Skip to main content

Table 1 Overall performance of the model generalizability

From: DeepSeedling: deep convolutional network and Kalman filter for plant seedling detection and counting in the field

Training set

Testing set

mAP \(\text {IOU}_{\text {all}}\)

mAR100 \(\text {IOU}_{\text {all}}\)

F1 \(\text {IOU}_{\text {all}}\)

mAP \(\text {IOU}_{\text {0.5}}\)

mAR100 \(\text {IOU}_{\text {0.5}}\)

F1 \(\text {IOU}_{\text {0.5}}\)

T15U15 training

UGA2018 testing

0.763

0.808

0.785

0.981

1.000

0.991

UGA2018 training

UGA2018 testing

0.778

0.818

0.798

0.983

0.992

0.987

T15U18 training

UGA2015 testing

0.179

0.335

0.233

0.352

0.683

0.464

UGA2015 training

UGA2015 testing

0.599

0.695

0.643

0.923

0.997

0.959

U15U18 training

TAMU2015 testing

0.377

0.535

0.442

0.588

0.857

0.698

TAMU2015 training

TAMU2015 testing

0.791

0.827

0.809

0.989

1.000

0.995

  1. For the testing set in each of the UGA2018, UGA2015, and TAMU2015 datasets, two Faster RCNN models were trained using the training set from the same dataset and from the combination of the other two datasets, respectively. Performance comparison of the two models was used to evaluate the model generalizability