Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison between the chalkiness segmentation results of the weakly supervised approaches Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++ and Score CAM with ResNet-101 as backbone on polished rice

From: Deep learning based high-throughput phenotyping of chalkiness in rice exposed to high night temperature

Approach

GT-known Loc. Acc. (%)

Loc. Acc. (%)

Avg. IoU (%)

Layer

T (%)

Grad-CAM

84.43

84.13

68.11

layer2_0_conv2

60

Grad-CAM++

48.19

48.19

43.98

layer2_0_conv2

60

Score-CAM

68.07

66.87

55.02

layer2_2_conv3

60

  1. Only 166 chalky seed images in the polished test set were used for chalkiness segmentation evaluation. Performance is reported using the following metrics: Ground-Truth Localization Accuracy (GT-known Loc. Acc.), which represents the fraction of ground-truth chalky seed images with \(\text{ IoU } \ge 0.5\); Localization Accuracy (Loc. Acc.), which represents the fraction of ground-truth chalky images, with \(\text{ IoU } \ge 0.5\), correctly predicted by the model; Average IoU (Avg. IoU), which represents the average IoU for the set of chalky seed images. To calculate the IoU, the mask of the predicted chalkiness is obtained using a threshold \(T=60\%\) of the maximum pixel intensity. The last two columns show the layer that was used for generating the heatmap and the threshold used to binarize the heatmap when calculating IoU, respectively