Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Significance (p-values) after ANOVA of results depicted in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (first column)

From: A customizable method to characterize Arabidopsis thaliana transpiration under drought conditions

   Col-0 VS hab1-1 abi1-2 Ler VS aba1-1 VS abi1-1 Ler VS aba1-1 Ler VS abi1-1 aba1-1 VS abi1-1
Figure 1 Whole plant transpiration      
 Factor Genotype 0.938 < 0.001    
 Covariate Soil volumetric water content < 0.001 < 0.001    
 ANCOVA G × SWP 0.339 < 0.001 0.099 < 0.001 < 0.001
Figure 2 Transpiration normalized      
 Factor Genotype < 0.001 < 0.001    
 Covariate Soil water potential < 0.001 < 0.001    
 ANCOVA G × SWP 0.730 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.622
Figure 3 Leaf relative water content      
 Factor Genotype 0.007 < 0.001    
 Covariate Soil Water Potential < 0.001 < 0.001    
 ANCOVA G × SWP 0.836 0.458 0.182 0.444 0.530
Figure 4 ABA      
 Factor Genotype 0.005 < 0.001    
 Covariate Soil water potential < 0.001 < 0.001    
 ANCOVA G × SWP 0.062 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Figure 5 Transpiration normalized      
 Factor Genotype < 0.001 < 0.001    
 Covariate ABA < 0.001 < 0.001    
 ANCOVA G × ABA 0.047 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.418 < 0.001
Figure 6 Shoot fresh weight      
 Factor Genotype < 0.001 < 0.001    
 Covariate Soil water potential < 0.001 < 0.001    
 ANCOVA G × SWP 0.372 0.622 0.746 0.341 0.132
 Shoot dry weight
  Factor Genotype 0.003 < 0.001    
  Covariate Soil water potential < 0.001 0.033    
  ANCOVA G × SWP 0.203 0.324 0.374 0.136 0.908
 Relative growth rate
  Factor Genotype 0.593 0.009    
  Covariate Soil water potential < 0.001 < 0 .001    
  ANCOVA G × SWP 0.260 0.001 0.003 0.005 0.159
  1. Factors used to build the model (independent/dependent/covariate and interaction; second column)