Table 4 Comparison of different detection methods
From: Early real-time detection algorithm of tomato diseases and pests in the natural environment
Detection methods | F1 score (%) | Average precision (%) | Missing rate (%) | Time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOG + SVM | 64.45 | 60.55 | 31.7 | 7497 |
Faster-RCNN | 89.04 | 86.49 | 14.5 | 4459 |
SSD | 88.45 | 85.51 | 16.9 | 447 |
YOLOv3 | 91.43 | 87.62 | 7.7 | 54 |
The proposed method | 94.77 | 91.81 | 2.1 | 55 |