Skip to main content

Table 10 Percentage chalkiness area and chalkiness score were obtained for individual seeds randomly selected across treatments and genotypes

From: Deep learning based high-throughput phenotyping of chalkiness in rice exposed to high night temperature

Chalkiness (% area) Main panicle Primary panicle Other panicle
CNT HNT CNT HNT CNT HNT
CO-39 7.54 \(\pm 0.8\) 8.17 \(\pm 1.0\) 6.95 \(\pm 0.6\) 7.73 \(\pm 0.3\) 8.00 \(\pm 1.8\) 7.19 \(\pm 1.1\)
IR1561 13.35 \(\pm 2.5\) 16.22 \(\pm 3.0\) 8.21 \(\pm 0.2\) 16.37 \(\pm 2.4\) 8.52 \(\pm 1.1\) 12.35 \(\pm 1.2\)
IR-22 8.02 \(\pm 0.8\) 6.33 \(\pm 0.5\) 9.36 \(\pm 2.2\) 5.27 \(\pm 0.5\) 5.89 \(\pm 0.9\) 5.30 \(\pm 0.6\)
Kati 7.39 \(\pm 0.7\) 7.44 \(\pm 0.4\) 13.56 \(\pm 1.2\) 10.34 \(\pm 2.5\) 14.32 \(\pm 1.9\) 10.70 \(\pm 2.5\)
Oryzica 10.61 \(\pm 1.4\) 10.75 \(\pm 1.8\) 5.32 \(\pm 0.5\) 5.64 \(\pm 0.6\) 5.05 \(\pm 0.6\) 4.83 \(\pm 1.4\)
WAS-174 7.25 \(\pm 2.0\) 5.76 \(\pm 1.7\) 5.91 \(\pm 0.4\) 9.39 \(\pm 2.6\) 4.44 \(\pm 0.8\) 12.81 \(\pm 1.4\)
Chalkiness score CNT HNT CTN HNT CTN HNT
CO-39 0.07518 \(\pm 0.008\) 0.06827 \(\pm 0.009\) 0.07157 \(\pm 0.004\) 0.07780 \(\pm 0.003\) 0.07449 \(\pm 0.016\) 0.07119 \(\pm 0.010\)
IR1561 0.10415 \(\pm 0.015\) 0.12933 \(\pm 0.026\) 0.07026 \(\pm 0.002\) 0.14653 \(\pm 0.032\) 0.07006 \(\pm 0.006\) 0.11615 \(\pm 0.012\)
IR-22 0.07276 \(\pm 0.003\) 0.06294 \(\pm 0.006\) 0.09692 \(\pm 0.017\) 0.05694 \(\pm 0.006\) 0.05916 \(\pm 0.012\) 0.05686 \(\pm 0.007\)
Kati 0.09238 \(\pm 0.009\) 0.09252 \(\pm 0.002\) 0.17087 \(\pm 0.017\) 0.13309 \(\pm 0.032\) 0.16940 \(\pm 0.018\) 0.13586 \(\pm 0.029\)
Oryzica 0.14890 \(\pm 0.024\) 0.16370 \(\pm 0.029\) 0.08302 \(\pm 0.011\) 0.08862 \(\pm 0.006\) 0.07928 \(\pm 0.014\) 0.08246 \(\pm 0.026\)
WAS-174 0.09386 \(\pm 0.024\) 0.07700 \(\pm 0.023\) 0.08449 \(\pm 0.005\) 0.13393 \(\pm 0.038\) 0.06039 \(\pm 0.011\) 0.18932 \(\pm 0.018\)
  1. A three-way analysis of variance for these traits (Chalkiness Area (%) and Score) were performed under completely randomized design (CRD) using PROC GLM procedure in SAS. Means were separated using HSD (Tukey’s Studentized Range ) test at p = 0.05. Table includes mean and ± SEM for three way comparison. Chalkiness area (%) was significantly affected by genotype (G) (\(p<0.001\)), treatment (T) × G (\(p<0.001\)) and G × panicle type (P) (\(p<0.001\)) and T × G × P (\(p<0.001\)) interaction effects. Chalkiness score was significantly affected by G (\(p<0.001\)), T × G (\(p<0.016\)), G × P (\(p<0.001\)) and T × G × P (\(p=0.03\)) interaction effects