A customizable method to characterize Arabidopsis thaliana transpiration under drought conditions

Table 1 Significance (p-values) after ANOVA of results depicted in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (first column)

		Col-0 VS hab1-1 abi1-2	Ler VS aba1-1 VS abi1-1	Ler VS aba1-1	Ler VS abi1-1	aba1-1 VS abi1-1
Figure 1	Whole plant transpiration
Factor	Genotype	0.938	< 0.001
Covariate	Soil volumetric water content	< 0.001	< 0.001
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.339	< 0.001	0.099	< 0.001	< 0.001
Figure 2	Transpiration normalized
Factor	Genotype	< 0.001	< 0.001
Covariate	Soil water potential	< 0.001	< 0.001
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.730	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.622
Figure 3	Leaf relative water content
Factor	Genotype	0.007	< 0.001
Covariate	Soil Water Potential	< 0.001	< 0.001
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.836	0.458	0.182	0.444	0.530
Figure 4	ABA
Factor	Genotype	0.005	< 0.001
Covariate	Soil water potential	< 0.001	< 0.001
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.062	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Figure 5	Transpiration normalized
Factor	Genotype	< 0.001	< 0.001
Covariate	ABA	< 0.001	< 0.001
ANCOVA	G × ABA	0.047	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.418	< 0.001
Figure 6	Shoot fresh weight
Factor	Genotype	< 0.001	< 0.001
Covariate	Soil water potential	< 0.001	< 0.001
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.372	0.622	0.746	0.341	0.132
Shoot dry weight
Factor	Genotype	0.003	< 0.001
Covariate	Soil water potential	< 0.001	0.033
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.203	0.324	0.374	0.136	0.908
Relative growth rate
Factor	Genotype	0.593	0.009
Covariate	Soil water potential	< 0.001	< 0 .001
ANCOVA	G × SWP	0.260	0.001	0.003	0.005	0.159

Factors used to build the model (independent/dependent/covariate and interaction; second column)

ISSN: 1746-4811