Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison towards the floating point computations (FLOPs) when processing images with the resolution of \(1216\times 912\). Only the single-precision floating point multiplication are taken into account

From: TasselNetv2: in-field counting of wheat spikes with context-augmented local regression networks

 

TasselNet

TasselNetv2

Non-overlap

Dense sample

conv1

\(4.70\times 10^{8}\)

\(6.92\times 10^{9}\)

\(4.79\times 10^{8}\)

conv2

\(1.24\times 10^{9}\)

\(1.83\times 10^{10}\)

\(1.28\times 10^{9}\)

conv3

\(1.22\times 10^{9}\)

\(1.81\times 10^{10}\)

\(1.28\times 10^{9}\)

conv4

\(2.44\times 10^{9}\)

\(3.61\times 10^{10}\)

\(2.56\times 10^{9}\)

conv5

\(2.44\times 10^{9}\)

\(3.61\times 10^{10}\)

\(2.56\times 10^{9}\)

conv6(fc1)

\(5.17\times 10^{8}\)

\(2.07\times 10^{9}\)

\(2.07\times 10^{9}\)

conv7(fc2)

\(1.75\times 10^{7}\)

\(6.46\times 10^{7}\)

\(6.46\times 10^{7}\)

conv8(fc3)

\(1.26\times 10^{5}\)

\(5.05\times 10^{5}\)

\(5.05\times 10^{5}\)

Total

\(8.34\times 10^{9}\)

\(1.16\times 10^{11}\)

\(1.03\times 10^{10}\)