Floral infrared emissivity estimates using simple tools

Table 2 The summary results of ANOVA tests for the effect of measurement location within each species

Species	F	df	P	Post hoc
B. perennis	1.781	2, 53	0.178	–
Campanula sp.	1.357	2, 60	0.265	–
Cistus ‘Snow Fire’	16.772	2, 40	< 0.001	R ~ (B + E)
C. verticillata	2.071	2, 38	0.140	–
G. pratense	2.284	2, 37	0.116	–
G. psilostemon	19.047	2, 38	< 0.001	R ~ (B + E)
Helianthemum sp.	6.355	2, 38	0.004	R ~ (B + E)
L. vulgare	3.401	2, 57	0.040	R ~ E
P. cambricum	9.077	2, 39	< 0.001	R ~ (B + E)
Taraxacum agg.	0.825	2, 56	0.444	–

F statistics (F), degrees of freedom (df), and probability (p) are given, as are a summary of the results of post hoc Tukey’s tests where: ‘R ~ (B + E)’ indicates a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between reproductive structures and the petal base as well as a significant difference between the reproductive structures and the petal edge within that species; ‘R ~ E’ indicates a significant difference between the reproductive structures and the petal edge; – indicates no significant effect of measurement location

ISSN: 1746-4811