- Open Access
A high-throughput method for detection of DNA in chloroplasts using flow cytometry
© Rowan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 25 January 2007
- Accepted: 23 March 2007
- Published: 23 March 2007
The amount of DNA in the chloroplasts of some plant species has been shown recently to decline dramatically during leaf development. A high-throughput method of DNA detection in chloroplasts is now needed in order to facilitate the further investigation of this process using large numbers of tissue samples.
The DNA-binding fluorophores 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), SYBR Green I (SG), SYTO 42, and SYTO 45 were assessed for their utility in flow cytometric analysis of DNA in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Fluorescence microscopy and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) were used to validate flow cytometry data. We found neither DAPI nor SYTO 45 suitable for flow cytometric analysis of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) content, but did find changes in cpDNA content during development by flow cytometry using SG and SYTO 42. The latter dye provided more sensitive detection, and the results were similar to those from the fluorescence microscopic analysis. Differences in SYTO 42 fluorescence were found to correlate with differences in cpDNA content as determined by qPCR using three primer sets widely spaced across the chloroplast genome, suggesting that the whole genome undergoes copy number reduction during development, rather than selective reduction/degradation of subgenomic regions.
Flow cytometric analysis of chloroplasts stained with SYTO 42 is a high-throughput method suitable for determining changes in cpDNA content during development and for sorting chloroplasts on the basis of DNA content.
- Flow Cytometric Analysis
- Chloroplast Genome
- SYBR Green
- Rosette Leave
- Chloroplast Division
Chloroplasts arose from endosymbiosis between a cyanobacterium and a eukaryotic host and contain their own genome . The chloroplast genome is a remnant of the original endosymbiont, a result of gene transfer to the nucleus over evolutionary time  and contains fewer than 100 protein-encoding genes in land plants . The number of copies of the genome per chloroplast is not constant, but changes dramatically during development. The amount of DNA per plastid has been studied by fluorescence microscopy using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Within chloroplasts, the DNA is associated with RNA and proteins in complexes known as nucleoids . In meristematic cells, chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) replication outpaces chloroplast division, leading to an increase in the amount of DNA per chloroplast , possibly to allow increased capacity for protein synthesis by providing a higher dosage of rRNA genes . During the cell expansion phase that follows cell division in the meristem, the amount of cpDNA is diluted by chloroplast division without compensatory DNA synthesis [7, 8], accompanied by cpDNA degradation in barley  and rice . The fate of cpDNA in mature leaves had received little attention until recently, when it was shown that cpDNA declines somewhat during development in pea and Medicago truncatula , and much more extensively in Arabidopsis  and maize . The reduction of cpDNA occurs long before the onset of senescence in photosynthetically active leaves. Whether the loss of cpDNA is a general feature of development among all chloroplast-containing organisms remains to be assessed, in part because the assay for DNA content of individual chloroplasts is quite laborious.
The currently available methods for analyzing cpDNA content during development are time-consuming. Without a high-throughput method, it will be difficult to further investigate this developmental process and to screen large numbers of plants for mutations that affect the persistence of cpDNA. Flow cytometry is a rapid assay that has been used in a variety of applications including analysis of nuclear DNA content , detection of immunostaining , and cell viability . In this study, we show that flow cytometry can be used to analyze cpDNA content during development, and to sort chloroplasts on the basis of DNA content.
Flow cytometry using DAPI
Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy of chloroplasts using SG
Flow cytometric analysis of cpDNA can be performed on chloroplasts with or without chemical fixation. Glutaraldehyde fixation was used to render the chloroplast membrane permeable to DNase in order to provide controls for selecting the optimal dye concentration. However, glutaraldehyde fixation can also cause autofluorescence  not due to DNA. We compared unfixed chloroplasts to chloroplasts fixed with either glutaraldehyde or formaldehyde. We found that fluorescence of SG-stained chloroplasts increased slightly after fixation with glutaraldehyde (~12%), but decreased after fixation with formaldehyde (~17%) (data not shown). Thus, for SG, chloroplasts should either be fixed in the same manner or not be fixed.
We were able to detect differences in DNA content between chloroplasts isolated from immature and mature tissues with SG. Chloroplasts isolated from young seedlings (14 days old) had a mean fluorescence intensity of 4342, whereas those isolated from 20-day-old seedlings had a mean fluorescence intensity of 1938 (Figure 3G). In order to obtain additional information about changes that accompany chloroplast development, we analyzed SG fluorescence and chlorophyll autofluorescence simultaneously. Chloroplasts from 14-day-old seedlings had more chlorophyll, and contained a relatively high DNA content, compared with chloroplasts from 20-day-old seedlings (Figure 3G,H). In conclusion, a difference in cpDNA content between chloroplasts from different developmental stages was observed by flow cytometric analysis using SG.
Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy of chloroplasts using SYTO 42
SYTO 42 is a DNA-binding fluorophore with an excitation maximum at 433 nm and an emission maximum at 460 nm. Though it is designed for fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry, we could find no reports of its use for these applications. The Becton Dickinson LSR II that we used has a 405 nm excitation laser that excites below the maximum and an emission filter capable of detecting the emission maximum at 460 nm.
SYTO 42 specifically reports the DNA, but not RNA, in chloroplasts. Treatment of chloroplasts with RNase did not result in a reduction of fluorescence (Figure 4G and 4J), whereas treatment with DNase did (Figure 4I,J). To assess the efficacy of our DNase treatment, chloroplasts were fixed with glutaraldehyde, washed, and treated with and without DNase, and the chloroplast lysates were used for PCR amplification. The expected band of cpDNA was detected from chloroplasts not treated with DNase (Figure 4N). The band was absent from lysates prepared from DNase-treated chloroplasts, indicating that the DNase treatment results in the complete removal of DNA from the chloroplasts. Fixation with glutaraldehyde did not increase the fluorescence of SYTO 42 (Figure 4K).
Chloroplasts isolated from 20-day-old seedlings had less DNA than chloroplasts from 14-day-old seedlings (Figure 4L,M), as expected. The mean SYTO 42 fluorescence was 3062 at 14 days after imbibition and fell to 935 by 20 days after imbibition. The difference between these two samples was 3.3-fold, compared to only 2.2-fold for the same samples analyzed using SG.
Flow cytometry of chloroplasts using SYTO 45
SYTO 45 is a DNA-binding fluorophore that is similar to SYTO 42. We could find no reports of its application to either fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry. SYTO 42 has a 370-fold fluorescence enhancement upon binding DNA, whereas that for SYTO 45 is 4660-fold. SYTO 45 has an excitation maximum at 455 nm and emission maximum at 484 nm. This dye was included in this study because of the high fluorescence enhancement upon binding DNA, even though the 405 nm excitation laser and 420 – 460 nm emission filter set on the Becton Dickinson LSR II flow cytometer that we used only encompass the lower ends of the excitation and emission spectra of SYTO 45.
Flow cytometry using SYTO 42 and a high-throughput assay of changes in cpDNA content during development
The fluorescence of DAPI-DNA was measured using the microscopic method we used previously  for chloroplasts isolated (without the use of DNase) from tissues at four different developmental stages. The same samples were also analyzed by flow cytometry using SYTO 42, since this fluorophore demonstrated the best detection capability. Twelve day-old Arabidopsis seedlings had cotyledons and four rosette leaves. The cotyledons were about 3 mm in length and fully expanded. The first and second rosette leaves were 3–5 mm in length and in the expansion phase of development. The third and fourth leaves were visible and just beginning to expand. Chloroplasts were isolated from the cotyledons and the first pair of rosette leaves. Twenty-three-day-old Arabidopsis plants had initiated flowering. Chloroplasts were isolated from the first and fifth rosette leaves (both fully expanded), which were approximately 10 mm and 30 mm in length, respectively.
By simultaneously analyzing chlorophyll and DNA content using flow cytometry, it is possible to generate a Plastid Profile of Development (PPoD; Figures 3H, 4M and 6F). For the four tissues described above, the PPoD shows how chlorophyll and cpDNA content vary during leaf development. Chloroplasts from immature rosette leaves have a lower chlorophyll, but similar DNA content to chloroplasts from cotyledons of 12-day-old plants. In the leaves of 23-day-old plants, both chlorophyll and DNA content are reduced. We conclude that flow cytometry can be used to rapidly analyze DNA and chlorophyll contents of chloroplasts.
Determination of DNA content by qPCR after fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of SYTO 42-stained chloroplasts
Though the use of DAPI for the flow cytometric assessment of DNA content is well established for isolated nuclei , its application for the much lower DNA content of chloroplasts was not previously reported. The fluorescence of DAPI bound to DNA was much weaker and required longer exposure times for microscopic image analysis compared to the other dyes included in this study. The DAPI-DNA signal is evidently too weak to be detected in the brief time period during which DAPI-stained chloroplasts are excited by the laser in our flow cytometer.
Both SG and SYTO 42 are useful fluorophores for analysis of cpDNA content by flow cytometry. Though many cytometers are equipped to analyze SG, we recommend using SYTO 42 because it provides greater sensitivity of cpDNA detection and its fluorescence is not affected by fixation with glutaraldehyde. SYTO 42 fluorescence values correlate with differences in cpDNA content as determined by qPCR. The SYTO 45 fluorophore should provide even more sensitivity for detection of cpDNA, but the limited number of excitation wavelengths currently available for laser-excitation flow cytometers prevents this potential from being realized.
Cho et al.  used flow cytometry to assess DNA content of mitochondria and chloroplasts using propidium iodide (PI). The emission spectrum of PI is similar to that of chlorophyll, making it difficult to analyze cpDNA content during chloroplast development. The PPoD described in the present study can be used as a "signature" of development from proplastid to chloroplast and may be the parameter of choice when comparing plant species with respect to their relative degree of retention of cpDNA during development. The PPoD may also be useful in identifying tissues and plant growth conditions for attempting to introduce exogenous genes in chloroplast transformation experiments [27, 28].
We have demonstrated that flow cytometry is a rapid method to analyze DNA content of chloroplasts, and that FACS can be used to sort chloroplasts on the basis of DNA content. It takes several hours to measure DNA content of a small sample of chloroplasts (~100) by fluorescence microscopy, whereas thousands of chloroplasts can be analyzed in seconds using flow cytometry. This new technique will facilitate the analysis of the genetic and environmental aspects of the loss of cpDNA during development.
Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana (Columbia) were sown on rockwool and grown at 20°C on 16 h light/8 h dark cycles. Whole plants were harvested 14 and 20 days after imbibition. Seeds of A. thaliana (Columbia, Nossen and Estland) were also sown in soil and grown in a greenhouse for the harvest of cotyledons and leaves. The cotyledons and first two rosette leaves were harvested 12 days after imbibition. The first and fifth rosette leaves were harvested at 23 days after imbibition. Immature leaves from 35-day-old and mature leaves from 43-day-old plants were also harvested from the Columbia ecotype.
Plant tissue was soaked in 0.5% sarkosyl solution for 3–5 min, rinsed thoroughly, and ground using a mortar and pestle in 1.25 M NaCl, 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol following the high salt protocol . This high salt method prevents contaminating DNA from adhering to the chloroplast envelope during the isolation process. The homogenate was filtered through Miracloth and centrifuged in a microcentrifuge at 12,000 × g for 20 s. With large volumes, the homogenate was centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended and washed twice in sorbitol dilution buffer (SDB; 0.33 M sorbitol, 20 mM HEPES, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% bovine serum albumin ). The chloroplasts were loaded onto step gradients (30%:70% Percoll in SDB) and centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C in a microcentrifuge. For large volumes, the step gradients were centrifuged for 30 min at 4°C at 1,500 × g. The chloroplasts were taken from the 30%:70% Percoll interface and washed twice in SDB.
Fluorescence microscopy using DAPI, SG, SYTO 42, and SYTO 45
Chloroplasts were stained with DAPI as in . SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes Inc, Carlsbad, CA) was supplied by the manufacturer at a stock solution of 10,000× in DMSO. The concentration of the stock was measured  as approximately 10 mg/mL. Thus, the unit × represents 1 μg/mL. Concentrations of SG used in this study are reported in μg/mL. SYTO 42 and 45 (Molecular Probes, Inc, Carlsbad, CA) were supplied by the manufacturer as 5 mM solutions. Chloroplasts were adjusted to 1% β-mercaptoethanol and 3.5 μg/mL (3.5×) SG or 25 μM SYTO 42 or 20 μM SYTO 45. Samples containing 0.8% glutaraldehyde were included for comparison to unfixed samples. For SG, a sample that had been previously fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 1 h was also included. Images of chloroplasts were obtained according to . DAPI-DNA fluorescence was measured for images taken from microscopic fields using a 345 – 375 nm excitation filter and a 435 – 485 nm emission filter. SG-DNA fluorescence was detected using a 460 – 480 nm excitation filter and a 515 nm long pass emission filter. Fluorescence of DNA bound to SYTO 42 and SYTO 45 was measured using a 426 – 446 nm excitation filter and a 465 – 495 nm emission filter. Fluorescence was analyzed on a scale of 0 – 1,023 grayscale units. The value of relative fluorescence (Rfl) for DAPI-DNA was calculated by multiplying the fluorescence intensity by the area of fluorescence and dividing by 1,000 .
Treatment of chloroplasts with DNase and RNase
Chloroplasts were fixed in 0.8% glutaraldehyde for 1–2 h in order to compromise the chloroplast membranes and washed four times with SDB. Chloroplasts were then left untreated or treated with DNase (1 mg/mL DNase and 10 mM MgCl2), RNase (0.2 μg/mL) or DNase and RNase. Samples were incubated on ice for ~24 h before washing with SDB, staining and analysis.
Flow cytometry of chloroplasts
Chloroplasts in SDB were stained with 5 – 30 μg/mL DAPI, 0.15 – 7 μg/mL (0.15 – 7x) SG, 1 – 20 μM SYTO 42, or 1 – 20 μM SYTO 45 for 15–30 min prior to analysis using a Becton Dickinson LSR II flow cytometer. Data were acquired using FACSDiva software and analyzed using FlowJo v. 6.3 (Treestar, Ashland, OR). DAPI was excited using a 355 nm laser and detected using a 420 – 460 nm filter set. SG was excited using a 488 nm laser and detected using a 515 – 545 nm filter set. SYTO 42 and 45 were excited using a 405 nm laser and detected using a 420 – 460 nm filter set. Chlorophyll was excited using the 488 nm laser and detected using a 663 – 677 nm filter set. Chloroplast samples treated with and without DNase were compared in order to distinguish DNA-containing chloroplasts from debris. The voltage settings were held constant when collecting the data presented as profiles within a given figure panel. Thus the fluorescence distributions within a given panel can be compared meaningfully. Chloroplasts to be compared within a single panel were fixed or not fixed with 0.8% glutaraldehyde, although the SYTO 42-DNA fluorescence profiles are indistinguishable with or without fixation (Figure 4K).
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of chloroplasts
Chloroplasts were stained with 10 μM SYTO 42 and sorted using a Becton-Dickinson FACSAria cell sorter. SYTO 42 was excited using a 405 nm laser and detected with a 420–460 nm emission filter set. Four non-overlapping gates across the distribution of SYTO 42 fluorescence were used to designate the fractions to be sorted. The sorted fractions were collected into SDB to provide them with the proper osmoticum and stored on ice for further processing and analysis immediately following collection.
Lysis of chloroplasts for PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Chloroplasts were lysed in a solution containing 1% SDS, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 200 μg/mL proteinase K and incubated for at least one hour at 37°C. Proteinase K was inactivated by the addition of 0.1 mM PMSF, and 20 mM potassium acetate was added to precipitate the detergent. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 2 – 8°C to remove the precipitated detergent. For the fractions collected by FACS, chloroplasts were first counted using an eosinophil counting slide (Spiers-Levy, Blue Bell, PA) before lysis was performed with a known concentration of chloroplasts. Conventional PCR amplification of a 156-bp fragment of the chloroplast psb A gene was performed using the forward primer 5'AGAGACGCGAAAGCGAAAG3' and reverse primer 5' CTGGAGGAGCAGCAATGAA 3'. Amplification of 1 μL template DNA was performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 0.2 μM primers, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase. Following an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 32 cycles of 20 s denaturation at 94°C, 30 s annealing at 57°C, and 45 s extension at 72°C were performed using a PTC-100 programmable thermal controller from MJ Research Systems (now a division of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
For real-time qPCR, amounts of cpDNA ranging from 5 fg/μL to 50 pg/μL were used to generate a standard curve for determining the concentration of cpDNA present in the lysates of chloroplast fractions. Standards were diluted in the same solution as used for the lysates to provide identical reaction conditions for standards and unknowns. Three analyses were performed using primer sets amplifying different regions of the chloroplast genome. The forward primer 5' TTGCGGTCAATAAGGTAGGG 3' and reverse primer 5' TAGAGAATTTGTGCGCTTGG 3' were used to amplify a 189-bp fragment including part of the psb A gene and an intergenic region. The forward primer 5' CACCCGAGATGAAAGAAAAG 3' and reverse primer 5' AGTAGCAGGGTCTGGAGCAA 3' were used to amplify a 143-bp fragment of the pet A gene. The forward primer 5' TGAGATCCGCTAAAACAAGG 3' and the reverse primer 5' CTAGCCGATGGGACAAAA 3' were used to amplify a 157-bp fragment of the ndh A gene. Amplification of 1 μL template DNA was performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 0.12 μM primers, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 4.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 μg/mL SYBR Green, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase. Three replicates of each standard and five to six replicates of each sample were included in each of the three analyses. Following an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 45 cycles of 15 s denaturation at 94°C, 15 s annealing at 55°C, and 20 s extension at 72°C were performed and amplification of the reactions monitored using the Chromo 4 real-time detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). A melting curve from 65°C to 95°C was used to confirm the presence of single products. Data were analyzed using the Opticon Monitor 3 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), and the amount of DNA in each of the unknown samples was determined in fg/μL. One fg represents approximately 6.33 copies of the chloroplast genome. The number of copies of the chloroplast genome per μL was calculated from the number of fg/μL divided by the number of chloroplasts per μL to obtain the number of copies of the chloroplast genome per chloroplast.
We would like to thank Michele Black for assistance with the flow cytometry. We thank the Botany Greenhouse and Comparative Genomics Center at the University of Washington, Department of Biology for material support. This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service, National Research Service Award, T32 GM07270, from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.
- Howe CJ, Barbrook AC, Koumandou VL, Nisbet RE, Symington HA, Wightman TF: Evolution of the chloroplast genome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003, 358: 99-106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin W: Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: frequent and in big chunks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2003, 100: 8612-8614. 10.1073/pnas.1633606100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W: Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2004, 5: 123-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuroiwa T: The replication, differentiation, and inheritance of plastids with emphasis on the concept of organelle nuclei. International Review of Cytology. 1991, 128: 1-61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyamura S, Nagata T, Kuroiwa T: Quantitative fluorescence microscopy on dynamic changes of plastid nucleoids during wheat development. Protoplasma. 1986, 133: 66-72. 10.1007/BF01293188.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bendich AJ: Why do chloroplasts and mitochondria contain so many copies of their genome?. Bioessays. 1987, 6: 279-282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamppa GK, Elliot LV, Bendich AJ: Changes in chloroplast number during pea leaf development. An analysis of a protoplast population. Planta. 1980, 148: 437-433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott NS, Possingham JV: Chloroplast DNA in expanding spinach leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1980, 31: 1081-1092. 10.1093/jxb/31.4.1081.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baumgartner BJ, Rapp JC, Mullet JE: Plastid transcription activity and DNA copy number increase early in barley chloroplast development. Plant Physiology. 1989, 89: 1011-1018.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- , Kawano S, Tano S, Kuroiwa T: Degradation of chloroplast DNA in second leaves of rice (Oryza sativa) before leaf yellowing. Protoplasma. 1991, 160: 89-98. 10.1007/BF01539960.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaver JM, Oldenburg DJ, Bendich AJ: Changes in chloroplast DNA during development in tobacco, Medicago truncatula, pea, and maize. Planta. 2006, 224: 72-82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowan BA, Oldenburg DJ, Bendich AJ: The demise of chloroplast DNA in Arabidopsis. Current Genetics. 2004, 46: 176-181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oldenburg DJ, Bendich AJ: Changes in the structure of DNA molecules and the amount of DNA per plastid during chloroplast development in maize. J Mol Biol. 2004, 344: 1311-1330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolezel J, Bartos J: Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann Bot (Lond). 2005, 95: 99-110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Metelitsa LS: Flow cytometry for natural killer T cells: multi-parameter methods for multifunctional cells. Clin Immunol. 2004, 110: 267-276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soudant P, Chu FL, Lund ED: Assessment of the cell viability of cultured Perkinsus marinus (Perkinsea), a parasitic protozoan of the Eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, using SYBRgreen-propidium iodide double staining and flow cytometry. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005, 52: 492-499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dilkes BP, Dante RA, Coelho C, Larkins BA: Genetic analyses of endoreduplication in Zea mays endosperm: evidence of sporophytic and zygotic maternal control. Genetics. 2002, 160: 1163-1177.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coleman AW: Use of the fluorochrome 4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole in genetic and developmental studies of chloroplast DNA. Journal of Cell Biology. 1979, 82: 299-305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gendreau E, Traas J, Desnos T, Grandjean O, Caboche M, Hofte H: Cellular basis of hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1997, 114: 295-305.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuroiwa T, Suzuki T: An improved method for the demonstration of the in situ chloroplast nuclei in higher plants. Cell Structure and Function. 1980, 195-197.Google Scholar
- Kiltie AE, Ryan AJ: SYBR Green I staining of pulsed field agarose gels is a sensitive and inexpensive way of quantitating DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 2945-2946.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luu-The V, Paquet N, Calvo E, Cumps J: Improved real-time RT-PCR method for high-throughput measurements using second derivative calculation and double correction. Biotechniques. 2005, 38: 287-293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jorio H, Tran R, Meghrous J, Bourget L, Kamen A: Analysis of baculovirus aggregates using flow cytometry. J Virol Methods. 2005, 134: 8-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbesti S, Citterio S, Labra M, Baroni MD, Neri MG, Sgorbati S: Two and three-color fluorescence flow cytometric analysis of immunoidentified viable bacteria. Cytometry. 2000, 40: 214-218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collins JS, Goldsmith TH: Spectral properties of fluorescence induced by glutaraldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981, 29: 411-414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cho HS, Lee SS, Kim KD, Hwang I, Lim JS, Park YI, Pai HS: DNA gyrase is involved in chloroplast nucleoid partitioning. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2665-2682.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daniell H, Kumar S, Dufourmantel N: Breakthrough in chloroplast genetic engineering of agronomically important crops. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 238-245.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maliga P: Plastid transformation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004, 55: 289-313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zipper H, Brunner H, Bernhagen J, Vitzthum F: Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: e103-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Tabata S: Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 1999, 6: 283-290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.