Table 7 Outcome of the approach of spike counting on the test images of 30 plants
Image no | Ground truth | Predicted using model | TP | FP | FN | Precision | Accuracy | F1 score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
2 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
3 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
4 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.94 |
7 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
9 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
10 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
11 | 13 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.95 |
13 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
14 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
15 | 16 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.90 |
16 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
17 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
18 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
19 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
20 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
21 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.93 |
22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.93 |
23 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
24 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
26 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
27 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.93 |
28 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.91 |
29 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
30 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.93 |
Average | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.97 |