Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 The concentration of minerals in grafted samples

From: Methods for grafting Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema salsugineum

Grafts Ion
Potassium Sodium Calcium Magnesium Iron Zinc
A/A-shoot 12,858.32 ± 931.80 1204.88 ± 80.59 36,524.40 ± 874.03 7420.49 ± 435.10 141.77 ± 14.42 38.94 ± 3.21
A/E-shoot 10,106.16 ± 1205.97d** 1397.9 ± 247.91 39,942.75 ± 202.28 6138.81 ± 461.11 135.00 ± 20.06 35.38 ± 1.70
E/A-shoot 14,868.31 ± 695.20 707.89 ± 24.66 37,169.66 ± 1662.76 4276.28 ± 546.09 118.95 ± 34.96 25.63 ± 1.49
E/E-shoot 12,406.83 ± 749.57a* 893.8 ± 95.48 27,259.93 ± 1500.16a* 3777.52 ± 421.56 121.62 ± 20.87 41.69 ± 3.55a**
A/A-root 10,171.13 ± 528.54b* 1396.41 ± 60.72b* 2818.28 ± 168.40b* 833.00 ± 20.42b** 300.34 ± 12.82b* 12.42 ± 2.07b**
E/A-root 7569.79 ± 531.27 1709.06 ± 133.45 3120.19 ± 964.76 618.87 ± 61.50 375.73 ± 22.73 32.06 ± 3.22
A/E-root 7748.17 ± 409.96 1528.33 ± 160.85 3328.57 ± 497.91 1700.96 ± 116.09 197.54 ± 27.08 21.87 ± 3.73
E/E-root 4163.79 ± 210.98c** 861.3 ± 46.00c** 2617.92 ± 458.93c* 1523.01 ± 160.50 196.75 ± 10.20 43.02 ± 6.34c*
  1. Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
  2. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
  3. aE/A-shoot compare with E/E-shoot; bE/A-Root compare with A/A-Root; cA/E-Root compare with E/E-Root; dA/A-shoot compare with A/E-shoot