- Open Access
An improved method for Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of tomato suitable for the study of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 14 December 2017
- Accepted: 3 May 2018
- Published: 9 May 2018
Solanum lycopersicum, an economically important crop grown worldwide, has been used as a model for the study of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis in non-legume plants for several years and several cDNA array hybridization studies have revealed specific transcriptomic profiles of mycorrhizal tomato roots. However, a method to easily screen candidate genes which could play an important role during tomato mycorrhization is required.
We have developed an optimized procedure for composite tomato plant obtaining achieved through Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation. This protocol involves the unusual in vitro culture of composite plants between two filter papers placed on the culture media. In addition, we show that DsRed is an appropriate molecular marker for the precise selection of cotransformed tomato hairy roots. S. lycopersicum composite plant hairy roots appear to be colonized by the AM fungus Rhizophagus irregularis in a manner similar to that of normal roots, and a modified construct useful for localizing the expression of promoters putatively associated with mycorrhization was developed and tested.
In this study, we present an easy, fast and low-cost procedure to study AM symbiosis in tomato roots.
- Composite plants
- Hairy roots
- Arbuscular mycorrhiza
The Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) is an economically important crop grown worldwide. Tomato production accounts for 16% of global vegetable production and constitutes the largest vegetable category. The total tomato crop is forecast to reach 38.6 million tons in 2017 and is expected to continue growing (https://www.wptc.to/).
Tomato crops are susceptible to many insects, bacteria and nematodes which cause significant reductions in fruit yields under current production practices . Rhizosphere symbiotic microorganisms are increasingly proposed as a possible alternative to overcoming these problems , with particular emphasis on arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi which form mutualistic symbiotic association with most higher plants. Although tomato growth is not very responsive to AM fungi , mycorrhization significantly reduces tomato infection and disease severity caused by several root pathogens [4–7] and is regarded as a potential beneficial crop management tool to reduce pathogen populations in the soil which positively impacts crop health, quality and production .
In addition to its cultivation and economic importance worldwide, S. lycopersicum has become a convenient model for research into plant genetics and physiology due to several features such as its relatively compact genome (950 Mb), the availability of a marker-saturated genetic linkage map and the annotated genome sequence (http://solgenomics.net), rich germplasm collections (Tomato Genetics Resource Center, http://tgrc.ucdavis.edu) and highly efficient transformation protocols .
Several microarray analyses [10–12] have produced specific transcriptomic profiles of mycorrhizal tomato roots. However, the development of a procedure to easily screen candidate genes performing important functions during mycorrhization is required. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation offers a fast and reliable alternative to stable transformation when research is focused on root biology. Unlike A. tumefaciens, A. rhizogenes contains root locus (rol) genes, which, on induction, trigger the development of adventitious, genetically transformed so-called hairy roots due to the conspicuous abundance of their root hairs, a term first used in the literature by Stewart et al. .
Using A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation, healthy composite plants consisting of untransformed shoots with transgenic hairy roots can be generated. Protocols for obtaining composite plants have been proposed in order to easily pinpoint genes resistant to root pathogens in coffee , peanuts , soybean [16–18], potato , and even tree species such as avocado  and Prunus . These techniques have also been developed to assess genes predicted to function in the plant parasitism of neighboring roots  and to study root symbiotic interactions including AM and Rhizobium symbiosis in legume species such as soybean , pea  and Medicago truncatula [24–26].
Although some molecular studies have been carried out using in vitro tomato hairy root cultures, e.g. for the study of Fusarium tolerance  or of changes in cell wall ligno-suberization associated with salt stress , no reports exist regarding the use of this system to study AM symbiosis in tomato and, to our knowledge, no specific protocol currently exists for obtaining composite tomato plants in vitro. Only one paper have previously reported the obtaining of composite tomato plants , however the protocol was not specific for tomato and the authors did not used in vitro conditions.
The aim of this work was to show the difficulties found for in vitro composite tomato plant obtaining and we set up a method to overcome these problems. The major challenges we encountered were the excessive handling required and the consequent high level of contamination-related loss. The main factor which hampered composite tomato plant obtaining was the specific growth of tomato hairy roots which penetrate deeply into the culture media. In order to assist in tracking the success of the transformation procedure and to distinguish between non-cotransformed and transgene-containing roots, we used DsRed as a visual marker protein that delivers red fluorescence, and we tested that it can be successfully used as a marker to undoubtedly identify and select tomato cotransformed hairy roots from the beginning of the in vitro culture until the harvesting time. In this paper, we present a strategy for fast and efficient production of S. lycopersicum composite plants using A. rhizogenes MSU440, in which the transgenic roots of the composite plants showed the expression of the red fluorescence protein marker (DsRed). We demonstrated that these plants are efficiently mycorrhized by Rhizophagus irregularis and also showed the utility of this method for localizing the expression of AM-induced promoters. The procedure developed would now favor undertaking further research into the molecular mechanisms involved in AM symbiosis in tomato.
Binary vectors and A. rhizogenes strain
We selected three different binary vectors to facilitate transgenic overexpression, RNAi silencing and localization of promoter-GUS expression. The three vectors, all of which contained the DsRed marker gene for identification and selection of cotransformed hairy roots, used GATEWAY technology (Invitrogen) for transgene and promoter cloning. The following vectors were selected: pUBIcGFP-DR  for overexpression, pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot (http://gateway.psb.ugent.be) for RNAi silencing and pBGWFS7::pAtUbq10::DsRed for promoter-GUS expression analysis. The latter vector was obtained by cloning the pAtUbq10::DsRed fragment in the pBGWFS7 vector  using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara). In order to check the proper functioning of this plasmid, the arbuscular-induced phosphate transporter 4 promoter (pSlPT4) was subcloned. The empty binary vectors pUBIcGFP-DR, pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot and pBGWFS7::pAtUbq10::DsRed, as well as the construct pBGWFS7:: pAtUbq10::DsRed::pSlPT4 were introduced into A. rhizogenes MSU440 by electroporation, and transformants were selected by resistance to streptomycin and spectinomycin.
Generation of composite S. lycopersicum plants
Roots grown during the first week (adventitious laterals, non-transformed roots) were removed, and plantlets were transferred to 0.5× MS agar medium (0.8% agar) plates without vitamins in order to boost new root development. During the following 3–4 weeks, screening and removal of DsRed-negative roots (non-transformed) were carried out weekly by observation under a fluorescent Leica M165F stereomicroscope. Plantlets with at least one cotransformed hairy root were transferred to 0.5× MS agar medium (0.8% agar) with vitamins. Finally, seedlings with selected DsRed-positive roots (hairy roots) were transplanted to pots and allowed to grow in a growth chamber.
Plant growth conditions
Composite tomato seedlings obtained in vitro were grown in an autoclave-sterilized (20 min at 120 °C) mixture of expanded clay, washed vermiculite and coconut fiber (2:2:1, by volume). Plant growth and treatments took place in a growth chamber (day: night cycle, 16 h, 24 °C; 8 h, 20 °C; relative humidity 50%). Inoculation with R. irregularis (DAOM 197198) was carried out in 500-ml pots as previously described . Each seedling was grown in a separate pot and was inoculated with a piece of monoxenic culture in Gel-Gro medium containing 50 R. irregularis spores and infected carrot roots. As hairy root tomato plantlets strongly suffer during transfer from in vitro to pot culture, plastic glasses or humidity domes were placed on top of these plants and sprayed with water every 2 days to maintain moisture and to prevent wilting during the first weeks. One week after planting and weekly thereafter, 20 ml of a modified Long Ashton nutrient solution containing 25% of the standard phosphorus (P) concentration was added to the pots , as low phosphate conditions have been shown to stimulate hyphal branching, consequently improving the rate of colonization by the AM fungi [34, 35]. Plants were harvested at different times after inoculation, and the root system was washed and rinsed several times with tap water. DsRed-negative roots (non-transformed laterals or non-cotransformed hairy roots) were removed and screened by observation under a fluorescent Leica M165F stereomicroscope.
AM fungal staining
A non-vital trypan blue histochemical staining procedure was used . Stained roots were observed with a light microscope, and the intensity of root cortex colonization by the AM fungus was determined as previously described by Trouvelot .
RNA extractions and gene expression quantification
Total RNA was isolated from about 0.2 g-samples using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions and treated with RNase-Free DNase. 1 µg of DNAse-treated RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the iScriptTM cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the supplier’s protocol. For qPCR, a 20 μL PCR reaction containing 1 μL of diluted cDNA (1:10), 10 μL 2× SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 200 nM of each primer was prepared using a 96-well plate. The experiment was carried out on three biological replicates, and the threshold cycle (Ct) was determined in triplicate. The relative transcription levels were calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCt method . The Ct values of SlPT4 gene were normalized to the Ct value of the LeEF-1α (accession number X14449) housekeeping gene. The qPCR data for SlPT4 gene was shown as relative expression with respect to the control treatment (non-AM inoculated roots) to which an expression value of 1 was assigned. Primers used were 5′-GGTGGCGAGCATGATTTTGA-3′and 5′-CGAGCCAACCATGGAAAACAA-3′ for LeEF-1α; and 5′-GAAGGGGAGCCATTTAATGTGG-3′ and 5′-ATCGCGGCTTGTTTAGCATTTCC-3′ for SlPT4 expression analyses.
Histochemical localization of GUS activity and the AM fungus
AM inoculated and non-inoculated transgenic roots carrying the SlPT4 promoter-GUS fusion were subjected to GUS staining based on a technique earlier developed by Jefferson . Hairy roots were vacuum-infiltrated with a GUS staining solution composed of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, 1 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 1 mM potassium ferricyanide, 0.05% Triton X-100, 10.6 mM EDTA-Na and 5 μg ml−1 X-gluc cyclohexylammonium salt (previously dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide) for 30 min to improve substrate penetration. The tissues were then incubated in the dark at 37 °C from 1 h to overnight or until staining was satisfactory in the same staining solution. For co-staining of the AM fungus, GUS-stained hairy roots were embedded in hot (∼ 60 °C) liquid 4% agarose in PBS 1X. 60 μm longitudinal sections were cut on a vibratome (Leica VT1200S) and vacuum-infiltrated with 10 μg ml−1 WGA-Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg., USA) in PBS 1X for 20 min in the dark. Cuttings were washed with PBS 1X. A stereomicroscope Leica M165F and an inverted fluorescent microscope (Leica DMI600B) were used for visualization.
rhizogenes-mediated tomato transformation
Rhizogenes inoculation method
The most common inoculation procedure used for generating composite plants involves stab inoculation . However, many authors have found that growth is significantly improved when A. rhizogenes is inoculated directly on freshly sectioned seedling radicles or hypocotyls in some species [22, 26, 42]. In order to determine the most appropriate method for tomato transformation, S. lycopersicum plants were inoculated with A. rhizogenes either by puncturing the seedlings with a glass needle containing bacteria or by coating the fresh diagonally-cut ends of hypocotyls into bacterial cultures. During the first week following inoculation, a small number of non-transformed adventitious laterals appeared just above the hypocotyl section regardless of the A. rhizogenes inoculation method used, which is a normal response of tomato seedlings to removal of the root apical meristem. Two weeks after inoculation, puncture inoculation resulted in approximately 50% of the plantlets developing cotransformed hairy roots, while only 25% of the coated-inoculated seedlings had regenerated cotransformed hairy roots by that time. However, 4 weeks after A. rhizogenes inoculation and consecutive weekly removal of non-cotransformed hairy roots (non-DsRed expressing roots), at least 90% of plantlets had developed cotransformed hairy roots in both punctured and coated-inoculated seedlings. Although transgenic root growth was boosted by the puncture method, both methods were found to be effective for obtaining composite plants, with the final test showing similar success (Fig. 4b). These results are different to those obtained with M. truncatula  and Triphysaria versicolor , where transformation efficiency increased by dipping the freshly sectioned hypocothyls into Agrobacterium cultures. We therefore conclude that the effectiveness of the type of wound for A. rhizogenes infection is species-dependent.
Elimination of A. rhizogenes is not required
Most protocols proposed for obtaining composite plants include the use of antibiotics, such as timentin, cefotaxime or augmentin depending on the A. rhizogenes strain used, in order to inhibit A. rhizogenes growth on the media of the in vitro composite plant culture [22, 26]. We noticed that, in the absence of cefotaxime, A. rhizogenes did not spread out in the in vitro culture used in this study, in which the filter paper is placed on the MS media and sucrose is lacking, and the percentage of composite plants obtained is not significantly affected (Fig. 4c).
Molecular markers: Selection for cotransformed hairy roots by DsRed
Antibiotic counterselection is often used to increase the percentage of hairy roots cotransformed with the binary vector T-DNA and to inhibit growth of non-transformed adventitious laterals and non-cotransfromed hairy roots. After testing a range of kanamycin (Km) concentrations for the growth of hairy roots cotransformed with the plasmid pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot, we found that 100 μg ml−1 Km was insufficient to totally inhibit non-transformed hairy root initiation and, over this level of concentration, Km began to negatively affect the shoot growth of composite plants. It was not possible to set an optimal concentration for complete inhibition of non-transformed root development without interfering with shoot growth. In order to determine whether additional antibiotic selection is appropriate in order to enhance cotransformed hairy root growth, experimental trials were carried out both with and without kanamycin (100 μg ml−1). The number of plantlets, which developed uncotransformed hairy roots, increased by 30% in the absence of Km as compared to those in the presence of Km (100 μg ml−1) 2 weeks after infection. However, once they had developed more than two cotransformed hairy roots, regardless of the presence or absence of the antibiotic, after removal of non-cotransformed hairy roots, the composite seedlings rarely developed new untransformed hairy roots and achieved similar final success rates (Fig. 4c). These results show that, although antibiotic selection slightly boosts the growth of cotransformed hairy roots initially, the presence of the antibiotic does not totally eliminate untransformed root development and does not implies a superior efficiency of the method. We show that S. lycopersicum transformed roots with pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot, pUBIcGFP-DR and the new plasmid pBGWFS7,0::pUbq::DsRed developed in this study are highly suitable for tomato hairy roots obtaining and selection without requiring selective co-transformation antibiotics.
Transfer of composite tomato plantlets to pots
One of the critical steps of the procedure involves the transfer of composite plantlets from in vitro conditions to pots. In this step, most of the plantlets were not sufficiently strong to acclimate to the new ex vitro conditions and died after a few days. We performed a trial for pre-acclimatization and growth of composite plants before transferring to pots, in which the aerial part was exposed to ex vitro conditions, while keeping the root system in vitro as explained as follows. A hole was melted in the side and the lid of the Petri dish containing the 0.5x MS medium (0.8% agar) using a hot metal rod. The obtained 4 week old composite tomato plantlets were transferred (one plantlet in each Petri plate), with the roots placed on the surface of the medium and the shoot extending beyond the hole. The gap around shoot emerging from the hole of the Petri dish was sealed with silicone grease. Petri dishes were placed vertically in a growth chamber. In this way, larger and stronger composite plants pre-acclimated to ex vitro conditions were obtained. However, this procedure was discarded because it greatly increased contamination of the media. Alternatively, composite plantlets were directly transferred from in vitro conditions to pots, and immediately covered with translucent plastic or fitted with a humidity chamber to maintain humidity for the first 3 weeks, which resulted in survival rates of virtually 100% for the plantlets transferred.
Symbiotic phenotype and molecular characterization of AM composite plants
Promoter-GUS analysis of AM-composite tomato plants
In the protocol developed in this work, we firstly provide experimental evidence that slanted culture of seedlings is not required. Alternatively, the placing of seedlings between two filter papers in sandwich mode is also successful and useful for the composite seedling culture of species such as tomato, whose roots tend to penetrate the culture media. In addition, the tedious task of detaching the agar from roots when transferring plantlets to pots is avoided by using this method.
The other major challenge we overcame in the in vitro culture of composite plants was the frequent contamination of the culture media. Weekly transfer of the plantlets to maintain fresh media and antibiotic activity, as well as taking out the aerial part of the plant greatly increased contamination of the culture media. Procedure modifications introduced, driven to reduce changes in the culture media and to minimize composite plant handling, virtually reduced in vitro culture contamination to zero and simplified the method considerably.
In view of our results, we conclude that large amounts of composite tomato plants can be obtained by using this low-cost and user-friendly handling method, which avoids the use of antibiotics and the tedious task of detaching agar from the roots, and also minimizes the transfer of plantlets to different media and plant manipulation, thus reducing contamination to virtually zero and achieving success rates of 90% and almost 100% at times. In addition, selection of cotransformed tomato hairy roots is completely ensured through the use of the fluorescent molecular marker DsRed. This method provides an improved tool to rapidly assess gene functions in tomato roots without the need for stable transformation plant production. In particular, we showed that the proposed technique is extremely useful for mycorrhizal studies and screening of candidate genes for involvement in AM symbiosis. However, it is important to note that this method might also be suitable for molecular studies of root pathogen interactions affecting tomato, which is an extremely important agricultural species.
JMGG and JAO conceived and designed the study. THP, RH and MITN carried out the experiments of transformation. THP made constructs and performed the molecular studies. THP and MITN executed the experiments of AM fungal inoculation and mycorrhization analysis. THP wrote the first draft of the manuscript and discussed experimental approaches with RH and JMGG. JMGG directed the experiments and wrote the final draft of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was funded by grants from the Interministerial Commission of Science and Technology (CICYT) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) through the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness in Spain (AGL2014-52298-P). Tania Ho’s research fellowship was supported by the FPI-MINECO program. We are grateful to Dr. M Udvardi (Noble Research Institute) for generously providing the pUBIcGFP-DR vector. We also thank Dr. JA López-Ráez and Dr. A. Belver from the EEZ-CSIC for their help and critical comments; and M. Calvo-Polanco for encouraging us to publish this protocol. We also wish to thank Michael O’Shea for proof-reading the document.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Engindeniz S. Economic analysis of pesticide use on processing tomato growing: a case study for Turkey. Crop Prot. 2006;25:534–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haldar S, Sengupta S. Microbial ecology at rhizosphere: bioengineering and future prospective. In: Choudhary DK, Varma A, Tuteja N, editors. Plant–microbe interaction: an approach to sustainable agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 63–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith FA, Grace EJ, Smith SE. More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol. 2009;182:347–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akköprü A, Demir S. Biological control of Fusarium wilt in tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici by AMF Glomus intraradices and some rhizobacteria. J Phytopathol. 2005;153:544–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berta G, Sampo S, Gamalero E, Massa N, Lemanceau P. Suppression of Rhizoctonia root-rot of tomato by Glomus mossae BEG12 and Pseudomonas fluorescens A6RI is associated with their effect on the pathogen growth and on the root morphogenesis. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2005;111:279–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cordier C, Gianinazzi S, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. Colonisation patterns of root tissues by Phytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica related to reduced disease in mycorrhizal tomato. Plant Soil. 1996;185:223–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diedhiou P, Hallmann J, Oerke E-C, Dehne H-W. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum on Meloidogyne incognita infestation of tomato. Mycorrhiza. 2003;13:199–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Copetta A, Bardi L, Bertolone E, Berta G. Fruit production and quality of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) are affected by green compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Biosyst. 2011;145:106–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pino LE, Lombardi-Crestana S, Azevedo MS, Scotton DC, Borgo L, Quecini V, Figueira A, Peres LE. The Rg1 allele as a valuable tool for genetic transformation of the tomato’Micro-Tom’model system. Plant methods. 2010;6:23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- López-Ráez JA, Verhage A, Fernandez I, Garcia JM, Azcón-Aguilar C, Flors V, Pozo MJ. Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:2589–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- García Garrido JM, León Morcillo RJ, Martín Rodríguez JA, Ocampo Bote JA. Variations in the mycorrhization characteristics in roots of wild-type and ABA-deficient tomato are accompanied by specific transcriptomic alterations. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010;23:651–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fiorilli V, Catoni M, Miozzi L, Novero M, Accotto GP, Lanfranco L. Global and cell-type gene expression profiles in tomato plants colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol. 2009;184:975–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart FC, Rolfs FM, Hall FH. A fruit-disease survey of western New York in 1900. Geneva: New York Agricultural Experiment Station; 1900.Google Scholar
- Alpizar E, Dechamp E, Espeout S, Royer M, Lecouls A-C, Nicole M, Bertrand B, Lashermes P, Etienne H. Efficient production of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots and composite plants for studying gene expression in coffee roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:959–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geng L, Niu L, Gresshoff PM, Shu C, Song F, Huang D, Zhang J. Efficient production of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots and composite plants in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2012;109:491–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kereszt A, Li D, Indrasumunar A, Nguyen CD, Nontachaiyapoom S, Kinkema M, Gresshoff PM. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean to study root biology. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:948–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuma K, Lopes-Caitar V, Romero C, Silva S, Kuwahara M, Carvalho M, Abdelnoor R, Dias W, Marcelino-Guimarães F. A high efficient protocol for soybean root transformation by Agrobacterium rhizogenes and most stable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34:1987–2000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Todd TC, Trick HN. Rapid in planta evaluation of root expressed transgenes in chimeric soybean plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29:113–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horn P, Santala J, Nielsen SL, Hühns M, Broer I, Valkonen JP. Composite potato plants with transgenic roots on non-transgenic shoots: a model system for studying gene silencing in roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33:1977–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prabhu SA, Ndlovu B, Engelbrecht J, Van den Berg N. Generation of composite Persea americana (Mill.)(avocado) plants: a proof-of-concept-study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0185896.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bosselut N, Van Ghelder C, Claverie M, Voisin R, Onesto J-P, Rosso M-N, Esmenjaud D. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Prunus as an alternative for gene functional analysis in hairy-roots and composite plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30:1313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomilov A, Tomilova N, Yoder JI. Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed roots of the parasitic plant Triphysaria versicolor retain parasitic competence. Planta. 2007;225:1059–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemow SR, Clairmont L, Madsen LH, Guinel FC. Reproducible hairy root transformation and spot-inoculation methods to study root symbioses of pea. Plant Methods. 2011;7:46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Floss DS, Schmitz AM, Starker CG, Gantt JS, Harrison MJ. Gene silencing in Medicago truncatula roots using RNAi. Legume Genomics Methods Protoc. 2013;1069:163–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chabaud M, Boisson-Dernier A, Zhang J, Taylor CG, Yu O, Barker DG. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root transformation. The Medicago truncatula handbook, version November 2006.Google Scholar
- Boisson-Dernier A, Chabaud M, Garcia F, Bécard G, Rosenberg C, Barker DG. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of Medicago truncatula for the study of nitrogen-fixing and endomycorrhizal symbiotic associations. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2001;14:695–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bettini PP, Santangelo E, Baraldi R, Rapparini F, Mosconi P, Crinò P, Mauro ML. Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolA gene promotes tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;25:225–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Talano MA, Agostini E, Medina MI, Reinoso H, del Carmen Tordable M, Tigier HA, de Forchetti SM. Changes in ligno-suberization of cell walls of tomato hairy roots produced by salt treatment: the relationship with the release of a basic peroxidase. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163:740–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collier R, Fuchs B, Walter N, Kevin Lutke W, Taylor CG. Ex vitro composite plants: an inexpensive, rapid method for root biology. Plant J. 2005;43:449–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kryvoruchko IS, Sinharoy S, Torres-Jerez I, Sosso D, Pislariu CI, Guan D, Murray J, Benedito VA, Frommer WB, Udvardi MK. MtSWEET11, a nodule-specific sucrose transporter of Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2016;171:554–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Karimi M, Inze D, Depicker A. GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:193–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin-Rodriguez JA, Huertas R, Ho-Plagaro T, Ocampo JA, Tureckova V, Tarkowska D, Ludwig-Muller J, Garcia-Garrido JM. Gibberellin–abscisic acid balances during arbuscular mycorrhiza formation in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1273.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt EJ. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Farnham: Commenwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1966.Google Scholar
- Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature. 2005;435:824–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagahashi G, Douds DD. Partial separation of root exudate components and their effects upon the growth of germinated spores of AM fungi. Mycol Res. 2000;104:1453–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phillips JM, Hayman D. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1970;55:158IN116–161IN118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trouvelot A. Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un systeme radiculaire. Recherche de methodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In: Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S, editors. Mycorrhizae: physiology and genetics. Paris: Institut geNational de la Recherche Agronomique; 1986. p. 217–21.Google Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jefferson R. The GUS reporter gene system. Nature. 1989;342:837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limpens E, Ramos J, Franken C, Raz V, Compaan B, Franssen H, Bisseling T, Geurts R. RNA interference in Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of Arabidopsis and Medicago truncatula. J Exp Bot. 2004;55:983–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quandt HJ, Pühler A, Broer I. Transgenic root nodules of Vicia hirsuta: a fast and efficient system for the study of gene expression in indeterminate-type nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1993;6:699–706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martirani L, Stiller J, Mirabella R, Alfano F, Lamberti A, Radutoiu SE, Iaccarino M, Gresshoff PM, Chiurazzi M. T-DNA tagging of nodulation-and root-related genes in Lotus japonicus: expression patterns and potential for promoter trapping and insertional mutagenesis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1999;12:275–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gomez SK, Javot H, Deewatthanawong P, Torres-Jerez I, Tang Y, Blancaflor EB, Udvardi MK, Harrison MJ. Medicago truncatula and Glomus intraradices gene expression in cortical cells harboring arbuscules in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Balestrini R, Gómez-Ariza J, Lanfranco L, Bonfante P. Laser microdissection reveals that transcripts for five plant and one fungal phosphate transporter genes are contemporaneously present in arbusculated cells. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2007;20:1055–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagy R, Karandashov V, Chague V, Kalinkevich K, Tamasloukht MB, Xu G, Jakobsen I, Levy AA, Amrhein N, Bucher M. The characterization of novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporters from Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum uncovers functional redundancy in symbiotic phosphate transport in solanaceous species. Plant J. 2005;42:236–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar