A method for rapid and homogenous initiation of post-harvest physiological deterioration in cassava storage roots identifies Indonesian cultivars with improved shelf-life performance

Zainuddin, Ima M.; Lecart, Brieuc; Sudarmonowati, Enny; Vanderschuren, Hervé

doi:10.1186/s13007-022-00977-w

Plant Methods

Table 2 PPD scores of 28 Indonesian cassava cultivars

From: A method for rapid and homogenous initiation of post-harvest physiological deterioration in cassava storage roots identifies Indonesian cultivars with improved shelf-life performance

No.	Cultivars	Level of greyness (PPD Score)				%contaminated roots at 7 dph %	Average PPD Score	PPD status	Cluster
No.	Cultivars	0 or 1 dph	2 dph	4 dph	7 dph	%contaminated roots at 7 dph %	Average PPD Score	PPD status	Cluster
1	Manggu	0.15 ± 0.02	0.15± 0.06	0.18 ± 0.06	0.21 ± 0.07	11	0.17	delayed	1
2	MentegaII	0.13 ± 0.02	0.16 ± 0.03	0.21 ± 0.08	0.22 ± 0.07	0	0.18	delayed	1
3	Kristal Merah	0.14 ± 0.01	0.18 ± 0.09	0.25 ± 0.1	0.27 ± 0.13	0	0.21	delayed	1
4	Valenca	0.12 ± 0.02	0.21 ± 0.1	0.28 ± 0.09	0.24 ± 0.06	0	0.21	delayed	1
5	Baros Kencana	0.2 ± 0.02	0.23 ± 0.06	0.23 ± 0.02	0.22 ± 0.04	0	0.22	delayed	2
6	Gebang	0.19 ± 0.03	0.21 ± 0.06	0.24 ± 0.03	0.28 ± 0.05	0	0.23	delayed	2
7	AdiraIV	0.18 ± 0.01	0.2 ± 0.02	0.27 ± 0.12	0.28 ± 0.06	0	0.23	delayed	2
8	Apuy	0.18 ± 0.02	0.22 ± 0.02	0.29 ± 0.08	0.27 ± 0.07	0	0.24	delayed	2
9	Roti	0.17 ± 0.01	0.18 ± 0.01	0.33 ± 0.15	0.28 ± 0.09	0	0.24	delayed	2
10	Darul Hidayah	0.19 ± 0.03	0.26 ± 0.09	0.28 ± 0.04	0.31 ± 0.07	17	0.26	delayed	2
11	Lokal Nguneng	0.13 ± 0.02	0.24 ± 0.19	0.33 ± 0.08	0.18 ± 0.05	50	0.22	intermediate	3
12	Randu	0.11 ± 0.01	0.2 ± 0.1	0.35 ± 0.15	0.3 ± 0.14	33	0.24	intermediate	3
13	Lelen	0.14 ± 0.02	0.26 ± 0.1	0.41 ± 0.13	0.2 ± 0.11	50	0.25	intermediate	3
14	Menti	0.16 ± 0.01	0.16 ± 0.02	0.37 ± 0.11	0.33 ± 0.11	17	0.26	intermediate	4
15	Ubi Kuning	0.15 ± 0.02	0.21 ± 0.07	0.34 ± 0.08	0.34 ± 0.12	0	0.26	intermediate	4
16	AdiraI	0.13 ± 0.03	0.14 ± 0.01	0.28 ± 0.15	0.5 ± 0.17	0	0.26	intermediate	4
17	Malang II	0.12 ± 0	0.25 ± 0.12	0.32 ± 0.09	0.4 ± 0.09	40	0.27	intermediate	4
18	Rengganis	0.14 ± 0.02	0.27 ± 0.13	0.36 ± 0.21	0.42 ± 0.11	20	0.30	early	5
19	Kristal Putih	0.14 ± 0.01	0.34 ± 0.04	0.38 ± 0.16	0.4 ± 0.17	0	0.32	early	5
20	Gempol	0.17 ± 0.01	0.33 ± 0.11	0.41 ± 0.13	0.36 ± 0.1	0	0.32	early	5
21	Malang VI	0.17 ± 0.01	0.4 ± 0.12	0.4 ± 0.1	0.37 ± 0.06	33	0.34	early	5
22	Sentul	0.17 ± 0.03	0.33 ± 0.1	0.47 ± 0.14	0.39 ± 0.1	33	0.34	early	5
23	MentegaI	0.14 ± 0.02	0.24 ± 0.09	0.44 ± 0.12	0.32 ± 0.19	0	0.29	early	6
24	Baturaja	0.16 ± 0.05	0.24 ± 0.13	0.4 ± 0.07	0.4 ± 0.11	10	0.30	early	6
25	BIC302	0.14 ± 0.01	0.27 ± 0.13	0.46 ± 0.06	0.46 ± 0.06	0	0.33	early	7
26	Tali	0.15 ± 0.02	0.3 ± 0.07	0.52 ± 0.11	0.5 ± 0.09	33	0.37	early	7
27	Ubi Putih	0.15 ± 0.01	0.4 ± 0.07	0.49 ± 0.07	0.45 ± 0.13	0	0.37	early	7
28	Vandemir	0.14 ± 0.01	0.47 ± 0.11	0.49 ± 0.14	0.55 ± 0.05	11	0.41	early	7

All evaluated cultivars were ranked based on the average PPD score. The pattern of PPD development within 7 dph was divided into seven groups (Additional file 2: Figure S2). The number of biological replicates per cultivar per time point: Additional file 1: Data S4

Back to article page

ISSN: 1746-4811

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com