From: Comparison of three genomic DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from maize
# | Sample ID | User name | Nucleic acid conc. | Unit | A260 | A280 | 260/280 | 260/230 | Sample type | Factor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Probe 1_1 | M10 1st elution | 386.9 | ng/µL | 7.737 | 3.733 | 2.07 | 2.28 | DNA | 50.00 |
2 | Probe 1′_1 | M10 2nd elution | 63.2 | ng/µL | 1.265 | 0.610 | 2.07 | 3.27 | DNA | 50.00 |
3 | Probe 2_1 | M321 1st elution | 198.3 | ng/µL | 3.966 | 1.942 | 2.04 | 2.36 | DNA | 50.00 |
4 | Probe 2′_1 | M321 2nd elution | 123.0 | ng/µL | 2.460 | 1.215 | 2.02 | 2.45 | DNA | 50.00 |
5 | Probe 1_2 | M10 1st elution, liquid N | 75.9 | ng/µL | 1.518 | 0.735 | 2.07 | 2.56 | DNA | 50.00 |
6 | Probe 1′_2 | M10 2nd elution, liquid N | 8.7 | ng/µL | 0.175 | 0.098 | 1.78 | −8.55 | DNA | 50.00 |
7 | Probe 2_2 | M321 1st elution, liquid N | 35.2 | ng/µL | 0.704 | 0.356 | 1.98 | 2.18 | DNA | 50.00 |
8 | Probe 2′_2 | M321 2nd elution, liquid N2 | 11.1 | ng/µL | 0.221 | 0.114 | 1.93 | 4.28 | DNA | 50.00 |