Skip to main content

Preparation of uniformly labelled 13C- and 15N-plants using customised growth chambers

Abstract

Background

Stable isotopically labelled organisms have found wide application in life science research including plant physiology, plant stress and defense as well as metabolism related sciences. Therefore, the reproducible production of plant material enriched with stable isotopes such as 13C and 15N is of considerable interest. A high degree of enrichment (> 96 atom %) with a uniformly distributed isotope (global labelling) is accomplished by a continuous substrate supply during plant growth/cultivation. In the case of plants, 13C-labelling can be achieved by growth in 13CO2(g) atmosphere while global 15N-labelling needs 15N- containing salts in the watering/nutrient solution. Here, we present a method for the preparation of 13C and 15N-labelled plants by the use of closed growth chambers and hydroponic nutrient supply. The method is exemplified with durum wheat.

Results

In total, 330 g of globally 13C- and 295 g of 15N-labelled Triticum durum wheat was produced during 87 cultivation days. For this, a total of 3.88 mol of 13CO2(g) and 58 mmol of 15N were consumed. The degree of enrichment was determined by LC-HRMS and ranged between 96 and 98 atom % for 13C and 95–99 atom % for 15N, respectively. Additionally, the isotopically labelled plant extracts were successfully used for metabolome-wide internal standardisation of native T.durum plants. Application of an isotope-assisted LC-HRMS workflow enabled the detection of 652 truly wheat-derived metabolites out of which 143 contain N.

Conclusion

A reproducible cultivation which makes use of climate chambers and hydroponics was successfully adapted to produce highly enriched, uniformly 13C- and 15N-labelled wheat. The obtained plant material is suitable to be used in all kinds of isotope-assisted research. The described technical equipment and protocol can easily be applied to other plants to produce 13C-enriched biological samples when the necessary specific adaptations e.g. temperature and light regime, as well as nutrient supply are considered. Additionally, the 15N-labelling method can also be carried out under regular glasshouse conditions without the need for customised atmosphere.

Background

The use of plants and plant-derived metabolites labelled with heavy stable isotopes offers an interesting perspective in phytochemical research. Some research fields where stable isotopes found application are nutrition [1], evaluation of biosynthetic pathways [2], metabolic engineering [3], flux analysis [2, 4], accurate quantification of plant metabolites [5], studies on plant–microbe interactions [6] and untargeted metabolomics and proteomics [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The increasing popularity of isotopically labelled plant material goes hand in hand with the development of complementary analytical tools e.g. NMR and high throughput GC–MS and LC-HRMS which enable differentiation between native and labelled metabolites [13, 14] as well as the availability of bioinformatics (for automated data processing) and statistical tools (for differential metabolome analysis). Therefore, protocols for the reproducible production of globally labelled biological organisms including higher plants with target stable isotopes are of increasing interest.

Up to now, a variety of in vivo stable isotopic labelling methodologies for different organisms were described (e.g. organelles, cells, tissue/organs and whole plants) [3, 15, 16]. These approaches are based on the application of isotopically labelled substrates to the organism under investigation which further converts the labelled substrate to various downstream metabolites via endogenous enzymes. Depending on the labelling regime, the organism can be labelled uniformly or non-uniformly with different degrees of enrichment. In tracer [2, 17] or pulse-based methods (time-dependent substrate exposure) [4, 18] a specific submetabolome is labelled. These study types aim to elucidate metabolic networks or determine the rates of metabolic transformations or enzymatic reactions. On the other side, globally labelled organisms can be used for metabolome- or proteome-wide internal standardisation in untargeted -omics approaches which aim to capture the total number of the respective biochemical constituents. In addition, metabolic alterations which may, for example, be caused by various stress factors can be comprehensively investigated.

Global 13C-labelling is used to produce uniformly 13C-labelled plants (here termed as 13C14N plants) and requires a continuous supply of 13CO2 throughout the whole cultivation. The 13CO2 is applied as a substrate which is in planta further converted to all assimilates required to sustain plant metabolism. Therefore, airtight cultivation chambers (labelboxes) with 13CO2 atmosphere become necessary. As the preparation of 13C-enriched plants affords long-term cultivations the technical equipment has to enable the regulation of growth parameters such as temperature, light and the atmospheric humidity as well as the levels of CO2 and O2. Global 15N-labelling is accomplished by applying 15N-containing nutrient solution through the root system and 15N distribution takes place by transport via xylem and the initial formation of 15N-labelled glutamine in the plastids and further via transamination reactions. In such a way, 15N-labelled plants (termed 12C15N) can be produced. As 15N is applied via the nutrient solution, hydroponic cultivation with a 15N-labelled ammonium- and/or nitrate solution are prerequisite for defined labelling experiments. If both labelling regimes are used/applied in parallel under the same experimental conditions (cultivation chamber and hydroponics), the obtained plants can be expected to have similar metabolic composition and their metabolomes (13C14N and 12C15N) can be correlated. Alternatively, if only 15N-labelling is required the 15N salts can be also provided without the use of cultivation chambers.

Up to know, the stable isotopically labelling procedures are implemented in the labs of other research groups who were successful at producing different plants with different degrees of enrichment with 13C [18,19,20,21,22], 15N [23,24,25,26] and using both elements in form of dual labelling (13C15N plants) or single labelling of plants cultivated in parallel (13C14N and 12C15N plants) [13, 15, 16, 27]. Here, we aim to present a fully automated and robust labelling equipment implemented to produce highly 13C- and 15N-enriched wheat, cultivated in parallel under the same conditions with high N and C metabolome coverage. The presented procedure describes the detailed setup and experimental instructions for the automated long-term cultivation of wheat plants allowing plant manipulation/treatment in closed atmosphere. The procedure enables the production of plants highly enriched with 13C (> 96 atom %) via the 13CO2 atmosphere whereas the CO2 concentration can be controlled during the cultivation. The moisture levels can be limited and CO2 or ethylene can be removed by the optional application of a scrubbing device. The included irrigation system allows introduction of nutrient solution into the closed atmosphere. Additionally, 15N-labelling can be performed by enrichment of the nutrient solution with 15N-containing salts which makes it possible to produce up to 99 atom % of 15N in 12C15N plants. A dual labelling combining 13C and 15N is also possible. The described setup can easily be extended/adjusted to cultivate other highly 13C-enriched uniformly labelled plants. Moreover, the presented labelbox setup also allows pulse labelling experiments to study metabolic processes.

Results and discussion

The presented method describes the cultivation of T. durum plants from seedling to flowering stage, for the production of 13C14N plants under controlled 13CO2 atmosphere and 12C15N material by supply with 15N-labelled NH4NO3, Ca(NO3)2, and KNO3 containing nutrient solution. To demonstrate both cultivation and the exemplary application of the plant material in an untargeted metabolomics approach, the paper is structured as follows: (a) cultivation in the labelbox for the production of 13C14N and 12C15N T.durum including detailed documentation of the applied and recorded parameters; (b) enrichment of the generated biomass of wheat and the consumption of CO2 and nutrient solution; (c) assessment of the 13C and 15N enrichment by high resolution mass spectrometry and (d) application of the labelled wheat in an isotope assisted untargeted LC-HRMS approach with the aim to elucidate the 13C and/or 15N-containing metabolome. Additionally, some novel aspects as well as comparison with already presented protocols for stable isotopically labelling will be discussed.

Wheat cultivation in the labelbox

The cultivation of 4 wheat plants in each labelbox lasted 87 days in total. Defined temperature and light regimes were applied depending on the growth stage. The atmospheric parameters inside the labelbox (inner temperature, humidity as well as CO2 and O2 levels) were recorded in regular time-intervals (shown in Fig. 1) over the whole cultivation period.

Fig. 1
figure1

13C-labelbox cultivation record of wheat for the inner atmosphere correlated to the observed growth stages and applied setpoint levels for ambient temperature and light duration. Similar records were obtained for the 15N-labelbox

The temperature and light regime used during cultivation was adapted to 24 h cycles to simulate natural day and night rhythm for summer wheat. Therefore, the ambient temperature (outside the label box) was increased stepwise while the light exposure was extended in the course of cultivation. To simulate day time conditions, the plants were exposed to artificial light during the first 34 days for 12 h, while from day 35 the exposure was extended by 2 h (14 h/10 h at day/night). The ambient temperature setpoints were increased during the cultivation in three steps (Fig. 1b). In parallel, the temperature inside the labelbox was recorded with the integrated temperature sensor. The inner temperature reached ambient conditions during night, while it was up to 10 °C higher than that of the ambient climate chamber during the day, due to the energy provided by the external light source, regardless of the time point during cultivation (Fig. 1c).

The first two monitored growth stages were (Z1) seedling development and (Z2) tillering (Fig. 6a, b). During this period, which represents about one-third of the cultivation time, the temperature inside the labelbox was 10 °C during night and 22 °C during the day (Fig. 1c) resulting in 3 to 6 tillers per plant. During that stage, the daily CO2 consumption was between 50 and 100 ml (25 to 50 loops) of CO2 per day and CO2 levels did not increase during night (Fig. 1c). Further, during the day the O2 levels were slightly below 20% while the relative humidity was recorded to be 53%. During the night intervals, Peltier cooling was necessary to keep relative humidity at the maximum allowed 70% which depicts the higher humidity through the release of H2O as plant transpiration product via the stomata.

The first temperature increase initiated the stem elongation stage (Z3) (Fig. 6c). The resulting increase in biomass is reflected by an elevated CO2 consumption during the day and higher CO2 levels in the dark (up to 1500 ppmv). CO2 was not removed from the atmosphere in the labelbox as it was quickly assimilated after starting the day time period and this helped to save expensive 13CO2. The O2 level slightly increased in comparison to the Z1/Z2 stage but was still below 21%. High O2 levels would reduce the rate of photosynthesis as shown in [28]. It was also observed that the increase in biomass and the associated elevated transpiration and respiration steadily raised relative humidity levels during the day to reach ca. 64% at day 40 (Fig. 1c). Similar records were obtained in the 15N-labelbox.

During growth stages Z4–6 (corresponding to booting, heading and anthesis), the recorded parameter levels were maintained at setpoint levels. O2 levels and relative humidity reached and stayed at max. values with ~ 21% and 70%, respectively. With the biomass, the increase in CO2 consumption was further observed to rise further up to ~ 2.3 l (1100 loops) at day 66. High demand on CO2 can also be seen from short intervals between dosages to keep CO2 at an average level of 400 ppmv (Fig. 1c).

The harvest period lasted a total of 14 days. Approximately 6 days (144 h) after first anthers appeared, the respective ear and the adjacent stem and leaves were cut, removed from the box and frozen in liquid nitrogen. As expected, the removal of plant material from the labelbox resulted in a decrease of CO2 consumption, O2 levels and relative humidity (Fig. 1c), starting from day 71.

Summarised, the recorded cultivation conditions are in accordance with the applied temperature- and light regimes and also reflect both the increase in biomass as well as photosynthesis and respiration activity during growth of the plants in the labelbox.

Yield of biomass and consumption of 13CO2 and 15N-enriched nutrient solution

In total, 330 g of 13C14N- and 295 g of 12C15N-labelled plant fresh weight (FW) were harvested from two labelboxes. The mass fractions obtained for different plant organs was similar for both labelboxes. Roots represented the greatest mass fraction (50%), followed by stems (ca. 30%), leaves and ears (ca. 10% each) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Mass fractions in [%] relative to the whole wheat plant weight

The total water content in FW was determined to be between 64% and 70% for different wheat organs. After freeze drying, the rest moisture levels of the plant organs were below 5%. The consumption rate of the nutrient solution in the 15N-labelled wheat was 24.4 ml/g FW and 870 mg of 15N was consumed in total. In the 13C-experiment, 3.81 mol of 13CO2 were consumed which corresponds to a consumption rate of 11.5 mmol 13CO2/g FW (Additional file 1: Equation (S1, S4)). The consumed amounts of 15N or 13CO2 are in good agreement with the literature [29,30,31].

Determination of the degree of 13C- and 15N enrichment by LC-HRMS

The degree of isotopic enrichment with 13C and 15N, were determined by LC-HRMS in 13C14N and 12C15N wheat ear extracts respectively. For this, the LC-HRMS data was firstly processed by the MetExtractII software [14]. Then, ca. 9 highly abundant metabolites from the obtained list that contains truly wheat-derived metabolites were selected and used to determine the degree of enrichment. A detailed annotation or identification was beyond of the scope of this study. However, as 13C- and 15N-labelling was employed the number of C and N atoms contained in the target compounds were known exactly. The considered metabolites contained between 9 and 14 carbon atoms and 1 to 4 nitrogen atoms, respectively. Further, the isotopologue abundance distribution for each metabolite in measured mass spectra were examined manually with Xcalibur 4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) and exemplified with one tested compound (tryptophan) in Fig. 3. All isotopologues of the same metabolite show the same retention times as they coelute from the chromatographic column.

Fig. 3
figure3

In each experiment high abundant isotopologues of tryptophan were represented as M (all carbons are 12C), M’ (all carbons are 13C) and M’’ (all nitrogens are 15N) and the low abundant isotopologues of the same molecule are M + 1 (one 13C and rest 12C), M’-1 (one 12C and rest 13C) and M’’-1 (one 14N and rest 15N). The relative isotopologue intensities were used to determine the degree of enrichment

For calculation of the degree of enrichment, peak height intensities at three different regions of chromatographic peak (centre, front and tail of peak) were considered. MS peak height intensities > 106 were taken into account to accurately determine the degree of isotopic enrichment [32].

The degree of enrichment (EX) for native and labelled forms was calculated according to Eq. (1) which is derived from the binominal distribution equation [33]. RX represents the intensity ratio of the inspected isotopologues of a molecule. The count C/N is the number of carbon or nitrogen atoms contained in the molecule. The IM+0.997 represents the intensity of the low abundant 15N mass peak in native samples.

$$ \begin{aligned}& E_{x} \left[ {atom\% } \right] = \left( {1 - \frac{{R_{x} }}{{count_{{{C \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {C N}} \right. \kern-0pt} N}}} + R_{x} }}} \right);\\ &\quad x = {}^{13}{\text{C}},{}^{15}{\text{N}},{}^{12}{\text{C}}\;or\;{}^{14}{\text{N}}\end{aligned} $$
(1)
$$ \begin{aligned}& R_{13C} \; = \;\frac{{I_{{M^{\prime} - 1}}}}{{I_{{M^{\prime}}}}};\;R_{15N} \; = \;\frac{{I_{{M^{\prime\prime} - 1}}}}{{I_{{M^{\prime\prime}}}}};\;\\&R_{12C} \; = \;\frac{{I_{M + 1}}}{{I_{M}}};\;R_{14N} \; = \;\frac{{I_{M + \;0.997}}}{{I_{M}}}\end{aligned} $$
(2)

The degrees of 13C and 15N in T. durum cultivars were determined to be (98.4 ± 0.1) atom % and (99 ± 0.2) atom %, respectively. Similar levels were obtained for earlier labelling experiments with T. aestivum (Table 1). In comparison to other genotypes, the cultivar Apogee had a lower degree of enrichment for 13C and 15N. This might be explained with the fact that initially native seeds were used. In comparison to other genotypes, the Apogee is a “dwarf wheat”. The amount of produced biological material per seed is ca. 2.8 times lower for Apogee wheat than for Karur plants. Therefore, the fraction of 12C and 14N per seed that originated from the seeds is higher in Apogee than in the other cultivars.

Table 1 Determined degree of enrichment after cultivation of 13C- and 15N-labelled T. aestivum and T. durum cultivars as well as the enrichment in native analogues

Annotation of the global metabolome

Extracts of the stable isotopically labelled wheat (13C and 15N separately) were used to internally standardise native wheat extracts. These sample mixtures were measured with LC-HRMS and processing of the obtained raw data was performed with the in-house developed MetExtract II software [7, 8, 14, 34]. The program automatically performs an efficient filtering of all non-wheat derived metabolites by extracting metabolic features based on their chromatographic coelution and isotopic pattern (which is characteristic to the mixture of native and labelled extracts) [14]. The LC-HRMS data of the 13C-experiment contained 1467 ions (global metabolome including all N-containing ions) while 367 ions were found in the 15N-experiment (only N-containing ions were considered). In the next step, both feature lists were merged into one matrix by combining ions with same characteristics. For this, m/z values and retention times of native isotopologues containing 12C and/or 14N were considered in both experiments. This combined matrix, encompassed 1621 ions in total. In order to remove false positive ions from the N metabolome (e.g. those containing N but no C), the isotopologue pattern of each metabolite putatively containing N was additionally curated manually by the aid of the MZmine software [35] and the isotopologue pattern was reviewed in all experiments (e.g. in native, 13C- and 15N-labelling experiment similar isotopologue patterns were expected as those shown in Fig. 3).

Finally, the data set contained 1519 ions which were assigned to 652 unique metabolites with a mass range between m/z 116 and 875 (Fig. 4). Amongst the detected metabolites, 143 contained nitrogen. As illustrated in the feature plot of Fig. 4, metabolites containing nitrogen atoms tended to elute during the first 15 min of the chromatographic run. With respect to number, the majority of the detected N-containing metabolites contain 1, 2 or 3 nitrogens.

Fig. 4
figure4

Each dot represents one metabolite found in the 13C and 15N experiment

Applications of the presented method and comparison with existing protocols

Previously, two types of equipment for stable isotopic labelling of plants with 13C were described. The first employs commercially available, smaller sized automatic cultivation chambers with a built-in regulation module for light and temperature regimes [16, 20, 36]. The second one makes use of (in-house designed) labelling devices placed in bigger sized climate chambers, climate rooms or glasshouses which provide an external light and temperature regulation [13, 15, 18, 19, 27]. Both approaches enable continuous monitoring and regulation of atmospheric parameters. Enrichment with 15N or 34S does not require systems with an enclosed atmosphere but rather hydroponic cultivation systems [23,24,25, 37]. Generally, both equipment types are in principle suitable to perform pulse [16, 18] and uniformly labelling [13, 20, 38] of plants at different enrichment degrees.

The method described here employs a customised labelbox that can be purchased commercially. In contrast to the existing approaches the presented method enables the manipulation of plants during cultivation by the use of four gloves which are tightly attached to the labelbox. Additionally, a gate compartment with an air lock system constitutes a part of the labelbox, enabling the introduction or removal of manipulation and sampling tools as well as sampled plant material from the labelbox without contaminating the inner atmosphere with ambient 12CO2 during cultivation.

The presented setup may be also used to mimic abiotic stress—e.g. low or elevated nutrient supply or targeted control of O2 or CO2 levels [16]. In combination with the application of stable isotopically labelled 13CO2 the thereby caused molecular alterations may be effectively investigated. Further, the presented equipment is perfectly suited for pulse labelling or—to reduce experimental costs—uniform labelling with lower degrees of enrichment. The latter can be achieved with carbon dioxide showing a lower degree of 13C enrichment. In addition, the monitoring of both 12CO2 and 13CO2 can be performed in one single box. For pulse labelling, synthetic air consisting of 14N2 and 16O2 only might be replaced by CO2-containing air and 13CO2 can be dosed according to the needs of the respective experiment.

While the costs for 15N-salts are rather moderate, the 13CO2 labelling is cost demanding but affordable on a long-run. For example, 330 g of wheat plant material were produced from ~ 100 L 13CO2 in a single labelbox, giving enough material for global internal standardisation of ~ 105 analytical samples according to the described LC-HRMS workflow. This would correspond to ca. 0.1 euros per sample for global internal standardisation. For making sure that the labelled plant material can be used over a long period, it should be freeze-dried to less than ca. 5% rest moisture and stored at − 80 °C. To our experience, under such conditions, the plant material may be preserved for several years without a significant change of its metabolic composition.

Conclusion

The method presented in this article enables the reproducible production of stable isotopically labelled plant material under controlled conditions. By the use of a customised growth chamber (labelbox), the composition of the atmosphere inside the labelbox including 13CO2 can be pre-selected and regulated during long-term cultivation. By this, degrees of global 13C enrichment as high as 98% can be achieved. Furthermore, with the presented equipment, plants can also be treated during cultivation without interfering with the labelling process. Complementary 15N-labelling is facilitated by watering with 15N-enriched nutrient solutions, which can also be done in the greenhouse without the need of the labelbox.

The globally labelled plant material can be used as internal reference in metabolism-related plant research and phytochemical analysis including metabolomics, proteomics and lipidomics [34, 39,40,41,42]. The generated plants can also be further processed to generate fractions of tailored substance classes or to isolate pure phytochemicals. Moreover, the labelled plants or generated fractions can be used for internal standardisation of experimental native samples to improve accuracy and reliability in both qualitative and quantitative analysis [43, 44].

While here, method performance characteristics have been evaluated for global uniform 13C- and 15N-labelling of cereals, the presented approach can also easily be adapted to culture other plant species or used for short-term labelling, the production of partly enriched plant material or kinetic studies using alternate exposure to 12CO2 and 13CO2 in pulsed time intervals [18].

Methods

This chapter includes [1] a description of the technical equipment used for the global 13C- and 15N-labelling in detail; [2] a presentation of the cultivation procedure adapted to produce globally labelled wheat from seedling to flowering stage and [3] a sample preparation workflow for the applied untargeted LC-HRMS based metabolomics approach.

Description of the labelling equipment

This section is related to the functional description of the cultivation process to produce globally 13C- and 15N-labelled plants using the PhytolabelBox equipment (ECH, Halle, Germany). All symbols contained in this section are related to Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure5

Simplified schematic overview of the labelling process by applying the PhytolabelBox equipment (ECH, Halle Germany)

The plants were cultivated in two specially designed cultivation chambers, so called labelboxes . Each of these 214-L Plexiglas labelboxes is equipped with two internal fans as well as a sensor assembly S for temperature, relative humidity and overpressure measurement. Each labelbox also contains 4 openings tightly sealed with gloves (Glove Box Glove Jugitec® H, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, JUNG RUBBERTEC) allowing plant manipulation during cultivation. Control and regulation of cultivation parameters (e.g. CO2 supply, overpressure and atmospheric humidity), which are essential to achieve and maintain adequate conditions for plant growth were implemented by different modules, which are together with the labelbox termed as PhytolabelBox equipment. These modules are navigated by the control unit based on the user predefined parameter setpoints via the software on the PC . Separate from this, the nutrient supply is manually carried over the irrigation delivery module .

Gas supply and control module

CO2 is supplied from the gas bottles which are connected via stainless steel and copper lines to the labelbox . Since carbon labelling was realised in one of the boxes (13C-labelbox), this is supplied with 13CO2 gas while the 15N-labelbox was operated with native 12CO2. Each gas bottle is equipped with a pressure reducer, which was set to 1 bar. The amount of the introduced CO2 is balanced by dosage loops 2b (ca. 2 ml at 1 bar) located in the control unit . The dosage loops 2b are covered with magnet valves 2a, c from both sides (in- and outlet). These valves are opened reciprocally in short time intervals during gas dosing operation. The pressure difference between the pressure reducer at the gas bottle and the interior of the labelbox forces the CO2 into the loop space and further into the labelbox . The CO2 [ppmv] measurement was performed by IR absorption using separate cuvettes 2e for 13CO2 and 12CO2. Simultaneously, the O2 [%] is also measured with an electrochemical sensor 2f, which is located in the control unit. Immediately before measurement, the sensor and cuvettes are rinsed with air from the labelbox to achieve a homogeneous gas sample. The labelbox is always operated at slight overpressure (the difference between ambient and inner pressure) of 10 ± 2 mbar to prevent ambient air from entering the closed and controlled atmosphere.

The overpressure levels are constantly recorded by the integrated sensor S in each labelbox and the pressure signal status is continuously transferred via the control unit to the PC . If the overpressure level decreases below the allowed minimum setpoint (slight gas leaks are expected and occur), the dosing of synthetic air (mixture of N2 + O2) is activated. To this end, a magnet valve 2d, which is located in the control unit opens and the synthetic air is dosed into the labelbox until the overpressure level reaches the setpoint again. If the pressure in the cultivation box exceeds the maximum allowed overpressure of 12 mbar, a magnet valve opens to release excess air. This mechanism is controlled by the software and is additionally used for the air exchange in case CO2 and/or O2 levels exceed the defined maximum values. To prevent damage to the plexiglas labelboxes by excessive overpressure, a power-independent mechanism preventing too high pressure in the closed labelboxes is installed (overpressure limitation unit ). For this, a water-filled bottle connected to the labelbox provides a robust safety tool, as by a simple physical mechanism, overpressure > 15 mbar is automatically released.

Humidity control module

To regulate the maximum humidity levels, each cultivation chamber contains an internal relative humidity (polymer-based capacitive) sensor S, an external membrane pump 5a and Peltier element 5b as well as a condensate bottle 5c. A permanent gas circulation (30 L/min) is maintained throughout the whole cultivation period passing the Peltier element 5b by use of a membrane pump 5a. In such a way, not only continuous homogenous air is provided to the plants but also relative humidity levels can be limited. The increase of relative humidity above a specified value caused by plant transpiration activates an increase of Peltier current in the drying module. Peltier current forces one side of the block to cool down, which enables water condensation from the air coming from the labelbox. The condensate is further collected in separate bottles whereas the dried air is guided back to the cultivation chambers.

Irrigation system

The irrigation system consisted of two external bottles with nutrient solutions (for the growing period, Table 2) connected over hoses and pipes to the plant pots in the labelboxes. Depending on the labelling regime the two boxes were supplied with different nutrient solutions 6b,c. The labelbox used for global 15N-labelling was supplied with salts enriched with 15N 6c. To prevent contamination of the air in the boxes during watering, the airspace in the nutrient solution bottles was connected with labelboxes to allow pressure compensation with air from inside the boxes.

Table 2 Adapted Hoagland solution

CO2 scrubber

At the beginning of the cultivation, before placing the seedlings into the labelbox, CO2 was removed from air inside the labelbox. This is achieved by the use of CO2 scrubber which is attached to the gas hose between the membrane pump 5a and labelbox . It is filled with CO2 adsorbent (3–4 mm diameter, Soda Lime Carbon Dioxide adsorbent spherical granules, Spherasorb™, Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, UK) which traps CO2 after navigating the dry air from the labelbox through the CO2 scrubber. In the presented setup, switching of the valve to direct the gas flow through the CO2 scrubber has to be done manually.

Chemicals

Methanol (MeOH, LC–MS CHROMASOLV®), acetonitrile (ACN, LC–MS CHROMASOLV®) and formic acid (FA, MS grade, ~ 98% purity) were purchased from Riedel-de Haën, Honeywell (Seelze, Germany). The ultra-pure water was obtained from an ELGA Purelab system Veolia Water (Ultra AN MK2, Vienna, Austria). The salts KOH (≥ 99.5%), NH4NO3 (≥ 99%), Na2MoO4*2H2O, KH2PO4 (≥ 99.8%), KNO3 (65%) were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and MgSO4*7H2O, ZnSO4*7H2O, Ca(NO3)2*4H2O, Ferric sodium - EDTA (C10H12N2NaFeO8), MnCl2*4H2O, ZnSO4*7H2O, CuSO4*5H2O (> 98%) from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). NH4NO3 (15N, 98 atom %), Ca(NO3)2 (15N, 98 atom %), KNO3 (15N, 98 atom %) and 13CO2 (99% purity) was purchased from Eurisotop (St-Aubin, France) while CO2 and synthetic air were obtained from Messer (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria).

Plant material

Wheat genotypes Karur (T.durum), Remus (T.aestivum) and Apogee (a dwarf cultivar of T. aestivum) were generated and used in native and labelled (13C and 15N) form. The native seeds of Karur and Remus were obtained from—and grown in the glasshouse at—the Institute of Biotechnology in Plant Production (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Agrobiotechnology, IFA-Tulln, Austria). The native Apogee seeds were obtained from the Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, University Research Center Tulln, Austria) and grown in the labelbox while supplied with non-labelled substrates. The 13C- and 15N-labelled material of each genotype was produced in the labelbox from native seeds.

Experimental description

The cultivation of T.durum plants lasted 87 days in total and comprised following steps: 1. preparation of the nutrient solution, wheat seedlings and labelboxes; 2. cultivation and 3. harvest.

Preparation of the nutrient solution

To generate globally 13C- and 15N-labelled T.durum plants, the seedlings were grown in a perlite substrate using nutrient solutions adapted from Hoagland (1950) [45] and Bugbee, Spanarkel (1994) [46] (Table 2). The salt concentration was adapted to the growing stage of the plants resulting in two nutrient solutions (one for the germination and one for the growing period respectively, Table 2). Both labelling regimes were provided with the same nutrient solutions, with the only difference that the 15N-labelling experiment was carried out with highly 15N-enriched salts. From two stock solutions, a total of 4 different nutrient solutions were prepared for two developmental periods, i.e. 2 with labelled 15N (98–99 atom % enriched) and 2 with native 14N salts.

All 4 nutrient solution types were prepared from the Hoagland stock solutions (composition in Table 2) in cool (< 10 °C) ultra-pure autoclaved water and stirred for ca. 10 min on a magnet stirrer. Low amounts of 12C as well as 14N were present in the nutrient solutions to provide iron uptake in the form of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) chelate complex.

Preparation of wheat seedings

Before placement into the labelboxes, wheat seedlings were prepared according to the following three steps: germination, vernalisation and planting.

Germination

Wheat seeds were placed in blocks of rock wool (4 × 4 cm, Grodan) with the embryo upwards so that each block contained three seeds. The seed-contained blocks were placed in two separate darkly shaded boxes and watered with solutions for the germination period containing either 15N or 14N salts until saturation of the rock wool. Boxes were closed and the seeds germinated at room temperature in the darkness for 2 days.

Vernalisation

Germinated seedlings were proceeded to vernalisation in the dark for 2 days at 4 °C in the cooling room to promote shoot yield and acceleration of the flowering process [47]. Under these conditions, previous experiments have shown to result in 4–6 shoots per T.durum plant during cultivation.

Planting of seedlings

Plant pots (~ 1 L) were wrapped in aluminum foil as depicted in Fig. 6, to prevent access of light to the medium and thus growth of algae. Pots were filled with perlite and nutrition solutions for the growth period (Table 2). For 15N-labelling nutrient solution containing 15N salts was used. Germinated and vernalised seedlings were transferred from rock wool blocks into corresponding prepared plant pots. After the placement of seedlings, a layer of rock wool was added on top of the pot, to reduce water evaporation from the nutrient solution and prevent access of light during plant cultivation.

Fig. 6
figure6

Wheat in the cultivation box at different growth stages: a seedling development (Z1), b tillering (Z2), c stem elongation (Z3), d heading (Z5)

Preparation of the PhytolabelBox equipment

Prior to placement of plants into the labelboxes, the technical performance of the equipment was verified.

First, the tightness of labelboxes was tested. The labelboxes are operated with slight overpressure which is regulated at (10 ± 2) mbar above the ambient atmospheric pressure. The ability to keep the overpressure at the setpoint range can be taken as a measure of tightness of the system including the labelboxes. To check this, the pressure cycle consisting of the pressure drop from 10 mbar to 8 mbar and build up back to 10 mbar by dosage of synthetic air was monitored, resulting in pressure cycle periods of 10 min for the 15N- and 20 min for the 13C-labelbox respectively. These values slightly increased with the progress of the cultivation.

Second, the increase of CO2 in the labelbox per dosed loop was determined. This is required for the estimation of the CO2 consumption rate of plants after the cultivation is finished. Tests showed that per dosed loop of CO2, the concentration of CO2 in the labelbox increased by (4.6 ± 0.3) ppm 12CO2 in the 15N-labelbox and (9.7 ± 0.3) ppm in 13C-labelbox when the pressure reducing device on the CO2 bottles was set to 1 bar each.

Cultivation of plants

Start of the cultivation.

  1. 1.

    The pots with seedlings were placed in the corresponding 15N- and 13C-labelboxes.

  2. 2.

    The labelbox cover at the back was tightly sealed with screws. Note: Too tightly sealed screws may damage the Plexiglas housing. To promote tightness a silicone paste was applied on the sealing gums of the labelboxes.

  3. 3.

    The atmospheric CO2 in the 13C-labelbox was removed by passing the air through the CO2 scrubber. Further, 13CO2 gas was manually dosed to reach a level of 400 ppm in the labelbox.

  4. 4.

    The setpoint values of CO2, O2, overpressure and humidity were defined in the software (Table 3).

    Table 3 Setpoint values for the recorded and regulated atmospheric parameters for both labelboxes
  5. 5.

    The cultivation was initiated by starting the measurement in the software. All user predefined setpoints were automatically monitored and regulated by the system during the whole cultivation period (Table 3).

Cultivation conditions

The temperature and light-duration setpoints outside the labelbox for the day/night cycle were realised over an external control unit of the climate chamber, in which the labelboxes were located throughout the cultivation period. These setpoint values are shown in Table 4. The light intensity remained constant during the whole cultivation period. The light intensity at simulated day conditions was estimated with the Li-COR sensor (LI-190SA Quantum Sensor, Li-COR, Germany) and was measured on top of the rock wool immediately after placing the pots with seedlings into the labelbox to be 206 µmol/(m2·s) in the 13C-labelbox and 220 µmol/(m2·s) in 15N-labelbox respectively.

Table 4 Light and temperature intervals in the climate chamber during the cultivation process

Irrigation

Irrigation rhythm was adapted to the growth stage of the plants. In the first 3 weeks of cultivation, the plants were irrigated once a week and from day 28 until harvest twice a week. Irrigation was accomplished manually by an external peristaltic pump (S20, Vederflex® smart, UK) and a flow velocity of 100 ml/min. The volume of nutrient solution applied during watering was recorded. Both labelboxes were watered with the respective nutrient solution by the use of separate hoses.

Harvest

Each ear and the adjacent stems, leaves and roots inside the 13C-labelbox were harvested separately 144 h after the first anthers had appeared on the ear, respectively. The sample material was removed via the gate compartment with an air lock system and immediately shock frozen in liquid nitrogen outside the labelboxes. The time between cutting the samples and freezing was kept as short as possible. The 15N-plants were harvested under similar experimental conditions while the 15N-labelbox was open, as the ambient atmosphere does not disrupt the 15N-labelling process.

Freeze-drying and sample storage

Sample material was freeze-dried (FreeZone 6Plus, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) to < 5% rest moisture for long term storage at − 80 °C. To this end, wheat ears were dried for 6 days, stems for 1 day and leaves for 2 days at − 80 °C and ~ 0.4 mbar. Rest moisture was estimated with the infrared moisture analyzer (LC 4800P-OOV1, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).

Sample preparation

Two set of samples were prepared for the measurement. One is used for the determination of the degree of enrichment and the other for the annotation of the global C and N metabolome. The procedure for milling and extraction as well as the solvent composition of samples at the time point of measurement was the same in both cases. The only difference is in the composition of the sample extracts. For annotation of the global metabolome, wheat ear extracts of freshly sampled native wheat from glasshouse were mixed with either freeze-dried 12C15N or freeze-dried 13C14N ears from the labelbox. For the determination of the degree of enrichment, extracts of either native, 12C15N- or 13C14N- wheat ears were used.

The wheat ears were milled to a fine powder with a ball mill (MM400, Retsch, Haan, Germany) while being kept in frozen condition. The extraction was performed similarly as reported in [8]. In short, 100 mg of fresh native wheat powder and 30 mg of dried wheat powder was extracted separately with 1 ml MeOH/ACN/H2O (1.5/1.5/1 v/v/v) + 0.1% formic acid (FA). 70 µl of H2O was added to the extraction solvent of dried wheat in order to compensate for the loss of water during the drying process. For the detection of the global C and N metabolomes, native extracts were mixed 1:1 (v/v) with 13C14N or 12C15N extracts and diluted with H2O + 0.1% FA in order to obtain 1:1 organic: water ratio prior to LC-HRMS [8]. For determination of the degree of enrichment, the labelled and native extracts were diluted with H2O + 0.1% FA individually.

LC-HRMS measurement

The LC-HRMS measurement was performed in positive ionisation mode on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer (QExactiveHF, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) coupled to a Vanquish uHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) with the method described in [49].

Data processing

Data processing was performed with the AllExtract module in MetExtract II software [14]. Here, only LC-HRMS spectra of the sample set for global C and N metabolome annotation were considered. Briefly summarised, the MetExtract II software was set up to search for pairs of chromatographic peaks, which originate from co-eluting native and (13C- or 15N-) labelled metabolite ion forms. Native and labelled metabolite forms must show their distinctive and mirror-symmetric isotopologue patterns. Moreover, their chromatographic peak shapes must be highly similar and show perfect coelution. Such detected metabolite ions were then aligned across all samples of the either 13C- or 15N-labelling experiment.

The measured LC-HRMS raw files were converted into mzXML format using the MSConvertGUI (version 3.0.19166-cc86d1f56) from Proteowizard [50], and further loaded in the MetExtract II. Data processing parameters of MetExtract II were: Intensity threshold for M and M’: 10,000 counts; Chromatography start and end time: 3–36 min; Chromatographic peak scales: 7–21; Maximum allowed deviation for signal pairs: ± 3 ppm; Maximum isotopologue abundance error: ± 15%; Minimum peak correlation: 0.85 (Pearson correlation); MZ-delta between native and labelled metabolite ion form: 1.00335484 for the 13C-labelling experiment and 0.99703000 for the 15N-labelling experiment; Isotopologue purity: 0.9893 for the native metabolite form, 0.9850 for the 13C-labelled metabolite ion form, 0.9951 for the 15N-labelled metabolite ion form; Maximum MZ deviation of consecutive signal pairs: ± 8 ppm; Number of isotopologues checked: 2; Number of carbon atoms searched for in the 13C-labelling experiment: 3–60; Number of nitrogen atoms searched for in the 15N-labelling experiment: 1–12. Parameters for the combination of the 13C- and the 15N-labelling experiment: Maximum allowed MZ deviation: 5 ppm; Maximum allowed retention time shift: ± 0.15 min.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

13C:

Stable isotope of carbon containing 6 protons and 7 neutrons

13C-labelbox:

Cultivation chamber for 13C-labelling

15N:

Heavy stable isotope of nitrogen which contains 7 protons and 8 neutrons

15N-labelbox:

Cultivation chamber for 15N-labelling

DW:

Dry weight

FW:

Fresh weight

GC-MS:

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Labelbox:

Cultivation chamber in which stable isotopic labelling is performed

LC-HRMS:

Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry

MS:

Mass spectrometry

mzXML:

File format for LC-HRMS data

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

T. aestivum :

Triticum aestivum

T. durum :

Triticum durum

Z1:

Growth stage of wheat after Zadoks scale [48] and represents seedling development

Z2:

Growth stage of wheat after Zadoks scale [48] and represents tillering

Z3:

Growth stage of wheat after Zadoks scale [48] and represents stem elongation

Z4:

Growth stage of wheat after Zadoks scale [48] and represents booting

Z5:

Growth stage of wheat after Zadoks scale [48] and represents heading

Z6:

Growth stage of wheat after Zadoks scale [48] and represents anthesis

References

  1. 1.

    Grusak MA. Intrinsic stable isotope labeling of plants for nutritional investigations in humans. Elsevier Nutr Biochem. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2863(97)00017-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bacher A, Chen F, Eisenreich W. Decoding biosynthetic pathways in plants by pulse-chase strategies using 13CO2 as a Universal Tracer dagger. Metabolites. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo6030021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dersch LM, Beckers V, Wittmann C. Green pathways: metabolic network analysis of plant systems. Metab Eng. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Allen DK, Bates PD, Tjellstrom H. Tracking the metabolic pulse of plant lipid production with isotopic labeling and flux analyses: past, present and future. Prog Lipid Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2015.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    García Alonso JI, Rodriguez-González P. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2013. p. 41–76.

  6. 6.

    Cano PM, Jamin EL, Tadrist S, Bourdaud’hui P, Pean M, Debrauwer L, et al. New untargeted metabolic profiling combining mass spectrometry and isotopic labeling: application on Aspergillus fumigatus grown on wheat. Anal Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac401872f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bueschl C, Kluger B, Lemmens M, Adam G, Wiesenberger G, Maschietto V, et al. A novel stable isotope labelling assisted workflow for improved untargeted LC-HRMS based metabolomics research. Metabolomics. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-013-0611-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Doppler M, Kluger B, Bueschl C, Schneider C, Krska R, Delcambre S, et al. Stable isotope-assisted evaluation of different extraction solvents for untargeted metabolomics of plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17071017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gevaert K, Impens F, Ghesquiere B, Van Damme P, Lambrechts A, Vandekerckhove J. Stable isotopic labeling in proteomics. Proteomics. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oeljeklaus S, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. Advancements in plant proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry. J Proteomics. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Giavalisco P, Kohl K, Hummel J, Seiwert B, Willmitzer L. 13C isotope-labeled metabolomes allowing for improved compound annotation and relative quantification in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomic research. Anal Chem. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900979e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Giavalisco P, Li Y, Matthes A, Eckhardt A, Hubberten HM, Hesse H, et al. Elemental formula annotation of polar and lipophilic metabolites using 13C, 15N and 34S isotope labelling, in combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Plant J. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04682.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dersch LM, Beckers V, Rasch D, Melzer G, Bolten C, Kiep K, et al. Novel approach for high-throughput metabolic screening of whole plants by stable isotopes. Plant Physiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bueschl C, Kluger B, Neumann NKN, Doppler M, Maschietto V, Thallinger GG, et al. MetExtract II: a software suite for stable isotope-assisted untargeted metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02518.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Soong JL, Reuss D, Pinney C, Boyack T, Haddix ML, Stewart CE, et al. Design and operation of a continuous 13C and 15N labeling chamber for uniform or differential, metabolic and structural, plant isotope labeling. Jove-J Vis Exp. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3791/51117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Aljazairi S, Arias C, Nogues S. Carbon and nitrogen allocation and partitioning in traditional and modern wheat genotypes under pre-industrial and future CO2 conditions. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kluger B, Bueschl C, Lemmens M, Berthiller F, Haubl G, Jaunecker G, et al. Stable isotopic labelling-assisted untargeted metabolic profiling reveals novel conjugates of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in wheat. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6483-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bromand S, Whalen JK, Janzen HH, Schjoerring JK, Ellert BH. A pulse-labelling method to generate 13C-enriched plant materials. Plant Soil. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011922103323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Charron CS, Britz SJ, Mirecki RM, Harrison DJ, Clevidence BA, Novotny JA. Isotopic labeling of red cabbage anthocyanins with atmospheric 13CO2. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2008. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.133.3.351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gleichenhagen M, Zimmermann BF, Herzig B, Janzik I, Jahnke S, Boner M, et al. Intrinsic isotopic 13C labelling of polyphenols. Food Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Huege J, Sulpice R, Gibon Y, Lisec J, Koehl K, Kopka J. GC-EI-TOF-MS analysis of in vivo carbon-partitioning into soluble metabolite pools of higher plants by monitoring isotope dilution after 13CO2 labelling. Phytochemistry. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.03.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Miyagi A, Takahara K, Kasajima I, Takahashi H, Kawai-Yamada M, Uchimiya H. Fate of 13C in metabolic pathways and effects of high CO2 on the alteration of metabolites in Rumex obtusifolius L. Metabolomics. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-010-0272-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Grusak MA, Pezeshgi S. Uniformly 15N-labeled soybean seeds produced for use in human and animal nutrition studies—description of a recirculating hydroponic growth system and whole-plant nutrient and environmental requirements. J Sci Food Agr. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740640212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ippel JH, Pouvreau L, Kroef T, Gruppen H, Versteeg G, van den Putten P, et al. In vivo uniform 15N-isotope labelling of plants: using the greenhouse for structural proteomics. Proteomics. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200300506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ohtake N, Sato T, Fujikake H, Sueyoshi K, Ohyama T, Ishioka NS, et al. Rapid N transport to pods and seeds in N-deficient soybean plants. J Exp Bot. 2001;52(355):277–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Palmblad M, Bindschedler LV, Cramer R. Quantitative proteomics using uniform 15N-labeling, MASCOT, and the trans-proteomic pipeline. Proteomics. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bernard MJ, Pitz SL, Chang C-H, Szlavecz K. Continuous 13C and 15N labeling of tree litter using a climate-controlled chamber. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1089273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Björkman O. The effect of oxygen concentration on photosynthesis in higher plants. Physiologia Planatarum. 1966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1966.tb07046.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Curci PL, Cigliano RA, Zuluaga DL, Janni M, Sanseverino W, Sonnante G. Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation. Scientific reports. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01377-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Carvajal M. Investigation into CO2 absorption of the most representative agricultural crops of the region of murcia. In: CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas). Madrid; 2010. http://www.ecorresponsabilidad.es/pdfs/lessco2/ponencia_cisc_ingles.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2020.

  31. 31.

    Skudra I, Ruža A, editors. Nitrogen Content Changes in Winter Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Depending on Fertilizer norms. Nordic View to Sustainable Rural Development: Proceedings of the 25th NJF Congress; 2015.

  32. 32.

    Xu Y, Heilier JF, Madalinski G, Genin E, Ezan E, Tabet JC, et al. Evaluation of accurate mass and relative isotopic abundance measurements in the LTQ-orbitrap mass spectrometer for further metabolomics database building. Anal Chem. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100271j.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chokkathukalam A, Kim DH, Barrett MP, Breitling R, Creek DJ. Stable isotope-labeling studies in metabolomics: new insights into structure and dynamics of metabolic networks. Bioanalysis. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.13.348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bueschl C, Krska R, Kluger B, Schuhmacher R. Isotopic labeling-assisted metabolomics using LC-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6375-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A, Oresic M. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Péan M, Boiry S, Ferrandi J-C, Gibiat F, Puel O. Production and use of mycotoxins uniformly enriched with stable isotopes for their dosage in biological samples:(1) production of uniformly enriched biomass. J Label Compounds Radiopharm. 2007;50(5–6):569–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nakabayashi R, Tsugawa H, Mori T, Saito K. Automation of chemical assignment for identifying molecular formula of S-containing metabolites by combining metabolomics and chemoinformatics with 34S labeling. Metabolomics. 2016;12(11):168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Charron CS, Britz SJ, Mirecki RM, Harrison DJ, Clevidence BA, Novotny JA. Isotopic labeling of red cabbage anthocyanins with atmospheric 13CO2. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;133(3):351–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rampler E, Coman C, Hermann G, Sickmann A, Ahrends R, Koellensperger G. LILY-lipidome isotope labeling of yeast: in vivo synthesis of 13C labeled reference lipids for quantification by mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7an00107j.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tugarinov V, Kanelis V, Kay LE. Isotope labeling strategies for the study of high-molecular-weight proteins by solution NMR spectroscopy. Nat Protoc. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kohlstedt M, Wittmann C. GC-MS-based 13C metabolic flux analysis resolves the parallel and cyclic glucose metabolism of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Metab Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2019.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Denery JR, Nunes AA, Dickerson TJ. Characterization of differences between blood sample matrices in untargeted metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102806p.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wu L, Mashego MR, van Dam JC, Proell AM, Vinke JL, Ras C, et al. Quantitative analysis of the microbial metabolome by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using uniformly 13C-labeled cell extracts as internal standards. Anal Biochem. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. In: Circular, vol. 347. California Agricultural Experiment Station; 1950. p. 32.

  46. 46.

    Bugbee B, Spanarkel B, Johnson S, Monje O, Koerner G. CO2 crop growth enhancement and toxicity in wheat and rice. Adv Space Res. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(94)90306-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Vernalization in cereals. J Biol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. Decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sauerschnig C, Doppler M, Bueschl C, Schuhmacher R. Methanol generates numerous artifacts during sample extraction and storage of extracts in metabolomics research. Metabolites. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo8010001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D, Mallick P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the whole team of ECH Halle in particular Michael Hahn, Dr. Dorit Wilke and Janine Dumke for their great technical understanding and steady support with the design and improvement of the labelbox. We further thank Barbara Steiner from the Institute of Biotechnology in Plant Production (IFA-Tulln) for providing the seeds and native plants from the glasshouse. The authors do also gratefully acknowledge the Austrian Science Fund (project SFB Fusarium F3715 and F3711) and the BOKU matching fund for financial support.

Funding

The study was financed by Austrian Science Fund (FWF, Project SFB Fusarium F3715 and F3711).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AC, MD, ML and RS contributed scientifically and technically to the development of the cultivation method and the preparation of the manuscript. AK, HB and ML scientifically contributed in adaptation of the cultivation method while AP and KX technically supported during plant cultivation. AC performed the LC-HRMS measurements and data evaluation and CB performed data processing, statistical analysis and data visualisation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Schuhmacher.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Calculation of the CO2 consumption.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ćeranić, A., Doppler, M., Büschl, C. et al. Preparation of uniformly labelled 13C- and 15N-plants using customised growth chambers. Plant Methods 16, 46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00590-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • 13CO2 atmosphere
  • 15N-containing nutrient solution
  • Stable isotopic labelling
  • Internal standard
  • Metabolomics
  • Cultivation of wheat
  • LC-HRMS