Skip to main content

Table 1 Experiment characteristics, including sowing and harvest dates, trial duration (in days and in degree days (°Cd) after sowing), environmental conditions and plant characteristics at harvest

From: A low-cost method to rapidly and accurately screen for transpiration efficiency in wheat

Exp.

Harvest

Sowing date

Harvest date

Trial duration (days)

Trial duration (°Cd)

Mean temp. (°C)

Mean VPD (kPa)

Leaf area (cm2 plt−1)

Mean Zadoks stage

Above-ground biomass at harvest (g)

Cumulative transpiration (mL)

1

E1H1

06/05/2015

15/06/2015

40

677

21.7

1.70

52 (46)

[36–68]

15(21) [15–16]

0.85(0.85)

[0.73–0.92]

97(95)

[70–117]

 

E1H2

 

29/06/2015

54

912

21.4

1.58

166(149)

[101–212]

17(22)

[16–18]

1.12(0.96)

[0.71–1.37]

282(257)

[211–337]

 

E1H3

 

13/07/2015

68

1127

21.2

1.54

306(318)

[209–380]

39(43)

[37–43]

3.03(3.85)

[1.86–3.89]

615(705)

[400–780]

 

E1H4

 

28/07/2015

83

1352

20.6

1.46

430(427)

[326–503]

58(60)

[50–62]

7.3(7.22)

[4.90–9.44]

1240(1205)

[829–1532]

 

E1H5

 

12/08/2015

98

1572

20.9

1.54

316(291)

[166–454]

>70(>70)

[>70]

10.2(10)

[5.28–13.88]

1801(1761)

[916–2346]

 

E1H6

 

18/08/2015

104

1664

21.1

1.59

286(219)

[207–364]

> 70(> 70)

[> 70]

13.5(11)

[10.88–16.14]

2486(2005)

[1960–3117]

2

E2H1

16/06/2015

25/08/2015

70

1079

21.3

1.68

335(249)

[249–471]

46(45)

[39–52]

4.00(2.86)

[2.86–5.98]

992(751)

[699–1321]

3

E3H1

14/07/2015

10/09/2015

58

905

23.9

2.18

254(335)

[185–335]

42(45)

[39–44]

3.00(3.8)

[1.66–3.80]

797(1056)

[529–1056]

  1. Mean daily temperature and mean daylight vapour pressure deficit (VPD) were calculated over the period used to estimate TE (i.e. from the beginning to the end of water use measurements for each harvest). Harvests are labelled by experiment (E1–E3) and the harvest within each sowing (H1–H6). Mean Zadoks stage, leaf area, and above-ground dry biomass at harvest, as well as the cumulative amount of water transpired are given (1) for the trial mean (i.e. mean of all 11 genotypes), (2) for the reference cv. Hartog (in brackets) and (3) for the range of genotypic mean values (in square brackets). Note that in E1H1, no significant difference was found among genotypes, therefore, results from this harvest are presented in Table 2, but not elsewhere in the paper nor included in most analyses