Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of existing plastome annotation tools

From: PGA: a software package for rapid, accurate, and flexible batch annotation of plastomes

Tools

Operating system

User interface

Time

Approach

Post-annotation algorithms for identification of feature boundaries

Output file format

Log file

References

DOGMA

Windows, Linux, Mac

Web

5–10 min

Target against reference

No

table

No

Wyman et al. [12]

CpGAVAS

Windows, Linux, Mac

Web

~ 1 h

Target against reference

No

GFF3 and GenBank

No

Liu et al. [13]

Plan

Windows, Linux, Mac

Console

~ 30 s

Target against reference

No

tbl

Yes

Huang and Cronk [16]

Verdant

Windows, Linux, Mac

Web

10–30 min

Target against reference

Yes

GFF3

No

McKain et al. [14]

GeSeq

Windows, Linux, Mac

Web

6 s–13 min

Target against reference

No

GenBank

No

Tillich et al. [15]

PGA

Windows, Linux, Mac

Console

~ 20 s

Reference against target

Yes

GenBank

Yes

This study

  1. For PGA, a laptop equipped with 2.5 GHz 4-core Intel core i3 processors and 8 GB memory was used. Runtimes for other tools were derived from the corresponding references. The phrase “target against reference” signifies a BLASTN or TBLASTN search of a target plastome against an annotated reference plastome, whereas “reference against target” signifies a BLASTN or TBLASTN search of an annotated reference plastome against a target plastome