Skip to main content

Table 1 Model parameters, assuming only decay constants k3 (NanoLUC) and k4 (LUC) differ between reporters

From: Expanding the bioluminescent reporter toolkit for plant science with NanoLUC

Parameter

Value

Units

Source

Process

k 1

50

cps h−1

Fitted

Translation

k 2

0.8

h−1

Fitted

BOA decay

k 3

0.0121

h−1

Experimental

NanoLUC decay

k 4

0.15

h−1

Fitted

LUC decay

a

0.004

h−1

Fitted

Furimazine decay

  1. Fitting the parameters show that is possible to replicate the signal in Fig. 4d. NanoLUC decay rate was obtained by scaling the experimentally determined rate assuming a Q10 = 2.5 as plate reader experiments were conducted at 21 °C. The NL decay trend could possibly be explained by decay in the furimazine concentration, for which a exponential decay was introduced. Troein et al. [39] estimated a LUC decay constant of ~ 0.183 h−1 in Ostreococcus tauri