.111.085266.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Solomon MJ, Larsen PL, Varshavsky A: Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene. Cell. 1988, 53: 937-947. 10.1016/S0092-8674(88)90469-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pokholok DK, Harbison CT, Levine S, Cole M, Hannett NM, Lee TI, Bell GW, Walker K, Rolfe PA, Herbolsheimer E: Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell. 2005, 122: 517-527. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guertin MJ, Lis JT: Chromatin landscape dictates HSF binding to target DNA elements. PLoS Genet. 6-Google Scholar
  20. Dedon PC, Soults JA, Allis CD, Gorovsky MA: A simplified formaldehyde fixation and immunoprecipitation technique for studying protein-DNA interactions. Anal Biochem. 1991, 197: 83-90. 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90359-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Orlando V, Strutt H, Paro R: Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods. 1997, 11: 205-214. 10.1006/meth.1996.0407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hecht A, Grunstein M: Mapping DNA interaction sites of chromosomal proteins using immunoprecipitation and polymerase chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 304: 399-414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Das PM, Ramachandran K, van Wert J, Singal R: Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Biotechniques. 2004, 37: 961-969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bowler C, Benvenuto G, Laflamme P, Molino D, Probst AV, Tariq M, Paszkowski J: Chromatin techniques for plant cells. Plant J. 2004, 39: 776-789. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02169.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haring M, Offermann S, Danker T, Horst I, Peterhansel C, Stam M: Chromatin immunoprecipitation: optimization, quantitative analysis and data normalization. Plant Methods. 2007, 3: 11-10.1186/1746-4811-3-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ricardi MM, Gonzalez RM, Iusem ND: Protocol: fine-tuning of a Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol in tomato. Plant Methods. 2010, 6: 11-10.1186/1746-4811-6-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Casas-Mollano JA, Rohr J, Kim EJ, Balassa E, van Dijk K, Cerutti H: Diversification of the core RNA interference machinery in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of DCL1 in transposon silencing. Genetics. 2008, 179: 69-81. 10.1534/genetics.107.086546.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schroda M, Vallon O, Wollman FA, Beck CF: A chloroplast-targeted heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) contributes to the photoprotection and repair of photosystem II during and after photoinhibition. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 1165-1178.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Willmund F, Schroda M: HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90C is a bona fide Hsp90 that interacts with plastidic HSP70B in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138: 2310-2322. 10.1104/pp.105.063578.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell BL, Yasui Y, Li CI, Fitzpatrick AL, Lampe PD: Impact of freeze-thaw cycles and storage time on plasma samples used in mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery projects. Cancer Inform. 2005, 1: 98-104.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chua YL, Brown AP, Gray JC: Targeted histone acetylation and altered nuclease accessibility over short regions of the pea plastocyanin gene. Plant Cell. 2001, 13: 599-612.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lodha M, Schroda M: Analysis of chromatin structure in the control regions of the Chlamydomonas HSP70A and RBCS2 genes. Plant Mol Biol. 2005, 59: 501-513. 10.1007/s11103-005-0450-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Arrigo P: Acetylation and methylation patterns of core histones are modified after heat or arsenite treatment of Drosophila tissue culture cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11: 1389-1404. 10.1093/nar/11.5.1389.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Strenkert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement