Skip to main content

Table 2 ANOVA, broad sense heritability (\({\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{b}}^{2}\)) and Expected Genetic Advance (EGA) in drought stress experiment

From: A novel selection model based on multivariate methods and arbitrary genetic parameters: a case study on tomato families

S.O.V

DF

Mean of squares

DTF

DFF

DTH

H

CN

FN

Yld

SFW

SFV

Replication

2

218.690

211.480

14.368a

227.468

30.037

1.803

8475.547

85.938

235.887

Families

56

134.679a

125.251b

44.377b

2375.152

1591.293

124.455

999824.592b

406.842

18095.968b

Error

112

80.589

73.366

4.577

3293.174

1991.688

154.764

112924.005

397.958

306.065

\({\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{b}}^{2}\)

–

0.402

0.414

0.897

 ~ 0

 ~ 0

 ~ 0

0.887

0.022

0.983

EGA%

–

8.003

6.334

5.150

 ~ 0

 ~ 0

 ~ 0

50.721

0.775

147.304

S.O.V

DF

Mean of squares

FD

FWC

SPAD

pH

EC

TDS

Sal

TSS

RWC

Replication

2

0.017

31.146a

54.415a

0.271

0.833

0.228

0.289

1.718

0.006

Families

56

0.657b

90.521b

157.793b

2.969b

9.003b

2.512b

3.134b

18.659b

0.036b

Error

112

0.014

9.696

16.842

0.329

1.011

0.277

0.349

2.081

0.010

\({\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{b}}^{2}\)

–

0.978

0.893

0.893

0.889

0.888

0.890

0.889

0.888

0.720

EGA%

–

82.017

26.680

20.235

39.370

47.776

47.313

47.531

64.804

22.042

  1. a, b means significant in 5% and 1% probability level, respectively
  2. DTF Number of days to 50% flowering, DFF Number of days to 50% fruit formation, DTH Number of days to harvesting, H plant height, CN cluster number per plant, FN fruit number per plant, Yld fruit yield per plan, SFW average of single fruit weight, SFV average of single fruit volume, FD fruit density, FWC fruit water content, SPAD relative chlorophyll content, pH fruit juice acidity, EC fruit juice electrical conductivity, TDS total dissolved solids, Sal; fruit juice salinity, TSS total soluble solids, RWC relative water content