Skip to main content

DARLING: a device for assessing resistance to lodging in grain crops



Stalk lodging (breakage of plant stems prior to harvest) is a major problem for both farmers and plant breeders. A limiting factor in addressing this problem is the lack of a reliable method for phenotyping stalk strength. Previous methods of phenotyping stalk strength induce failure patterns different from those observed in natural lodging events. This paper describes a new device for field-based phenotyping of stalk strength called “DARLING” (device for assessing resistance to lodging in grains). The DARLING apparatus consists of a vertical arm which is connected to a horizontal footplate by a hinge. The operator places the device next to a stalk, aligns the stalk with a force sensor, steps on the footplate, and then pushes the vertical arm forward until the stalk breaks. Force and rotation are continuously recorded during the test and these quantities are used to calculate two quantities: stalk flexural stiffness and stalk bending strength.


Field testing of DARLING was performed at multiple sites. Validation was based upon several factors. First, the device induces the characteristic “crease” or Brazier buckling failure patterns observed in naturally lodged stalks. Second, in agreement with prior research, flexural rigidity values attained using the DARLING apparatus are strongly correlated with bending strength measurements. Third, flexural stiffness and bending strength values obtained with DARLING are in agreement with laboratory-based stiffness and strength values for corn stalks. Finally, a paired specimen experimental design was used to determine that the flexural data obtained with DARLING is in agreement with laboratory-based flexural testing results of the same specimens. DARLING was also deployed in the field to assess phenotyping throughput (# of stalks phenotyped per hour). Over approximately 5000 tests, the average testing rate was found to be 210 stalks/h.


The DARLING apparatus provides a quantitative assessment of stalk strength in a field setting. It induces the same failure patterns observed in natural lodging events. DARLING can also be used to perform non-destructive flexural tests. This technology has many applications, including breeding, genetic studies on stalk strength, longitudinal studies of stalk flexural stiffness, and risk assessment of lodging propensity.


Stalk lodging (breakage of plant stems prior to harvest) reduces the yield of grain crops by approximately 5% annually [2]. Crop varieties that are high yielding and tolerant of crowding stress can be especially susceptible to lodging due to increased grain weight and plant height. Increasing the bending strength of plant stems is therefore important to both current food production and to the development of future grain crop varieties. It is estimated that US farmers lose almost $3.8 billion per year in lost maize yield due to the problem of stalk lodging (USDA Annual Yield Reports [2]).

Various testing methodologies for predicting stalk lodging resistance have been presented, including crush tests [17, 18], rind penetration tests [10, 12] and bending tests [4,5,6,7, 9, 13]. In addition, several researchers have sought to establish correlations between various chemical or morphological factors of plants and stalk lodging resistance (e.g., measurements of stalk diameter, stalk lignin content, rind thickness, etc.). Unfortunately, these methods are typically labor-intensive and time consuming and often require the use of expensive laboratory equipment (e.g., laboratory-based bending and crushing tests), making them unattractive to plant breeders. In addition, some of these methods do not produce the same failure types and patterns observed in naturally lodged maize stalks [13]. In addition to the above mentioned methods several patents have been filed for devices designed to measure lodging resistance [1, 8, 11].

The predominant failure pattern of maize stalk lodging is a distinctive crease near the node [14]. Prior art methods of measuring stalk strength induce failure patterns that are substantially different from this creasing pattern (see for example, crushing tests: [17, 18]; rind penetration tests [12]; and bending tests [4,5,6,7, 9]. The discrepancy between imposed and natural failure patterns limits the utility of previous methods for phenotyping stalk lodging resistance. This paper describes a portable, field-based tool called “DARLING” (device for assessing resistance to lodging in grains) that replicates the failure mode of naturally lodged stalks and provides quantitative measurements of stalk bending strength and stalk flexural stiffness. The authors of the present work are not aware of any other non-proprietary devices for phenotyping stalk bending strength and bending stiffness of large grain crops in a field setting that can replicate the failure patterns of naturally lodged stalks. The historical lack of such a device has been a significant limitation for breeding efforts focused on reducing stalk lodging.

Device description

The DARLING apparatus consists of four subsystems: frame, graphical user interface, electronics for data acquisition, and sensors for measuring force and rotation. The frame consists of a vertical arm connected to a footplate via a hinge. The electronics enclosure and the force sensor are attached to the vertical arm, as shown in Fig. 1. The method of operation is illustrated in Fig. 2. To operate DARLING, the user aligns the stalk with the force sensor, steps on the footplate, presses the “start test” button and pushes the vertical arm forward, causing the stalk to bend (see Fig. 1b). Force and rotation are recorded during each test. The recorded data are used to calculate the maximum bending moment applied during the test as well as the flexural rigidity of the stalk. The device subsystems and components are described in more detail in the following sections.

Fig. 1

The physical appearance and major components of DARLING. 1—electronics and display; 2—vertically adjustable force gauge; 3—vertical arm; 4—footplate; 5—hinge; 6—optional handle extension for testing shorter crops or crops that undergo large rotations before failure

Fig. 2

Method of use diagram: left—in position for testing to begin. Right: the device is pushed forward, inducing bending of the stalk. 1—Corn or sorghum plant; 2—vertical arm; 3—footplate; 4—electronics enclosure; 5—force gauge


The primary components of the aluminum frame consists of a footplate, a hinge, and a vertical arm. Additional frame components include mounting fixtures for the electronics enclosure and the force gauge. Because grain crops vary in height, the force gauge mounting bracket is adjustable. Before testing, the operator adjusts the height of the force gauge to match the crop being tested. The operator then reads the height of the force gauge from a scale on the vertical arm, and enters the height into the device’s graphical user interface. An optional arm that provides an ergonomic advantage when testing particularly short crop varieties can also be added to the frame (see Fig. 2).

Graphical user interface

A graphical user interface is used to control DARLING. The interface consists of a color LCD screen (Adafruit Industries 1933) as well as four selection buttons on the left hand side of the device and four navigation buttons on the top of the device, as shown in Fig. 3. The user interface was written using the Python programming language.

Fig. 3

The electronics enclosure and graphical user interface

The user interface provides the following functionality: sensor calibration; real-time sensor verification; a note manager tool; appending of test specific data to each data file (e.g. plot number, plot notes, the height of the force sensor etc.); start/stop test buttons; post-test review of the collected data; software update functionality; data export to a USB drive; and access to the native computer operating system that runs the graphical user interface. Perhaps the most important feature of the user interface is the post-test review screen (Fig. 4). This provides the user with a force–deformation plot of each test and allows the user to append additional notes to each test file. At this screen the user also has the option of accepting or rejecting the collected data.

Fig. 4

Post-test review screen. The user is able to add post-test notes (center of screen), review the collected data (graph) and save or reject the test data


The central component of the electronics system is a Raspberry Pi computer (Raspberry Pi RASPBERRYPI3-MODB-1GB) which runs the user interface and records all of the test data. All sensor signals are routed to a microcontroller (Arduino Pro Mini 328,, which digitizes the signals and forwards the data to the Raspberry Pi computer where it is recorded as shown in Fig. 5. DARLING is powered by a lithium Ion battery (PowerCore 20100, Anker) which attaches to the side of the electronics enclosure. The battery can power the device for over 8 h before requiring a recharge. In addition, the battery is easily accessible for battery exchange in case of a low battery.

Fig. 5

Diagram of major electronic components


The primary sensors measure force and rotation. The force sensor consists of a traditional 25-lb S-beam load cell (analog voltage device) with overload protection (model FSH01020, Futek Advanced Sensor Technologies, Inc., Irvine, CA). Rotation can be measured in two ways: by a rotational potentiometer attached to the frame hinge (see label 5 in Fig. 1), and/or by using an integrated circuit containing an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) (Adafruit Industries 2021—LSM9DS0). Other types of sensors can be attached to the DARLING device as well. These include Global Positions System sensors (GPS), ambient temperature and ambient humidity sensors. The force sensor can be exchanged to enable measurement of bi-axial forces or enable measurement of forces exceeding 25 lbs.

Data files

Data is recorded at approximately 30 Hz. Recorded data includes elapsed time, angle of rotation, and force. At the start of each test the ambient temperature, humidity, and GPS coordinates of the device are also recorded. The data from each test is stored in a structured CSV file. The header of the CSV file contains metadata, test attributes, sensor calibration values, and optional data such as field notes. An example data file is provided as Additional file 1.

Post-test calculations

The primary features extracted from the test data are the bending strength (maximum applied bending moment) and the flexural stiffness (i.e., flexural rigidity) of each stalk. The bending strength is computed by calculating the maximum bending moment, M at failure:

$$M = Fh$$

where F is the applied force and h is the height of the applied force (i.e., the height of the force gauge). The flexural rigidity of the stalk is calculated using the equation for deflection of a cantilever beam and is given by the symbol EI:

$$EI = \phi h^{3} / 3$$

where \(\phi\) is the slope of the linear portion of the force/deformation curve. Deformation is calculated as h sin(θ), where θ is the rotational displacement measured by DARLING.


To date, DARLING has been used to perform several thousand tests on sorghum, and maize at over 15 sites. Researchers from various fields (including, engineering, plant science, genetics, agriculture and high school students) have used DARLING to successfully collect bending strength and bending stiffness data. The results presented below are focused on validation and accuracy of DARLING’s measurements as well as descriptions of the types of data that DARLING produces.

Failure patterns

DARLING induces failure patterns that are entirely similar to those observed in naturally lodged maize plants. In mature maize plants that have stalk lodged this failure pattern involves creasing of the stem near the node line as described in [14]. Mature plants that are diseased or affected by pest damage may exhibit additional failure patterns including splitting or snapping [14]. DARLING replicates these failure types and patterns.

Maize plants that have not reached full maturity and that exhibit high levels of turgor pressure will often exhibit snapping failures (i.e., the stalk will snap in half) during natural lodging events. This failure type is sometimes referred to as “green snap”. This failure pattern is replicated by DARLING when testing turgid plants that have not reached full maturity.

The last predominant failure pattern observed in natural lodging events is root lodging (uprooting of the plant). This often occurs when plants are rooted in wet or loose soil or when plants exhibit a weak root structure. When testing plants in these soil types DARLING replicates these failure patterns. The user interface of DARLING allows the researcher to either categorize specimens by failure type (root lodged, stalk lodged, splitting, creasing snapping, break height, etc.), or to simply discard failure patterns that are not of interest.

The importance of reproducing natural failure patterns should be emphasized. Applying bending loads to inhomogeneous, anisotropic, non-prismatic biological structures (i.e., corn stalks) in such a way that natural failure patterns are produced is not always trivial. For example, for many years the standard bending test used to assess stalk bending strength did not produce the same failure patterns as naturally lodged corn stalks and under-predicted strength by 20–30% (see Robertson et al. [13, 14]). Bending loads in biological structures can cause Brazier buckling, tissue delamination, longitudinal shear failure, transverse compressive failure, longitudinal compressive or tensile failure or a combination of the above failures which may not be related to the plant’s natural failure pattern. DARLING was designed with the intent to assess lodging resistance of maize genotypes and was therefore designed to reproduce failure patterns observed in natural lodging events.

Validation and accuracy of measurements

Several approaches were employed to validate DARLING’s measurements. First data from DARLING was analyzed and compared to typical data patterns observed for structures loaded in bending until failure. We found that data obtained from DARLING exhibits characteristic features common for structures subjected to bending loads to failure, namely: a region of linear force/displacement followed by a departure from linearity, and finally a reduction in load-bearing ability (see Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

A plot of typical data: applied load plotted vs. displacement. Annotations show the point of maximum load and the regression curve for computing flexural stiffness

Second, data from DARLING was analyzed to check that it was in agreement with laboratory-based protocols for testing maize stalks in bending. In particular, in prior research, long-span 3-point bending tests of maize stalks as described in Robertson et al. [13] have demonstrated that stalk flexural rigidity is strongly correlated with stalk bending strength [15]. This same correlation is observed in the data collected using DARLING (see Fig. 7). In addition, the typical range of failure moments and flexural stiffness values for laboratory-based long-span 3 point bending tests of maize stalks were compared to the typical range of failure moments and flexural stiffness values acquired using DARLING. We found that both laboratory and DARLING measurements of mature hybrid maize stalks demonstrated failure moments ranging from approximately 3–40 Nm.

Fig. 7

Correlation between stalk flexural stiffness and stalk bending strength was observed in for both maize and sorghum. Regression lines are shown for slope-intercept and slope only regression lines. All regression lines are significant (p-value < 0.001). Keep in mind that the coefficient of determination is defined differently for models with and without intercept terms [3]

Third, a paired sample experiment was conducted to compare DARLING’s measurements to that of an Instron Universal Testing System (model # 5944, Norwood MA). In particular, DARLING was used to measure the bending stiffness of a number of synthetic samples. Each of these synthetic samples was then tested for bending stiffness using a three-point-bending protocol that utilized the Instron universal testing system. Synthetic samples included wooden dowels, steel rods, and aluminum bars. A total of seven synthetic samples were tested overall. In addition, ten bamboo culms of varying sizes were tested with both the Instron and with DARLING to provide additional points for comparison. DARLING’s flexural stiffness data showed strong agreement with the Instron’s flexural stiffness data. In particular, the coefficient of determination (R2) between flexural stiffness data collected with DARLING and flexural stiffness data collected with the Instron was 0.99 for the synthetic samples and 0.98 for the bamboo culms (see Fig. 8). The flexural rigidity of the samples ranged from 0.3 to 19 N-m2.

Fig. 8

DARLING measurements of flexural stiffness were highly correlated with flexural stiffness measurements gathered using three point bending testing methods. Note the slope of the regression line is not 1.0 for the bamboo samples. This is because the bamboo samples were tapered (i.e., diameter changes with length along the stalk) and the moment/stress distribution along the sample is different in a 3-pt bending test than it is in a cantilevered test. The slope of the regression line for the synthetic samples is closer to 1.0 as these samples were not tapered. It should be noted that wind loaded stalks exhibit moment distributions similar to those induced by DARLING but not similar to those produced in a three-point bending test

Lastly, lodging incidence data was gathered on a set of 47 hybrids grown at over 90 distinct locations over 4 years. Stalk strength measurements obtained by DARLING over the course of 2 years were found to be significantly correlated with historical lodging incidence data of the same hybrids. (see Sekhon et al. [16] for a full description and statistical analysis of correlations with natural lodging counts).


DARLING has limitations related to human factors as well as limitations related to technical factors. Limitations related to human factors are presented first, followed by limitations related to technical factors.

Limitations related to human factors, include the labor (and associated cost) required to operate DARLING. Across several thousand tests, and multiple users, the median time required to conduct a single test was 17 s, or approximately 210 stalks/h. The authors are working to implement software changes to DARLING that can automatically detect erroneous test results. This would eliminate the need for the user to inspect the results of each test and make a decision as to the data quality (accept or reject). This improvement should significantly reduce the time required to conduct a test, and simultaneously improve data quality.

The other major human factor limitation is user-to-user variability. Because DARLING is manually articulated, the nature of the applied motion can affect test results. Smooth, gradual rotation of the device leads to cleaner, more reliable data whereas jerky, erratic, and/or rapid motion introduces inertial effects and often leads to poor quality data. Most conscientious users can quickly learn to use DARLING in a consistent manner as test data is immediately displayed following each test.

DARLING also has limitations related to technical factors. These factors include the types of plants that can be tested, and the assumptions used in calculating stalk flexural rigidity and bending strength. With regards to the first technical limitation, DARLING was designed to test large grain crops such as maize and sorghum. In its current form DARLING cannot be used to gather accurate bending strength and flexural stiffness data from small grain crops such as wheat and barley. The authors are working on a separate device to measure the bending strength and bending stiffness of smaller crops.

The second technical limitation of DARLING relates to the equations used to compute stalk flexural rigidity and bending moment. These equations are based on a number of simplifying engineering assumptions. These include the following: (1) when measuring flexural stiffness or bending strength the force is applied perpendicular to the longitudinal stalk axis; and (2) when measuring flexural stiffness (but not when measuring bending strength) the stalk does not rotate in the soil.

Assumption (1), (the force is applied perpendicular to the longitudinal stalk axis), is quite reasonable when stalks are straight, vertically oriented, and when angular deformation values are less than about 20°. This assumption becomes less accurate when these conditions are violated. In other words, the accuracy of measurements decreases as the amount of rotation increases past 20°. In addition, curved stalks or stalks that are not vertically oriented should not be tested with DARLING. Regarding assumption 1, reliable results are obtained when testing mature maize stalks in dry soil immediately prior to harvest. In these conditions, stalks tend to break when rotated by a fairly small amount and the turgor pressure of the stalk is low and fairly constant. When testing green stalks, turgidity has been observed to influence both data quality and failure mode. Stalks with high turgor pressure typically break in a snapping mode under relatively low angular deformation. In contrast, green stalks with low turgor pressure tend to bend much further before breaking and exhibit a buckling failure pattern. Large angular rotation values present when testing green stalks with low turgidity result in decreased accuracy of the associated bending moment measurements. As such, testing of green stalks with low turgor pressures is not recommended. Finally, while assumption 1 affects the accuracy of bending strength measurements, it does not affect the accuracy of flexural stiffness measurements. This is because only the first portion of the load displacement curve (the portion occurring prior to 20° of displacement) is used to calculate flexural rigidity.

The validity of assumption (2) (the stalk does not rotate in the soil) depends upon soil conditions and the root structure of the plant being tested. Dry soil with high clay content is often quite rigid, while sandy, wet, or loose soil can allow significant rotation of the stalk and root crown within the soil. Accurate bending strength values can still be obtained in poor soil conditions if the stalks breaks before it has been deflected by 20°. However, flexural stiffness measurements obtained in poor soil tend to underestimate the actual flexural stiffness of the plant stalk.


To the best of the authors’ knowledge, DARLING is the first device to induce natural failure patterns and provide reliable measurement of stalk bending strength for corn and sorghum in a field environment. DARLING was developed and thoroughly tested over a period of 3 years and has proven to be robust and reliable.

DARLING has potential application in breeding studies and for establishing connections between genetics and stalk bending strength. Several such studies are currently underway. The device may also be used to investigate several biomechanical phenomena in plants including for example, the relationship between applied energy and applied force at break, the effects of material fatigue, inherent material damping, etc. The average time to test a single plant with DARLING is approximately 17 s/stalk. In an academic or industrial setting the device is capable of testing around 200 stalks/h, depending on both the individual user and the experimental design.

Availability of data and materials

All data presented in this manuscript can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.


  1. 1.

    Deppermann KL, Bohnert M, Bull J, Conry J, Cook K, Eathington S, Frey T, Hartsook J, Schnicker B, Nefzger J. Apparatus and methods for evaluating plant stalk strength. Patent number 7401528 B2; 2008.

  2. 2.

    Duvick DN. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron. 2005;86:83–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Eisenhauer JG. Regression through the origin. Teach Stat. 2003;25(3):76–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gou L, Zhao M, Huang J-J, Zhang B, Li T, Sun R. Bending mechanical properties of stalk and lodging resistance of maize. Acta Agron Sin. 2008;34(4):653–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hu H, Liu W, Fu Z, Homann L, Technow F, Wang H, et al. QTL mapping of stalk bending strength in a recombinant inbred line maize population. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126(9):2257–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jenkins MT. Experiments on stiffness of stalk. Iowa Agric Exp Stn Annu Rep. 1930;1930:51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kokubo A, Kuraishi S, Sakurai N. Culm strength of barley: correlation among maximum bending stress, cell wall dimensions, and cellulose content. Plant Physiol. 1989;91(3):876–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kuhn KW, Tipton SL, Letsinger K, Keachall JW, Sharpsville CT, Cunnyngham T, Floyd AP, Elwood KG, Freeman K, Ray JB. Method and means for testing the strength of plant stalks. Patent number 5044210; 1991.

  9. 9.

    Li Y, Qian Q, Zhou Y, Yan M, Sun L, Zhang M, Fu Z, Wang Y, Han B, Pang X, Chen M, Li J. BRITTLE CULM1, which encodes a COBRA-like protein, affects the mechanical properties of rice plants. Plant Cell 2003;15(3):2020–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Li K, Yan J, Li J, Yang X. Genetic architecture of rind penetrometer resistance in two maize recombinant inbred line populations. BMC Plant Biol. 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mucker GA. Stalk strength tester. Patent number 6983582; 2006.

  12. 12.

    Peiffer JA, Flint-Garcia SA, De Leon N, McMullen MD, Kaeppler SM, Buckler ES. The genetic architecture of maize stalk strength. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e67066.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Robertson DJ, Smith S, Gardunia B, Cook D. An improved method for accurate phenotyping of corn stalk strength. Crop Sci. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Robertson DJ, Julias M, Gardunia BW, Barten T, Cook DD. Corn stalk lodging: a forensic engineering approach provides insights into failure patterns and mechanisms. Crop Sci. 2015;55(6):2833–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Robertson DJ, Lee SY, Julias M, Cook DD. Maize stalk lodging: flexural stiffness predicts strength. Crop Sci. 2016;56(4):1711–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sekhon RS, Joyner CN, Ackerman AJ, McMahan CS, Cook DD, Robertson DJ. Stalk bending strength is strongly associated with maize stalk lodging incidence across multiple environments. bioRxiv 675793; 2019.

  17. 17.

    Thompson DL. Stalk strength of corn as measured by crushing strength and rind thickness. Crop Sci. 1963;3(4):323–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zuber MS, Grogan CO. A new technique for measuring stalk strength in corn. Crop Sci. 1961;1(5):378–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, award #1826715, and award #1400973, and from the United States Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture award #2016-67012-28381. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or of the National Science Foundation.

Author information




All authors participated in the design development, continuous improvement and validation of the DARLING apparatus. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Robertson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study does not include human data, tissue or subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1. Rows 1–38 contain meta-data and header information including sensor calibration values, post and pre-test notes, etc. Test data is recorded in rows 39-end. Test data includes a timestamp for each data point, the angle of the rotational potentiometer, the angle of the inertial measurement unit, as well as loads from the X and Y channels. Note that for the sample file provided a uniaxial load cell was employed during the test hence the Y-load channel data does not vary. Also note that the rotational potentiometer sensor was calibrated to set the vertical direction approximately equal to 90 degrees, whereas the inertial measurement sensor was calibrated to set vertical approximately to 0 degrees. Calibration values can be modified within the Graphical User Interface to the user’s desired preferences.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cook, D.D., de la Chapelle, W., Lin, T. et al. DARLING: a device for assessing resistance to lodging in grain crops. Plant Methods 15, 102 (2019).

Download citation


  • Stalk
  • Strength
  • Lodging
  • Phenotyping
  • Maize
  • Bending
  • Stiffness
  • Flexural
  • Rigidity
  • Darling