Skip to main content
Fig. 7 | Plant Methods

Fig. 7

From: Monitoring of drought stress and transpiration rate using proximal thermal and hyperspectral imaging in an indoor automated plant phenotyping platform

Fig. 7

Relationship between measured and predicted transpiration rate (E). E was measured with a portable LICOR infrared gas analyzer. (A) The first row visualizes the test prediction accuracy of thermal infrared (TIR) index-based models (CTDout, CWSITa_out, and Tdry-Tp), while the second row shows the performance of these indices when they are combined with environmental data not included in the index (Table 4). The third row contains two figures that show the accuracy of models that combine one TIR index (CTDout or CWSITa_out) with environmental data and hyperspectral indices (RMP1483/1430, WBI). This type of model was not created for the Tdry-Tp index, as hyperspectral indices did not significantly contribute to this model (Chi-square test, P < 0.05). (B) Prediction accuracy of the LASSO, RF and PLSR models that combine multiple TIR indices with hyperspectral wavelengths and/or environmental data. The semi-transparent black dots represent the predicted and measured E of the 100 bootstrap samples, while the black line shows the one-to-one relationship. The test RMSE and R2 are added to each scatterplot

Back to article page