Open Access

A quantitative RT-PCR platform for high-throughput expression profiling of 2500 rice transcription factors

  • Camila Caldana1,
  • Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible1,
  • Bernd Mueller-Roeber1, 2Email author and
  • Slobodan Ruzicic1
Plant Methods20073:7

DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-3-7

Received: 11 March 2007

Accepted: 08 June 2007

Published: 08 June 2007



Quantitative reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has been demonstrated to be particularly suitable for the analysis of weakly expressed genes, such as those encoding transcription factors. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important crop and the most advanced model for monocotyledonous species; its nuclear genome has been sequenced and molecular tools are being developed for functional analyses. However, high-throughput methods for rice research are still limited and a large-scale qRT-PCR platform for gene expression analyses has not been reported.


We established a qRT-PCR platform enabling the multi-parallel determination of the expression levels of more than 2500 rice transcription factor genes. Additionally, using different rice cultivars, tissues and physiological conditions, we evaluated the expression stability of seven reference genes. We demonstrate this resource allows specific and reliable detection of the expression of transcription factor genes in rice.


Multi-parallel qRT-PCR allows the versatile and sensitive transcriptome profiling of large numbers of rice transcription factor genes. The new platform complements existing microarray-based expression profiling techniques, by allowing the analysis of lowly expressed transcription factor genes to determine their involvement in developmental or physiological processes. We expect that this resource will be of broad utility to the scientific community in the further development of rice as an important model for plant science.


Various high throughput techniques that allow the accurate quantification of expression levels (transcript abundance) of hundreds or thousands of genes are currently available [1]. Commonly, cDNA- and oligonucleotide-based microarrays are used to measure transcripts at a genome-wide scale [1]. However the usefulness of these is often limited by their sensitivity and accuracy, particularly for low-abundance transcripts. In contrast, quantitative reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR or real-time RT-PCR) allows even weakly expressed genes to be accurately quantified [2]. Thus, whilst array-based hybridisation typically allows the detection of one transcript per cell [3, 4], qRT-PCR can detect one transcript per 1000 cells [5]. Recent improvements in qRT-PCR methodology have eliminated many of the initial problems that were associated with quantitative gene expression studies, such as those arising from alternative splicing events [6]. Despite such developments qRT-PCR is mostly used to detect relatively small numbers of genes.

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins (trans-acting factors) that enhance or repress gene expression through their binding to specific DNA sequences (cis-acting elements) in the promoters of their target genes. The functional characterization of TFs is crucial for the reconstruction of transcriptional regulatory networks controlling developmental and physiological processes such as growth, organ formation and the response to hormonal or environmental stimuli [7, 8]. Transcription factor genes represent a sizable fraction of the genomes of all eukaryotic organisms, including higher plants [7]. Analysis of the rice genome [9, 10] indicated that approximately 2.6% of the identified genes encode TFs [10]. Currently, the functional analysis of TFs in monocotyledonous species lags considerably behind that of the model dicotyledonous species Arabidopsis thaliana.

Microarray expression profiling in rice has not been widely reported with relatively few publicly available data. Studies using qRT-PCR have also not been widely reported, have focussed on small groups of genes, and in many cases were only used to confirm expression changes from microarray experiments. Therefore, the utility of qRT-PCR as a high-throughput method in rice has not been investigated.

To facilitate the analysis of rice TFs we have recently established a database [11, 12]. The coding sequences of more than 2500 identified rice TFs were used to design primers for a large-scale qRT-PCR platform. The comparative analysis of several rice varieties and tissues described here has confirmed the broad applicability of the platform.

Results and Discussion

Primer design

Analysis of the rice genome indicated that 21% of all genes give rise to alternatively spliced transcripts [13]. In the case of TFs, splice variants can affect the architecture of the DNA-binding domain and often show tissue-specific expression patterns [14]. To distinguish between such variants, splice variant-specific primer pairs were designed for the 5.7 % of all TF loci (131 TF loci) where this was possible. In total, primer pairs for 2508 gene models derived from 2306 loci were designed (Additional file 1). The design of primers followed a set of stringent criteria, as generally suggested in qRT-PCR protocols (e.g. Primer Express Software v2.0 Application Manual, Applied Biosystems). To minimize the risk of amplifying contaminating genomic DNA, primers spanning at least one exon-exon junction, or annealing to different exons, were designed where possible (56% of predicted gene models). However, 35% of genes contained no introns. The specificity of each primer was confirmed by comparing its sequence with all predicted rice coding sequences (CDS) using the BLASTN tool at TIGR [15] to ensure that at least one primer of each pair targets a unique site within the set of predicted rice CDS.

RNA sampling and control for genomic DNA contamination

RNA was initially extracted using a phenol-based method from two different tissues (root and shoot) of four rice cultivars, three of which were indica cultivars (Cham, DR2 and Lua man) and the fourth was a japonica cultivar (Nipponbare). This protocol (e.g. as described by Czechowski et al. and Jain et al. [5, 16]) gave satisfactory total RNA yield, but the RNA quality was too low for the synthesis of high-quality cDNA [data not shown] [17]. We therefore used the guanidinium thiocyanate-based RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) [18]. Total RNA extraction was straightforward and provided RNA with high yield and quality from both root and shoot tissue (45–75 μg total RNA/100 mg fresh weight).

RNA preparations are usually contaminated with low amounts of genomic DNA, which can result in non-specific amplification [19]. The manufacturer's recommended on-column DNAse treatment was not sufficient to remove interfering genomic DNA. Therefore, we performed a second DNAse incubation on the isolated RNA to eliminate detectable genomic DNA contamination. Genomic DNA was detected by qRT-PCR using 0.125 μg of isolated RNA as template, and three different primer pairs annealing to intergenic regions of chromosomes 1 (AP003727, positions 7366–7426) and 7 (AP006456, positions 27334624–27334684), and an intron of the gene Os01g01840. It is important to select more than a single genomic region to assess genomic DNA contamination because chromosomal sites can be differentially accessible to DNAse I. Omitting the second DNAse digestion always resulted in the amplification of some, but not all, of these genomic regions (data not shown). In most cases the CT values obtained were >30. Synthesis of cDNA from the isolated RNA was only performed when all three genomic control amplifications scored negative.

We chose a two-step qRT-PCR protocol where reverse transcription and PCR-mediated cDNA amplification are carried out in subsequent steps in separate tubes. The two-step protocol is preferred when SYBR Green is used as a detection dye because it diminishes unwanted primer dimer formation [20]. The reverse transcriptase reaction was primed with oligo-(dT) instead of random-sequence primers because the latter preferentially selects for more abundant mRNA species and not for transcripts of weakly expressed genes, such as many TF genes. A flowchart of the protocol is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Flow-chart of an optimised protocol for qRT-PCR in large-scale expression profiling experiments. The protocol implements multiple optimised and control steps including RNA isolation, digestion of genomic DNA (gDNA), evaluation of cDNA quality, primer design and data analysis. The absence of gDNA was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) with primer pairs targeting various non-coding regions. The quality of the cDNA was tested using different reference genes, as outlined in the text.

Reaction specificity

All 2508 primer pairs were checked by qRT-PCR using cDNAs synthesised from the roots of the rice cultivars, Cham and DR2 kept under control and salt stress (100 mM NaCl) conditions. Additionally, shoot cDNA from DR2 was used to test a smaller set of primer pairs targeting 192 TF genes. Melting curve analysis was performed for all PCR products to confirm the occurrence of specific amplification peaks and the absence of primer-dimer formation. Finally, all 2508 PCR products from the control DR2 root sample were run on 4% agarose gels and photographically documented (available upon request).

Approximately 3% of all TF genes analysed (i.e. 73 out of 2508 genes) did not yield detectable PCR amplicons, indicating no or weak expression under the employed conditions. In most cases (57 TF genes) at least one primer spanned an exon-exon junction thus precluding tests for priming efficiency on genomic DNA template. Only 2.5% of all reactions (61 TF genes) yielded unspecific PCR products as indicated by multiple or incorrectly sized amplicons.

Primer efficiency

Although the fluorescence during qRT-PCR is primarily determined by the starting abundance of a given cDNA template, its increase during the run is strongly affected by the amplification efficiency. When this efficiency is 100%, the amount of a cDNA targeted by a given primer pair is doubled in every PCR cycle of the exponential phase. However, the priming site, the sequence specificity of the primer, and the unwanted formation of primer-dimers are factors that can significantly affect the efficiency of individual PCR reactions. We used the LinRegPCR software [21] to determine the PCR efficiency of each primer pair of the TF qRT-PCR platform, taking into account all amplification profiles obtained (27588 in total). Firstly, the correlation coefficients (R) assigned to efficiency values were used to evaluate the amplification curves and all reactions with an R < 0.990, reflecting low-quality amplifications, were excluded from further analyses. Subsequently, average PCR efficiencies were computed for each individual primer pair across all analyzed samples. This showed that 8% of the 2508 primer pairs (200 TF genes) displayed PCR efficiencies greater than 1.90, and 87% of the primer pairs (2182 TF genes) had efficiencies of 1.51–1.90. Only 5% of the primer pairs (125 TF genes) had PCR efficiencies with mean values below 1.4, and these mostly represented reactions that lacked detectable fragment amplification (CT > 40) or that generated unspecific PCR products. The efficiencies of reference genes tested in this work ranged from 1.73 to 1.96 (see below; Table 1).
Table 1

Selected reference genes for rice and corresponding primer pair information.

Locus identifier

Gene name

Primer sequence F/R [5'-3']

Amplicon length [bp]

Amplicon Tm [°C]

PCR efficiency























Expressed protein





















Elongation factor 1α






* Primer pair recognizes all splicing variants. Location of forward and reverse primer in the same exon [S] or in different exons [D].

The TF qRT-PCR platform was developed primarily using the nuclear genome sequence of the japonica cultivar Nipponbare (TIGR annotation) [15], which might affect its general applicability for experiments involving indica cultivars. SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) variation among the two rice subspecies was found to be low (<0.4%) [22], and these mostly occur in intergenic regions which contain approximately four times more SNPs than occur within genes [23]. SNPs may affect the comparative analysis of gene expression levels in qRT-PCR experiments. Therefore, to investigate variation of primer specificity between the indica varieties Cham and DR2, PCR efficiencies were separately computed in a cultivar-specific manner for all gene models. Although individual primer pairs of the TF primer platform can exhibit slight differences for their target genes in different varieties/cultivars (Figure 2), this did not significantly affect the overall applicability of the platform for expression profiling experiments, a finding we have also validated in independent experiments (Caldana et al., manuscript in preparation).
Figure 2

Distribution of calculated PCR efficiencies as determined for two indica rice cultivars. The two distributions were compared using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and were found to be significantly different at p = 0.001. Non-parametric comparison of mean values (Mann-Whitney U test) confirmed the presence of statistically significant differences at p = 0.000001. Transformation to expression values revealed that the slightly different PCR efficiencies could lead to a mean difference of maximal 0.3, when the fold change was expressed as log2. Individual primer pairs can thus exhibit slight differences for their target genes in different cultivars. However, this does not significantly affect the overall applicability of the primer platform for expression profiling experiments (Caldana et al., manuscript in preparation).

Accuracy and precision of real-time PCR

To determine the sensitivity and accuracy of the rice qRT-PCR platform, as reported for other platforms [5], we performed additional experiments. Firstly, we assessed the linearity, sensitivity and accuracy using three weakly expressed genes with preferential expression in either shoots (Os12g38200) or roots (Os03g55610 and Os08g38220). Shoot- and root-derived cDNAs were mixed in different ratios (see Figure 3) and transcript abundance of the three genes was determined by qRT-PCR. Linearised values were calculated as 2 ( 40 C T ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqaIYaGmdaahaaWcbeqaaiabcIcaOiabisda0iabicdaWiabgkHiTiabboeadnaaBaaameaacqqGubavaeqaaSGaeiykaKcaaaaa@34C2@, where CT represents the threshold cycle and directly reflects template abundance. A linear relationship was observed in all three cases, suggesting that, as previously reported for Arabidopsis [5], qRT-PCR was sufficiently accurate in rice even for low-abundant transcripts. These relationships were highly significant with R2 values (coefficient of determination) of 0.61, 0.94, and 0.90 for Os03g55610, Os08g38220, and Os12g38200, respectively (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Linearity and sensitivity of qRT-PCR. cDNA derived from root or shoot RNA was mixed in different ratios (as indicated; total amount of cDNA was 1 ng) and used as template to test transcript abundance of three selected genes (Os03g55610, Os08g38220, and Os12g38200) via qRT-PCR. A linear relationship between root (or shoot) cDNA and expression level of the various genes was observed. Symbols in both panels represent the mean ± SD (n = 3).

We also tested the experimental reproducibility of the rice qRT-PCR platform. Czechowski et al. [5] demonstrated qRT-PCR precision by analysing intra-assay variation using the same pool of cDNAs and inter-assay variation using two different pools of cDNAs synthesised from the same batch of RNA, obtaining R2 values of 0.99 and 0.95, respectively. Here, we wanted to determine the variation between different biological replicates which encompasses both technical and biological variation. Using cDNA synthesised from DR2 harvested in three independent experiments we measured the expression of 201 TF genes. The ΔCT (CT_gene of interest - CT_reference gene) was calculated and the precision of the assay was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV). Despite the fact that the majority of gene models tested (111 genes) displayed an extremely low expression level (CT > 35), the obtained mean CV was 14%. This is in good agreement with published expression data for human keratinocyte subclones, in which a CV of 18% was found for genes with a CT > 30 [24]. In contrast, CV values are generally higher in microarray-based analyses of genes with such low expression, indicating a lower reproducibility [25]. These findings underscore the advantage of qRT-PCR as an alternative and often superior tool for expression profiling studies, especially for the investigation of genes with low expression level.

Selection of reference genes for qRT-PCR in rice

Generally in qRT-PCR, transcripts of stably expressed genes, also called reference genes, are employed for data normalisation. In rice, previous publications have suggested 18S-rRNA, GADPH, UBI5 and EF-1α as good reference genes [26, 16]. To identify the most suitable reference genes in rice we initially selected nine candidates: 18S-rRNA, ubiquitin (UBQ), actin (ACT), actin1 (ACT1), β-tubulin (TUB), cyclophilin (CYC), elongation factor 1α (EF-1α), which are commonly used house-keeping genes in plants, and expressed protein (EP) and TIP41-like protein (TIP41) found to be good reference genes in Arabidopsis [27]. UBQ (Os01g45420), considered as a stable house-keeping gene in various plant species [27, 16], had unstable expression across three different rice cultivars (data not shown), and was excluded from further studies. Although the abundance of 18S-rRNA remained constant in different rice cultivars and physiological conditions (data not shown), we did not consider it further as a suitable reference for our analyses, primarily because it requires the use of random hexamers instead of oligo(dT) as primers for the reverse transcriptase.

An overview of the remaining seven reference genes is given in Table 1. CYC, EP and TIP41 are expressed at low, TUB, ACT and ACT1 at intermediate, and EF-1α at high levels, respectively. Their expression stability was measured by qRT-PCR in a set of 11 different cDNA samples (Additional file 2), and calculated using the gene expression stability measure (M) implemented in the geNORM software [28]. This determines the stability of a reference gene, taking into account the average pair-wise variation (V) of that gene in comparison to all other reference genes tested. Assuming that the difference of gene expression level of two ideal control genes is the same in all experimental conditions (tissues, treatments) compared, the lower a genes M value is, the more stably it is expressed (suggested limit of M<1.5).

To follow the relationship between expression stability and experimental condition, geNORM was run with different input data (Figure 4). The first experimental series used the 11 cDNA samples. Except for CYC, which exhibited an M value of 1.88, all genes displayed values below the threshold of 1.5, proving their stability. EF-1α and EP had the most stable expression and are consequently the best overall reference genes. We also compared expression stability using shoot or root tissue of the different rice cultivars (Figure 4). Although all genes had M values below 1.5, TIP41 was the least stably expressed gene in both tissues. This is in contrast to the stable expression of the orthologous gene from Arabidopsis (At4g34270) across many different tissues [27]. Together with our data from UBQ, this highlights the need to test the suitability of a given gene even if its orthologue in another species is an adequate reference gene. We also tested the affect of salt stress on the expression stability of the selected genes. As in the tissue experiment, all genes displayed satisfactory M values and the best ranked genes were ACT1 and CYC, followed by EF-1α. However, the weakly expressed gene CYC was the least stable when more diverse conditions were used. Therefore, considering all the experimental categories, ACT1 and EF-1α were the most stable reference genes. Additionally, EP, similar to its Arabidopsis orthologue (At4g33380) [27], showed good stability in all experiments. Generally, we recommend including more than a single reference gene in each qRT-PCR experiment. Conveniently, the geNORM software also calculates the pair-wise variation (V), which indicates the optimal number of reference genes to be analysed in a given experiment.
Figure 4

Expression stability of selected reference genes as calculated by geNORM. The data sets used for the calculation of the average expression stability (M) values are provided in Additional file 2. 'All tested conditions' includes all probes tested (different cultivars, tissues and physiological conditions); 'Root tissue (100 mM salt stress)' includes all root samples of salt stress-treated plants; 'Root tissue' and 'Shoot tissue' include samples of non-stressed tissues of different cultivars. A lower M value indicates more stable expression. According to the geNORM manual, genes with M values >1.5 are not suitable reference genes for the selected conditions. Gene codes and primers used for the qRT-PCR experiments are given in Table 1.


A qRT-PCR platform for multi-parallel expression profiling of more than 2500 rice TF genes has been established. It complements existing microarray-based profiling technologies, which are generally not well suited for reliable analysis of weakly expressed genes including TFs. This resource is available for the scientific community to use for their own experiments.


Plant material

The three rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) cultivars (Cham, DR2 and Lua man) were obtained from the Institute of Biotechnology (Hanoi, Vietnam). Additionally, a Nipponbare (Oryza sativa L. spp. japonica) cultivar provided by the International Rice Research Institute (Manila, Philippines) was used. The plants were grown in hydroponic culture [29] under a day-length of 12 h at 26/22°C (day/night), 70% humidity and 700 μmol m-2 s-1 light intensity. Roots and shoots were harvested three weeks after germination. Salt-stressed plants (Cham, DR2, and Lua man) were harvested 30 min or 3 h after the application of 100 mM NaCl, with control samples harvested in parallel.

RNA extraction, DNAse I digestion and cDNA synthesis

The roots and shoots of three biological replicates with five plants each were pooled to isolate total RNA using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. During the extraction, the first on-column DNAse I (Qiagen) digestion was carried out. A second DNAse I (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) digestion was performed on a total of 60 μg of total RNA according to the manufacturer's instructions. Absence of genomic DNA contamination was subsequently confirmed by qRT-PCR using three different primer pairs. The primers were designed to amplify two intergenic regions (AP003727, positions 7366 – 7426: forward 5'-AGAGAAGACCGCCATGTTGG-3' and reverse 5'-CTGGCACCACAAAAACAATGAC-3'; and AP006456, positions 27334624 – 27334684: forward 5'-TATCCACTCGACAGGACGTGC-3' and reverse 5'-CCGGCAGGCAAGCTACTAGAC-3'), and an intron sequence of the gene Os01g01840 (forward 5'-TAGAGAGTTCGATCTTGCGCG-3' and reverse 5'-CGGCCCATTCAATGAAGTCTT-3'). RNA integrity was checked on 1% (w/v) agarose gels and the concentration measured before and after DNAse I digestion. cDNA was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA using Superscript™ III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The efficiency of cDNA synthesis was estimated by qRT-PCR using β-tubulin (Os01g59150, forward primer 5'-GGAGTCACATGCTGCCTAAGGTT-3' and reverse primer 5'-TCACTGCCAGCTTACGGAGG-3').

Design and validation of qRT-PCR primers

Transcription factor sequences were extracted from version 1 of the Rice Transcription Factor Database [11, 12] and used to establish the rice TF qRT-PCR platform. The set of 2508 gene models corresponding to 2306 loci of confirmed and putative transcription factors was subsequently used to design primers for ca. 500 genes. The remaining 2000 primer pairs were designed by MWG Biotech AG (Ebersberg, Germany). A standard set of reaction conditions and a set of stringent criteria were used as follows: Tm of 60°C ± 2°C, PCR amplicon length of 60 to 150 bp, primer length of 20 ± 5 bp, and a guanine-cytosine content of 45 to 55%. If gene structure allowed, at least one primer was designed to cover an exon-exon junction. The specificity of the primer pair sequence was checked against Version 2 of the rice transcripts (CDS) from the TIGR Rice Database [15] using the BLAST programme. The EXPECT threshold (statistical significance) was set to 1000, as suggested when searching for short, nearly exact matches [30]. The specificity of the amplicons was checked by qRT-PCR dissociation curve analysis and electrophoresis of PCR products on 4% agarose gels. The efficiencies (E) of the polymerase chain reactions were estimated using the LinRegPCR software [21] (Additional file 1).

Selection of reference genes

Potential reference genes were chosen based on published data for rice and other plant species and rice orthologues were identified using the TBLASTN programme [15]. The gene models used were: actin (Os03g50890), actin1 (Os05g36290), β-tubulin (Os01g59150), expressed protein (Os06g11070), TIP41-like protein (Os03g55270), cyclophilin (Os08g19610) and elongation factor 1α (Os03g08020). Primer design followed the same criteria as described and details are given in Table 1.

Quantitative RT-PCR conditions and analysis

PCR reactions were conducted in an ABI PRISM 7900 HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). A 5 μl reaction containing 0.5 μl of cDNA (1.25 ng/μl), 200 nM of each gene-specific primer and 2.5 μl of SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems Applera, Darmstadt, Germany), was used to monitor double-strand DNA synthesis. The qRT-PCR reactions were carried out following the recommended thermal profile: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. After 40 cycles, the specificity of the amplifications was tested by heating from 60°C to 95°C with a ramp speed of 1.9°C min-1, resulting in melting curves. Data analysis was performed using SDS 2.2.1 software (Applied Biosystems). All amplification curves were analysed with a normalized reporter (Rn: the ratio of the fluorescence emission intensity of SYBR Green to the fluorescence signal of the passive reference dye) threshold of 0.2 to obtain the CT values (threshold cycle). The reference control genes were measured with four replicates in each PCR run, and their average CT was used for relative expression analyses. TF expression data were normalized by subtracting the mean reference gene CT value from their CT value (ΔCT). The Fold Change value was calculated using the expression 2 Δ Δ C T MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqaIYaGmdaahaaWcbeqaaiabgkHiTiabfs5aejabfs5aejabboeadnaaBaaameaacqqGubavaeqaaaaaaaa@33ED@, where ΔΔCT represents ΔCTcondition of interest - ΔCT control. The obtained results were transformed to log2 scale.

Dilution experiments

Mixtures of root and shoot cDNA were prepared as described by Czechowski et al. [5] to give the ratios indicated in Figure 3. Primer pairs for two root-specific genes (Os03g55610, 5'-TACCCCACCCAACACCATCATCTG and 5'-TGAGAAGAAGGCAAAGGCAGTGAG; Os08g38220; 5'-GGGGTTTCCAACTACACCCGATGA and 5'-TCACCATATACCCCACGCGCAA) and one shoot-specific gene (Os12g38200, 5'-TGGTTTTCTCCTCGCTTCCAATCT and 5'-TGCTGCTGCATCTGAGTCCAATT) were used in qRT-PCR experiments.

Determination of reference gene expression stability

To analyse the expression stability of the selected reference genes, the geNORM v.3.4 software was used as described by Vandesompele et al. [28]. The measured CT values were transformed so the highest expression of each reference gene is equal to 1 and its expression in all other conditions is relative to this value (as suggested by the geNORM manual). The gene expression stability (M) was calculated and the most stable control genes were determined.



This work was supported by a BMBF research grant (FKZ 0312854). Camila Caldana received a DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst) scholarship (No. A/02/37115) and is a member of the International PhD Programme 'Integrative Plant Science' (IPP-IPS) funded by the DAAD (No. D/04/01336) and the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). We are grateful to the following colleagues from the Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (Potsdam, Germany): Prof. Dr. Mark Stitt for financial support of the primer resource; Dr. Tomasz Czechowski and Dr. Michael K. Udvardi for initial advice on establishing the platform; and Dr. Dirk Walther for help in statistical analyses. We are also very grateful to Dr. Matthew Hannah for improving our English. We thank Diego Mauricio Riaño Pachón (University of Potsdam, Germany) for assistance in initial bio-computational analyses. We thank Prof. Dr. Le Tran Binh from the Institute of Biotechnology (Hanoi, Vietnam) for providing rice seeds. Bernd Mueller-Roeber thanks the Fond der Chemischen Industrie for funding (No. 0164389).

Authors’ Affiliations

Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1
University of Potsdam, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology


  1. Lee JY, Levesque M, Benfey PN: High-throughput RNA isolation technologies. New tools for high-resolution gene expression profiling in plant systems. Plant Physiology. 2005, 138: 585-590.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  2. Pfaffl MW, Daxenberger A, Hageleit M, Meyer HHD: Effects of synthetic progestagens on the mRNA expression of androgen receptor, progesterone receptor, oestrogen receptor alpha and beta, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF-1 receptor in heifer tissues. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A-Physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine. 2002, 49: 57-64. 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2002.jv412.x.View Article
  3. Holland MJ: Transcript abundance in yeast varies over six orders of magnitude. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002, 277: 14363-14366.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Horak CE, Snyder M: Global analysis of gene expression in yeast. Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2002, 2: 171-180.View Article
  5. Czechowski T, Bari RP, Stitt M, Scheible WR, Udvardi MK: Real-time RT-PCR profiling of over 1400 Arabidopsis transcription factors: unprecedented sensitivity reveals novel root- and shoot-specific genes. Plant Journal. 2004, 38: 366-379.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Brunner A, Yakovlev I, Strauss S: Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies. BMC Plant Biology. 2004, 4: 14-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  7. Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, Reuber L, Jiang CZ, Keddie J, Adam L, Pineda O, Ratcliffe OJ, Samaha RR: Arabidopsis transcription factors: Genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science. 2000, 290: 2105-2110.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Gao G, Zhong YF, Guo AY, Zhu QH, Tang W, Zheng WM, Gu XC, Wei LP, Luo JC: DRTF: a database of rice transcription factors. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 1286-1287.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang RL, Dunn M, Glazebrook J, Sessions A, Oeller P, Varma H: A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science. 2002, 296: 92-100.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Yu J, Hu SN, Wang J, Wong GKS, Li SG, Liu B, Deng YJ, Dai L, Zhou Y, Zhang XQ: A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp.indica). Science. 2002, 296: 79-92.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Rice Transcription Factor Database. http://​ricetfdb.​bio.​uni-potsdam.​de/​
  12. Riano-Pachon DM, Ruzicic S, Dreyer I, Mueller-Roeber B: PlnTFDB: an integrative plant transcription factor database. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007, 8: 42-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  13. Wang BB, Brendel V: Genomewide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006, 103: 7175-7180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  14. Taneri B, Snyder B, Novoradovsky A, Gaasterland T: Alternative splicing of mouse transcription factors affects their DNA-binding domain architecture and is tissue specific. Genome Biology. 2004, 5: R75-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  15. TIGR: The Institute of Genomic Research. http://​www.​tigr.​org/​tdb/​e2k1/​osa1
  16. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP: Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2006, 345: 646-651. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.140.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Suzuki Y, Makino A, Mae T: An efficient method for extraction of RNA from rice leaves at different ages using benzyl chloride. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001, 52: 1575-1579.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate phenol chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry. 1987, 162: 156-159.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Pfaffl MW: Quantification strategies in real-time PCR. The real-time PCR encyclopaedia A-Z of quantitative PCR. Edited by: Bustin SA. 2004, 87-120. La Jolla, CA, USA: International University Line (IUL)
  20. Wong ML, Medrano JF: Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. Biotechniques. 2005, 39: 75-85.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RHL, Moorman AFM: Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neuroscience Letters. 2003, 339: 62-66.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Feltus FA, Wan J, Schulze SR, Estill JC, Jiang N, Paterson AH: An SNP resource for rice genetics and breeding based on subspecies Indica and Japonica genome alignments. Genome Research. 2004, 14: 1812-1819.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  23. Ma JX, Bennetzen JL: Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004, 101: 12404-12410.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  24. Rajeevan MS, Vernon SD, Taysavang N, Unger ER: Validation of array-based gene expression profiles by real-time (kinetic) RT-PCR. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 2001, 3: 26-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  25. Wang YL, Barbacioru C, Hyland F, Xiao WM, Hunkapiller KL, Blake J, Chan F, Gonzalez C, Zhang L, Samaha RR: Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 59-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  26. Kim BR, Nam HY, Kim SU, Kim SI, Chang YJ: Normalization of reverse transcription quantitative-PCR with housekeeping genes in rice. Biotechnology Letters. 2003, 25: 1869-1872.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, Udvardi MK, Scheible WR: Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2005, 139: 5-17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  28. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology. 2002, 3: research0034.0031-research0034.0011. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034.View Article
  29. Yang X, Romheld V, Marschner H: Effect of bicarbonate on root-growth and accumulation of organic-acids in Zn-Inefficient and Zn-efficient rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil. 1994, 164: 1-7. 10.1007/BF00010104.View Article
  30. NCBI: The National Center for Biotechnology Information. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​blast


© Caldana et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.