Skip to main content

Table 4 The high resistant and susceptible accessions screened out

From: A high-throughput phenotyping procedure for evaluation of antixenosis against common cutworm at early seedling stage in soybean

Accession name

DLP (%)

LW (g)

Experiment 1

Experiment 2

Zhan [10]

Wu [11]

DLP1

DLP2

Mean 1

DLP1

DLP2

Mean 2

Resistant

        

 Lamar

12

5

9

12

7

9

  

 PI227687

20

9

15

23

13

18

23

0.209

 JAPAN

32

20

26

35

21

28

18

0.258

 P64

39

36

38

     

 Bethol

40

30

35

     

 AGH

43

45

44

54

35

44

20

0.240

 ZD14

40

50

45

   

18

0.347

 TSBPHDJ

44

46

45

   

23

 

 HPXQD

40

52

46

50

46

48

16

0.230

 NN89-30

50

47

49

   

21

0.304

 Average 1

36

34

35

35

24

29

20

0.265

Susceptible

        

 JNLSD

73

83

78

   

38

0.650

 MYBMD

71

78

75

83

85

84

34

0.733

 XJ2

64

83

74

     

 DPDLH

62

77

70

72

79

75

46

0.747

 JXQDA

65

74

70

   

47

 

 XTDD

62

73

68

     

 NN89-29

54

75

65

73

76

74

42

0.659

 FJ341

64

63

64

   

36

 

 JLNMH

54

69

62

64

70

67

49

0.702

 CYHZM

61

61

61

   

42

0.671

 Average 2

63

74

69

73

78

75

42

0.693

  1. In “Accessions name” column, accessions in italics are the same with the Zhan’s and Wu’s results [10, 11]. Average 1 and Average 2 are the mean of resistant and susceptible accessions, respectively. “DLP1” and “DLP2” represent the average DLP over dates of Test 1 and Test 2, respectively. Mean 1 and Mean 2 are the mean of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, respectively
Back to article page

Plant Methods

ISSN: 1746-4811