Skip to main content

Table 1 Advantages and disadvantages of techniques that study DNA-binding proteins

From: DNA–protein interaction studies: a historical and comparative analysis

Technique [References]

Technique

Applications

Case studies

Pros

Cons

Filter binding assay [12, 16,17,18]

Inexpensive and easy

The interaction may not withstand the filtration process

Impossible to recover the resulting products

Identify nucleic acid–protein interactions

Prabu et al. [45]

EMSA [3, 18]

Fast and easy

Powerful and sensitive

Semi-quantitative

 

Identify nucleic acid–protein interactions

Identify complexes in a cell/tissue extract

Liu et al. [46]

Cross-linking [3, 22]

UV cross-linking is not invasive and does not practically disturb the molecular structures

Laser cross-linking is simple and fast and decreases the probability of damaging the molecular structures

Formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and UV standard cross-linking methods are non-specific

Identifies the molecules that participate in a DNA–protein complex, even though some of them may not be directly in contact with the DNA

 

EMSA combined with Western Blotting techniques [2, 18, 38]

Immunoblotting analysis combined with EMSA performs only one diffusion blotting

Electrophoretic ‘supershift’ assay only uses one gel and does not need any diffusion blotting

All variants are relatively fast and easy

Electrophoretic ‘supershift’ assay requires the purification of the antibody preparation

Shift-Western Blotting involves two blotting membranes

Detect if a certain protein is present in a nucleic acid–protein complex (electrophoretic ‘supershift’ assay) and estimate its size (shift-Western Blotting and immunoblotting analysis combined with EMSA)

Identify the nucleic acid–binding proteins that link to a certain nucleic acid and estimate their molecular weight (2D electrophoresis (EMSA + SDS-PAGE) and South-Western Blotting)

Wang et al. [47]

In vivo analysis: Y1H and PTA [42, 44]

EMSA and in vitro binding with a cell extract using mutated probes are quick and easy

Y1H and PTA provide reliable results and are relatively direct and sensitive

Y1H is quick

PTA takes a long time to be performed and involves several steps

Determine if a certain TF binds to a given sequence in vivo

Liu et al. [46]