Skip to main content

Table 3 The concentration of minerals in grafted samples

From: Methods for grafting Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema salsugineum

Grafts

Ion

Potassium

Sodium

Calcium

Magnesium

Iron

Zinc

A/A-shoot

12,858.32 ± 931.80

1204.88 ± 80.59

36,524.40 ± 874.03

7420.49 ± 435.10

141.77 ± 14.42

38.94 ± 3.21

A/E-shoot

10,106.16 ± 1205.97d**

1397.9 ± 247.91

39,942.75 ± 202.28

6138.81 ± 461.11

135.00 ± 20.06

35.38 ± 1.70

E/A-shoot

14,868.31 ± 695.20

707.89 ± 24.66

37,169.66 ± 1662.76

4276.28 ± 546.09

118.95 ± 34.96

25.63 ± 1.49

E/E-shoot

12,406.83 ± 749.57a*

893.8 ± 95.48

27,259.93 ± 1500.16a*

3777.52 ± 421.56

121.62 ± 20.87

41.69 ± 3.55a**

A/A-root

10,171.13 ± 528.54b*

1396.41 ± 60.72b*

2818.28 ± 168.40b*

833.00 ± 20.42b**

300.34 ± 12.82b*

12.42 ± 2.07b**

E/A-root

7569.79 ± 531.27

1709.06 ± 133.45

3120.19 ± 964.76

618.87 ± 61.50

375.73 ± 22.73

32.06 ± 3.22

A/E-root

7748.17 ± 409.96

1528.33 ± 160.85

3328.57 ± 497.91

1700.96 ± 116.09

197.54 ± 27.08

21.87 ± 3.73

E/E-root

4163.79 ± 210.98c**

861.3 ± 46.00c**

2617.92 ± 458.93c*

1523.01 ± 160.50

196.75 ± 10.20

43.02 ± 6.34c*

  1. Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
  2. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
  3. aE/A-shoot compare with E/E-shoot; bE/A-Root compare with A/A-Root; cA/E-Root compare with E/E-Root; dA/A-shoot compare with A/E-shoot