Skip to main content

Table 3 ArsenicNetPlus method versus other methods on cassava dataset using 7-fold cross-validation

From: Pseudo high-frequency boosts the generalization of a convolutional neural network for cassava disease detection

Method

Accuracy (%)

Recall (%)

Precision (%)

Loss

F1-score (%)

ArsenicNetPlus

\(95.93\)

\(95.91\)

\(95.98\)

1.244

\(95.94\)

V2-Resnet-101

\(86.90\)

\(86.80\)

\(87.02\)

0.779

\(86.92\)

EfficientNet-B5

\(92.43\)

\(92.37\)

\(92.46\)

1.469

\(92.42\)

AlexNet

\(62.46\)

\(61.98\)

\(62.94\)

2.718

\(62.46\)

RepVGG-B3g4

\(93.08\)

\(93.07\)

\(93.14\)

0.347

\(93.11\)