Open Access

Real-time monitoring of PtaHMGB activity in poplar transactivation assays

Plant Methods201713:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0199-x

Received: 24 February 2017

Accepted: 8 June 2017

Published: 15 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Precise control of gene expression is essential to synchronize plant development with the environment. In perennial plants, transcriptional regulation remains poorly understood, mainly due to the long time required to perform functional studies. Transcriptional reporters based on luciferase have been useful to study circadian and diurnal regulation of gene expression, both by transcription factors and chromatin remodelers. The high mobility group proteins are considered transcriptional chaperones that also modify the chromatin architecture. They have been found in several species, presenting in some cases a circadian expression of their mRNA or protein.

Results

Transactivation experiments have been shown as a powerful and fast method to obtain information about the potential role of transcription factors upon a certain reporter. We designed and validated a luciferase transcriptional reporter using the 5′ sequence upstream ATG of Populus tremula × alba LHY2 gene. We showed the robustness of this reporter line under long day and continuous light conditions. Moreover, we confirmed that pPtaLHY2::LUC activity reproduces the accumulation of PtaLHY2 mRNA. We performed transactivation studies by transient expression, using the reporter line as a genetic background, unraveling a new function of a high mobility group protein in poplar, which can activate the PtaLHY2 promoter in a gate-dependent manner. We also showed PtaHMGB2/3 needs darkness to produce that activation and exhibits an active degradation after dawn, mediated by the 26S proteasome.

Conclusions

We generated a stable luciferase reporter poplar line based on the circadian clock gene PtaLHY2, which can be used to investigate transcriptional regulation and signal transduction pathway. Using this reporter line as a genetic background, we established a methodology to rapidly assess potential regulators of diurnal and circadian rhythms. This tool allowed us to demonstrate that PtaHMGB2/3 promotes the transcriptional activation of our reporter in a gate-dependent manner. Moreover, we added new information about the PtaHMGB2/3 protein regulation along the day. This methodology can be easily adapted to other transcription factors and reporters.

Keywords

Transcriptional reporter Transactivation assay Chromatin remodeling High mobility group Diurnal and circadian rhythms Poplar Populus tremula × alba Transient expression LHY2

Background

A precise synchronization of plant development with environmental changes largely depends on an accurate control of gene expression. Transcriptional regulation is being comprehensively studied in Arabidopsis, however, its understanding in poplar has lately emerged along with the successful application of the genetic transformation methods. Several laboratories have undertaken this research area by doing functional and molecular analysis of poplar transcription factor in wood development, branching, nitrogen acquisition, flowering, and growth-dormancy cycles [116]. Nevertheless, the time required for functional characterization in perennial trees is usually a great limitation. A rapid assessment of the potential effect that a protein or a protein family could carry out upon transcription on its putative target genes, will accelerate the acquisition of knowledge concerning regulation of gene expression in poplar.

Transcriptional reporters are essential tools for spatio-temporal gene expression studies in plants [1721]. They consist of a transcriptional fusion of a reporter gene, e.g. β-glucoronidase (GUS) [22], green fluorescent protein (GFP) [23], or luciferase (LUC) [24], and the cis regulatory and promoter sequences of a given gene under study. Luciferase-based transcriptional reporters have been successfully applied to study regulation of diurnal and circadian gene expression in plants [10, 17, 2431]. The rapid degradation of the LUC protein in vivo allows a real-time monitoring of gene transcription in 24 h time course experiments [24]. Thus, real-time bioluminescent assays have been shown to robustly reproduce the mRNA expression pattern [24]. In addition to this, luciferase-based transcriptional reporters have been used to identify new regulators of the circadian clock by mutagenesis screening [25], or by functional studies with a candidate gene [10, 32, 33]. Even more, they have also been useful for the analysis of signal transduction pathways operating upstream and downstream the clock [30, 3436], and to assess the contribution of chromatin dynamics to circadian rhythms by chemical inhibition of histone deacetylation pathway [17].

High mobility group (HMG) proteins were identified as part of non-histone nuclear protein extract from calf thymus [37]. All HMG proteins present a non-sequence-specific DNA binding domain (HMG-box), besides additional structural features that allow their separation in three different families: HMGA, HMGB and HMGN [38, 39], being the HMGB type the most studied in plants. This latest subgroup presents a basic N-terminal tail and an acidic C-terminal tail, which interaction regulates the protein affinity to the DNA [40]. Moreover, that tails also contain information for protein localization [41], but the deciphering of this code it is being elusive.

An interesting feature of some HMG proteins is that their mRNA or protein present diurnal oscillations. For instance, Hmgb1 protein has a circadian regulation in rat retinal photoreceptor cells [42]. In addition, HMG1 but not HMG2 mRNA from Pharbitis nil is controlled by an endogenous rhythm [43, 44], revealing a gene specificity regarding this kind of regulation. Nevertheless, whether this control has a feedback in the regulation of the circadian clock or upon any of its genes has not been explored so far.

HMG proteins alter the architecture of the chromatin, facilitating the histone 1 eviction, and then relaxing the chromatin [45, 46]. To this aim, the acidic tail, together with the HMG-box, interacts with DNA, while basic residues interact with histones, loosening the nucleosome [45, 47]. These proteins are also involved in the recruitment and stabilization of transcription factors to their binding sites [45, 4851]. Due to these functions, HMG proteins have also been described as chromatin chaperones serving as transcriptional facilitators [52, 53].

Post-translational modifications such as methylation, acetylation and phosphorylation play an important role in HMG function [54]. For instance, those modifications are involved in nuclear export of HMGB1 in mouse [5557] and in nucleosome interaction and subcellular distribution during mitosis for human HMGN1 [5861]. In maize, phosphorylation of HMGB1 and HMGB2/3 reduce their affinity by DNA [62]. This reduction is primarily caused by the stabilization of the interaction between the acidic and basic tails of these proteins [40]. Moreover, this phosphorylation also reduces the interaction between HMGB proteins and transcription factors [48], but has no role in protein localization [41].

In this article, we presented a step-by-step procedure to generate and validate a stable luciferase-based transcriptional reporter on the hybrid poplar (Populus tremula × P. alba) clock gene LHY2. Moreover, we adapted to poplar an automatic luminescence microplate reader protocol to monitor diurnal and circadian rhythms of the LHY2 reporter in real-time during several days. Furthermore, we established a rapid transactivation assay to determine the potential function that a protein or a protein family has under different light conditions, in a temporal manner and over a certain reporter. Using this methodology, we were able to analyze the transcriptional activity of two members of poplar HMGB family. Our results showed a dark-dependent transcriptional activity of PtaHMGB2/3. Additionally, we provided information about the posttranslational control of this member of HMGB protein family.

Methods

Plants, strains and growth conditions

For gene expression analysis and genetic transformation, we used P. tremula × alba INRA clone 717 1B4. For gene expression analysis, poplars were cultured in vitro and transferred to 3.5-L pots containing blond peat as we previously described in [7]. Poplar leaf samples were harvested under different light conditions. Plants were grown under long days (LD) 16 h:8 h light–dark at 21 °C. From LD, plants were subsequently shifted to continuous light (LL) or to continuous dark (DD), at 21 °C, during 48 h.

For transient expression experiments in poplar, pPtaLHY2::LUC poplars were grown in vitro in a Murashige and Skoog medium modification 1B (pH 5.7) supplemented with 2% sucrose and with indole acetic and indole butyric acids (0.5 mg/L) containing 0.7% (w/v) plant agar under LD at 21 °C during 3–4 weeks.

For transient expression experiments in Nicotiana benthamiana, plants were grown in greenhouse from seeds under 16 h:8 h light–dark cycles at 21 °C during 3–4 weeks.

We used Escherichia coli DH5α strain for gene cloning and Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101/pMP90 strain [63] for transient expression and plant transformation assays.

Plasmid constructs

The selected promoter sequence of PtaLHY2 was amplified from P. tremula × alba genomic DNA using specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S1). For PCR, Pfu Ultra Hotstart High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used and the PCR fragments were purified and cloned into pCR-Zero-Blunt vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A second PCR was carried out for amplifying the promoter with Gateway tails, using pCR-Zero-Blunt-pPtaLHY2 as a template. The amplified fragment was purified and cloned into pDONR207 Gateway vector. This Gateway cassette was transferred into the destination binary vector LucTrap-3(GW) [64], generating the final pPtaLHY2::LUC construct.

We used Golden Braid (GB) technology [65] to generate overexpression and knock-down constructs in this work. The GB_parts used in this study are detailed in the Additional file 2: Table S2.

For functional studies, PtaHMGB2/3 and PtaHMGB6 were amplified from P. tremula × alba cDNA samples. Fragments were purified and cloned in a pUPD vector. Then, we generated a complete transcriptional unit creating 35S::PtaHMGB2/3::tNOS and 35S::HMGB6:tNOS in 1alpha2 expression vector, respectively. Afterwards, each of these constructs, were cloned in a 1omega1 expression vector together with 1alpha1_35S::GFP::tNOS to select the successfully infiltrated leaf areas in the transient expression assays. For knock-down construct, HMGB2/3 artificial microRNA was generated as described in [66] and adapted to GB. Then, it was cloned in a 1omega1 together with 35S::GFP::tNOS.

Stable and transient plant transformation

Hybrid poplars were transformed with a binary plasmid carrying the pPtaLHY2::LUC construct, via an Agrobacterium-mediated protocol previously described [67].

Transient poplar transformation was performed following the protocol previously reported [68]. Transient N. benthamiana agroinfiltration experiments were done as previously described [69]. N. benthamiana leaves samples were harvested 3 days post infiltration for protein assays and fluorescence microscopy.

Luciferase reporter assays

We screened the transgenic lines of pPtaLHY2::LUC by spraying these plants with d-luciferin 5 mM and then measuring bioluminescence at ZT0 using a CCD camera (NightOwl–Berthold), exposing the plants during 15 min. Three out of 12 lines were selected to further work.

To perform continue monitoring luciferase activity, we used leaf tissue from 3 to 4 weeks old plants carrying the pPtaLHY2::LUC transcriptional reporter. The leaf discs were done using a hole puncher leaving a total area of 32 mm2 approximately. To avoid dehydration of the tissue while cutting the discs, leaves were placed over a filter paper previously dampened with water. After this, they were left in a 96-well plate with Murashige and Skoog 1B medium (pH 5.7) without sucrose. Fifty microlitres of d-luciferin 5 mM were added into every well on top of the leaf disc. A qPCR film was used to cover the plate. We made three holes in the plastic seal covering every well to avoid condensation with a syringe needle (BD Microlance 3–30F ½″ 0.3 × 13 mm). The TriStar2 LB 942 luminometer (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany) was used to register the luciferase activity measuring 5 s per well every 3 h. Additional file 3: Figure S1 illustrates the different steps of the microplate preparation for luminescence measurement.

We did plots and statistical analysis using RStudio [70]. To infer the period and the relative amplitude error we use Spectrum Resampling application [71].

Phylogenomic and phylogeny studies

The phylogenomic comparison among the different 5′ cis regulatory sequences were done using mVISTA online application [72].

We used protein sequences to do phylogenetic trees. We used MUSCLE algorithm to do the alignments (200 iterations) and neighbour-joining, UPGMA and maximum likelihood to infer the tree. To carry out this work we used MEGA7 application [73].

RT-PCR expression analyses

The samples analyzed in these experiments were pools of at least three plants. Total RNA extraction was done using NucleoSpin RNA Plant kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Single-stranded cDNA synthesis, primer design and data analysis were performed as described previously [10, 7476]. Real-time PCR were carried out using LightCycler 480 II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) following the manufacture procedures.

Microscopic studies

For protein subcellular localization, transiently expressing PtaHMGB2/3:YFP and YFP N. benthamiana leaves were sectioned and observed using Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscope. Images were captured with 40× magnification by a Leica DFC 300FX CCD color camera equipped with Leica Application Suite 2.8.1 build 1554 acquisition.

For the quantification of YFP, HMGB2/3:YFP and HMGB6:YFP fluorescence, discs images were captured by a Leica MZ10F fluorescence binocular loupe, using 10× magnification. Images were recorded by a Leica DFC 300FX CCD color camera equipped with Leica Application Suite 2.8.1 build 1554 acquisition. Relative fluorescence (fold-increase) was calculated using Fiji software [77] as previously described [78].

Protein assays

The 35S::3xHA:HMGB2/3:tNOS construct was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. After 3 days post infiltration, leaf samples were collected at the indicated times point in each experiment.

For 3xHA:HMGB2/3 immunodetection, leaf samples were ground and 0.25 g of tissue were extracted with RIPA protein extraction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1%Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS). Protein extracts were clarified by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 1 min at 4 °C. Total protein concentration was quantified using Bradford protein assay [79]. Afterwards 100 µg of total protein sample was loaded in SDS-PAGE.

For cell-free degradation assays, leaf samples were ground and 0.25 g of tissue were extracted with cell-free buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 5 mM ATP). Protein extracts were clarified by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 1 min at 4 °C. Equal amounts of extracts were transferred to individual tubes and incubated at 30 °C or left on ice for 90 min. Reactions were stopped by adding protein gel-loading buffer and loaded in SDS-PAGE.

To test the implication of the proteasome, we repeated the previous cell-free degradation assay with samples harvested at ZT6. Samples incubated at 30 °C were supplemented with MG132 50 μM or DMSO as a control. Reactions were stopped by adding protein gel-loading buffer and loaded in SDS-PAGE.

Western blot

Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [33]. Anti-HA peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used in 1:1000 dilution.

Results

Generation of pPtaLHY2::LUC transcriptional reporter to monitor diurnal and circadian rhythms in poplar

We wanted to select a transcriptional reporter capable to monitor diurnal gene expression in a temporal manner, in the hybrid P. tremula × alba adapted to our geographical region. To this aim, we chose the LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTIL (LHY) gene, which is one of the circadian clock central genes. LHY is directly linked to the regulation of developmental processes such as, hypocotyl growth and flowering in Arabidopsis [80, 81] and winter dormancy in poplar [10]. Populus has duplicated LHY genes, designated LHY1 and LHY2, showing conserved daily expression patterns [10, 82]. LHY2 expression is higher than LHY1 in Populus species, suggesting that LHY2 may play a major role in the clock [10, 82]. Moreover, LHY2 has already been used as a transcriptional reporter in the P. tremula × tremuloides hybrid poplar [68]. Firstly, we performed a phylogenetic analysis to identify P. tremula × alba LHY2 using LHY protein sequences from Populus and Salix species (Additional file 4: Figure S2a). Hence, the phylogeny indicated that the LHY sequence encoded by Potri.014G106800 is PtaLHY2. To study the daily pattern of gene expression of PtaLHY2, we carried out time series qRT-PCR analyses of poplar mRNA from leaf samples collected in long day conditions (LD) (Fig. 1a). A well-marked oscillatory pattern was detected for PtaLHY2 mRNA accumulation showing a peak at dawn, similarly to the diurnal expression reported for its poplar homologs PnLHY2 and PttLHY2, and for Arabidopsis LHY [10, 82, 83].
Fig. 1

Design and validation of pPtaLHY2::LUC transcriptional reporter in poplar. a PtaLHY2 mRNA expression profile in long day (LD) conditions obtained by qRT-PCR. Data indicates mean ± SD of three technical replicates. This experiment was performed twice. A representative result is shown in this figure. Upper bar indicates the photoperiod: black boxes represent the night and white boxes represent the day, respectively. b Phylogenomic analysis obtained by mVISTA plot using the LHY1 and LHY2 5′ upstream ATG sequences from Populus trichocarpa (Pt), Populus tremula × tremuloides (Ptt) and Salix purpurea (Sp). Populus tremula × alba was used as a reference sequence. Regions of 6 bp with more than 70% of identity are shadowed in pink. c pPtaLHY2::LUC activity detected by luminescence assay during 2 days under LD and 2 days under continuous light (LL) conditions. The activity of pPtaLHY2::LUC line #5 is shown in this figure. Data indicates mean of three independent assays. Error bars indicate SD of the mean. d Period versus relative amplitude error analysis for the three transgenic lines analyzed. Data indicate mean of three independent assays for every line. Error bars indicate SD of the mean

It has been shown that photoperiodic and circadian cis-regulatory elements are conserved across the species and localized at the 5′ regulatory region of those genes [84]. Therefore, to identify potential cis-regulatory elements of PtaLHY2, we carried out phylogenomic comparison among the 5′ 1600 bp sequences of three poplar homologs and one willow species, upstream the translation start site (Fig. 1b). All 5′ sequences of LHY2 showed higher similarity with the reference one (P. tremula × alba) than LHY1, even in the case of Salix purpurea (Fig. 1b). Due to the conservation observed in all the alignments, we selected the 1300 bp of 5′ PtaLHY2 sequence to create the binary vector pPtaLHY2::LUC. Using this construct we generated a stable transgenic poplar line using an Agrobacterium-mediated protocol. Individual lines were screened by bioluminescence analysis using a CCD camera, selecting three lines from a total number of 12 that showed high luciferase activity (#5, #7 and #10). We adapted and standardized to poplar samples a microplate reader system for monitoring luciferase activity in a temporal manner [33]. Leaf discs of poplar reporter lines #5, #7 and #10 were placed on 96-well plate in presence of luciferin 5 mM. The luminescence was recorded every 3 h under LD and continuous light (LL) conditions during 4 days (2 days in LD followed by 2 days in LL) (Fig. 1c; Additional file 4: Figure S2b, c). The results corroborate that our reporter reproduce the PtaLHY2 expression pattern observed in LD and LL (Fig. 1a; Additional file 4: Figure S2d). Moreover, the period and relative amplitude error (RAE) of the three lines were calculated in both mentioned conditions. Mutations that affect the clock, usually present RAE values around 0.3–0.6 in reporter gene assays [29]. In our analyses, RAE was less than 0.05 in both conditions tested, confirming the robustness of the rhythms of our reporter lines [85]. Regarding the period, it presented a value around 24 h, the correct data for circadian clock genes. Interestingly, the period in LL was a bit higher than in LD, a situation usually observed in these transcriptional reporters in constant light conditions [17, 86] (Fig. 1d).

Variation of PtaHMGB2/3 but not of PtaHMGB6 level affects the expression of pPtaLHY2::LUC

HMGB proteins have a critical role in the regulation of gene expression acting as chromatin remodelers at nucleosome level and as chaperones upstream of specific transcription factors [52]. HMGB protein family presents several members that have not been previously characterized in poplar. We carried out a phylogenetic study using Arabidopsis thaliana and putative Populus trichocarpa HMGB proteins. We inferred the phylogeny using Neighbour-Joining (Fig. 2), Maximum Likelihood (Additional file 5: Figure S3a) and UPGMA (Additional file 5: Figure S3b) methods. We established well-supported homologies for all HMGB proteins except for AtHMGB4 and AtHMGB5.
Fig. 2

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of HMGB family by neighbour-joining method. The HMGB evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining method. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 4.147 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The analysis involved 15 protein sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 113 positions in the final dataset. The Potri.002G009000 and Potri.007G000900 were named as PtHMGB2/3 and PtHMGB6, respectively

To test the ability of these proteins to modify the expression of our transcriptional reporter, we selected two poplar proteins named as PtaHMGB2/3 and PtaHMGB6 (Fig. 2) for two reasons: (1) their divergence was sufficiently supported with high bootstrap values in the three analyses and (2) they have mostly conserved their HMG-box domain, but C-terminal and N-terminal domain show highly divergent sequences (Additional file 6: Figure S4).

To functionally test PtaHMGB2/3, firstly we studied its subcellular localization in planta by transiently expressing 35S::PtaHMGB2/3:YFP in N. benthamiana. Imaging of PtaHMGB2/3:YFP by fluorescence microscopy showed a nuclear location of the protein (Fig. 3a), while a construct expressing free YFP was detected throughout the whole cell (Fig. 3b). Our result showed that PtaHMGB2/3 has plant nuclear localization fate. In addition to this, we generated a knock down construct using an artificial microRNA (35S::amiRNA_PtaHMGB2/3). To study the ability of the amiRNA to knock down the PtaHMGB2/3 levels, we transiently expressed 35S::amiRNA_PtaHMGB2/3 in poplar leaves using the agroinfiltration method previously described [68]. Our qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of HMGB2/3 decreased approximately in a 50% (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3

PtaHMGB2/3 activates pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter in a gate-dependent manner. a, b Fluorescence microscopic images showing the subcellular localization of 35S::PtaHMGB2/3:YFP::tNOS (a) and 35S::YFP::tNOS (b) in Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells. White arrow indicates nuclear accumulation of PtaHMGB2/3:YFP. Scale bars are 50 μm. c PtaHMG2/3 mRNA expression levels obtained by qRT-PCR in poplar leaves samples transiently expressing 35S::amiRNA_PtaHMGB2/3::tNOS35S::GFP::tNOS and transiently expressing the control construct 35S::GFP::tNOS. Data indicates mean of two independent experiments. d Luciferase activity detected in leaf discs when 35S::PtaHMGB2/3::tNOS35S::GFP::tNOS is transiently expressed in pPtaLHY2::LUC genetic background under LD conditions. e Strip chart representing the distribution of luciferase values obtained at ZT1 and ZT25, for transiently transformed leaf discs of PtaHMGB2/3 overexpressing and control, respectively. Horizontal bar represents the median. This experiment was performed twice. A representative result is shown in this figure. f Luciferase activity detected in leaf discs when 35S::amiRNA_PtaHMGB2/3::tNOS35S::GFP::tNOS is transiently expressed in pPtaLHY2::LUC genetic background under LD conditions. g Strip chart representing the distribution of luciferase values obtained at ZT1 and ZT25, for transiently transformed leaf discs of PtaHMGB2/3 knockdown and control, respectively. Horizontal bar represents the median. This experiment was performed twice. A representative result is shown in this figure. Control and transiently transformed luciferase measurements were compared with U-Mann–Whitney test at ZT1 and ZT25 (d, g). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001

To investigate the potential role of PtaHMGB2/3 upon the expression of our transcriptional reporter, we agroinfiltrated the overexpressing (p35S::PtaHMGB2/3:tNOSp35 S::GFP:tNOS) and the amiRNA constructs (p35S::amiRNA_HMGB2/3:tNOSp35 S::GFP:tNOS) in pPtaLHY2::LUC #5 transgenic line. After 3 days post-infiltration, we selected and sectioned GFP expressing agro-infiltrated leaf discs and registered their luciferase activity in a luminometer during 2 days under LD conditions (Additional file 3: Figure S1). The explants that overexpressed the PtaHMGB2/3 registered higher luciferase values than the control in a gate-dependent manner (Fig. 3d, e). According to that, knocking down PtaHMGB2/3 decreased luciferase activity at the peak time (Fig. 3f, g). All together these results showed that overexpressing PtaHMGB2/3 not only can increase the activity of PtaLHY2 promoter, but also that this protein allows pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter to reach its proper activity levels.

Since many members belonging to HMGB protein family have been described as transcriptional enhancers [45, 53], we tested whether the activation observed in pPtaLHY2::LUC is a common ability of HMGB proteins. According to this, we assayed PtaHMGB6 which is phylogenetically distant to PtaHMGB2/3 (Fig. 2). The overexpression of PtaHMGB6 did not change the expression of pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter (Fig. 4a). This absence of activation could be due to PtaHMGB6 did not reach the same protein levels than PtaHMGB2/3. To check this hypothesis, PtaHMGB2/3:YFP, PtaHMGB6:YFP and the free YFP were transiently expressed in poplar leaves. The YFP fluorescence emitted by each transfected discs were measured to estimate protein abundance. We corroborated that both PtaHMGB2/3:YFP and PtaHMGB6:YFP were expressing at similar levels (Additional file 7: Figure S5a). Afterwards, discs showing similar YFP fluorescence, were placed in the 96-well plate to measure luciferase activity and check their functionality upon pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter. While the PtaHMGB2/3:YFP construct was able to significantly activate LHY2 promoter activity, no effect was shown when overexpressing 35S::PtaHMGB6:YFP (Additional file 7: Figure S5b). These results indicate that the enhanced activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC observed during PtaHMGB2/3 overexpression is not a common feature of both HMGB proteins, indicating that PtaHMGB2/3 and PtaHMB6 are not redundant in the enhanced activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC.
Fig. 4

Darkness promotes PtaHMGB2/3 but not PtaHMGB6 activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC. a Luciferase activity detected in leaf discs when 35S::PtaHMGB6::tNOS35S::GFP::tNOS is transiently expressed in pPtaLHY2::LUC genetic background under LD conditions. This experiment was performed twice. A representative result is shown in this figure. b Luciferase activity detected in leaf discs when 35S::PtaHMGB2/3::tNOS35S::GFP::tNOS is transiently expressed in pPtaLHY2::LUC genetic background under LD long days during 24 h and then transferred to LL during the following 48 h. This experiment was performed twice. A representative result is shown in this figure

PtaHMGB2/3 activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC is dark-dependent

Our automatic bioluminescence system showed that pPtaLHY2::LUC rhythm persists in constant light conditions very likely prompted by the circadian clock (Fig. 1a). To investigate whether overexpression of PtaHMGB2/3 enhances the activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC in constant light conditions, we transiently overexpressed PtaHMGB2/3 in pPtaLHY2::LUC plants and monitored their bioluminescence during 1 day in LD and 2 days in LL conditions. After the first day in LD, we observed the enhanced transcriptional activity of pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter (Fig. 3d, e), however the effect vanished in LL conditions (Fig. 4b). These results suggest a critical role of darkness in the proper functioning of PtaHMGB2/3 upon pPtaLHY2::LUC.

PtaHMGB2/3 is diurnally controlled at protein level

The gate-dependent activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC suggests that PtaHMGB2/3 activity should be tightly controlled. Previous research carried out in Pharbitis nil, demonstrated that the mRNA of an HMG protein has an endogenous rhythm when plants were placed in continuous dark conditions (DD) [43]. To fully characterize PtaHMGB2/3 gene expression, we carried out time series qRT-PCR analyses of poplar mRNA leaf samples collected in three different conditions (LD, DD, LL) (Fig. 5a–c). The results revealed non-robust rhythm in all tested conditions, indicating that there is neither diurnal nor circadian regulation of PtaHMGB2/3 mRNA accumulation in poplar, contrasting what was reported for HMG1 of Pharbitis nil.
Fig. 5

PtaHMGB2/3 protein abundance shows diurnal pattern. ac PtaHMG2/3 mRNA expression profile obtained by qRT-PCR in long days conditions (LD) (a), continuous dark (DD) (b), and continuous light (LL) (c). d Immunodetection of 3xHA::PtaHMGB2/3 protein abundance obtained by western blotting. Protein extracts were obtained at ZT4 and ZT16 from wild type and 3xHA:PtaHMGB2/3 expressing Nicotiana benthamiana leaves samples grown under LD. e, f Immunodetection of 3xHA:PtaHMGB2/3 protein abundance obtained by western blotting. Nicotiana benthamiana leaves samples expressing 3xHA::PtaHMGB2/3 were collected in a 24 h time course experiment under LD conditions. Protein extracts were incubated in cell free degradation buffer during 60 min at 4 °C (e) and 30 °C (f). g Immunodetection of 3xHA:PtaHMGB2/3 protein abundance by western blot. Nicotiana benthamiana leaves samples expressing 3xHA::PtaHMGB2/3 were collected at ZT6 under LD conditions. Protein extracts were incubated in cell free degradation buffer during 30, 60 and 90 min at 30 °C or 90 min at 4 °C, with or without proteasome inhibitor MG132 50 μM. Top labelling indicates Zeitgeber times (ZT) of each protein sample. Black arrowhead shows the localization 3xHA:PtaHMGB2/3 in the blot. Red ponceau staining of the membrane is shown as loading control. All immunodetection experiments were performed twice. A representative result is shown in this figure

We wondered whether a differential protein accumulation or degradation rate might explain the gate-dependent activation observed when PtaHMGB2/3 is constitutively overexpressed. To investigate PtaHMGB2/3 protein accumulation or degradation in planta, we choose N. benthamiana agroinfiltration system that has been successfully applied to analyze proteasome-dependent protein degradation as well as ubiquitination in vivo or in vitro reactions [69, 87, 88]. We transiently overexpressed PtaHMGB2/3 tagged with 3xHA epitope in N. benthamiana plants and performed western blotting with wild type and 3xHA:PtaHMGB2/3 expressing leaves, collecting the samples at ZT4 and ZT16. The results showed a specifically detection of a band around 25 kDa, which is the expected molecular weight of our fusion protein (Fig. 5d). In addition to this, we specifically detected a high molecular weight track of bands, at both time points assayed, that resemble some kind of protein modification [33, 69].

To carry out PtaHMGB2/3 degradation assay, we transiently overexpressed PtaHMGB2/3 tagged with 3xHA epitope in N. benthamiana plants and performed time series analysis on leaf samples collected every 4 h. After that, cell free degradation assays followed by western blot analyses were performed with the protein leaf extracts [33]. This assay permits in vitro enzymatic reactions, such as, proteases and proteasome degradation, in contrast to the previous experiment (Fig. 5d) in which we only can detect protein abundance in a steady state conditions. While in cold treatment the 25 kDa band showed similar abundance in the different time points analyzed (Fig. 5e), at 30 °C we detected the highest degradation of this band at ZT2, a mild degradation at ZT6 and 10, and no degradation from ZT14 to 22 (Fig. 5f). In addition to the 25 kDa band, we observed that the high molecular weight track of bands exhibited a diurnal cycle of protein degradation even at 4 °C, increasing at 30 °C (Fig. 5e, f). Hence, the higher molecular weight version of PtaHMGB2/3 is more susceptible to degradation than the 25 kDa band. These results indicate that the degradation of PtaHMGB2/3 is mostly restricted to the light period.

Finally, to study the potential role of the 26S proteasome in the degradation of PtaHMGB2/3, we performed a cell free degradation assay with the ZT6 protein leaf extract, in the presence and absence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. While in the absence of MG132 we observed a progressive degradation among the time points assessed, the presence of the drug inhibited this degradation (Fig. 5g). Collectively, these results indicate that the 26S proteasome creates a differential PtaHMGB2/3 protein degradation during the day. This could contribute to the gate-dependent activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC observed when PtaHMGB2/3 is constitutively overexpressed in planta.

Discussion

Monitoring diurnal and circadian rhythms using stable transcriptional reporters in poplar

Luciferase-based transcriptional reporters to monitor diurnal and circadian rhythms have been widely used in Arabidopsis, however their use in poplar has only been shown in poplar transient assays or poplars transformed with well-known Arabidopsis circadian reporters [10, 68]. Here, we reported a step-by-step procedure to design and validate the activity of a poplar transcriptional reporter based on the clock gene PtaLHY2. Using the pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter line, we adapted an automatic luminescence microplate reader for continuous monitoring diurnal and circadian rhythms in poplar tissues, previously used in Arabidopsis, green algae and tobacco [33, 89, 90].

Our stable transformed pPtaLHY2::LUC reporter line reproduces the PtaLHY2 mRNA expression pattern in LD and LL. Remarkably, our RAE analysis demonstrated the robustness of the rhythm of our stably reporter poplar lines, which improved the one observed for pPttLHY::LUC in transient reporter assays [68]. A plausible explanation for this improved robustness of our poplar reporter would be the fact that the extrachromosomal expression of a transiently transformed pPttLHY::LUC reporter is not under chromatin regulation. Indeed, an increasing number of publications have pointed to the importance of the chromatin organization in fine tuning gene expression, particularly in plant clock genes [17, 9193]. Therefore, stably integrated transcriptional reporter in poplar plants is desirably when robustness of rhythms is required, or even more, when chromatin regulation levels are considered for further analysis. However, cis-regulatory elements and promoter sequences are essential to generate the rhythms. Therefore, the use of diurnal and circadian transcriptional reporters to analyse rhythms in transient assay are very useful to identify cis-regulatory elements in loss of function analyses or to study the activity of transcriptional factors by transactivation assays [9496].

Using poplar stable transcriptional reporters to functionally study new regulators of diurnal and circadian rhythms

The study of transcriptional regulation in herbaceous plants mainly relies on forward genetic screening, followed by an extensive molecular analysis of the candidate gene function. However, in perennial plants, the scarce available information about transcriptional regulation mainly comes from functional studies of selected transcription factors in poplar species, which require spending long time generating transgenic plants. We set up a system for rapid evaluation of the transcriptional regulatory function of candidate genes in a temporal manner, using a transcriptional reporter as a genetic background. We applied the transient expression methodology, developed by Takata and Eriksson [68], to transiently overexpressing and knocking down a candidate gene. Using an automatic luminescence microplate reader, the potential alteration of the reporter was examined in individual selected leaf discs for two consecutive days.

In this work, we used this transactivation assay in poplar as a quick approach to investigate the potential role of a protein as a diurnal and circadian regulator of the biological clock, using our pPtaLHY2::LUC transcriptional reporter. Moreover, this system could be used to rapidly assess in poplar the transcriptional regulation of other proteins upon non-circadian reporter targets, under biotic or abiotic stresses in a temporal manner. Similar strategy has been applied to unravel the consequences of the interaction between Arabidopsis proteins PIF4 and ELF3 upon the Arabidopsis PIL1 promoter in tobacco leaves [89]. Transactivation studies have also been performed to demonstrate the role of the interaction between poplar FT and FD upon the activation of OsMADS15 in rice protoplasts [4]. Moreover, transgenic poplars carrying Like-APETALA1:GR construct were used to demonstrate its role as activator of AINTEGUMENTA-like1 (AIL1) [3]. In a similar manner, poplar trees which overexpressed PHYA or FT, were used to observed changes in AIL1 [2]. All these experiments could have been performed directly in poplar without the requirement of generating a double transgenic plant.

We would like to draw attention, however, to the high difference regarding transformation efficiency when comparing this protocol to other transient methodologies followed in Arabidopsis [97] or tobacco [69]. Working with the latest protocols, almost every leaf in the plant is uniformly transfected. Nevertheless, using the protocol with poplar, we tend to observe isolated leaf patches successfully transfected. To deal with this pitfall, we increased the number of plants that had to be transfected in every experiment. Moreover, we included the 35S::GFP:tNOS cassette in the binary vectors along with our potential regulators, which allowed us to select those leaf areas that were successfully transfected.

Participation of HMGB proteins in controlling diurnal and circadian rhythms

Using this methodology, we study the role of two representative members of poplar HMGB proteins revealing a novel function for this type of nuclear regulators. There is an extensive biochemical characterization of HMGB proteins in plants, which has allowed to define their transcriptional regulatory activity as chromatin remodelers and chaperones, facilitating the entrance and binding of specific transcription factors to DNA [40, 41, 48, 98, 99]. Nevertheless, only a few works have been published describing their participation in particular biological processes [100, 101], none of them in poplar.

By using our transient transactivation assay in poplar, we demonstrated that PtaHMGB2/3, but not PtaHMGB6, promotes the activity of PtaLHY2 promoter in a gate-dependent manner. Moreover, its activity is observed only under LD conditions, particularly at dawn. PtaHMGB2/3 and PtaHMGB6 present their HMG-box domains mostly conserved, although they have large amino acid sequence differences in their characteristic basic N-terminal and acidic C-terminal. HMG proteins bind DNA by their HMG-box domain and by their acidic C-terminal [45, 46]. Furthermore, HMG-box mediates the interaction with other proteins [48, 102]. The differential ability of PtaHMGB2/3 and PtaHMGB6 upon the activity of PtaLHY2 promoter may be explained by a differential DNA affinity. However, due to the dissimilarities found in their primary protein structure, we cannot exclude the possibility of the interaction with other transcription factor. In fact, this possibility might also explain why the PtaHMGB2/3 needs darkness to promote the activation of PtaLHY2 promoter.

Remarkably, our transient transactivation assays also revealed that the gate-dependent activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC is produced under a constitutive expression of PtaHMGB2/3. Two reasons could explain this marked temporal restriction of PtaHMGB2/3 activity: (1) PtaHMGB2/3 is posttranslationally controlled showing a diurnal pattern that overlaps with PtaLHY2 activation and/or (2) PtaHMGB2/3 activity depends on a diurnally controlled factor.

Even though PtaHMGB2/3 mRNA accumulation clearly showed no robust oscillatory mRNA pattern under LD, LL and DD conditions, we found that PtaHMGB2/3 protein has a marked degradation rate depending on the time of the day, and that this degradation is mediated by the 26S proteasome. This is a novel feature for HMGB proteins in plants that is in accordance with the circadian regulation of protein accumulation reported for Hmgb1 in rat retinal photoreceptor cells. Rat Hmgb1 presents a diurnal oscillation with its peak of abundance around ZT6 and its trough at midnight [42]. The daily pattern of protein stability in these HMGBs, suggests a higher level of specialization in their function. In this work, we showed that PtaLHY2 transcription starts rising from midnight, so presumably proteins that influence its expression should be present at that time. Hence, this specific control of protein stability could contribute to the gate-dependent activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC by PtaHMGB2/3.

The high molecular weight bands that we specifically detected in the immunoblots, present at ZT4 and ZT16 in the protein abundance assay, indicated their potential posttranslational modification is not diurnally controlled. However, in the protein degradation experiment, they showed a marked diurnal pattern, even at 4 °C. Moreover, the abundance of this high molecular weight track of bands was more susceptible to degradation than the 25 kDa band. HMG proteins can be posttranslationally modified with acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination [40, 41, 48, 54, 98, 99, 103]. These modifications control the import and export to and from the nucleus, respectively [54] but also regulate the binding to DNA [40, 99] and the interaction with other proteins [48, 102]. Therefore, these high molecular weight versions of PtaHMGB2/3 might contribute to control its activity, perhaps affecting the protein stability. Nevertheless, their biological role needs to be further study.

Although we provide evidences that PtaHMGB2/3 is posttranslationally modified, we cannot exclude that PtaHMGB2/3 activity depends on a diurnally controlled factor. Previous work demonstrated that HMGB proteins interact with transcription factors improving their binding to DNA [45, 48]. One plausible scenario could be that HMGB2/3 interacts with a photosensitive transcription factor. Thus, the presence of this factor during the night would provide competence to PtaHMGB2/3 to promote the gate-dependent activation of pPtaLHY2::LUC. This hypothesis might also shed light on why the amplitude of pPtaLHY2::LUC in LL is much lower than in LD. Future work will evaluate this hypothesis.

Conclusion

In this work, we generated a stable luciferase reporter line based on the PtaLHY2 clock gene. Using this reporter line as a genetic background, we established a methodology to rapidly assess potential regulators of diurnal and circadian rhythms. This procedure allowed us to demonstrate that PtaHMGB2/3 promotes the transcriptional activation of PtaLHY2 circadian reporter in a gate-dependent manner. Moreover, we added new information about the diurnal control of the PtaHMGB2/3.

Abbreviations

LHY2

late elongated hypocotyl 2

HMG: 

high mobility group

YFP: 

yellow fluorescence protein

GFP: 

green fluorescence protein

LUC: 

luciferase

LD: 

long days

LL: 

continuous light

DD: 

continuous dark

ZT: 

zeitgeber time

CT: 

circadian time

RAE: 

relative amplitude error

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JMR-S, MP and IA planned and designed the research; JMR-S, PMT, AM-C, DC and MP performed experiments; JMR-S, PMT, MP and IA, analyzed data; JMR-S, PMT, MP and IA wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. P. Más for technical advise to implement the luciferase assay. The authors thank Dr. S. Prat for technical advice and assistance with the luminescence experiments and Nicotiana benthatiana transient assays and for facilitating LucTrap3-GW vector. We also thank Dr. V. L. Chiang for giving us the plasmid containing poplar amiRNA408.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants AGL2011-22625, AGL2014-53352-R, PCIG13-GA-2013-631630 awarded to I.A. and M.P.; M.P. was supported by the Ramón y Cajal programme of MINECO (RYC-2012-10194). JM.R.-S. was funded by a FPU12/01648 fellowship and P.M.T. Ph.D. programme of CEI campus of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (L1UF00-47-JX9FYF).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
(2)
Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

References

  1. Böhlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, et al. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science. 2006;312:1040–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Karlberg A, Bako L, Bhalerao RP. Short day-mediated cessation of growth requires the downregulation of AINTEGUMENTALIKE1 transcription factor in hybrid aspen. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002361.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Azeez A, Miskolczi P, Tylewicz S, Bhalerao RP. A tree ortholog of APETALA1 mediates photoperiodic control of seasonal growth. Curr Biol. 2014;24:717–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Tylewicz S, Tsuji H, Miskolczi P, Petterle A, Azeez A, Jonsson K, et al. Dual role of tree florigen activation complex component FD in photoperiodic growth control and adaptive response pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:3140–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yordanov YS, Ma C, Strauss SH, Busov VB. EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 (EBB1) is a regulator of release from seasonal dormancy in poplar trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:10001–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhu R, Shevchenko O, Ma C, Maury S, Freitag M, Strauss SH. Poplars with a PtDDM1-RNAi transgene have reduced DNA methylation and show aberrant post-dormancy morphology. Planta. 2013;237:1483–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Moreno-Cortés A, Hernández-Verdeja T, Sánchez-Jiménez P, González-Melendi P, Aragoncillo C, Allona I. CsRAV1 induces sylleptic branching in hybrid poplar. New Phytol. 2012;194:83–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mohamed R, Wang C-T, Ma C, Shevchenko O, Dye SJ, Puzey JR, et al. Populus CEN/TFL1 regulates first onset of flowering, axillary meristem identity and dormancy release in Populus. Plant J. 2010;62:674–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zawaski C, Busov VB. Roles of gibberellin catabolism and signaling in growth and physiological response to drought and short-day photoperiods in Populus trees. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86217.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ibáñez C, Kozarewa I, Johansson M, Ogren E, Rohde A, Eriksson ME. Circadian clock components regulate entry and affect exit of seasonal dormancy as well as winter hardiness in Populus trees. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:1823–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kozarewa I, Ibáñez C, Johansson M, Ögren E, Mozley D, Nylander E, et al. Alteration of PHYA expression change circadian rhythms and timing of bud set in Populus. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;73:143–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson ME, Hoffman D, Kaduk M, Mauriat M, Moritz T. Transgenic hybrid aspen trees with increased gibberellin (GA) concentrations suggest that GA acts in parallel with flowering locus T2 to control shoot elongation. New Phytol. 2014;205:1288–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Acker R, Leplé J-C, Aerts D, Storme V, Goeminne G, Ivens B, et al. Improved saccharification and ethanol yield from field-grown transgenic poplar deficient in cinnamoyl-CoA reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:845–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Horvath DP, Sung S, Kim D, Chao W, Anderson J. Characterization, expression and function of dormancy associated MADS-BOX genes from leafy spurge. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;73:169–79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pilate G, Guiney E, Holt K, Petit-Conil M, Lapierre C, Leplé J-C, et al. Field and pulping performances of transgenic trees with altered lignification. Nature. 2002;20:607–12.Google Scholar
  16. Jing ZP, Gallardo F, Pascual MB, Sampalo R, Romero J, De Navarra AT, et al. Improved growth in a field trial of transgenic hybrid poplar overexpressing glutamine synthetase. New Phytol. 2004;164:137–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Perales M, Mas P. A functional link between rhythmic changes in chromatin structure and the Arabidopsis biological clock. Plant Cell. 2007;19:2111–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar SV, Wigge PA. H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes mediate the thermosensory response in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2010;140:136–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rojas-Fernandez A, Herhaus L, Macartney T, Lachaud C, Hay RT, Sapkota GP. Rapid generation of endogenously driven transcriptional reporters in cells through CRISPR/Cas9. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9811–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiao Y-L, Redman JC, Monaghan EL, Zhuang J, Underwood BA, Moskal WA, et al. High throughput generation of promoter reporter (GFP) transgenic lines of low expressing genes in Arabidopsis and analysis of their expression patterns. Plant Methods. 2010;6:13–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang NN. The GUS reporter-aided analysis of the promoter activities of Arabidopsis ACC synthase genes AtACS4, AtACS5, and AtACS7 induced by hormones and stresses. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:909–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW. GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987;6:3901–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheen J, Hwang S, Niwa Y, Kobayashi H, Galbraith DW. Green-fluorescent protein as a new vital marker in plant cells. Plant J. 1995;8:777–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Millar AJ, Short SR, Chua NH, Kay SA. Novel circadian phenotype based on firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants. Plant Cell. 1992;4:1075–87.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Millar AJ, Carre IA, Strayer CA, Chua NH, Kay SA. Circadian clock mutants in Arabidopsis identified by luciferase imaging. Science. 1995;267:1161–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Spensley M, Kim J-Y, Picot E, Reid J, Ott S, Helliwell C, et al. Evolutionarily conserved regulatory motifs in the promoter of the Arabidopsis clock gene late elongated hypocotyl. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2606–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Endo M, Shimizu H, Nohales MA, Araki T, Kay SA. Tissue-specific clocks in Arabidopsis show asymmetric coupling. Nature. 2014;515:419–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Takahashi N, Hirata Y, Aihara K, Mas P. A hierarchical multi-oscillator network orchestrates the Arabidopsis circadian system. Cell. 2015;163:148–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Herrero E, Kolmos E, Bujdoso N, Yuan Y, Wang M, Berns MC, et al. Early flowering4 recruitment of early flowering3 in the nucleus sustains the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2012;24:428–43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Haydon MJ, Mielczarek O, Robertson FC, Hubbard KE, Webb AAR. Photosynthetic entrainment of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock. Nature. 2014;502:689–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dodd AN, Salathia N, Hall A, Kévei E, Tóth R, Nagy F, et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science. 2005;309:630–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Strayer C. Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science. 2000;289:768–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Perales M, Portolés S, Mas P. The proteasome-dependent degradation of CKB4 is regulated by the Arabidopsis biological clock. Plant J. 2006;46:849–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wenden B, Kozma-Bognar L, Edwards KD, Hall AJW, Locke JCW, Millar AJ. Light inputs shape the Arabidopsis circadian system. Plant J. 2011;66:480–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Covington MF, Harmer SL. The circadian clock regulates auxin signaling and responses in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e222.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Legnaioli T, Cuevas J, Mas P. TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO J. 2009;28:3745–57.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Goodwin GH, Johns EW. Isolation and characterisation of two calf-thymus chromatin non-histone proteins with high contents of acidic and basic amino acids. Eur J Biochem. 1973;40:215–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Bustin M, Reeves R. High-mobility-group chromosomal proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1996;54:35–100.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Grasser KD, Launholt D, Grasser M. High mobility group proteins of the plant HMGB family: dynamic chromatin modulators. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1769:346–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomsen MS, Franssen L, Launholt D, Fojan P, Grasser KD. Interactions of the basic N-terminal and the acidic C-terminal domains of the maize chromosomal HMGB1 protein. Biochemistry. 2004;43:8029–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedersen DS, Merkle T, Marktl B, Lildballe DL, Antosch M, Bergmann T, et al. Nucleocytoplasmic distribution of the Arabidopsis chromatin-associated HMGB2/3 and HMGB4 proteins. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1831–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoppe G, Rayborn ME, Sears JE. Diurnal rhythm of the chromatin protein Hmgb1 in rat photoreceptors is under circadian regulation. J Comp Neurol. 2007;501:219–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng CC, Bui AQ, O’Neill SD. Abundance of an mRNA encoding a high mobility group DNA-binding protein is regulated by light and an endogenous rhythm. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;23:813–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Neill SD, Zheng CC. Abundance of mRNAs encoding HMG1/HMG2 class high-mobility-group DNA-binding proteins are differentially regulated in cotyledons of Pharbitis nil. Plant Mol Biol. 1998;37:235–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Travers AA. Priming the nucleosome: a role for HMGB proteins? EMBO Rep. 2003;4:131–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Štros M. HMGB proteins: interactions with DNA and chromatin. BBA Gene Regul Mech. 2010;1799:101–13.Google Scholar
  47. Kato H, van Ingen H, Zhou B-R, Feng H, Bustin M, Kay LE, et al. Architecture of the high mobility group nucleosomal protein 2-nucleosome complex as revealed by methyl-based NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12283–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Krohn NM, Yanagisawa S, Grasser KD. Specificity of the stimulatory interaction between chromosomal HMGB proteins and the transcription factor Dof2 and its negative regulation by protein kinase CK2-mediated phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:32438–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Malarkey CS, Churchill MEA. The high mobility group box: the ultimate utility player of a cell. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37:553–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Laurent B, Randrianarison-Huetz V, Maréchal V, Marchal V, Mayeux P, Dusanter-Fourt I, et al. High-mobility group protein HMGB2 regulates human erythroid differentiation through trans-activation of GFI1B transcription. Blood. 2010;115:687–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Martinez-Garcia JF, Quail PH. The HMG-I/Y protein PF1 stimulates binding of the transcriptional activator GT-2 to the PHYA gene promoter. Plant J. 1999;18:173–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Agresti A, Bianchi ME. HMGB proteins and gene expression. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003;13:170–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ueda T, Yoshida M. HMGB proteins and transcriptional regulation. BBA Gene Regul Mech. 2010;1799:114–8.Google Scholar
  54. Zhang Q, Wang Y. HMG modifications and nuclear function. BBA Gene Regul Mech. 2010;1799:28–36.Google Scholar
  55. Bonaldi T, Talamo F, Scaffidi P, Ferrera D, Porto A, Bachi A, et al. Monocytic cells hyperacetylate chromatin protein HMGB1 to redirect it towards secretion. EMBO J. 2003;22:5551–60.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Youn JH, Shin JS. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HMGB1 is regulated by phosphorylation that redirects it toward secretion. J Immunol. 2006;177:7889–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ito I, Fukazawa J, Yoshida M. Post-translational methylation of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) causes its cytoplasmic localization in neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:16336–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Herrera JE, Sakaguchi K, Bergel M, Trieschmann L, Nakatani Y, Bustin M. Specific acetylation of chromosomal protein HMG-17 by PCAF alters its interaction with nucleosomes. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:3466–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Bergel M, Herrera JE, Thatcher BJ, Prymakowska-Bosak M, Vassilev A, Nakatani Y, et al. Acetylation of novel sites in the nucleosomal binding domain of chromosomal protein HMG-14 by p300 alters its interaction with nucleosomes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:11514–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Prymakowska-Bosak M, Misteli T, Herrera JE, Shirakawa H, Birger Y, Garfield S, et al. Mitotic phosphorylation prevents the binding of HMGN proteins to chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5169–78.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Prymakowska-Bosak M, Hock R, Catez F, Lim JH, Birger Y, Shirakawa H, et al. Mitotic phosphorylation of chromosomal protein HMGN1 inhibits nuclear import and promotes interaction with 14.3.3 proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:6809–19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Stemmer C, Fernández S, Lopez G, Alonso JC, Grasser KD. Plant chromosomal HMGB proteins efficiently promote the bacterial site-specific β-mediated recombination in vitro and in vivo. Biochemistry. 2002;41:7763–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Koncz C, Schell J. The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;204:383–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Calderon-Villalobos LIA, Kuhnle C, Li H, Rosso M, Weisshaar B, Schwechheimer C. LucTrap vectors are tools to generate luciferase fusions for the quantification of transcript and protein abundance in vivo. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:3–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Sarrion-Perdigones A, Falconi EE, Zandalinas SI, Juárez P, Fernández-del-Carmen A, Granell A, et al. GoldenBraid: an iterative cloning system for standardized assembly of reusable genetic modules. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21622.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Shi R, Yang C, Lu S, Sederoff R, Chiang VL. Specific down-regulation of PAL genes by artificial microRNAs in Populus trichocarpa. Planta. 2010;232:1281–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Gallardo F, Fu J, Canton F, Garcia-Gutierrez A, Canovas F, Kirby E. Expression of a conifer glutamine synthetase gene in transgenic poplar. Planta. 1999;210:19–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Takata N, Eriksson ME. A simple and efficient transient transformation for hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × P. tremuloides). Plant Methods. 2012;8:30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Liu L, Zhang Y, Tang S, Zhao Q, Zhang Z, Zhang H, et al. An efficient system to detect protein ubiquitination by agroinfiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2010;61:893–903.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Internet]. 1st ed. Boston, MA; 2016. http://www.rstudio.com/.
  71. Costa MJ, Finkenstädt B, Roche V, Lévi F, Gould PD, Foreman J, et al. Inference on periodicity of circadian time series. Biostatistics. 2013;14:792–806.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W273–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Ibáñez C, Ramos A, Acebo P, Contreras A, Casado R, Allona I, et al. Overall alteration of circadian clock gene expression in the chestnut cold response. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3567.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Berrocal-Lobo M, Ibáñez C, Acebo P, Ramos A, Pérez-Solís E, Collada C, et al. Identification of a homolog of Arabidopsis DSP4 (SEX4) in chestnut: its induction and accumulation in stem amyloplasts during winter or in response to the cold. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:1693–704.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Hsu C-Y, Adams JP, Kim H, No K, Ma C, Strauss SH, et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T duplication coordinates reproductive and vegetative growth in perennial poplar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:10756–61.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. McCloy RA, Rogers S, Caldon CE, Lorca T, Castro A, Burgess A. Partial inhibition of Cdk1 in G 2phase overrides the SAC and decouples mitotic events. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:1400–12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Park M-J, Kwon Y-J, Gil K-E, Park C-M. LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL regulates photoperiodic flowering via the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:S111–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Schaffer R, Ramsay N, Samach A, Corden S, Putterill J, Carre IA, et al. The late elongated hypocotyl mutation of Arabidopsis disrupts circadian rhythms and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Cell. 1998;93:1219–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Takata N, Saito S, Tanaka Saito C, Nanjo T, Shinohara K, Uemura M. Molecular phylogeny and expression of poplar circadian clock genes, LHY1 and LHY2. New Phytol. 2009;181:808–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Kim J-Y, Song H-R, Taylor BL, Carré IA. Light-regulated translation mediates gated induction of the Arabidopsis clock protein LHY. EMBO J. 2003;22:935–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Michael TP, Mockler TC, Breton G, McEntee C, Byer A, Trout JD, et al. Network discovery pipeline elucidates conserved time-of-day-specific cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e14–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Brown P. Biological rhythms analysis software system manual [Internet]. 2007 Oct pp. 1–100. www.amillar.org/.
  86. Millar AJ, Kay SA. Integration of circadian and phototransduction pathways in the network controlling CAB gene transcription in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:15491–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Sato T, Sako K, Yamaguchi J. Assay for proteasome-dependent protein degradation and ubiquitinated proteins. Plant proteomics. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2013. p. 655–63.Google Scholar
  88. García-Cano E, Zaltsman A, Citovsky V. Assaying proteasomal degradation in a cell-free system in plants. J Vis Exp. 2014;85:1–6.Google Scholar
  89. Nieto C, López-Salmerón V, Davière J-M, Prat S. ELF3-PIF4 interaction regulates plant growth independently of the Evening Complex. Curr Biol. 2015;25:187–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Corellou F, Schwartz C, Motta JP, Djouani-Tahri EB, Sanchez F, Bouget FY. Clocks in the green lineage: comparative functional analysis of the circadian architecture of the picoeukaryote ostreococcus. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3436–49.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Hemmes H, Henriques R, Jang I-C, Kim S, Chua N-H. Circadian clock regulates dynamic chromatin modifications associated with Arabidopsis CCA1/LHY and TOC1 transcriptional rhythms. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:2016–29.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Malapeira J, Khaitova LC, Mas P. Ordered changes in histone modifications at the core of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:21540–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Jones MA, Covington MF, DiTacchio L, Vollmers C, Panda S, Harmer SL. Jumonji domain protein JMJD5 functions in both the plant and human circadian systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:21623–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Yang Y, Li R, Qi M. In vivo analysis of plant promoters and transcription factors by agroinfiltration of tobacco leaves. Plant J. 2000;22:543–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Sheen J. Signal transduction in maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1466–75.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Hellens RP, Allan AC, Friel EN, Bolitho K, Grafton K, Templeton MD, et al. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods. 2005;1:13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Wu H-Y, Liu K-H, Wang Y-C, Wu J-F, Chiu W-L, Chen C-Y, et al. AGROBEST: an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression method for versatile gene function analyses in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Methods. 2014;10:1–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Stott K, Watson M, Bostock MJ, Mortensen SA, Travers A, Grasser KD, et al. Structural insights into the mechanism of negative regulation of single-box high mobility group proteins by the acidic tail domain. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:29817–26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Stemmer C, Schwander A, Bauw G, Fojan P, Grasser KD. Protein kinase CK2 differentially phosphorylates maize chromosomal high mobility group B (HMGB) proteins modulating their stability and DNA interactions. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1092–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Schrumpfová PP, Fojtová M, Mokroš P, Grasser KD, Fajkus J. Role of HMGB proteins in chromatin dynamics and telomere maintenance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2011;12:105–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Kwak KJ, Kim JY, Kim YO, Kang H. Characterization of transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing high mobility group b proteins under high salinity, drought or cold stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;48:221–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Wissmuller S. The high-mobility-group domain of Sox proteins interacts with DNA-binding domains of many transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:1735–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Walker JM, Goodwin GH, Johns EW. The isolation and identification of ubiquitin from the high mobility group (HMG) non-histone protein fraction. FEBS Lett. 1978;90:327–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement