Skip to main content

Table 2 Advantages and inconveniences of methods, alternative to portable MRI, used to measure water content, plant structure, xylem and phloem fluxes, and cavitation

From: Towards portable MRI in the plant sciences

Parameter measured

Method

Advantages

Disadvantages

Anatomy

Microscopy

Affordable; easy to perform; high spatial resolution (from a few hundredths of a nanometer for electronic to a couple of tenths of a micrometer for optic)

Destructive; Limited to laboratory; only a small portion of sample can be observed at once

X-ray (µ)radiography

High spatial (~ 50–100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive

Limited to laboratory; possible impact of ionizing radiation; expensive; not easily accessible

Neutron radiography

High spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive; adapted to dense materials

Limited to laboratory; expensive; not easily accessible; possible impact of neutron radiation on plant tissue; limited to plants that fit in a thin container

Dye tracing

Affordable; easy to perform; portable

Destructive

Air-coupled ultrasound

Non-invasive; high temporal resolution (a few seconds per scan); easy to perform; affordable; portable

Indirect; large variation in results

Laser-based guided waves

High temporal resolution (~ a few seconds per scan); easy to perform; portable

Indirect; large variation in results; laser beam can cause tissue damage

High-field MRI

Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution

Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape

Water content

Fresh weight/Dry weight

Affordable; Easy to perform

Limited to laboratory; Destructive; time consuming (overnight drying required)

NIRS

Non-invasive; portable; affordable; easy to perform

Indirect, results must be interpreted through models (problem of genericity); calibration particularities for a given species and/or context; limited to outermost layers of sample

THz spectroscopy

Non-invasive; easy to perform; affordable; portable

Indirect; results must be interpreted through models; limited to outermost layers of sample

High-field MRI

Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution

Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape

Xylem flux

Sap flow meters

Portable; affordable; easy to perform

Invasive; limited to organs with sufficient diameter

Porometers

Portable; affordable; easy to perform

Indirect, large margin of error in estimating sap flow due to variation between leaves

2D light transmission

Non-invasive; affordable; spatial resolution (~ 200–500 μm), offers real-time data on water uptake by roots

Indirect, limited to laboratory; limited to certain plants that fit in a thin container and sandy soil; no other light sources than the instrument during measurement

Gravimetric

Affordable; portable; easy to perform; non-invasive

Indirect

Isotopic tracing

Portable

Destructive; results must be interpreted through models; can be expensive (cost of radiotracers and mass spectroscopy analyses)

Dye tracing

Affordable; easy to perform; portable

Destructive

High-field MRI

Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution

Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape

Phloem flux

Aphids

Affordable

Limited to laboratory; Indirect, limited to certain plant species; approximative with large margin of error; can be complicated to execute

11C PET imaging

Non-invasive; sufficient spatial resolution to capture water dynamics (a couple of millimeters) and high temporal (a few minutes) resolution

Limited to laboratory; expensive and cumbersome equipment; possible impact of ionizing radiation

High-field MRI

Non-invasive, high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution

Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape

Cavitation

Acoustic emissions

Portable; easy to perform; affordable

Indirect, more qualitative than quantitative, can be destructive

Dye tracing

Affordable; easy to perform; portable

Destructive

Xylem Embolism Meter

Affordable; easy to perform

Indirect, Destructive; limited to laboratory; not suitable for very small (fine roots) or large samples (> 10 cm diameter)

Microscopy

Affordable; easy to perform; high spatial resolution (from a few hundredths of a nanometer for electronic to a couple of tenths of a micrometer for optic)

Destructive; Limited to laboratory; only a small portion of sample can be observed at once

X-ray (µ)radiography

High spatial (~ 50–100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive

Limited to laboratory; possible impact of ionizing radiation; expensive; not easily accessible

Neutron radiography

High spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive; adapted to dense materials

Limited to laboratory; expensive; not easily accessible; possible impact of neutron radiation on plant tissue; limited to plants that fit in a thin container

High-field MRI

Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution

Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape