Isolation of dimorphic chloroplasts from the single-cell C4 species Bienertia sinuspersici
© Lung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 January 2012
Accepted: 6 March 2012
Published: 6 March 2012
Three terrestrial plants are known to perform C4 photosynthesis without the dual-cell system by partitioning two distinct types of chloroplasts in separate cytoplasmic compartments. We report herein a protocol for isolating the dimorphic chloroplasts from Bienertia sinuspersici. Hypo-osmotically lysed protoplasts under our defined conditions released intact compartments containing the central chloroplasts and intact vacuoles with adhering peripheral chloroplasts. Following Percoll step gradient purification both chloroplast preparations demonstrated high homogeneities as evaluated from the relative abundance of respective protein markers. This protocol will open novel research directions toward understanding the mechanism of single-cell C4 photosynthesis.
KeywordsBienertia sinuspersici Chloroplast isolation Dimorphic chloroplasts Osmotic swelling Photosynthesis protoplast Single-cell C4 Vacuole isolation
The majority of terrestrial plants house chloroplasts primarily in one major cell type of leaves (i.e. mesophyll cells), and perform C3 photosynthesis to assimilate atmospheric CO2 into a 3-carbon product, 3-phosphoglyceric acid. In C4 species, on the other hand, a Kranz-type leaf anatomy featuring the second type of chlorenchyma cells surrounding the vascular bundles (i.e. bundle sheath cells) was reported as early as in the late 1800's . In these species, the initial carbon fixation into 4-carbon acids was first documented in the 1960's [2, 3]. The physiological relevance of the Kranz anatomy in relation to the C4 photosynthetic pathways, however, had not been elucidated until the successful separation of the two types of chlorenchyma cells and their respective dimorphic chloroplasts. With the development of various mechanical and enzymatic methods for separating the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, the biochemistry of C4 cycles has been intensively studied over the past few decades focusing explicitly on characterizing the enzymatic properties and determining their precise subcellular locations in these cell types (for review, see ), leading to the current C4 models. In the C4 model, atmospheric CO2 is initially converted into C4 acids by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in mesophyll cells. The C4 acids are broken down by a C4 subtype-specific decarboxylation enzyme in bundle sheath cells, and the liberated CO2 is subsequently re-fixed by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). The C4 pathway concentrates CO2 at the site of Rubisco and minimizes the photorespiration process, an unfavorable oxygenase activity of Rubisco with O2.
The indispensable relationship between the Kranz anatomy and C4 photosynthesis has been an accepted feature until the discovery of three terrestrial single-cell C4 species, Suaeda aralocaspica (formerly called Borszczowia aralocaspica) , Bienertia cycloptera [6, 7], and B. sinuspersici  in the Chenopodiaceae family. In chlorenchyma cells of these succulent Chenopodiaceae species, the C4 cycles are operational in the absence of Kranz anatomy due to the division of cytoplasm into two compartments. The cytoplasmic channels that connect the two compartments not only allow metabolite exchange but also limit inter-compartmental gas diffusion, resembling the function of plasmodesmata traversing the thickened and sometimes suberized bundle sheath cell wall. The two cytoplasmic compartments house two distinct chloroplast types and different subsets of enzymes, respectively. Accordingly, the peripheral compartment proximal to the CO2 entry point is specialized for carboxylation and regeneration of the initial carbon acceptor, phosphoenolpyruvate, whereas the central compartment distal to the CO2 entry point is responsible for decarboxylation of C4 acids and Rubisco-catalyzed re-fixation of the liberated CO2. In agreement with the immunolocalization patterns of the major enzymes involved [5, 7, 9], the two cytoplasmic compartments appear to be functionally equivalent to the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of Kranz-type C4 plants, respectively. Based on differential speed centrifugation for the enrichment of each chloroplast type in subcellular fractions of B. sinuspersici leaves, Offermann et al.  have recently examined the protein distribution patterns of dimorphic chloroplasts and confirmed their functional similarities to the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of Kranz-type C4 plants, respectively. Thorough studies of the enzymology of the single-cell C4 model, however, requires homogenous preparations of the dimorphic chloroplasts with specific techniques based on the unique cell anatomy, in analogy with the previous efforts of separation and subcellular fractionation of the dual cell types from Kranz-type C4 plants (for review, see ).
Here, we present our empirically optimized protocol for separating the dimorphic chloroplasts from chlorenchyma protoplasts of B. sinuspersici. By reducing the osmotic potential of culture medium to a suitable level, the isolated protoplasts were hypo-osmotically bursted, concomitantly extruding one type of chloroplasts encased in the central cytoplasmic compartment and another type of chloroplasts from the peripheral compartment adhered to the external surface of intact vacuoles. Following a subsequent centrifugation step, these two structures can be separated into the sedimented and floating fractions, respectively. Finally, two homogenous populations of dimorphic chloroplasts with minimal cross-contamination can be further purified by using a Percoll gradient. Overall, this dimorphic chloroplast isolation protocol can be applied in multiple areas of research toward further understanding the development of single-cell C4 systems.
Rationale of the isolation procedures in relation to cell anatomy
Isolation of chlorenchyma protoplasts from B. Sinuspersici
Hypo-osmotic shock treatment of isolated protoplasts induced vesicle formation
Additional file 1: An AVI movie showing bursting of protoplasts and their vacuoles at 0.1 M sucrose. This movie was made from the time-lapse images of protoplasts subjected to osmotic swelling at 0.1 M sucrose. Representative images are shown in Figure 3A. (AVI 580 KB)
Additional file 2: An AVI movie showing protoplast lysis and formation of vacuole-derived vesicles at 0.2 M sucrose. This movie was made from the time-lapse images of protoplasts subjected to osmotic swelling at 0.2 M sucrose. Representative images are shown in Figure 3B. (AVI 573 KB)
Additional file 3: An AVI movie showing osmotic swelling of protoplasts and pinching-off of vacuoles at 0.5 M sucrose. This movie was made from the time-lapse images of protoplasts subjected to osmotic swelling at 0.5 M sucrose. Representative images are shown in Figure 3C. (AVI 1 MB)
The vacuolar origin of vesicles from lysed protoplasts
Subfractionation of dimorphic chloroplasts from lysed protoplasts
Evaluating cross-contamination of the isolated dimorphic chloroplasts
Potential feasibility of isolating dimorphic chloroplasts from B. Sinuspersici
In view of the chlorenchyma cell anatomies of the three currently known terrestrial single-cell C4 species, isolation of dimorphic chloroplasts from the two Bienertia species is technically more feasible than that from S. aralocaspica. Firstly, chlorenchyma cells of the two Bienertia species (i.e. B. sinuspersici and B. cycloptera) enclose one type of chloroplasts within a distinctive spherical structure (CCC) at the centre of the cell and randomly distribute another type of chloroplasts in a thin layer of cytoplasm at the cell periphery (PCC). Separation of the dimorphic chloroplasts from chlorenchyma cells of these species is therefore technically feasible provided that the integrity of CCC is preserved during the process. Secondly, the mature chlorenchyma cells of Bienertia species effectively limit gas diffusion by the formation of CCCs in the cell interior, as a means to reduce CO2 leakage at the site of C4 acid decarboxylation and exposure of Rubisco to O2, At the cell periphery, the entire chlorenchyma cells are surrounded by extensive intercellular space to facilitate fixation of atmospheric CO2 (Figure 2B) . Therefore, the loosely packed chlorenchyma cells can be readily isolated by gently squeezing the leaves in a mortar and pestle . Technically, this rapid release of chlorenchyma cells devoid of contaminations such as epidermis, water storage and vacuolar tissues facilitates the subsequent isolation of pure and functional dimorphic chloroplasts. In contrast, mature leaves of S. aralocaspica partition dimorphic chloroplasts by localization of the first chloroplast type at one pole of the elongated chlorenchyma cells proximal to the atmosphere and the second chloroplast type at the opposite pole of the cells proximal to the vascular tissues . Thus, the operation of the single-cell C4 cycle in this species depends primarily on the polarization of the dimorphic chloroplasts and the radial elongation of the cells for effective limitation of CO2 and O2 diffusion [5, 17]. Isolation of the two polarized chloroplast types solely based on the difference in their subcellular locations might be technically challenging, if not impossible. Perhaps, we speculate that any change in cell shape due to cell wall removal, as the first step in routine chloroplast isolation procedures, might distort the polarization of the dimorphic chloroplasts, although the isolation of protoplasts from S. aralocaspica chlorenchyma cells has yet been attempted. The leaf anatomy of S. aralocaspica also reveals absolute exclusion of intercellular air space toward the inner poles of chlorenchyma cells due to the tight cell-cell adhesion [5, 17], implicating the difficulty in chlorenchyma cell isolation. Moreover, our successful plant propagation by vegetative cuttings added another technical advantage of using B. sinuspersici leaves for large-scale isolation of dimorphic chloroplasts with synchronized C4 development.
Technical considerations for isolation of central chloroplasts
A reliable protocol for separating the dimorphic chloroplasts is primarily based on the criteria of no cross-contamination. The isolation of C-Chls is relatively effortless due to the confinement of these organelles within the large, dense CCC structures, which can be easily recovered from the cell lysates by low-speed centrifugation (Figure 7A). It is worthy of note, however, that the C-Chl preparation might be potentially contaminated with P-Chls due to incomplete protoplast lysis. Previously, we reported a low-speed centrifugation-based method for floatation of healthy, intact chlorenchyma protoplasts on a sucrose medium and sedimentation of the stressed protoplasts . In the present study, any protoplasts surviving from the osmotically mediated lytic treatment might therefore be co-sedimented with the CCC fraction upon low-speed centrifugation leading to contamination of this fraction with P-Chls. Accordingly, we optimized our procedures for osmotic shock treatment and showed that the isolated protoplasts at a suitable cell density were almost exclusively bursted under the defined chemical, thermal and osmotic conditions (Figure 6), leading to a homogenous preparation (Figure 7A) and satisfactory purity (Figure 8) of C-Chls. In addition to P-Chls, the potential contamination of C-Chl preparation with chloroplasts from immature chlorenchyma cells should also be taken into account. The expression patterns of photosynthetic genes strongly suggested that these chloroplasts from immature chlorenchyma cells, as evident in the young leaf samples, might function in a C3 default mode of photosynthetic and photorespiratory pathways . Since no chloroplast clumping was observed at this early stage of leaf development , contamination due to immature chlorenchyma cells is not considered a major concern in the preparation of C-Chls using our low-speed centrifugation-based method.
Technical considerations for isolation of peripheral chloroplasts
On the other hand, purification of P-Chls from the protoplast lysates is deemed technical more challenging. Recently, Offermann et al.  reported the first protocol for dimorphic chloroplast isolation from B. sinuspersici based on differential speed centrifugation. According to our preliminary study, this centrifugation technique did not provide satisfactory purity of P-Chls due to two major problems. First, residual CCCs remained in the supernatant after the low-speed centrifugation leading to contamination of the P-Chl fraction. Attempts to increase the centrifugal force or duration of centrifugation, on the other hand, resulted in a considerable loss of P-Chls from the supernatant. More remarkably, the supernatant fraction of P-Chls was contaminated with C-Chls due to their dissociation from CCCs, which remains to be an unavoidable problem given the fact that the CCC is not confined by a membrane as revealed at the electron microscopic level (data not shown). In fact, rapid dispersal of C-Chls was commonly observed when the chlorenchyma protoplasts were subjected to unfavorable culture conditions  or mechanical disruption such as a gentle press on a microscopic slide . The integrity of CCC structures is primarily maintained by the association of C-Chls in the outer regions of CCCs with the surrounding cytoskeleton networks, of which microtubules have been found to be relatively important . During the dimorphic chloroplast isolation, the instability of the CCCs might be attributed to a combined effect of osmotic swelling of C-Chls in the hypotonic medium and depolymerization of microtubules by low temperature. Despite the contentious issue of cold treatment, chloroplast isolation at higher temperature is not recommended due to the potential risk of protein degradation and denaturation after cell lysis, particularly if chloroplasts are isolated for proteomics or enzymology studies. Similarly, chloroplasts for protein import studies should be isolated at low temperature due to the high susceptibility of the chloroplast protein import receptors to proteolysis . Of relevance to preventing proteolytic degradation, our chloroplast isolation method has an added advantage by confining the majority of proteolytic enzymes in the intact vacuoles.
Due to the considerable contamination of the P-Chls in the cell lysate with dissociated C-Chls, we sought an alternative method for P-Chl purification by isolation of floating vacuoles as P-Chl carriers. The separation of plant vacuoles from isolated protoplasts is a common phenomenon in hypotonic solutions and was documented as early as when protoplasts were isolated for the first time from a plant source . Since then, the protoplast-based techniques for plant vacuole isolation have been well established [20, 21]. These isolated vacuoles are commonly surrounded by their tonoplasts with loosely adhering protoplasmic materials , including the P-Chls in the present study (Figure 2D). Accordingly, we further optimized the conditions for isolating the vacuoles with adhering P-Chls since the floatation of P-Chls on a sucrose medium might effectively prevent their contamination with CCCs in the pellet or dissociated C-Chls in the supernatant. As expected, our P-Chl preparation using this method barely contained LSU, which was found almost exclusively in the C-Chl fraction as revealed by silver staining and Western blot analysis (Figure 8). The striking 10-fold difference in LSU level between the dimorphic chloroplasts is in agreement with our immunogold quantification analysis at the electron microscopic level showing that the LSU signals were distributed between P-Chls and C-Chls at a ratio of 1:20 (unpublished data). This observation substantially contrasted the previous results obtained using the differential centrifugation method . In their study, Western blot analysis revealed the immunoreactive band intensities of LSU for the P-Chl and C-Chl fractions at a ratio of 1: 3.5 , suggesting an impure preparation of P-Chls. Two possible sources of contamination in their P-Chl preparation with LSU might be, as discussed earlier, that the P-Chl fraction was easily contaminated with unpelleted CCCs or dissociated C-Chls using the differential centrifugation method. Also, the C3-like chloroplasts from immature chlorenchyma cells were inseparable from the P-Chls because neither type of chloroplasts forms intracellular clumping. On the other hand, since vacuoles were not prominently found in young chlorenchyma cells , our preparation of P-Chls using the vacuole-based method was not prone to contamination with C3-like chloroplasts, as indicated by the low level of LSU (Figure 8). Moreover, the unequal distribution of proteins associated with the photosystems (PsbO and PsaD) in the two chloroplast fractions presented here also supports earlier ultrastructural results showing that chloroplasts in the PCC have a lower granal index than those in the CCC .
With the development of the current method to isolate two homogenous populations of dimorphic chloroplasts from B. sinuspersici, research can be carried out toward a thorough understanding of the single-cell C4 mechanism. Enzymology of the C4 photosynthetic and photorepiratory pathways can be explicitly characterized. Given the different subsets of enzymes in the two types of chloroplasts, the possibility of differential protein import can be evaluated by in vitro import assays and biochemical characterization of the protein import receptors at the chloroplast envelope using the isolated dimorphic chloroplasts. Recently, high-throughput proteomic analyses of the stroma  and membrane fractions  of the purified mesophyll and bundle sheath cells from maize leaves have provided interesting insights into the different roles of dimorphic chloroplasts in C4 photosynthesis as well as other plastid functions. Similar proteomic analysis of the isolated dimorphic chloroplasts from B. sinuspersici might allow an informative comparison of their respective roles in single-cell C4 photosynthesis and other physiological metabolism. On another perspective, the concomitant isolation of intact vacuoles using the current method might also be useful. For instances, one might further rule out the possibility of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) in the single-cell C4 species by characterization of the metabolite contents in the vacuoles. Alternatively, the regulation of photosynthetic enzymes in this single-cell C4 species might be studied in relation to their turnovers in vacuoles through the autophagic pathway.
In conclusion, we have established a reliable method for isolating and purifying the dimorphic chloroplasts from a single-cell C4 species, B. sinuspersici. Following the hypo-osmotic lysis of isolated protoplasts under our defined conditions, one type of chloroplasts can be easily obtained from the discrete subcellular structures in the pellet fraction after low-speed centrifugation, whereas another type of chloroplasts along with vacuoles can be purified by floatation on a sucrose medium using the intact vacuoles as carriers. The purity and homogeneity of the dimorphic chloroplast preparations were evident from the electropheretic analyses of their respective protein markers. This technique can be applied in various experiments to unravel the novel photosynthetic pathways and other physiological aspects in the single-cell C4 model.
Isolation of chlorenchyma protoplasts from B. Sinuspersici leaves
B. sinuspersici plants were propagated asexually by vegetative cuttings essentially as described . Isolation of leaf-derived chlorenchyma protoplasts from B. sinuspersici has been optimized previously . Briefly, 20 mature leaves (> 2 cm in length) were freshly harvested from 3- to 4-month-old vegetatively propagated plants and chlorenchyma cells were isolated from the leaves in cell-stabilizing (CS) buffer [0.7 M sucrose, 25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 6.5), 5 mM KCl and 1 mM CaCl2] by gentle pressing using a mortar and pestle. The chlorenchyma cells were collected on a piece of 40-μm nylon mesh filter (Sefar America Inc., USA) with a stack of absorbent paper underneath for removal of the buffer solution. The isolated cells were gently shaken off from the nylon mesh filter into 5 mL of enzyme solution [CS buffer with 1.5% (w/v) cellulase Onozuka R10 (Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. A7030)] and incubated at 25°C in the dark without shaking. The progress of cellulase treatment was monitored under light microscopy such that the appearance of round-shaped protoplasts indicates complete cell wall digestion, which was normally achieved within 4 h. The protoplast-washing steps were performed by floating the cells on top of the supernatant after centrifugation at 100g for 2 min and gently aspirating them using a micropipette. A homogenous population of chlorenchyma protoplasts was obtained after washing in 5 mL of CS buffer twice. The viability of the isolated protoplasts was assessed by vital staining and the protoplast yield was determined using a Neubauer-Levy haemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA, USA).
Separation of dimorphic chloroplasts from Osmotically lysed protoplasts
The isolated protoplasts were washed once in wash buffer [0.7 M sucrose, 25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 6.5), 5 mM KCl] and resuspended in an appropriate volume of wash buffer to obtain a cell density of 105 protoplasts mL-1. All subsequent steps were carried out at 0~4°C unless otherwise specified. To separate the P-Chls and C-Chls by the hypo-osmotic shock method, 500 μL of protoplast suspension were prechilled on ice for 5 min and then diluted with 1.25 mL of dilution buffer [25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 6.5), 5 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA], which had been equilibrated at room temperature, to obtain a final sucrose concentration of 0.2 M. The diluted protoplasts were gently mixed by inverting the tube several times and incubated at room temperature for 2 min. Following the osmotic lysis of protoplasts, the samples were immediately transferred on ice for 10 min with minimal agitation. During this 10-min incubation on ice, the released CCCs were settled to the bottom of the tube while the intact vacuoles carrying P-Chls floated to the top of the medium. The sedimentation of CCCs and the floating of vacuoles with P-Chls were separated by centrifugation at 100g for 4 min in a swinging-bucket rotor (A-8-11 for Eppendorf centrifuge 5417R; Eppendorf Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Canada). The floating layer of vacuoles with P-Chls was carefully transferred to a fresh microfuge tube and the aqueous medium was aspirated off with a micropipette without disturbing the pellet containing CCCs. The CCC pellet was washed once in 2 mL of CS buffer by gently tapping with finger, centrifuged at 100g for 2 min, and resuspended in 300 μL of dilution buffer. The CCCs were then dissociated by pipetting 10 times up and down using a narrow bore 200-μL micropipette tip. To further purify C-Chls from the other organelles in CCCs, the dissociated CCCs were subjected to Percoll gradient centrifugation as described below. Similar Percoll gradients were used to isolate the loosely associated P-Chls from the vacuole surfaces.
Percoll gradient purification of chloroplasts
The chloroplast purification procedures were modified according to Smith et al. . Briefly, up to 1 mL of chloroplast suspension was layered on a 40%/85% Percoll step gradient consisting of an upper 500-μL Percoll solution [40% (v/v) Percoll, 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.3), 330 mM sorbitol, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2 and 2 mM EDTA] and a lower 500-μL Percoll solution [85% (v/v) Percoll, 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.3) and 330 mM sorbitol]. The gradient was centrifuged at 2,500g, 4°C for 10 min in a swinging-bucket rotor (A-8-11 for Eppendorf centrifuge 5417R; Eppendorf Canada Ltd., Mississauga, Canada). The intact chloroplasts at the 40%/85% interface of the Percoll gradient were aspirated and diluted with 6 volumes of ice-cold HS buffer [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.0) and 330 mM sorbitol]. The chloroplasts were pelleted by centrifugation at 750g, 4°C for 5 min and resuspended in 50 μL of ice-cold HS buffer.
Isolation of total chloroplasts from chlorenchyma protoplasts
The procedures for assembling a protoplast-rupturing device were modified according to the method described by Smith et al. . Briefly, the needle-fitting end of a 1-mL syringe barrel and the top part of a 500-μL microtube were cut off to form a hollow tube and a slightly wider adaptor ring, respectively. A piece of 10-μm nylon mesh filter (Spectrum Lab Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) was fitted against the cut end of the hollow tube and held in place using the adaptor ring. All subsequent steps were carried out at ~4°C. The isolated protoplasts were resuspended in an appropriate volume of protoplast breakage buffer [20 mM tricine-KOH (pH 8.4), 330 mM sorbitol, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaHCO3] to obtain a cell density of 4 × 105 protoplasts mL-1. Five hundred microliters of protoplast suspension were transferred into the protoplast rupturing device and the plunger was inserted to force the suspension through the mesh. An equal volume of protoplast breakage buffer was then added to the protoplast-rupturing device for completing the breakage of residual protoplasts and CCCs on the mesh. To isolate total chloroplasts from the cell lysate, the pooled filtrates were subjected to Percoll gradient centrifugation as described above.
SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis
The isolated chloroplasts were resuspended in solubilization buffer [50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 1% (w/v) SDS]. The solubilized proteins were quantified using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two micrograms of proteins were separated on SDS/12% PAGE. The resolved proteins were visualized by silver staining as described previously  or electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, which were probed with primary antibodies against PPDK (1:4,000; courtesy of Dr. Chris Chastain), LSU (1:5,000; Agrisera, Vannas, Sweden, cat. no. AS03-037), PsbO (1:5,000; courtesy of Dr. Marilyn Griffith), cytochrome f (1:1,000; Agrisera, Vannas, Sweden, cat. no. AS08-306) or PsaD (1:500; Agrisera, Vannas, Sweden, cat. no. AS09-461), followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. A6154). The signals were visualized by incubating the probed membranes with Amersham ECL-Plus solution (GE Healthcare, cat. no. RPN2132) and exposing the membranes to Amersham Hyperfilm ECL films (GE Healthcare, cat. no. 28-9068-39), which were developed using a CP1000 Agfa photodeveloper (AGFA, Ontario, Canada), digitized and processed using Adobe Photoshop CS (Adobe Systems Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). The intensities of immunoreactive bands were densitometrically quantified using the gel-analyzer function of ImageJ software v.1.46 (National Institutes of Health, USA).
For vital staining, 200 μL of protoplasts were incubated with 4 μL of 0.2% (w/v) fluorescein diacetate [Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. F5502; prepared in 100% (v/v) acetone] at room temperature for 15 min and washed twice with 200 μL of CS buffer. For vacuolar staining, 200 μL of protoplasts were centrifuged at 100g for 2 min and the floating protoplasts were collected and resuspended in 200 μL of acidic staining buffer [0.7 M sucrose, 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 4), 5 mM KCl and 1 mM CaCl2]. The protoplasts were stained with 1 μL of 10 mM CDCFDA [Invitrogen, cat. no. C-369] at room temperature for 15 min and washed twice with 200 μL of acidic staining buffer. The stained protoplasts were observed under epifluorescence microscopy.
Epifluorescence and light microscopy
Fifty microliters of cytochemically stained protoplasts were examined and imaged in flat-bottomed depression slides under an epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager D1) equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera. Leaf samples were fixed, dehydrated and embedded in London Resin White (Electron Microscopy Sciences) acrylic resin as previously described . Semi-thin (1 μm) sections were stained with 1% (w/v) toluidine blue O and observed under light microscopy. Bright field micrographs were acquired using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Germany) equipped with a Q-Imaging digital camera (Quorum Technologies Inc., Guelph, Canada). All images were processed and composed using Adobe Photoshop CS (Adobe Systems Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Representative images were presented after similar results were obtained from at least 3 independent experiments.
This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Research Grants and the University of Waterloo Start-Up Fund to S.D.X.C. S.-C.L. received additional financial support from Ontario Graduate Scholarship (Government of Ontario, Canada) and President's Graduate Scholarship (University of Waterloo, Canada). The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Chris Chastain (Minnesota State University Moorhead, MN, USA) for providing the anti-maize PPDK antibody.
- Haberlandt G: Physiologische pflanzenanatomie (Physiological plant anatomy). Engelmann, Leipzig. 1884
- Kortschak HP, Hartt CE, Burr GO: Carbon dioxide fixation in sugarcane leaves. Plant Physiol. 1965, 40: 209-213. 10.1104/pp.40.2.209.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Hatch MD, Slack CR: Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves: a new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. Biochem J. 1966, 101: 103-111.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Edwards GE, Franceschi VR, Ku MSB, Voznesenskaya EV, Pyankov VI, Andreo CS: Compartmentation of photosynthesis in cells and tissues of C4 plants. J Exp Bot. 2001, 52: 577-590. 10.1093/jexbot/52.356.577.View ArticlePubMed
- Voznesenskaya EV, Franceschi VR, Kiirats O, Freitag H, Edwards GE: Kranz anatomy is not essential for terrestrial C4 plant photosynthesis. Nature. 2001, 414: 543-546. 10.1038/35107073.View ArticlePubMed
- Freitag H, Stichler W: Bienertia cycloptera Bunge ex Boiss., Chenopodiaceae, another C4 plant without Kranz tissues. Plant Biol. 2002, 4: 121-132. 10.1055/s-2002-20444.View Article
- Voznesenskaya EV, Franceshi VR, Kiirats O, Artyusheva EG, Freitag H, Edwards GE: Proof of C4 photosynthesis without Kranz anatomy in Bienertia cycloptera (Chenopodiaceae). Plant J. 2002, 31: 649-662. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01385.x.View ArticlePubMed
- Akhani H, Barroca J, Koteeva N, Voznesenskaya E, Franceschi V, Edwards G, Ghaffari SM, Ziegler H: Bienertia sinuspersici (Chenopodiaceae): a new species from Southwest Asia and discovery of a third terrestrial C4 plant without Kranz anatomy. Syst Bot. 2005, 30: 290-301. 10.1600/0363644054223684.View Article
- Chuong SDX, Franceschi VR, Edwards GE: The cytoskeleton maintains organelle partitioning required for single-cell C4 photosynthesis in Chenopodiaceae species. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 2207-2223. 10.1105/tpc.105.036186.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Offermann S, Okita TW, Edwards GE: Resolving the compartmentation and function of C4 photosynthesis in the single-cell C4 species Bienertia sinuspersici. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155: 1612-1628. 10.1104/pp.110.170381.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Park J, Knoblauch M, Okita TW, Edwards GE: Structural changes in the vacuole and cytoskeleton are key to development of the two cytoplasmic domains supporting single-cell C4 photosynthesis in Bienertia sinuspersici. Planta. 2009, 229: 369-382. 10.1007/s00425-008-0836-8.View ArticlePubMed
- Lung SC, Yanagisawa M, Chuong SDX: Protoplast isolation and transient gene expression in the single-cell C4 species, Bienertia sinuspersici. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30: 473-484. 10.1007/s00299-010-0953-2.View ArticlePubMed
- Lara MV, Offermann S, Smith M, Okita TW, Andreo CS, Edwards GE: Leaf development in the single-cell C4 system in Bienertia sinuspersic: expression of genes and peptide levels for C4 metabolism in relation to chlorenchyma structure under different light conditions. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148: 593-610. 10.1104/pp.108.124008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Pringle JR, Preston RA, Adams AEM, Stearns T, Drubin DG, Haarer BK, Jones EW: Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1989, 31: 357-435.View ArticlePubMed
- Nasr-Esfahani MH, Aitken JR, Johnson MH: Hydrogen peroxide levels in mouse oocytes and early cleavage embryos developed in vitro or in vivo. Development. 1990, 109: 501-507.PubMed
- Franceschi VR, Nakata PA: Calcium oxalate in plants: formation and function. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005, 56: 41-71. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144106.View ArticlePubMed
- Voznesenskaya EV, Edwards GE, Kiirats O, Artyusheva EG, Franceschi VR: Development of biochemical specialization and organelle partitioning in the single-cell C4 system in leaves of Borszczowia aralocaspica (Chenopodiaceae). Am J Bot. 2003, 90: 1669-1680. 10.3732/ajb.90.12.1669.View ArticlePubMed
- Bölter B, May T, Soll J: A protein import receptor in pea chloroplasts, Toc86, is only a proteolytic fragment of a larger polypeptide. FEBS Lett. 1998, 441: 59-62. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01525-7.View ArticlePubMed
- Cocking EC: A method for the isolation of plant protoplasts and vacuoles. Nature. 1960, 187: 962-963. 10.1038/187962a0.View Article
- Gomez L, Chrispeels MJ: Tonoplast and soluble vacuolar proteins are targeted by different mechanisms. Plant Cell. 1993, 5: 1113-1124.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Robert S, Zouhar J, Carter C, Raikhel N: Isolation of intact vacuoles from Arabidopsis rosette leaf-derived protoplasts. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2: 259-262.View ArticlePubMed
- Majeran W, Cai Y, Sun Q, Van-Wijk KJ: Functional differentiation of bundle sheath and mesophyll maize chloroplasts determined by comparative proteomics. Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 3111-3140. 10.1105/tpc.105.035519.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Majeran W, Zybailov B, Ytterberg J, Dunsmore J, Sun Q, Van-Wijk KJ: Consequences of C4 differentiation for chloroplast membrane proteomes in maize mesophyll and bundle sheath cells. Mol Cell Prot. 2008, 7: 1609-1638. 10.1074/mcp.M800016-MCP200.View Article
- Smith MD, Fitzpatrick LM, Keegstra K, Scnhell DJ: In vitro analysis of chloroplast protein import. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. Edited by: Yamada KM. 2002, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 11.16.11-11.16.21.
- Mortz E, Krogh TN, Vorum H, Görg A: Improved silver staining protocols for high sensitivity protein identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight analysis. Proteomics. 2001, 1: 1359-1363. 10.1002/1615-9861(200111)1:11<1359::AID-PROT1359>3.0.CO;2-Q.View ArticlePubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.