Skip to main content

Table 3 Performances of GLCM, LBP, and LPQ texture features for wood identification

From: Computer vision-based wood identification and its expansion and contribution potentials in wood science: A review

References

Database

Image type

#SP/#IMG

Classifier

Classification rate (%)

GLCM

LBP

LPQ

Prasetiyo et al. [147]

CAIRO

Stereo

25/2390

ANN

89.6

93.6

–

Martins et al. [47]

UFPR

Micro

112/2240

SVM

55.3

79.3

–

Kobayashi et al. [66]

–

XCT

6/240

k-NN

98.3

99.5

–

Cavalin et al. [115]

UFPR

Micro

112/2240

SVM

80.7

88.5

91.5

Paula Filho et al. [62]

UFPR

Macro

41/2942

SVM

56.0

68.2

61.8

Martins et al. [95]

UFPR

Micro

112/2240

SVM

4.1

66.3

86.7

Yadav et al. [122]

UFPR

Micro

75/1500

SVM

–

79.9

93.5

da Silva et al. [71]

RMCA

Micro

77/1221

k-NN (k = 1)

–

85.0

87.4

  1. Stereo stereogram, Macro macroscopic image, Micro micrograph, XCT X-ray computed tomographic image, #SP number of species, #IMG number of images, ANN artificial neural network, SVM support vector machine, k-NN k-nearest neighbors