Skip to main content

Table 1 Statistical comparison of the biological replicates

From: Statistical evaluation of transcriptomic data generated using the Affymetrix one-cycle, two-cycle and IVT-Express RNA labelling protocols with the Arabidopsis ATH1 microarray

Region Comparison Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Average
MS 1-cycle vs. 2-cycle 0.948 0.948 0.938 0.945
MS 2-cycle vs. IVT-E 0.947 0.953 0.941 0.947
MS 1-cycle vs. IVT-E 0.980 0.980 0.977 0.979
EZ 1-cycle vs. 2-cycle 0.939 0.934 0.935 0.936
EZ 2-cycle vs. IVT-E 0.936 0.932 0.931 0.933
EZ 1-cycle vs. IVT-E 0.981 0.981 0.975 0.979
MS Pairwise one-cycle - - - 0.985
MS Pairwise two-cycle - - - 0.978
MS Pairwise IVT-E - - - 0.981
EZ Pairwise one-cycle - - - 0.991
EZ Pairwise two-cycle - - - 0.982
EZ Pairwise IVT-E - - - 0.989
  1. The top half of the table shows the R2 values for the comparisons for each of the three biological replicates (Rep 1-3) of meristem (MS) and elongation zone (EZ) tissues with the three labelling protocols. The bottom half of the table shows the average R2 values of the pairwise replicate comparisons for each labelling protocol (i.e. the average of rep1 vs. rep2, rep1 vs. rep3 and rep 2 vs. rep3).