Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of differences between locations or tactics for all response variables

From: Accounting for variation in designing greenhouse experiments with special reference to greenhouses containing plants on conveyor systems

Day 21

  

Location

   

North-west

North-east

South-east

Total area

Predicted averageab

 

7.562

7.031

6.828

(1000 pixels)

Standard errorc

 

0.2558

0.2786

0.3153

 

CV (%)d

 

19.3

20.3

25.8

Day 51

 

Tactic

  

Bench

Same lane

Half lane

Next lane

Total area

Predicted averageab

71.62

68.90

80.78

59.06

(1000 pixels)

Standard errors c

2.383

2.421

2.711

1.827

 

CV (%)d

28.2

29.8

28.5

26.3

Fresh weight

Predicted averageab

4.626

4.784

4.591

3.207

(g)

Standard errors c

0.1803

0.1946

0.2040

0.1523

 

CV (%)d

22.7

24.3

26.9

26.4

Height

Predicted averageab

37.79

39.01

38.30

37.01

(cm)

Standard errors c

0.567

0.493

0.649

0.663

 

CV (%)d

8.9

7.2

10.5

11.2

Density index

Predicted averageab

1.931

1.812

2.109

1.646

(1000 pixels / cm)

Standard errors c

0.068

 

CV (%)d

30.9

  1. aAn approximate LSD (5%) for total area on day 21 is 0.804; an approximate LSD (5%) for total area on day 51 is 6.67, for fresh weight is 0.520 and for height is 1.69; an exact LSD for the density index is 0.193.
  2. bThe predictions are for the average value at the centre of a row or lane.
  3. cThe standard errors give an indication of the variability of the predicted averages, but LSDs are required to judge whether pairs of predicted averages are different. The standard errors are proportional to the fitted standard deviations for the different locations/tactics.
  4. dThe coefficients of variation (CV) measure the variability of individual plants.