Skip to main content

Table 6 Performances of deep learning models reported in CV-based wood identification studies

From: Computer vision-based wood identification and its expansion and contribution potentials in wood science: A review

References

Dataset

Image type

#SP/#IMG

CNN model

CLS %

Hafemann et al. [29]

UFPR

Macro

41/2942

3-ConvNeta

95.8

Micro

112/2240

3-ConvNeta

97.3

Kwon et al. [96]

Softwoods

Macro

5/16,865

LeNet

99.3

Kwon et al. [64]

Softwoods

Macro

5/33,815

Ensemble of LeNet2, LeNet3, and MiniVGG4

0.98b

Ravindran et al. [81]

Meliaceae species

Stereo

10/2303

VGG16

88.7c

97.5d

Tang et al. [49]

FRIM collection

Stereo

100/101,446

SqueezeNet

77.5

Lopes et al. [51]

FWRC collection

Stereo

10/1869

InceptionV4_ResNetV2

92.6

Lens et al. [72]

UFPR

Micro

112/2240

ResNet101

96.4

de Geus et al. [55]

Brazilian species

Stereo

281/–

DenseNet

98.8

Ravindran [21]

Melaceae species

Stereo

10/–e

ResNet34

81.9

96.1

Fabijanska et al. [65]

European species

Macro

14/312

Residual convolutional encoder network

98.7

  1. #SP: number of species; #IMG: number of images; CLS %: classification accuracy; FWRC: Forest and Wildlife Research Center at Mississippi State University; –: no number specified
  2. a3 layers deep CNN
  3. bF1 score
  4. cSpecies identification
  5. dGenus identification
  6. eAt least 5 images per specimen (total 193 wood specimens)