Table 2 Soybean Welch’s t-test results
Metrics | 1 vs 4 dpi | 1 vs 6 dpi | 4 vs 6dpi |
|---|---|---|---|
CM height mock | 0.796 | \(\mathbf {9.12e-3}\) | \(\mathbf {3.40e-3}\) |
CM height WS | \(\mathbf {1.17e-9}\) | \(\mathbf {1.18e-16}\) | \(\mathbf {1.41e-7}\) |
CM distance mock | \(\mathbf {1.8e-6}\) | \(\mathbf {4.83e-6}\) | 0.797 |
CM distance WS | \(\mathbf {7.18e-5}\) | 0.160 | \(\mathbf {3.54e-3}\) |
Plant area mock\(^*\) | \(\mathbf {2.0e-6}^*\) | \(\mathbf {2.72e-4}^*\) | \(\mathbf {0.0106}^*\) |
Plant Area WS\(^*\) | \(\mathbf {3.72e-3}^*\) | \(\mathbf {4.90e-5}^*\) | \(\mathbf {4.30e-8}^*\) |
Plant height mock | 0.968 | 0.081 | \(\mathbf {0.047}\) |
Plant height WS | \(\mathbf {2.56e-4}\) | \(\mathbf {8.4e-7}\) | \(\mathbf {0.048}\) |
Plant width mock | \(\mathbf {8.89e-4}\) | \(\mathbf {3.05e-7}\) | \(\mathbf {8.66e-3}\) |
Plant width WS | 0.190 | \(\mathbf {0.024}\) | \(\mathbf {2.29e-3}\) |
\(H_{90}\) Mock | \(\mathbf {2.29e-4}\) | \(\mathbf {5.18e-7}\) | \(\mathbf {0.013}\) |
\(H_{90}\) WS | \(\mathbf {0.022}\) | 0.895 | 0.065 |
\(V_{90}\) Mock | 0.867 | \(\mathbf {1.94e-3}\) | \(\mathbf {1.52e-3}\) |
\(V_{90}\) WS | \(\mathbf {7.91e-7}\) | \(\mathbf {4.39e-11}\) | \(\mathbf {6.05e-4}\) |