Skip to main content

Table 1 Statistical comparison of the biological replicates

From: Statistical evaluation of transcriptomic data generated using the Affymetrix one-cycle, two-cycle and IVT-Express RNA labelling protocols with the Arabidopsis ATH1 microarray

Region

Comparison

Rep 1

Rep 2

Rep 3

Average

MS

1-cycle vs. 2-cycle

0.948

0.948

0.938

0.945

MS

2-cycle vs. IVT-E

0.947

0.953

0.941

0.947

MS

1-cycle vs. IVT-E

0.980

0.980

0.977

0.979

EZ

1-cycle vs. 2-cycle

0.939

0.934

0.935

0.936

EZ

2-cycle vs. IVT-E

0.936

0.932

0.931

0.933

EZ

1-cycle vs. IVT-E

0.981

0.981

0.975

0.979

MS

Pairwise one-cycle

-

-

-

0.985

MS

Pairwise two-cycle

-

-

-

0.978

MS

Pairwise IVT-E

-

-

-

0.981

EZ

Pairwise one-cycle

-

-

-

0.991

EZ

Pairwise two-cycle

-

-

-

0.982

EZ

Pairwise IVT-E

-

-

-

0.989

  1. The top half of the table shows the R2 values for the comparisons for each of the three biological replicates (Rep 1-3) of meristem (MS) and elongation zone (EZ) tissues with the three labelling protocols. The bottom half of the table shows the average R2 values of the pairwise replicate comparisons for each labelling protocol (i.e. the average of rep1 vs. rep2, rep1 vs. rep3 and rep 2 vs. rep3).