Solanum venturii, a suitable model system for virus-induced gene silencing studies in potato reveals StMKK6 as an important player in plant immunity
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 3 March 2016
- Accepted: 10 May 2016
- Published: 20 May 2016
Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) is an optimal tool for functional analysis of genes in plants, as the viral vector spreads throughout the plant and causes reduced expression of selected gene over the whole plant. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) is one of the most important food crops, therefore studies performing functional analysis of its genes are very important. However, the majority of potato cultivars used in laboratory experimental setups are not well amenable to available VIGS systems, thus other model plants from Solanaceae family are used (usually Nicotiana benthamiana). Wild potato relatives can be a better choice for potato model, but their potential in this field was yet not fully explored. This manuscript presents the set-up of VIGS, based on Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) in wild potato relatives for functional studies in potato–virus interactions.
Five different potato cultivars, usually used in our lab, did not respond to silencing of phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene with TRV-based vector. Thus screening of a large set of wild potato relatives (different Solanum species and their clones) for their susceptibility to VIGS was performed by silencing PDS gene. We identified several responsive species and further tested susceptibility of these genotypes to potato virus Y (PVY) strain NTN and N. In some species we observed that the presence of empty TRV vector restricted the movement of PVY. Fluorescently tagged PVYN-GFP spread systemically in only five of tested wild potato relatives. Based on the results, Solanum venturii (VNT366-2) was selected as the most suitable system for functional analysis of genes involved in potato–PVY interaction. The system was tested by silencing two different plant immune signalling-related kinases, StWIPK and StMKK6. Silencing of StMKK6 enabled faster spreading of the virus throughout the plant, while silencing of WIPK had no effect on spreading of the virus.
The system employing S. venturii (VNT366-2) and PVYN-GFP is a suitable method for fast and simple functional analysis of genes involved in potato–PVY interactions. Additionally, a set of identified VIGS responsive species of wild potato relatives could serve as a tool for general studies of potato gene function.
- Virus-induced gene silencing
- Potato virus Y
- Solanum venturii
Cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is, after rice, maize and wheat, the world’s fourth most important food crop (http://faostat.fao.org/). Its susceptibility to wide range of pathogens, which diminish its yield, could therefore have a great impact in the food production chain. One of the most important potato pathogens is the potato virus Y (PVY). The necrotic isolates of PVY are still responsible for huge agronomic and economic losses . The ability of viruses to cause a disease is determined at the level of molecular interactions between the host plant counterparts and virus factors that can lead to compatible (sensitive) or incompatible (resistant) interactions . The differential sensitivity of potato cultivars lies in their different genetic background, where the resistant ones usually possess Ry (extreme resistance) or Ny (hypersensitive resistance) gene (reviewed in ). However, recent transcriptomic studies revealed the complexity of signalling network involved in the defence response of potato against PVY [4–8].
The use of transient transformation would be a welcome additional tool to evaluate the role of individual genes in potato. Stable genetic transformation is a less preferred approach, since it is a lengthy process, taking at least 6 months to produce substantial number of transformed plants that can be used for functional experiments. However, to study the interaction between potato and PVY, the gene expression must be modified throughout the whole plant and not only locally, as the virus also spreads systemically. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) is an optimal tool for this purpose, as the virus vector spreads throughout the plant and causes reduction in activity of selected gene in the whole plant based on post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) .
Until now, several VIGS vectors originating from RNA and DNA viruses were developed [10, 11]. The Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) vector is the most widely used due to its wide host range and mild symptoms . Some VIGS studies with potato using TRV vector have been already described [13, 14], however they are not being used as routinely in potato as for example in model plant species Nicotiana benthamiana.
Tuber-bearing Solanum species that belong to section Petota, represent a large pool of potato relatives, potentially suitable as model species. Section Petota contains mostly species from North and South Americas [15, 16], e.g. Solanum bulbocastanum, Solanum stoloniferum and also the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum. The resource was already used by the potato breeders to introduce the desired traits into cultivars . As these are the closest relatives to cultivated potato, they would serve as a good model system with best possible data translation to cultivated potato cultivars. Large database was already constructed with information on phylogeny  and Phytophthora infestans resistance in wild potato relatives , but no information exist on resistance or susceptibility of these species to viruses.
In order to evaluate the potential application of TRV-based VIGS for functional analysis of potato genes we first screened cultivars for their susceptibility to TRV-based VIGS. As none of the cultivars responded to VIGS, we decided to test wild potato relatives as the closest possible model system, which could be used for potato–PVY interaction studies. We screened an assortment of wild potato relatives for their susceptibility to TRV-based VIGS and selected the most responsive species for further evaluation of their response to PVY infection. Finally, we were able to select good candidates for studies of gene function in potato–PVY interaction. To show that the selected system is applicable for functional evaluation of a potato genes, we selected a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) gene StWIPK (A. thaliana orthologue AtMAPK3) and a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MKK), gene StMKK6. In several studies the members of WIPK family were shown to be involved in wound and pathogen responses [20–24], response to oxidative stress [25, 26], drought response and stomata development [27–30]. WIPK was shown to be responsive after the infection of N. benthamiana with potato virus X (PVX) and PVY . MKK genes were also shown to be involved in regulation of cytokinesis [32–35] in abscisic and salicylic acid signalling [36, 37], in salt stress response  and also in response to pathogen infection [37–40]. With the developed methodology, we showed that downregulation (silencing) of StMKK6 promotes the viral spread, whereas silencing of StWIPK did not affect the virus.
VIGS on different potato cultivars
TRV-based VIGS is a wide-spread system for gene silencing, therefore our aim was to check its applicability on all the genotypes we use in PVY–potato interaction studies in our lab (Igor, PW363, Santé, Rywal, NahG-Rywal, Désirée, Désirée Glu-III and NahG-Désirée). They are differently sensitive to PVY (Additional file 1) because of their genetic background. NahG plants were genetically modified to impair salicylic acid (SA) accumulation [7, 41] and Glu-III transgenic Désirée harbours β-1,3-glucanase class III gene under control of 35S promoter . No literature data existed on the susceptibility of the selected cultivars to TRV-based VIGS. Experimental plants were agroinfiltrated with a mixture of pTRV1 and pTRV2:CaPDS, constructs for silencing phytoene desaturase (PDS). When silenced the carotenoid biosynthesis is supressed, which makes plants susceptible to photobleaching  that can easily be visualized. N. benthamiana plants were used as positive control and after 12 days post agroinfiltration, plants have already started to show the photo-bleaching phenotype, which persisted throughout the experiment. To show that the original pTRV2:CaPDS construct originating from pepper, would work also on other plant species, we have analysed the sequence identity of different PDS genes. The observed nucleotide sequence identity of Capsicum annuum PDS was higher than 95 % when compared to S. tuberosum or S. nigrum PDS and 92.7 % when compared to N. benthamiana PDS (Additional file 2). As N. benthamiana plants served as positive control and were always showing photo-bleached phenotype, we concluded that pTRV2:CaPDS should also work on Solanum species.
Both NahG-Rywal and NahG-Désirée plants developed strong disease symptoms (leaves have dried up and fallen off) already at 10 days post agroinfiltration. Most probably the lack of SA allowed high TRV accumulation, which was devastating for the small plants. None of other cultivars showed any signs of photo-bleaching. Cultivar Igor responded by dropping the infiltrated leaves, what often occurs after PVY inoculation in this cultivar , potentially indicating the multiplication of TRV. To our knowledge, there are only two publications presenting data on VIGS in potato using TRV, showing only three cultivars of S. tuberosum (GT12297-4, Cara and Pentland Ivory) as susceptible [13, 14]. Noteworthy, Brigneti et al. had applied VIGS to potato plants grown from seeds , a system not used in many of the labs, as the propagation of potatoes in tissue culture is required for retaining the desired genotype.
VIGS and wild potato relatives
Susceptibility of selected wild potato relatives to PVYNTN
The effect of TRV infection on PVYNTN spread in selected wild potato relatives
We showed that PVYNTN spreads in all of the selected clones and in order to use these clones in VIGS studies, we analysed the effect of empty TRV VIGS vector on spreading of PVYNTN. As when performing the normal VIGS experiment, we have agroinfiltrated 1 week old plants with empty TRV vector and after 3 additional weeks inoculated the plants with PVYNTN. Again, we have tested for presence of PVYNTN RNA in the samples of non-inoculated leaves collected 14 days after PVYNTN inoculation. Although we detected significant differences in PVYNTN content in limited number of cases (Additional file 5), as already discussed above, rather than the relative viral RNA content, the more important indicator of susceptibility to viral infection is the number of plants with detected PVY in upper leaves . In our experiments, prior agroinfiltration with empty TRV vector for VIGS reduced the number of plants successfully infected with PVYNTN (Fig. 2). In three (BLB 331-2, SPEC 287-2 and VNT 741-1) out of seven clones where the reduction in number of infected plants was observed (BLB 331-2, HJT 349-3, MCQ186-1, SPEC 287-2, VNT283-1, VNT 365-1 and VNT 741-1), only one out of five plants was systemically infected.
For functional analysis studies there should be no effect of TRV on the spreading of PVY, therefore we also compared the data of PVYNTN content measured in both experiments (with and without prior TRV agroinfiltration) (Fig. 2, Additional file 5). We showed that the clones suitable for further studies with VIGS, in which the TRV did not affect the spreading of PVYNTN, are S. jamesii (355-1), S. lesteri (358-4), S. okade (970-3), S. polytrichon (378-2) and S. venturii (250-2, 366-2 and 896-4). S. bulbocastanum, which was previously already used in TRV-based VIGS experiments for testing resistance genes against P. infestans , was shown not to be suitable for VIGS in the case of PVY studies, due to the influence of TRV on the course of PVY infection (Fig. 2).
Susceptibility of selected wild potato relatives to PVYN-GFP
Functional confirmation of StMKK6 role as positive regulator of plant defence against PVY
Effect of StWIPK silencing on spreading of PVYN-GFP to upper non-inoculated leaves
Systemically infected plants (%)
We established a fast screening system for evaluation of potato gene function, in particular in response to infection with PVY. As the cultivable potato is not suitable for TRV-based VIGS, we have performed an evaluation of suitability of wild potato relatives for functional analysis of potato genes involved in potato–virus interaction using TRV-based VIGS on a wide set of different species. The most responsive species were further tested for susceptibility to two different PVY strains in order to select the best model species. All tested wild potato relatives were shown to be tolerant to PVY, suggesting they do not possess any resistance genes against this virus. As presented in the manuscript, the system employing S. venturii (VNT366-2) and PVYN-GFP is the best choice for fast functional analysis of genes. Using the developed system, we have shown that StMKK6 has a role of positive regulator in potato defence against PVY. Additionally, a set of identified TRV-based VIGS responsive species could also serve as a general tool for functional analyses.
Plant materials and growth conditions
Set of wild potato relatives (wild Solanum species, Additional file 3) used in the studies is part of collection of WUR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands. Different Solanum tuberosum cultivars (Additional file 1) are part of the collection of National Institute of Biology, Slovenia. Nicotiana benthamiana was used in VIGS experiments as control of silencing. N. benthamiana plants were grown from seeds and kept in a growth chamber under controlled conditions (16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 22/20 °C respectively). In vitro potato plantlets of different Solanum species were propagated in sterile culture boxes containing MS medium supplemented with 3 % sucrose and 0.8 % agar and grown in a growth chamber under controlled conditions (16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 21/19 °C respectively). Two-week-old plantlets were transplanted into soil and moved to a greenhouse with 22/20 °C day/night temperature regime.
Plasmid constructs and transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens
The basic set of TRV VIGS vectors used in the studies was previously described . For PDS silencing we used the pTRV2:CaPDS that is based on pYL156 plasmid backbone with inserted 371-bp fragment (610–980 bp) of PDS gene from Capsicum annuum (GenBank accession X68058).
The full-length sequence of StWIPK was amplified from S. tuberosum cv. Rywal cDNA with the following primers: forward 5-ATGGTTGATGCTAATATGGGT-3 and reverse 5-GCACACAAGCTAGCACGAAC-3. The fragments were inserted into the pJET 1.2 blunt cloning vector (Thermo Scientific) and sequenced (GATC Biotech). For StWIPK silencing the 520-bp fragment (187–706 bp) was amplified from pJET plasmid harbouring StWIPK gene (GeneBank accession no. KP033231.1) with forward (5′-GAATTCTGAATGAGATGGTTGCAGTT-3′) and reverse (5′-TAAGCTCCATGAAGATGCAA-3′) primer. For StMKK6 silencing the 453-bp fragment (157–609 bp) was amplified from plasmid harbouring StMKK6 gene  (GeneBank accession no. KF837127.1) with forward (5′-GAATTCTGCCCTCAGAAACTAAGGAG-3′) and reverse (5′-TCCTTTGTGGTTCACTAGCA-3′) primer. In both cases forward primer harboured the EcoRI restriction site. The amplified fragments were inserted into the pJET 1.2 blunt cloning vector (Thermo Scientific) and sequenced (GATC Biotech). pJET plasmids harbouring StWIPK or StMKK6 fragment and empty pTRV2 plasmids were restricted with EcoRI (Gibco) and XbaI (Gibco) restriction enzymes and purified from agarose gel with Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega). Purified fragments were ligated into restricted pTRV2 with T4 DNA ligase (Fermentas). Resulting plasmids pTRV2:WIPK and pTRV2:MKK6 were sequenced (GATC Biotech) and introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation (Eppendorf Electroporator 2510) following manufacturer’s procedure with voltage set to 2000 V.
Phylogenetic tree of potato and its relatives was prepared with online Interactive phylogeny tool within SolRgene database (http://www.plantbreeding.wur.nl/SolRgenes/Phylogeny/species_select.php). In first step all the species were selected and in the second step the accessions used in our experiments were selected. 11 clones out of 73, which were used in our study for responsiveness to TRV silencing, were not available in the database and are therefore not included in the tree. Additionaly two S. lycopersicum and six S. tuberosum accessions were added to the phylogenetic tree to illustrate the relations of wild potato relatives to tomato and cultivated potato. A dendrogram [average linkage (UPGMA)] was created.
To check in silico whether the CaPDS construct (part of the sequence with GenBank accession number X68058.1) would have an effect on Solanum species, we have aligned different PDS sequences and checked the identity in comparison to CaPDS. The parts of sequences of PDS genes that were used were from S. tuberosum (GenBank accession number AY484445.1), S. nigrum (GenBank accession number EU434622.1) and N. benthamiana (GenBank accession number EU165355.1). Alignment was prepared and analysed with AlignX software (a component of Vector NTI Suite 9.0.0).
Agroinfiltration for TRV-based VIGS and inoculations with PVY
Plants, after being grown in soil for 7–10 days, were treated by co-infiltration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying pTRV1 and the various pTRV2 recombinants, in a 1:1 ratio as described by Du et al. . pTRV2:CaPDS and empty pTRV2 plasmids were used in initial experiments and later on as controls. For testing VIGS susceptibility of different potato cultivars three plants were tested for each cultivar and for wild potato species two plants were tested for each species.
Five plants of the wild potato relatives were inoculated with buffered suspension of PVYNTN (isolate NIB-NTN, GenBank accession number AJ585342) or PVYN-GFP (PVY N605-GFP ) infected plant sap 3 weeks after agroinfiltration with empty TRV vector or mock inoculated as described before [8, 45]. For experiments without prior agroinfiltration, three plants of each genotype were inoculated 4 weeks after they were transferred to soil. Samples (upper non-inoculated leaves) for RNA isolation (PVYNTN infected plants) were collected 14 days post inoculation (dpi) and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples for confocal microscope observation (PVYN-GFP infected plants) were collected 14 dpi and were stored in humid environment (petri dish with humid paper towel) until observed (maximum time from collection to observation was 4 h). For VIGS studies of StWIPK six biological replicates were used and four to six biological replicates (details in Additional file 6) for StMKK6. Upper non-inoculated leaves were sampled at different time points and observed under confocal microscope. For this purpose, leaves were cut and stored in humid environment until observed as described above.
RNA from the samples was isolated with innuPREP Plant RNA Kit and treated with DNAse (Invitrogen, USA; 0.1 U/Dnase per μg RNA) prior to reverse transcription. 1 μg of RNA was reversely transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Samples were analyzed in the set-up for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis as previously described , using TaqMan chemistry for determining the relative concentration of PVYNTN RNA  and cytochrome oxidase (Cox; ) as RNA load control. The transcript accumulation was normalized to that of Cox. The relative content of PVYNTN was calculated as follows: Cq value of Cox was subtracted from Cq value for PVY; the resulting value was used as exponential power on value 2; every value was finally divided by the minimum value. The resulting value was transformed with base 10 logarithm. Results were statistically evaluated using Two Way ANOVA in SigmaPlot 13.0 software. Two independent factors were considered in analysis: Genotype (individual species or clones) and Treatment (only PVY infection or PVY infection with prior agroinfiltration with empty TRV vector). The relative PVY RNA content was the dependent variable. For multiple comparison Tukey’s test was selected.
GFP and background chloroplast fluorescence were visualized with a Leica TCS SP5 laser-scanning microscope mounted on a Leica DMI 6000 CS inverted microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) with a HC PL FLUOTAR 10× objective and with Leica TCS LSI macroscope with Plan APO 1× or Plan APO 5× objective (Leica Microsystems, Germany). For excitation, the 488 nm laser line was used. Fluorescence emissions with wavelengths of 505–530 and 590–680 nm were collected simultaneously or sequentially through two channels. Images were processed by using Leica LAS AF Lite software (Leica Microsystems, Germany).
DD performed the experimental work, acquired the results, carried out the data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. AL and TS contributed to studies with StWIPK and StMKK6 and helped in writing the manuscript. VGAAV, KG and JŽ helped with experimental design and supervised the studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Dr. Richard R.G.F. Visser for providing the collection of wild potato relatives. We also thank Dr. Sabine Rosahl for providing NahG-Désirée potato plants and Dr. Andrej Blejec for help with statistical analysis. We would also like to acknowledge Gerard Bijsterbosch, Juan Du and Maja Jamnik for excellent technical assistance.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (Contract Numbers 1000-07-310032, J1-4268 and P4-0165), by COST Action FA0806 and Slovenian Society of Plant Biology.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Scholthof K-BG, Adkins S, Czosnek H, Palukaitis P, Jacquot E, Hohn T, Hohn B, Saunders K, Candresse T, Ahlquist P, Hemenway C, Foster GD. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;12:938–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitham SA, Yang C, Goodin MM. Global impact: elucidating plant responses to viral infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19:1207–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kogovšek P, Ravnikar M. Physiology of the potato–potato virus Y interaction. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Francis D, Cushman J, editors. Progress in Botany SE—3, vol. 74. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 101–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baebler Š, Stare K, Kovač M, Blejec A, Prezelj N, Stare T, Kogovšek P, Maruša P-N, Rosahl S, Ravnikar M, Gruden K. Dynamics of responses in compatible potato–potato virus Y interaction are modulated by salicylic acid. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e29009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gruden K, Pompe-Novak M, Baebler Š, Krečič-Stres H, Toplak N, Hren M, KogovŠek P, Gow L, Foster GD, Boonham N, Ravnikar M. Expression microarrays in plant–virus interaction. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;451:583–613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kogovšek P, Pompe-Novak M, Baebler Š, Rotter A, Gow L, Gruden K, Foster GD, Boonham N, Ravnikar M. Aggressive and mild potato virus Y isolates trigger different specific responses in susceptible potato plants. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:1121–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baebler Š, Witek K, Petek M, Stare K, Tušek-Žnidarič M, Pompe-Novak M, Renaut J, Szajko K, Strzelczyk-Żyta D, Marczewski W, Morgiewicz K, Gruden K, Hennig J. Salicylic acid is an indispensable component of the Ny-1 resistance-gene-mediated response against Potato virus Y infection in potato. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:1095–109.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baebler S, Krecic-Stres H, Rotter A, Kogovsek P, Cankar K, Kok EJ, Gruden K, Kovac M, Zel J, Pompe-Novak M, Ravnikar M. PVY(NTN) elicits a diverse gene expression response in different potato genotypes in the first 12 h after inoculation. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10:263–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baulcombe DC. Fast forward genetics based on virus-induced gene silencing. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999;2:109–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Unver T, Budak H. Virus-induced gene silencing, a post transcriptional gene silencing method. Int J Plant Genomics. 2009;2009:198680.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Faivre-Rampant O, Gilroy EM, Hrubikova K, Hein I, Millam S, Loake GJ, Birch P, Taylor M, Lacomme C. Potato virus X-induced gene silencing in leaves and tubers of potato. Plant Physiol. 2004;134:1308–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ratcliff F, Martin-Hernandez AM, Baulcombe DC. Technical advance: Tobacco rattle virus as a vector for analysis of gene function by silencing. Plant J. 2008;25:237–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brigneti G, Martín-Hernández AM, Jin H, Chen J, Baulcombe DC, Baker B, Jones JDG. Virus-induced gene silencing in Solanum species. Plant J. 2004;39:264–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du J, Tian Z, Liu J, Vleeshouwers VGAA, Shi X, Xie C. Functional analysis of potato genes involved in quantitative resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:957–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkes J. The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. London: Belhaven Press; 1990.Google Scholar
- Spooner DM, Berg RG van den, Rodrigues A, Bamberg JB, Hijmans RJ, Lara-Cabrera S. Wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota; Solanaceae) of North and Central America. BIS, Leerstoelgroep Biosystematiek, 30: The American Society of Plant Taxonomists; 2004 (Systematic Botany Monographs: 68).Google Scholar
- Berloo R, Hutten RCB, Eck HJ, Visser RGF. An online potato pedigree database resource. Potato Res. 2007;50:45–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs MM, van den Berg RG, Vleeshouwers VG, Visser M, Mank R, Sengers M, Hoekstra R, Vosman B. AFLP analysis reveals a lack of phylogenetic structure within Solanum section Petota. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:145.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vleeshouwers VGAA, Finkers R, Budding D, Visser M, Jacobs MMJ, van Berloo R, Pel M, Champouret N, Bakker E, Krenek P, Rietman H, Huigen D, Hoekstra R, Goverse A, Vosman B, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF. SolRgene: an online database to explore disease resistance genes in tuber-bearing Solanum species. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:116.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ishihama N, Yamada R, Yoshioka M, Katou S, Yoshioka H. Phosphorylation of the Nicotiana benthamiana WRKY8 transcription factor by MAPK functions in the defense response. Plant Cell. 2011;23:1153–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mase K, Mizuno T, Ishihama N, Fujii T, Mori H, Kodama M, Yoshioka H. Ethylene signaling pathway and MAPK cascades are required for AAL Toxin-induced programmed cell death. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25:1015–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samuel MA, Hall H, Krzymowska M, Drzewiecka K, Hennig J, Ellis BE. SIPK signaling controls multiple components of harpin-induced cell death in tobacco. Plant J. 2005;42:406–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seo S, Katou S, Seto H, Gomi K, Ohashi Y. The mitogen-activated protein kinases WIPK and SIPK regulate the levels of jasmonic and salicylic acids in wounded tobacco plants. Plant J. 2007;49:899–909.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yap Y, Kodama Y, Waller F, Chung KM, Ueda H, Nakamura K, Oldsen M, Yoda H, Yamaguchi Y, Sano H. Activation of a novel transcription factor through phosphorylation by WIPK, a wound-induced mitogen activated protein kinase in tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:127–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ahlfors R, Macioszek V, Rudd J, Brosché M, Schlichting R, Scheel D, Kangasjärvi J. Stress hormone-independent activation and nuclear translocation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana during ozone exposure. Plant J. 2004;40:512–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kovtun Y, Chiu WL, Tena G, Sheen J. Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2940–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gudesblat GE, Iusem ND, Morris PC. Guard cell-specific inhibition of Arabidopsis MPK3 expression causes abnormal stomatal responses to abscisic acid and hydrogen peroxide. New Phytol. 2007;173:713–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamel L-PP, Nicole M-CC, Sritubtim S, Morency M-JJ, Ellis M, Ehlting J, Beaudoin N, Barbazuk B, Klessig D, Lee J, Martin G, Mundy J, Ohashi Y, Scheel D, Sheen J, Xing T, Zhang S, Seguin A, Ellis BE. Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:192–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang Q, Hua J, Wang L, Xu B, Zhang H, Ye N, Zhang Z, Yu D, Cooke HJ, Zhang Y, Shi Q. MicroRNA and piRNA profiles in normal human testis detected by next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66809.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang H, Ngwenyama N, Liu Y, Walker JC, Zhang S. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:63–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- García-Marcos A, Pacheco R, Martiáñez J, González-Jara P, Díaz-Ruíz JR, Tenllado F. Transcriptional changes and oxidative stress associated with the synergistic interaction between potato virus X and potato virus Y and their relationship with symptom expression. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22:1431–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardin SC, Wolniak SM. Molecular cloning and characterization of maize ZmMEK1, a protein kinase with a catalytic domain homologous to mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase kinases. Planta. 1998;206:577–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardin SC, Wolniak SM. Expression of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase ZmMEK1 in the primary root of maize. Planta. 2001;213:916–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soyano T, Nishihama R, Morikiyo K, Ishikawa M, Machida Y. NQK1/NtMEK1 is a MAPKK that acts in the NPK1 MAPKKK-mediated MAPK cascade and is required for plant cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1055–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi Y, Soyano T, Kosetsu K, Sasabe M, MacHida Y. HINKEL kinesin, ANP MAPKKKs and MKK6/ANQ MAPKK, which phosphorylates and activates MPK4 MAPK, constitute a pathway that is required for cytokinesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51:1766–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu YY, Zhou Y, Liu L, Sun L, Zhang M, Liu YY, Li D. Maize ZmMEK1 is a single-copy gene. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:2957–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lazar A, Coll A, Dobnik D, Baebler S, Bedina-Zavec A, Zel J, Gruden K. Involvement of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) MKK6 in response to potato virus Y. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jin H, Liu Y, Yang K-YY, Kim CY, Baker B, Zhang S. Function of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in N gene-mediated resistance in tobacco. Plant J. 2003;33:719–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Involvement of MEK1 MAPKK, NTF6 MAPK, WRKY/MYB transcription factors, COI1 and CTR1 in N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant J. 2004;38:800–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Ren D, Pike S, Pallardy S, Gassmann W, Zhang S. Chloroplast-generated reactive oxygen species are involved in hypersensitive response-like cell death mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Plant J. 2007;51:941–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halim VA, Hunger A, Macioszek V, Landgraf P, Nürnberger T, Scheel D, Rosahl S. The oligopeptide elicitor Pep-13 induces salicylic acid-dependent and -independent defense reactions in potato. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2004;64:311–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobnik D, Baebler S, Kogovšek P, Pompe-Novak M, Stebih D, Panter G, Janež N, Morisset D, Zel J, Gruden K. β-1,3-Glucanase class III promotes spread of PVY(NTN) and improves in planta protein production. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2013;7:547–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1992;43:599–626.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pompe-Novak M, Gruden K, Baebler Š, Krečič-Stres H, Kovač M, Jongsma M, Ravnikar M. Potato virus Y induced changes in the gene expression of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;67:237–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rupar M, Faurez F, Tribodet M, Gutiérrez-Aguirre I, Delaunay A, Glais L, Kriznik M, Dobnik D, Gruden K, Jacquot E, Ravnikar M. Fluorescently tagged potato virus Y: a versatile tool for functional analysis of plant–virus interactions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015;28:739–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S, Klessig DF. Resistance gene N-mediated de novo synthesis and activation of a tobacco mitogen-activated protein kinase by tobacco mosaic virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7433–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S, Klessig DF. The tobacco wounding-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase is encoded by SIPK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7225–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kishi-Kaboshi M, Okada K, Kurimoto L, Murakami S, Umezawa T, Shibuya N, Yamane H, Miyao A, Takatsuji H, Takahashi A, Hirochika H. A rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade regulates metabolic flow to antimicrobial metabolite synthesis. Plant J. 2010;63:599–612.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Melech-Bonfil S, Sessa G. Tomato MAPKKKε is a positive regulator of cell-death signaling networks associated with plant immunity. Plant J. 2010;64:379–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Jin H, Yang K-Y, Kim CY, Baker B, Zhang S. Interaction between two mitogen-activated protein kinases during tobacco defense signaling. Plant J. 2003;34:149–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alazem M, Lin N-S. Roles of plant hormones in the regulation of host–virus interactions. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16:529–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brodersen P, Petersen M, Bjørn Nielsen H, Zhu S, Newman M-A, Shokat KM, Rietz S, Parker J, Mundy J. Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid/ethylene-dependent responses via EDS1 and PAD4. Plant J. 2006;47:532–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen M, Brodersen P, Naested H, Andreasson E, Lindhart U, Johansen B, Nielsen HB, Lacy M, Austin MJ, Parker JE, Sharma SB, Klessig DF, Martienssen R, Mattsson O, Jensen AB, Mundy J. Arabidopsis map kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell. 2000;103:1111–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- del Pozo O, Pedley KF, Martin GB. MAPKKKalpha is a positive regulator of cell death associated with both plant immunity and disease. EMBO J. 2004;23:3072–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J. 2002;31:777–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du J, Rietman H, Vleeshouwers VGAA. Agroinfiltration and PVX agroinfection in potato and Nicotiana benthamiana. J Vis Exp. 2014;83:e50971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hren M, Nikolić P, Rotter A, Blejec A, Terrier N, Ravnikar M, Dermastia M, Gruden K. “Bois noir” phytoplasma induces significant reprogramming of the leaf transcriptome in the field grown grapevine. BMC Genom. 2009;10:460.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kogovšek P, Gow L, Pompe-Novak M, Gruden K, Foster GD, Boonham N, Ravnikar M. Single-step RT real-time PCR for sensitive detection and discrimination of potato virus Y isolates. J Virol Methods. 2008;149:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weller SA, Elphinstone JG, Smith NC, Boonham N, Stead DE. Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:2853–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar