Skip to main content

Fast and easy bioassay for the necrotizing fungus Botrytis cinerea on poplar leaves



Necrotizing pathogens pose an immense economic and ecological threat to trees and forests, but the molecular analysis of these pathogens is still in its infancy because of lacking model systems. To close this gap, we developed a reliable bioassay for the widespread necrotic pathogen Botrytis cinerea on poplars (Populus sp.), which are established model organisms to study tree molecular biology.


Botrytis cinerea was isolated from Populus x canescens leaves. We developed an infection system using fungal agar plugs, which are easy to handle. The method does not require costly machinery and results in very high infection success and significant fungal proliferation within four days. We successfully tested the fungal plug infection on 18 poplar species from five different sections. Emerging necroses were phenotypically and anatomically examined in Populus x canescens leaves. We adapted methods for image analyses of necrotic areas. We calibrated B. cinerea DNA against Ct-values obtained by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and measured the amounts of fungal DNA in infected leaves. Increases in necrotic area and fungal DNA were strictly correlated within the first four days after inoculation. Methyl jasmonate pretreatment of poplar leaves decreased the spreading of the infection.


We provide a simple and rapid protocol to study the effects of a necrotizing pathogen on poplar leaves. The bioassay and fungal DNA quantification for Botrytis cinerea set the stage for in-depth molecular studies of immunity and resistance to a generalist necrotic pathogen in trees.


Botrytis cinerea is the anamorph of Botryotinia fuckeliana and the causal agent of grey mold disease [1]. It is one of the most widespread pathogens threatening the health of over 1400 species in the plant kingdom [2, 3]. B. cinerea infections destroy fruits, field crops, shrubs, and trees [1], causing annual economic losses of up to $100 billion worldwide [4]. The airborne disease can remain symptomless within a plant until favorable conditions for the outbreak of the infection prevail [5].

Often overshadowed by its tremendous impact on crop production, it has been overlooked that B. cinerea is also a major problem for many forest tree species [6, 7]. Büsgen [8] described necroses caused by B. cinerea on leaves of several broadleaf tree species, such as Ulmus montana, Populus alba, Tilia parvifolia, and Prunus avium. Seedlings and saplings of economically important tree species such as Abies spp., Pinus ssp., Cupressus ssp., Larix ssp., Tsuga ssp., and Cornus florida can be damaged or killed by B. cinerea [9, 10]. B. cinerea does not show distinct habitat specificity and is endemic in boreal and hot and dry environments [11]. These conditions stress many tree species in the northern hemisphere, rendering them more susceptible to pathogen infections with the progression of climate change [12].

Poplar species are model organisms to study tree-pathogen interactions [13] and are widely used for biomass production [14, 15]. Modern protocols are available to research poplar interactions with biotrophic pathogens, such as Melampsora larici-populina [16]. Poplars employ salicylic acid-dependent defense pathways to fend off biotrophic fungal diseases, e.g., [16, 17]. Extensive studies in herbaceous plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and arable crops [18, 19] showed that defense against necrotizing pathogens is regulated via jasmonate-dependent signaling pathways. To date, no state-of-the-art protocol is available for research on the interaction between poplar and necrotizing pathogens. Instead, even recent studies rely on the quantification of lesion area as a proxy for infection severity [20], a method prone to errors and uncertainties [21].

Here, we report the isolation of the potentially necrotizing pathogen B. cinerea from Populus x canescens. We present a fast and reliable protocol to infect various poplar species. We optimized fungal DNA extraction and quantification. The protocol uses the fast growth of B. cinerea under controlled conditions, its rapid infection cycle under optimal conditions [22], and the availability of highly specific qRT-PCR primers [23]. We demonstrate a correlation between necrotic leaf area and fungal DNA in the leaf. We conducted histological and anatomical analyses of necrotic and healthy leaf structures.


Origin and cultivation of poplar species

In vitro cultures of P. x canescens (INRA 717 1B4) and P. euphratica (clone B2 obtained from trees grown in the Ein Avdat region, Israel) were micropropagated as described by Müller et al. [24]. After four weeks of growth and rooting, the plantlets were potted in 3 L pots containing complete soil (Fruhstorfer Erde Type N, Hawita Gruppe, Vechta, Germany) and covered individually with transparent plastic beakers. To acclimate the plants to greenhouse conditions, the beakers were gradually lifted in the second week and removed at the beginning of the third week. The plants were cultivated in the greenhouse for five to eight weeks under ambient light with supplemental illumination of 150 µE m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation with a 16/8 h day/night rhythm. The temperature ranged from 15 °C to 30 °C, and air humidity was between 53 and 82%. The plants were watered regularly with tap water.

Twigs (length: about 30–40 cm) were collected (13.04.2022, after bud break) from different poplar species grown in the Forest Botanical Garden (location: 51° 34’N 9° 57’O; mean annual precipitation sum: 624 mm; mean annual temperature: 9.2 °C). The twigs were placed in the greenhouse with the cut end submerged in tap water and kept for four days under greenhouse conditions as described above.

Isolation and cultivation of Botrytis cinerea

Fourteen leaves of 12-week-old greenhouse-cultivated P. x canescens were cut and surface sterilized with 70% ethanol. The leaves were three times sterilized for five seconds, the maximal length without damaging the poplar leaf surface, as shown in pre-tests. Each leaf was placed on a 2% water agar (20 g micro Agar in ddH2O, Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands) in a Petri dish (12 × 12 cm, Greiner Bio-One International, Kremsmünster, Austria), with the petiole stuck in the agar. The Petri dishes were closed with gas permeable Parafilm® M (Bemis, Neenah, USA) and incubated in a climate cabinet (Percival Scientific, Perry, USA) at 21 °C, 60% relative air humidity, and a 16/8 h day/night rhythm. The development of lesions was inspected daily. Necrotic tissue was cut with a scalpel after 16 days and placed on PDA-S-medium (Potato-Dextrose-Agar [Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany] with streptomycin [50 µg/mL, Duchefa], pH 5.5). The necrotic leaf tissue samples were incubated on PDA-S for three days in a climate cabinet as described above. Outgrowing fungal mycelia were transferred to new PDA-S plates. This step was repeated three times. Each time, the newly formed mycelia were optically differentiated according to Smith et al. [25] by color, the texture of the colony surface, and characteristics of hyphae and placed on individual plates. Based on these criteria, four optically different fungal morphotypes were differentiated. For optical identification and analysis of growth patterns, the cultures were observed under a binocular stereomicroscope (M205 FA, Leica Camera Deutschland GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Squeeze preparations of mycelia were generated according to the CBS Handbook of mycology [26]. Hyphal growth and morphology of conidia were observed with an inverse light microscope (Axio Observer Z1, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). One morphotype showed fast growth, a flat, powdery and white mycelium without aerial hyphae and branched, sporadically septated, formed hyaline hyphae, thus, fulfilling the description of B. cinerea [27].

The selected morphotype was used for molecular identification as follows: The genomic DNA was extracted from pinhead-sized mycelium samples with the innuPREP DNA kit (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) according to the suppliers’ instructions. The extracted genomic DNA was used as the template for a polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using the ITS primer pair ITS1-F forward (3 ‘-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-5’) and ITS4 reverse (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [28, 29]. Following the Taq DNA polymerase protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), 2 µL genomic DNA in 20 µL reaction volume was used for PCR. PCR products and a technical replicate of a PCR product from a previous extraction using the same protocol as with the samples (positive control), and a ddH2O sample (negative control), were run on a 1.2% agarose gel containing 0.003% ethidium bromide (Carl Roth). After the run, the product lengths of the PCR products were evaluated under UV light (Typhoon FLA 9500, GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). Signals at a size of approx. 280 base pairs indicated successful PCR. Samples were purified with the innuPREP PCRpure kit (Analytik Jena) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. Twelve µL purified PCR product was mixed with 3 µL of the primer and sent for Sanger sequencing to a company (Microsynth Seqlab, Göttingen, Germany). The resulting forward and reverse sequences were combined with the Gap4 Staden package [30]; The resulting ITS sequences were compared with the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Rockville Pike, USA) database using the nucleotide BLAST tool ( and identified as B. cinerea strain CBS 261.71.

The ITS sequences obtained from two independently sequenced samples, one after isolation, and one before starting the infection experiments, were deposited in the NCBI Genbank under accession numbers ON740896 and ON740897. The B. cinerea cultivar isolated in this study from poplar leaves was deposited in the public collection of the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) under the collection number: DSM 114,993.

Cultivation of Botrytis cinerea

The identified fungal species B. cinerea was cultivated on PDA (Carl Roth) with 2% micro agar (Duchefa). Stock cultures of fungal mycelia were transferred to fresh PDA plates bi-weekly. To collect fungal mycelium, B. cinerea was grown for 7 days at 23 °C in darkness. To obtain spores, the fungus was grown in darkness at 28 °C for eight days [31]. For the harvest of spores, 1.5 mL 10% sterile glycerol was pipetted on the culture plate, and the spores were gently scraped with a sterile plate spreader (TH Geyer, Höxter, Germany). Spores in glycerol were stored at − 80 °C.

Liquid cultures of B. cinerea were produced by inoculating 100 mL Potato-Dextrose-Broth (Carl Roth) in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with five 6 mm fungal agar plugs punched out with a cork borer from a seven-day-old PDA plate with B. cinerea mycelium. The cultures were grown for 7 days on a shaker at 120 rpm at 23 °C in darkness.

Plug infection protocol

PDA plugs with fungus attached were punched with a 6 mm (diameter) cork borer (Carl Roth) from the actively growing edge of a seven-day-old B. cinerea culture on PDA (Carl Roth). One plug was transferred with a needle on the adaxial side of an intact leaf attached to a poplar plant (Fig. 1). Generally, we used the 4th fully expanded poplar leaf from the top of the shoot for the experiments. When plants were grown under non-sterile conditions, a brief surface sterilization of the leaf prior to inoculation is recommend. We wiped the upper leaf surface three times for 5 s with a 70% ethanol-soaked paper tissue interference with other potential leaf-colonizing microbes (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Then, the plug was placed between major veins with the mycelium faced upwards (Fig. 1a). The fungus grew through the agar plug to reach the leaf surface. A PDA plug without fungus from a non-inoculated PDA plate was used for mock infection of control leaves. The growth conditions were the same as mentioned above. After inoculation, the plants were cultivated for up to four days under ambient light with 16 h of supplemental illumination of 150 µE m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation. The temperature ranged from 15 °C to 30 °C, and air humidity was between 53 and 82%. The plants were watered regularly with tap water. Infected and non-infected leaves were harvested at different days post inoculation (dpi).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Botrytis cinerea infection-PDA plug on the 4th poplar leaf. From a seven-day-old B. cinerea culture on a Potato-Dextrose-Agar (PDA) plate, a B. cinerea-inoculated PDA plug was punched out with a 6 mm cork borer. a The B. cinerea-inoculated PDA plug was transferred to the 4th fully expanded Populus x canescens leaf and placed in between major veins with a needle. b Thereafter, the leaf was sealed with a plastic bag

To inoculate leaves from the outdoor poplars, fully expanded leaves attached to twigs were chosen. Inoculated leaves were placed in a low-density polyethylene zipper bag (Carl Roth). The lower end of the bag was pushed slightly inside the bag to create an air space to ensure that the plug did not stick to the bag (Fig. 1b). The plastic above the zipper was cut-off to ensure sufficient humidity and spread of fungal material while being able to place the zipper as near as possible to the stem (Fig. 1b). A flow chart of the infection method and tissue harvest is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow chart of the poplar-Botrytis cinerea pathoassay inoculation, harvest process, and quantification

The 4th leaf of Populus x canescens was sterilized by wiping the upper leaf surface three times for five seconds with a 70% ethanol-soaked paper tissue. Plugs were punched out at the actively growing edge of a 7-day-old B. cinerea culture. One plug was placed with the mycelium upwards on the Populus x canescens leaf. The leaf was sealed in a plastic bag. Leaves were harvested after different incubation times and digital pictures were taken. A leaf disk (diameter: 27 mm) around the centered necrosis was plunged out, and the area of the initial plug position was removed with the 6 mm cork borer before the sample was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. The total DNA was extracted from the leaf disks. Fungal DNA was measured via qRT-PCR. Ct-values were converted into the amount of DNA. The necrotic area was determined from the photos of the leaf disks using the R package pliman (Olivoto, 2022).

Spore infection protocol

To test the ability of the spores to germinate, harvested spores were allowed to germinate for 24 h in darkness at 23 °C. Twenty microliters of germinated spores on a glass slide were mounted with glycerol and observed with an Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss). Photos were taken with an AxioCam MRc (Carl Zeiss).

For inoculation, spores were diluted to a concentration of 1 × 106 [31] in tap water, and a volume of 20 µL was pipetted onto the fourth, fifth, and sixth fully developed leaf of a –greenhouse-cultivated P. x canescens plant. The inoculated leaves were individually enclosed in plastic bags to maintain high air humidity and incubated as described above. The leaves were monitored regularly.

Sampling of leaf disks

Inoculated leaves were cut from the stem with a blade after one to four days of infection. If not stated otherwise, the infection plug was punched out with a 6 mm cork borer and discarded. A leaf disk (27 mm diameter) was punched out around the 6 mm-wide hole. For further analyses, these leaf disks were used. The advantage of this approach is that we could use normalized leaf areas for image processing and fungal DNA quantification. Leaf disks for DNA quantification were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C (Fig. 2).

Determination of lesion area by image analysis

All photographs of leaves and leaf disks were taken with a Sony Alpha 6400 camera with a Sony SEL 18-135 mm f3.5–5.6 lens (Sony, Tokyo, Japan) and the following settings: 1/60 s exposure time, aperture F5.6, iso 200, 55 mm zoom, and manual focus. The samples were placed on an LED light table (Shenzhen Huion Animation Technology, Shenzhen, China) with maximum light intensity. A scale bar was included in each photograph, and no additional light source was used to avoid reflections.

The digital pictures of the leaf disks were used to determine the necrotic area. Infected areas were defined manually using a freely available imaging program (GIMP v2.10.32,, The GIMP Development Team, 2022). We distinguished green, healthy leaf tissue and brownish, pathogen-affected tissue using the foreground color selection tool and colored the necrotic area in bright red. The processed images were stored as png files and opened in ImageJ (Schindelin et al., 2012). The scale on each image was used to define the cm-to-pixel ratio, and then the necrotic area was determined using the “ROI Manager” tool. The total leaf area of interest (TLAI) was defined as the total leaf area of the disk minus area of the punched hole. TLAI and infected area were used to calculate the relative infected area.

R [32] and Rstudio [33] with the pliman package v 1.1.0 [34] were used for the automated analysis of symptomatic areas. For each experiment, corresponding references (i.e., images of healthy tissue, necrosis and background, img_healthy, img_symptoms, and img_background) were recorded and used in GIMP v2.10.32 [35]. Batches of pictures were analyzed using the pattern function of “pliman”. The function to fill holes (fill_hull = FALSE) was disabled to achieve correct recognition of the punched hole. Processed pictures were saved (save_image = TRUE) to check for correct processing by inspection of the white lines the R package draws around the recognized necrotic area. After processing, percent values of necrotic and healthy areas were saved in.csv format. The script used here was deposited at Github ( under:

Calibration and Quantification of Fungal DNA by qRT-PCR

Frozen leaf disks (TLAI) were milled twice in a ball mill (MM200, Retsch, Haan, Germany) equipped with two 3 mm and one 4 mm steel balls for 90 s at 30 Hz. Total DNA was extracted from frozen leaf powder using the innuPREP PlantDNA Kit (Analytik Jena) with an extended lysis time of 1 h. Afterward, the DNA concentration and purity were determined in 1 µL of extract in a NanoDrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific) spectrophotometer. The DNA concentrations of the leaf extracts were adjusted to 5 ng/µL.

We employed the B. cinerea-specific primers Bc3F (5’-GCTGTAATTTCAATGTGCAGAATCC-3’) and Bc3R (5’-GGAGCAACAATTAATCGCATTTC-3’) reported by Suarez et al. [36] and Diguta et al. [23] to quantify fungal DNA in the leaf extracts. The primers target the ribosomal region between the 28S and 18S genes (intergenic spacer). The quantitative real-time PCRs (qRT-PCR) reaction mixture contained 10 µL innuMIX qPCR DSGreen Standard master mix (Analytik Jena), 5 µL DNA (concentration 5 ng/µL, equaling 25 ng total DNA), 4 µL ddH2O and 1 µL primer mix of forward and reverse primer (10 µM each). The qRT-PCRs reactions were carried out with a qTower3G (Analytik Jena) at the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 1 denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, 2 annealing at 58 °C for 20 s and 3 elongation at 72 °C for 20 s. The qRT-PCR ended with a melting curve, starting from 60 °C to 95 °C in 15 s with an increase of 5 °C per s. Three technical replicates were analyzed per biological sample. Determination of Ct-values was performed with the qPCRsoft-Software v4 (Analytik Jena).

To calibrate the fungal Ct values, we produced pure B. cinerea DNA. For this purpose, mycelium was harvested from a liquid culture after one week of growth. The whole mycelium from one culture was lyophilized (Gamma 2–16 LSCplus, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). A hundred mg of freeze-dried mycelium was rehydrated with 150 µL ddH2O and immediately used for DNA extraction with the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the instructions of the manufacturer. The absorbance ratios at 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm were checked with a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Thereafter, the DNA was further purified with the Dneasy PowerClean Pro Cleanup Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting DNA concentration was determined using a Qubit dsDNA HS assay Kit in a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). It should be noted that the extraction procedure was successful with the Qiagen soil but not with the Analytik Jena plant kit.

The purified DNA from the fungal mycelium was used to produce a dilution series from 14.8 ng µL−1 to 0.00001 ng µL−1. The samples were used for qRT-PCR according to the following conditions: the qRT-PCR reaction mixture contained 10 µL innuMIX qPCR DSGreen Standard master mix (Analytik Jena), 5 µL DNA, 4 µL ddH2O and 1 µL primer mix (Bc3F and Bc3R) of forward and reverse primer (10 µM). The qRT-PCRs were carried out with a qTower3G (Analytik Jena) and the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 1 denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, 2 annealing at 58 °C for 20 s and 3 elongation at 72 °C for 20 s. The qRT-PCR ended with a melting curve, starting from 60 °C to 95 °C in 15 s with an increase of 5 °C per s. Three technical replicates were analyzed per biological sample. Determination of Ct-values was performed with the qPCRsoft-Software v4 (Analytik Jena).

The Ct values were regressed against the amount of DNA after ln (natural logarithm) transformation of the DNA values. A correlation test was performed using R [32] and Rstudio [33]. Data were plotted, and linear regression was performed (Fig. 3). We obtained a linear relationship (Ct = -1.598 ln(DNA) + 27.43, R2 = 0.9989, P < 0.0001). The equation was used to convert Ct values into corresponding amounts of fungal DNA (in pg) with the following Eq. 1:

Fig. 3
figure 3

Calibration curve for the amount of fungal DNA (pg) to Ct values

$${DNA}_{(pg)}= {e}^{(\frac{27.43- Ct value}{1.598})}$$

For all experiments, Ct values were converted into amounts of fungal DNA in pg. These amounts corresponded to the amount of fungal DNA in 25 ng of total (plant + fungal) DNA.

Fungal DNA was extracted from freeze-dried Botrytis cinerea mycelium grown in liquid culture. The purified DNA was serially diluted. qRT-PCR was performed using B. cinerea-specific primers. For every sample, three technical replicates were analyzed. Mean Ct values of the technical replicates were correlated to the amount of DNA in the PCR reaction. DNA data were ln transformed since the Ct values increase exponentially.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fungal mycelia on leaf surfaces

Fresh leaf samples (approximately 1 cm × 1 cm) were cut at different positions and time points after inoculation from infected and control leaves with a double-edge razor blade (Wilkinson Sword, Solingen, Germany). Each sample was fixed with conductive double-sided adhesive carbon tabs (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany) on a Standard SEM Pin Stub Mount (diameter 12.7 mm, Phenom-World, Eindhoven, Netherlands). Immediately afterwards, the samples were covered by a 10 nm gold layer (Plano) using the Q150R S/E/ES plus sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, United Kingdom). After sputter coating, the edges of the samples were sealed airtight with conductive carbon cement (Plano). The samples were stored in a dust-free SEM sample box for a maximum of two days before the measurements were conducted. SEM images were taken on a Phenom ProX (G5) desktop SEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Image acquisition was performed in Back-scattered electron mode (BSE mode) at a voltage of 15 kV and a resolution of 1024 pixels, and magnifications of 350x, 1000x, and 4000x.

Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging

Chlorophyll fluorescence of sections of whole leaves, including inoculated areas, was measured with an IMAGING-PAM (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). The measurements were conducted at an intensity of 0.5 µmol m−2 s−1 PAR, at a modulation frequency of 8 Hz, and at a saturation pulse intensity of 4000 µmol m−2 s−1 PAR. The emission of blue light was measured at 450 nm and of red light at 650 nm. According to Sekulska-Nalewajko et al. [37], the photosynthetic efficiency of dark-adapted leaves (Fv/Fm) and the quantum yield on non-regulated PSII energy dissipation (Y(NO)) data were used to analyze the impact of B. cinerea infection on leaf photosynthesis.

Cross-sections and histochemistry of infected and uninfected leaves

Fresh leaf samples of 1 cm x 1 cm were cut with a razor blade (Wilkinson Sword) from different parts of mock and B. cinerea-infected leaves. The samples were transferred individually in 2 cm x 2 cm wells of a sixteen-well plate (Greiner Bio-One International). The wells were then filled with liquid 5% agarose (Duchefa Biochemie), closed with a lid, and solidified at 4 °C overnight. During initial solidification, the samples were pushed down several times with forceps to prevent floating.

The agarose blocks containing the leaf samples were removed from the well plate, orientated for cross-sectioning, and trimmed with a razor blade (Wilkinson Sword). The vibratome VT1200 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to produce cross sections of 30 µm thickness with a cutting speed of 1 mm sec−1 and an amplitude of 0.5 mm. For this purpose, the vibratome was equipped with a double-edge bendable razor blade (Wilkinson Sword). The cross-sections were then submerged in a solution containing 10 µg mL−1 Wheat Germ Agglutinin Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and propidium iodide 10 µg mL−1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in phosphate-buffered saline solution (NaCl 137 mmol L−1, KCl 2.7 mmol L−1, Na2HPO4 10 mmol L−1, KH2PO4 1.8 mmol L−1) for 15 min. After staining, the cross-sections were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline solution and then transferred to specimen slides, where they were mounted with ROTIMount FluorCare (Carl Roth), a medium for fluorescence microscopy. The sections were viewed at 200 × and 400 × magnification with a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss), using filters with the wavelengths for excitation at 493 nm and emission at 520 nm for WGA Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate and with excitation at 538 nm and emission at 617 nm for propidium iodide. Photos were taken with an AxioCam MRc (Carl Zeiss).

Methyl jasmonate pretreatment

Ten-week-old greenhouse-grown P. x canescens plants were inserted in a large autoclave bag (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) with open ends at the top and the bottom. This setup prevented cross-contamination during spraying. The plants were sprayed with 200 µM methyl jasmonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) in ddH2O or with ddH2O (control) until runoff (approx. 25 mL) using a 250 mL spray bottle suitable for overhead spraying (Carl Roth). The bags were closed, and the control and MeJA-treated plants were transferred to different greenhouse cells. The bags were removed after four hours, and the plants were incubated for another four hours before inoculation and incubation with B. cinerea, as described above.

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as box plots with points representing one biological replicate unless indicated otherwise. The number of biological replicates is indicated in the tables and figure legends. To compare means, the normal distribution of the data sets was tested by visual inspection of residuals. If data were not normally distributed, they were log-transformed to achieve normal distribution. If data in percent included 0 or 1, they were transformed according to Smithson & Verkuilen [38]. Statistical tests were conducted with R [32] and Rstudio [33], using linear generalized mixed models, beta regression [39], or Tukey’s post hoc-test in the packages”multcomp” [40] and”car” [41]. Differences between treatments were considered significant when the values of the post hoc tests were P < 0.05. Correlations were tested using the build-in cor.test() function of R.


Botrytis cinerea plug-inoculation results in spreading necrosis on the poplar leaves

Leaves of P. x canescens did not show necrotic symptoms one day after B. cinerea inoculation. After 2 dpi, initial dark brownish necroses were observed, which grew in size at 3 and 4 dpi (Fig. 4a). Analyses of the necrotic areas showed significant increases from 2 to 4 dpi (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Time course of disease symptoms a, b and amount of fungal DNA c in poplar leaves in response to Botrytis cinerea

To be able to measure the B. cinerea DNA in the leaf disks, B. cinerea DNA extracted from pure culture was correlated to Ct values (Fig. 3). We quantified the amount of fungal DNA in infected leaves and mock-inoculated controls with B. cinerea-specific primers. B. cinerea DNA was detectable at all tested time points and increased significantly until 3 dpi (Fig. 4c). At 4 dpi, no further increase was detected (Fig. 4c). Mock-inoculated leaves also showed minor increases in B. cinerea DNA (Fig. 4c). This observation suggests that the fungus was ubiquitously present in leaves of greenhouse-grown poplars and that its growth was stimulated by the application of the uninfected plug during the incubation period.

Leaves of Populus x canescens were inoculated with a seven-day-old B. cinerea plug punched out of Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate or were mock inoculated with a plug from a sterile Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate. Leaves were harvested after one, two, three-, and four days post inoculation (dpi) as described in Figs. 1 and 2. a) Visual symptom development, b) increase of the necrotic area, c) and amount of B. cinerea DNA within the time course of 4 days. Quantification of necroses was conducted with the pliman package and expressed as percentage of the necrotic area of the leaf disk area (5.44 cm2). Fungal DNA was extracted from leaf disks (5.44 cm2), analyzed with B. cinerea-specific primers, and converted to the amount of B. cinerea DNA using the calibration in Fig. 3. Data are shown as min–max boxplots with the whiskers spanning across the range of the data points. Each point represents one biological replicate (n = 5). Each biological replicate was determined as the mean of three technical replicates. Different letters above the boxplots indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 calculated by ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. n.d. = not detectable.

The infection of P. x canescens leaves by B. cinerea was independently repeated three times to evaluate the reproducibility of the pathosystem. Necrosis developed on the B. cinerea inoculated leaves, but the symptomatic areas differed among independent experiments (Fig. 5). This result was probably due to differences in the ambient, semi-controlled glasshouse conditions during the inoculation period or different effects of the conditions on the poplar plants. The necrotic areas were highly correlated with the amount of detected B. cinerea DNA (Fig. 5), indicating the proper functioning of the pathosystem also under changing environmental conditions.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Relationship of necrotic leaf area and the amount of Botrytis cinerea DNA

In three independent experiments, the 4th fully developed leaf of a Populus x canescens plant was inoculated with a B. cinerea-plug from a seven-day-old Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate and harvested after four days of inoculation as described in Figs. 1 and 2. The necrotic area was determined from images using both the pliman package and manually with ImageJ. Necrotic areas were expressed as percentages of the area of the total leaf disk (5.44 cm2). Different amounts of fungal DNA from different experiments (blue circles, green triangles, orange squares) showed a significant correlation with the necrotic leaf area. Both methods (pliman and manual necrotic area determination) show a highly significant correlation (inset in Fig. 5). Each symbol represents one biological replicate. Each biological replicate was determined as the mean of three technical replicates.

In the initial experiments, we determined the necrotic area on poplar leaves manually, as commonly done in other studies, e.g., [42, 43]. This procedure was very labor-intensive. The recently published R package pliman [34] was used to automatize and speed up the analysis. To test whether pliman delivers reliable results, the necrotic areas found by manual and pliman analyses were compared. Both methods produced similar results and were highly significantly correlated (Inlet Fig. 5). Complete setup and image analysis with pliman took about 20 min, while the manual analysis took approx. three minutes per sample. Thus, pliman outperforms the manual approach by being faster and less laborious when dealing with seven or more samples. The optimized pliman procedure started with reference images for an individual experimental run, which was used to correct for the slight reddish coloration which often appears on poplar leaves.

Inoculation with Botrytis cinerea mycelium plugs results in the infection of different poplar species

To test the versatility of the infection system, leaves of poplar species of different sections cultivated under controlled conditions or collected in the Forest Botanical Garden (University of Goettingen, Germany) were inoculated with B. cinerea plugs. All tested species from the sections Populus, Aigeiros, Tacamahaca, Leucoides, and Turanga, except P. balsamifera, were successfully infected and showed necroses on day four after inoculation (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Botrytis cinerea-induced necroses on leaves of poplar species different sections

Different poplar species were obtained from greenhouse stocks and the Forest Botanical Garden Göttingen of the University of Goettingen (Germany). Leaves attached to twigs or whole plants were inoculated with a B. cinerea plug from a seven-day-old Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate and harvested four days post inoculation, as described in Figs. 1 and 2. Populus deltoides and P. koreana leaves were additionally damaged by caterpillars during the infection period. Pictures were taken of the full leaves, and brightness was enhanced by 20% for better visualization.

Histological analyses of infected leaves underline the necrotizing lifestyle of Botrytis cinerea

To obtain insights into the response to fungal infection, we analyzed the chlorophyll fluorescence of B. cinerea-infected and uninfected P. x canescens leaves. At 4 dpi, typical necroses were observed below and around the B. cinerea-PDA infection plugs but not on control leaves inoculated with pure PDA plugs (Fig. 7, upper row). The maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II of control leaves and the non-disturbed tissue of infected leaves were close to 0.8 (dark blue color Fig. 7 middle row). The infected leaves show reduced quantum yield, indicated by the light blue halo surrounding the necrotic area (black). The non-regulated energy dissipation (Y(NO)) was low (orange to yellow) in controls (Fig. 7 bottom row) and increased close to necrotic areas (dark green color in Fig. 7 bottom row). While photosynthetic damage (Fv/Fm) occurred only at the edge of the necrotic area, non-regulated energy dissipation was already observed in a larger area of the infected leaves surrounding the necrotic tissue (Fig. 7, middle and bottom row).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Images of control and Botrytis cinerea infected Populus × canescens leaves captured by light photography (top row) and pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorometry (middle and bottom rows). Fv/Fm: Photosynthetic efficiency of dark-adapted leaves, Y(NO): quantum yield of non-regulated PSII energy dissipation. Leaves were inspected 4 days post inoculation

To inspect the presence of B. cinerea hyphae outside the necrotic area, leaf cross sections of mock- and B. cinerea-inoculated leaves were stained to visualize fungal hyphae and plant cell walls (Fig. 8). Leaf structures were disintegrated in the necrotic areas, and hyphae could be observed all over the broken tissue. No hyphae could be identified in the tissue near the necrosis, away from the necrosis, or mock-inoculated leaves (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Fluorescence of leaf cross sections at different positions of mock and Botrytis cinerea inoculated Populus x canescens leaves

The 4th fully developed leaf of P. x canescens was inoculated with a B. cinerea plug from a seven-day-old Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate or mock inoculated with a plug from a sterile Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate and harvested four days post-inoculation. Leaf tissues (1 cm × 1 cm) from the positions indicated in the figure were embedded in agarose, trimmed after solidification, and sectioned with a vibratome (thickness 30 µm). The sections were stained with 10 µg mL−1 propidium iodide to visualize cell walls (red) and 10 µg mL−1 Wheat Germ Agglutinin Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate to visualize the fungus (green). Photos were taken under a fluorescence microscope. V = vascular bundle, T = trichome, H = hyphae.

In addition, scanning electron microscope pictures were taken from inoculated leaves after different time points and at different positions on the leaves. Non-necrotic areas of infected leaves did not show any differences in the epidermal cell patterns compared to healthy leaves (Fig. 9a, b). In necrotic areas of the adaxial side of the leaf, the epidermal cells appeared to be sunken and less turgid, thus, being distinguishable from healthy cells in the direct neighborhood (Fig. 9b). Necrotic tissue showed no clear vital cell patterns, only epidermal ridges (Fig. 9c). At the beginning, mycelium grew from the plug toward the leaves, then, forming a network on the leaf surface, similarly as it does on culture medium. After 2 dpi, hyphae were present on the abaxial side of the leaf directly under necrotic areas, showing fungal trespassing through the leaf (Fig. 9e). Fungal spores (Fig. 9e) and hyphae penetrating the stomatal pores were detected under the necrotic areas on the lower leaf surface (Fig. 9f).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Scanning electron microscopy of Botrytis cinerea structures on inoculated Populus x canescens leaves af, hj and light microscopy of B. cinerea in liquid culture g. a Sterile PDA-plug inoculated leaf. b B. cinerea inoculated leaf. Edge of the necrotic (right) and healthy (left) area after four days. c) Collapsed cells of a B. cinerea inoculated leaf at 4 dpi (days post inoculation). d Mycelium growing from the plug to the leaf at 2 dpi. e) Spore on the abaxial side at 3 dpi. f Mycelium growing through a stoma at 3 dpi. g) B. cinerea spores germinated 24 h in ¼ strength Potato-Dextrose-Broth, h B. cinerea spores on inoculated leaf at 12 dpi, i germinated B. cinerea spores forming a hyphal network on poplar leaf at 12 dpi, j B. cinerea conidiophores at 12 dpi

We also tested the ability of fungal spores to induce leaf necrosis on P. x canescens. We inoculated the leaves with 1 × 106 spores suspended in water or ¼ PDA. The treatments resulted in irreproducible infection patterns. The spores germinated on ¼ PDA (Fig. 9g), on the leaves (Fig. 9h) and formed hyphal networks (Fig. 9i) and conidia (Fig. 9j). But necrosis did not occur or was only very minor, even after long incubation periods (> 14 dpi). This result shows that the infection is hardly promoted under normal conditions, even when the leaves are kept in high humidity.

Jasmonate-dependency of the infection

Jasmonate is involved in the defense against necrotizing fungi in many plant species [44]. To test whether our bioassay system is capable of capturing jasmonate-responses of poplar leaves, whole P. x canescens plants were pretreated with methyl jasmonate. After 8 h pretreatment, leaves were plug-inoculated with B. cinerea. Mock-inoculated leaves did not show symptoms, whereas inoculated leaves showed visible necroses after 4 dpi. Methyl jasmonate exposed plants showed significantly less necrotic area and fungal DNA than the non-induced plants (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Leaf necrotic area a and Botrytis cinerea development b in poplar leaves after methyl jasmonate pretreatment

Ten-week-old greenhouse-grown Populus x canescens were sprayed with 200 µM methyl jasmonate (MeJA) in ddH2O or with ddH2O (control) until runoff (approx. 25 mL). Eight hours after pretreatment, the 4th fully developed leaf was inoculated with a B. cinerea plug from a seven-day-old Potato-Dextrose-Agar plate and harvested four days post inoculation. The necrotic area was determined with the pliman method and expressed as percentage of the total leaf disk area (5.44 cm2). B. cinerea growth was quantified by qRT PCR and calibrated with the data in Fig. 3. The figures show min–max boxplots with the whiskers spanning across the range of the data points. Each point represents one biological replicate (n = 6–7). Each biological replicate represents the mean of three technical replicates. Different letters above the box plots indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 calculated by ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.


Here, we developed a simple method that leads to the infection of poplar leaves by B. cinerea hyphae. We show that under these conditions, a range of phylogenetically divergent poplar species [45] can be infected, whereas B. cinerea infections are rare when the leaves were exposed to spores. Within the first days after inoculation, the increase in necrotic area reliably reported the severity of B. cinerea poplar leaf infections.

The infection can be performed with basic laboratory materials. While the automated analysis of the necrotic area using pliman is an improvement to individual analyses with imaging software in terms of speed and threshold assignment, it is still facing other problems in phytopathometry, such as the need for expertise in the classification of disease symptoms [21]. The qRT-PCR-based fungal DNA quantification, which we developed here, correlated with the size of the necrotic area. Under our experimental conditions, the increase in fungal DNA leveled off between 3 and 4 dpi. Since we have no evidence for hyphal growth outside the necrotic area in leaf cells, we speculate that the vital fungus continues to grow in newly damaged cells but withdraws from the nutrient-depleted cells at the center of the necrotic area. This proliferation pattern may limit the time scale of the qRT-PCR approach to evaluate the disease incidence. Therefore, we recommend the pliman approach for longer incubation periods, whereas both methods, qRT-PCR and necrotic area determination, achieve accurate B. cinerea infection data for up to about 4 dpi.

While spore infection under many different conditions tested here did not lead to homogenous infection patterns, the robustness of the plug infection protocol was demonstrated by several independent repetitions. However, the increase in necrotic tissue varied among different independent runs of the experiments. Since B. cinerea-induced infections are favored in the temperature range from 15 °C to 25 °C [46], we speculate that this might have been caused by unattended temperature fluctuations in our greenhouse. It is also conceivable that differences in poplar metabolism under different greenhouse conditions affected fungal proliferation. These possibilities should be clarified by future investigations.

We conducted B. cinerea bioassays with different poplar species when the leaves were very young, right after bud break. Young leaves of strawberry plants or eucalypt trees were more susceptible to B. cinerea than old leaves [47, 48], while young leaves of bean plants were less susceptible [49]. The disease resistance of poplar leaves may also vary with leaf age and, thus, should be taken into account when using our B. cinerea infection protocol.

Our infection system is suitable for inducing strong damage to leaves in controlled experiments using vigorously growing B. cinerea hyphae. However, it should be noted that the natural infection caused by B. cinerea starts with spores landing on the plant surface [50]. The spores can germinate and penetrate the leaf, where they remain quiescent until favorable conditions prevail for a disease outbreak [5]. This behavior is also true for B. cinerea in poplar leaves because we isolated the B. cinerea strain, able to induce severe leaf lesions, from healthy-appearing leaves. This finding exemplifies the peculiarity of B. cinerea being able to remain symptomless within the host tissue, either in the quiescent stage [5] or by a putatively endophytic lifestyle [51]. In our study, B. cinerea also showed symptomless development when germinated from spores on poplar leaves, suggesting adaptation of this strain to P. x canescens and vice versa. The latent or asymptomatic infection strategy of B. cinerea highlights the importance of its molecular quantification.

The factors that lead to disease outbreaks and occurrence of necroses in poplar are still enigmatic. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the phyllosphere microbiome can grant resistance against B. cinerea [52]. Our results also hint towards a control of the phyllosphere microbiome on B. cinerea because disease outbreak required leaf surface sterilization. Since the microbiome of forest trees show seasonal fluctuations [53], its impact on the severity of B. cinerea infections may vary and thus, negatively affect experiments. However, it should also be noted that the ethanol treatment for leaf sterilization can alter leaf surface chemistry and thereby, putatively facilitate fungal infections. Therefore, further studies are necessary to distinguish these possibilities and clarify a potential protective role of the surface microbiome. Inside Arabidopsis leaves, B. cinerea secreted toxins induce programmed cell death before fungal proliferation [54, 55]. In the present study, photosynthetic integrity was diminished in areas adjacent to the necroses, although we could not find clear-cut support for fungal presence in these cells. Therefore, we speculate that B. cinerea sets off a cell lytic program similar to that in Arabidopsis, feeding on leaking cell contents. B. cinerea was also able to grow vertically through the leaf, evading through the open stomata and forming new conidia. Thus, our microscopic results provided novel insights into how B. cinerea colonizes poplar leaves.

The reduction of disease severity after methyl jasmonate treatment is in line with findings for other species like Arabidopsis or tomato [56, 57]. In poplar, methyl jasmonate treatment induces phenol-based defenses [58] and recruits a signaling cascade involving JAZ proteins, several transcription factors of the MYB and ERF families, and chitinases [59]. Collectively, these responses are known to play roles in the defense of Arabidopsis against B. cinerea [60,61,62]. The infection protocol described in the present work will enable researchers to investigate controls on this ubiquitous fungus and uncover conditions under which B. cinerea escapes the poplar defense systems.

Increasing our knowledge of necrotizing pathogens in tree species is important because fungal diseases threaten the health of our forests [63]. The generalist B. cinerea is a dangerous pathogen in climate change-stressed forests, causing increased disease incidences in drought-stressed trees [64]. Our bioassay will be particularly useful for translational research, transferring knowledge from the B. cinerea infection system in Arabidopsis [65] to poplar and in tree improvement programs using bioengineering to enhance tree resistance and screening the natural inter- and intra-specific variation of B. cinerea resistance in Populus sp.


Here, we developed a novel bioassay for the poplar necrotizing pathogen B. cinerea and its molecular quantification in leaves. A major benefit of the method is that it is straightforward to use. The setup requires only plates with the B. cinerea strain, plastic bags, and photos of the necrotic area as the basis to quantify fungal disease severity. The bioassay is accomplished within 4 dpi, and an initial evaluation of the necrotic area can be done within an hour after image acquisition. The availability of an assay for the interaction of poplar with a necrotizing fungus will stimulate research in many areas, such as ectomycorrhiza-induced resistance [66], abiotic stresses [drought, heat, [67], nutrient stress [68]] or evaluation of new species for wood production [69]. Moreover, it also enables us to uncover molecular signaling pathways to combat necrotizing pathogens in an economically important tree species.

Availability of data and materials

Sequences are available at NCBI Genbank ( under accession numbers ON740896 and ON740897. B. cinerea strain 261.71 from poplar is available in the public collection of DSMZ ( under the collection number DSM 114993.


  1. Williamson B, Tudzynski B, Tudzynski P, Van Kan JAL. Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease. Mol Plant Pathol. 2007;8:561–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elad Y, Pertot I, Cotes Prado AM, Stewart A. Plant hosts of Botrytis spp. In: Fillinger S, Elad Y, editors. Botrytis—the fungus, the pathogen and its management in agricultural systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 413–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Roca-Couso R, Flores-Félix JD, Rivas R. Mechanisms of action of microbial biocontrol agents against Botrytis cinerea. J Fungi. 2021;7:1045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbey JA, Percival D, Abbey, Lord, Asiedu SK, Prithiviraj B, Schilder A. Biofungicides as alternative to synthetic fungicide control of grey mould (Botrytis cinerea)—prospects and challenges. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2018;29:207–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson B. Latency and quiescence in survival and success of fungal plant pathogens Ecology of plant pathogens. Wallingford, UK: Cab International; 1994. p. 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lilja A, Poteri M, Petäistö R-L, Rikala R, Kurkela T, Kasanen R. Fungal diseases in forest nurseries in Finland. Finn Soc Forest Sci. 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal RK, Singh P, Wang BSP. Botrytis: a hazard to reforestation. Eur J For Res. 1987;17:369–84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Büsgen M. Biologische Studien mit Botrytis cinerea. Flora Allg bot Ztg. 1918;111–112:606–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hepting GH. Diseases of forest and shade trees of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peace TR. Pathology of trees and shrubs, with special reference to Britain. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Notte A-M, Plaza V, Marambio-Alvarado B, Olivares-Urbina L, Poblete-Morales M, Silva-Moreno E, et al. Molecular identification and characterization of Botrytis cinerea associated to the endemic flora of semi-desert climate in Chile. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2021;2:100049.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeger MJ. The impact of climate change on disease in wild plant populations and communities. Plant Pathol. 2022;71:111–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feau N, Joly DL, Hamelin RC. Poplar leaf rusts: model pathogens for a model tree. Can J Bot NRC Res Press. 2007;85:1127–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansson S, Douglas CJ. Populus: a model system for plant biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:435–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polle A, Douglas C. The molecular physiology of poplars: paving the way for knowledge-based biomass production. Plant Biol. 2010;12:239–376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guinet C, Boutigny AL, Vialle A, Hamelin RC, Frey P, Ioos R. Simultaneous monitoring and quantification of Melampsora allii-populina and Melampsora larici-populina on infected poplar leaves using a duplex real-time PCR assay. Plant Pathol. 2016;65:380–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hacquard S, Veneault-Fourrey C, Delaruelle C, Frey P, Martin F, Duplessis S. Validation of Melampsora larici-populina reference genes for in planta RT-quantitative PCR expression profiling during time-course infection of poplar leaves. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;75:106–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gachon C, Saindrenan P. Real-time PCR monitoring of fungal development in Arabidopsis thaliana infected by Alternaria brassicicola and Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004;42:367–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Z, Qin G, Li B, Tian S. Infection assays of tomato and apple fruit by the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Bio-protoc. 2014;4:e1311–e1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bai Q, Duan B, Ma J, Fen Y, Sun S, Long Q, et al. Coexpression of PalbHLH1 and PalMYB90 genes from Populus alba enhances pathogen resistance in poplar by increasing the flavonoid content. Front Plant Sci. 2020;10:101772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bock CH, Chiang K-S, Del Ponte EM. Plant disease severity estimated visually: a century of research, best practices, and opportunities for improving methods and practices to maximize accuracy. Trop Plant Pathol. 2022;47:25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prins TW, Tudzynski P, von Tiedemann A, Tudzynski B, Ten Have A, Hansen ME, et al. Infection strategies of Botrytis cinerea and related necrotrophic pathogens. In: Kronstad JW, editor., et al., Fungal Pathology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2000. p. 33–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Diguta CF, Rousseaux S, Weidmann S, Bretin N, Vincent B, Guilloux-Benatier M, et al. Development of a qPCR assay for specific quantification of Botrytis cinerea on grapes: qPCR detection and quantification of Botrytis cinerea. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;313:81–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Müller A, Volmer K, Mishra-Knyrim M, Polle A. Growing poplars for research with and without mycorrhizas. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:00332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith G, Onions AHS, Allsopp D, Eggins HOW. Smith’s introduction to industrial mycology. Hoboken: Wiley; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gams W, van der Aa HA, van der Plaats-Niterink AJ, Samson RA, Stalpers JA. CBS course of mycology CBS course of mycology. Baarn: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hennebert GL. Botrytis and Botrytis-like genera. Pers Mol Phylogeny Evol Fungi. 1973;7:183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993;2:113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols Guide Methods Appl. 1990;18:315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bonfield JK, Smith KF, Staden R. A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:4992–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernández-Bautista N, Domínguez-Núñez JA, Moreno MMC, Berrocal-Lobo M. Plant tissue trypan blue staining during phytopathogen infection. Bio-protoc. 2016;6:e2078–e2078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2022.

  33. RStudio Team. R Studio: Integrated Development for R. 2020.

  34. Olivoto T. Lights, camera, pliman! An R package for plant image analysis. Methods Ecol Evol. 2022;13:789–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The GIMP development team. GIMP. 2022.

  36. Suarez MB, Walsh K, Boonham N, O’Neill T, Pearson S, Barker I. Development of real-time PCR (TaqMan®) assays for the detection and quantification of Botrytis cinerea in planta. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005;43:890–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sekulska-Nalewajko J, Kornaś A, Gocławski J, Miszalski Z, Kuźniak E. Spatial referencing of chlorophyll fluorescence images for quantitative assessment of infection propagation in leaves demonstrated on the ice plant: Botrytis cinerea pathosystem. Plant Methods. 2019;15:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Smithson M, Verkuilen J. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods. 2006;11:54–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A. Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw. 2010;34:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008;50:346–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fox J, Friendly M, Weisberg S. Hypothesis tests for multivariate linear models using the car package. R J. 2013;5:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Laflamme B, Middleton M, Lo T, Desveaux D, Guttman DS. Image-based quantification of plant immunity and disease. MPMI. 2016;29:919–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang M, Weiberg A, Lin F-M, Thomma BPHJ, Huang H-D, Jin H. Bidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection. Nat Plants. 2016;2:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pandey D, Rajendran SRCK, Gaur M, Sajeesh PK, Kumar A. Plant defense signaling and responses against necrotrophic fungal pathogens. J Plant Growth Regul. 2016;35:1159–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Isebrands JG, Richardson J. Poplars and willows: trees for society and the environment. CABI. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jarvis WR. Managing diseases in greenhouse crops. St Paul: Aps press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Caires NP, Rodrigues FA, Furtado GQ. Infection process of Botrytis cinerea on Eucalypt leaves. J Phytopathol. 2015;163:604–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Meng L, Höfte M, Van Labeke M-C. Leaf age and light quality influence the basal resistance against Botrytis cinerea in strawberry leaves. Environ Exp Bot. 2019;157:35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Deverall BJ, Wood RKS. Infection of bean plants (Vicia faba L) with Botrytis cinerea and B fabae. Ann Appl Biol. 1961;49:461–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. van Kan JAL. Infection strategies of Botrytis cinerea. Acta Hortic. 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. van Kan JAL, Shaw MW, Grant-Downton RT. Botrytis species: relentless necrotrophic thugs or endophytes gone rogue? Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;15:957–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ritpitakphong U, Falquet L, Vimoltust A, Berger A, Métraux J-P, L’Haridon F. The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen. New Phytol. 2016;210:1033–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bao L, Gu L, Sun B, Cai W, Zhang S, Zhuang G, et al. Seasonal variation of epiphytic bacteria in the phyllosphere of Gingko biloba, Pinus bungeana and Sabina chinensis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Huo D, Wu J, Kong Q, Zhang GB, Wang YY, Yang HY. Macromolecular toxins secreted by Botrytis cinerea induce programmed cell death in Arabidopsis leaves. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2018;65:579–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Leisen T, Werner J, Pattar P, Safari N, Ymeri E, Sommer F, et al. Multiple knockout mutants reveal a high redundancy of phytotoxic compounds contributing to necrotrophic pathogenesis of Botrytis cinerea. PLOS Pathog Public Library Sci. 2022;18:e1010367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Thomma BPHJ, Eggermont K, Broekaert WF, Cammue BPA. Disease development of several fungi on Arabidopsis can be reduced by treatment with methyl jasmonate. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2000;38:421–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Yu M, Shen L, Fan B, Zhao D, Zheng Y, Sheng J. The effect of MeJA on ethylene biosynthesis and induced disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;54:153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hu Z, Zhao L, Yang D, Shen Y, Shen F. Influences of the Populus deltoids seedlings treated with exogenous methyl jasmonate on the growth and development of Lymantria dispar larvae. J of For Res. 2006;17:277–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Luo J, Xia W, Cao P, Xiao Z, Zhang Y, Liu M, et al. Integrated transcriptome analysis reveals plant hormones jasmonic acid and salicylic acid coordinate growth and defense responses upon fungal infection in poplar. Biomolecules. 2019;9:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. El Oirdi M, El Rahman TA, Rigano L, El Hadrami A, Rodriguez MC, Daayf F, et al. Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2405–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Windram O, Madhou P, McHattie S, Hill C, Hickman R, Cooke E, et al. Arabidopsis defense against Botrytis cinerea: chronology and regulation deciphered by high-resolution temporal transcriptomic analysis. Plant Cell. 2012;24:3530–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Smirnova E, Marquis V, Poirier L, Aubert Y, Zumsteg J, Ménard R, et al. Jasmonic acid oxidase 2 hydroxylates jasmonic acid and represses basal defense and resistance responses against Botrytis cinerea infection. Mol Plant. 2017;10:1159–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Paap T, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Santini A. Invasion frameworks: a forest pathogen perspective. Curr Forestry Rep. 2022;8:74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang PG, Sutton JC. High temperature, darkness, and drought predispose black spruce seedlings to gray mold. Can J Bot. 1994;72:135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Veloso J, van Kan JAL. Many shades of grey in Botrytis–host plant interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:613–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dreischhoff S, Das IS, Jakobi M, Kasper K, Polle A. Local responses and systemic induced resistance mediated by ectomycorrhizal fungi. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:590063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Saijo Y, Loo EP. Plant immunity in signal integration between biotic and abiotic stress responses. New Phytol. 2020;225:87–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kasper K, Abreu IN, Feussner K, Zienkiewicz K, Herrfurth C, Ischebeck T, et al. Multi-omics analysis of xylem sap uncovers dynamic modulation of poplar defenses by ammonium and nitrate. Plant J. 2022;111:282–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Polle A, Janz D, Teichmann T, Lipka V. Poplar genetic engineering: promoting desirable wood characteristics and pest resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:5669–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to M. Fastenrath for the propagation of P. euphratica, to C. Leibecke for helping with plant maintenance, to T. Klein for supporting the DNA extraction and B. cinerea identification, and to U. Lipka for help with electron microscopy. We are grateful to V. Meng (Forest Botanical Garden, University of Göttingen) for providing various poplar species. We thank T. Olivoto (Department of Plant Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina) for helping fine-tune the pliman analysis for our purpose and J. Ballauff for assistance in statistical analysis.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL and the Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen University. The work in AP’s laboratory is funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG). KHK, SD, and ISD were supported in the framework of the International Research Training Group “PRoTECT” (IRTG 2172, M1, and M2.2), funding No. 273134146.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



KHK and SD developed the methodology, performed experiments, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. KHK supervised the project. ISD worked on fungal sporulation and spore infection. FH conducted scanning electron and fluorescence microscopy. AMW isolated and identified the Botrytis cinerea strain used in this study. AP acquired funding, supervised SD, ISD, AMW, and FH, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Henrik Kasper.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. The effect of 70% ethanol poplar leaf surface sterilization on infection severity of Botrytis cinerea and mock-PDA plug inoculation at 4 dpi. Table S1. Origin of Poplar species challenged with Botrytis cinerea.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dreischhoff, S., Das, I.S., Häffner, F. et al. Fast and easy bioassay for the necrotizing fungus Botrytis cinerea on poplar leaves. Plant Methods 19, 32 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Botrytis cinerea
  • Poplar
  • Necrosis
  • Pathogen
  • Fungus
  • Quantification
  • Jasmonate
  • Populus spec.
  • Infection assay